Naval operational medicine institute



Download 341.78 Kb.
Page4/8
Date05.01.2017
Size341.78 Kb.
#7209
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

Crash forces

There are several technics for the determination of crash forces. Some involve mathmatical modeling, other are based on autopsy findings. AFIP and the Safety Center can assist in determining whether the crash forces were in the potentially survivable range. Many Aerospace Medicine Specialists, and AMSO's attend a 2 week course in this subject as part of their training. If this is a pertinent part of any mishap investigation, especially those near the edge of the survivability envelope, don't hesitate to ask for assistance.


  • Container; refers to the integrity of the airframe during and after a crash.

  • Restraint systems; failure in an otherwise survivable mishap is certainly worth reporting.

  • Environment; includes occupiable space, intrusion of objects into this space, in-flight fire, fumes, etc.

  • Energy absorbtion; stroking seats, deformation of the aircraft, etc. which decreases the creash forces applied to the occupant.

  • Post-crash factors; fire, blocked exits, or drowning which may kill persons surviving the crash itself.

Depending on the condition of the remains, autopsy may be able to determine the cause of death, and relate the findings to the evidence in the wreckage. If there is any question whether an autopsy might be illuminating, telephone (or message) consultation with AFIP should be accomplished. Although the pathologist can rarely work miracles with 8 ounces of incinerated tissue, in appropriate circumstances, an autopsy can be most helpful in reconstructing what happened. The investigating FS should attend the postmortem if possible. If the autopsy is not performed by AFIP, the FS should ensure that the following specimens are obtained at autopsy whenever possible:

  • Whole body X-rays

  • Blood (note source)
    - 2 large red top tubes
    - 2 large purple top tubes

  • Urine 50 ml.

  • Vitreous

  • CSF

  • Other tissues (liver, lung, brain, etc) as available.

The pathologist may brief Board members, if they are available, and will submit a report, but participation by the FS will allow him to answer other question raised by Board members later. AFIP conducts an Aerospace Pathology course annually.

In addition to the exceptional in-house laboratory services, AFIP can tap the resources of several other agencies. When appropriate, the FBI or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms can assist with identification, or when hijacking, sabotage, or other explosion is a possibility. NTSB has computer capability to reconstruct a 3-D projection of the flight path from radar tapes. The more tracking stations providing data, the better the output. They can also provide assistance in evaluating crash forces as described above. Some of the Service research labs can provide assistance in answering specific questions. Simulators may offer insights into what the pilot was experiencing prior to the crash and direct the investigation along fruitful lines (e.g. disorientation, GLOC). Re-flying the mission profile (with appropriate safety checks) may be similarly helpful. In summary, when considering the mishap scenario, think of evidence which would support or reject a hypothesis; try to imagine or ask experienced investgators how such evidence might be obtained; and consult with the Board to determine whether that line of investigation is likely to be fruitful. If the answer is "yes", ask for assistance.



 

Pre-mishap Planning Checklist

  • OPNAVINST 3750.6Q The Naval Aviation Safety Program reviewed

  • NAVSAFECEN Flight Surgeon's Pocket Checklist (FS-PCL) reviewed

  • Local mishap plan reviewed

  • Local civilian Medical Examiner/Coroner contacted:

  • Jurisdiction addressed, and MOU reviewed by JAG

  • Instructions for other Services available and reviewed

  • DA Pam 385-95 Aircraft Accident Investigation and Reporting

  • AFP 127-1V1 US Air Force Guide to Mishap Investigations

  • AFI 91-204 Safety Investigations and Reports

  • Liaison with key personnel:

  • Station CO, XO, OpsO, SafetyO

  • Wing CO, XO, OpsO, SafetyO

  • Squadron CO, XO, OpsO, SafetyO

  • Aerospace Medical Safety Officer (AMSO)

  • Public Affairs Officer (PAO)

  • SAR personnel

  • Crash & Salvage/Fire Department

  • Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD)

  • Aircrew equipment specialists

  • Medical Treatment Facility CO/OIC

  • Medical colleagues (Medical staff meeting)

  • Medical support personnel

  • Photographer - Infrared film & #12 yellow filter for aerial photos.

  • Local civil engineers (site survey capabilities)

 

  • Brief instructions provided to supporting facilities:

  • ER

  • Drawing of samples

  • Handling of flight gear

  • Lab

  • Drawing & handling of samples

  • Morgue

  • AFIP autopsy protocol

  • Total body X-rays

  • Handling of samples for toxicology

  • Photo

  • Infrared and color film for on-site photos

  • Photos of autopsy

  • Special handling required by OPNAVINST 3750.6Q

  • Others as required

  • SAR equipment inventoried & inspected

  • Personnel trained in use

 

  • Flight Surgeon's Pocket Checklist in mishap investigation kit

 

  • Mishap investigation equipment inventoried regularly;(See FS-PCL for recommended contents.)

 

  • Identification of fatalities; support personnel identified

  • Dental

  • MP's

  • Others

 

  • Notification of next of kin; policy reviewed and roles identified

  • Decedent Affairs Officer

  • Casualty Assistance Care Officer (CACO)

  • CO appointed Command representative

  • Chaplain

 

  • List of Key phone numbers and points of contact

  • Safety Center (Duty Officer) DSN 564-3520 COM (757) 444-3520

  • AFIP (Medical Examiner) DSN 662-2626 COM (301) 319-0000

  • Local Medical Examiner/Coroner

  • Wing

  • TYCOM

 

MEDICAL AND LABORATORY PROCEDURES REQUIRED POST-MISHAP

1. Physical Examinations.

While the responsibility for performing the required physical examination lies with the first "Flight Surgeon" to examine the survivors and victims, an initial examination should be conducted by the first member of the medical department to contact the survivors/victims according to the following order of preference:



  1. U.S. Naval Flight Surgeon

  2. Other service flight surgeon

  3. Physician

  4. Senior Independent Duty Hospital Corpsman

  5. Other Hospital Corpsman

  • NOTE: These examinations shall be performed on all flight crewmembers, and on passengers and flight support personnel (e.g. controllers, LSO, line handlers) as appropriate.

 

2. Radiographs (X-Rays).

Radiographs (x-rays) shall be performed as clinically indicated. After all ejections, bailouts, and crashes with or without suspected back injuries, full spinal x-rays are required.

 

3. Biological Samples.

While biological/laboratory samples are required only for Class A and B mishaps, and those Class C mishaps which are investigated by a Flight Surgeon, the exact class of the mishap is frequently not known until it is too late to obtain meaningful laboratory samples. For this reason, the following rule of thumb should be used: obtain laboratory samples any time there is damage of any extent to an aircraft or other government property, or any time someone is injured in association with flight operations. Samples which are later determined to be superfluous may be discarded.



  • WARNING: Clean venopuncture site with Betadine solution, NOT ALCOHOL SWAB which can give false positive for blood alcohol!

  1. SAMPLES

Sufficient blood and urine shall be drawn from each member of the flight crew and from support personnel such as handlers, controllers, or LSO's, who may have been involved in the mishap, for the determination of:

    1. Blood alcohol - 2 gray topped tubes (fluoride)

    2. Lactic aid - 2 gray topped tubes (fluoride)

    3. CBC & differential - 2 lavender topped tubes
      (Make 4-5 smears on glass slides with Wright's stain ASAP)

    4. Carbon monoxide - lavender topped tubes

    5. Glucose - 1 red topped tube

    6. Drug levels - 2 red topped tubes

    7. Misc. (extra) - 2 red topped and 2 green topped tubes (heparin)

  1. HANDLING PROCEDURES:

    1. Blood alcohol - refrigerate only - DO NOT CENTRIFUGE

    2. Lactic acid - centrifuge ASAP - remove and freeze plasma ASAP

    3. CBC - refrigerate only - DO NOT CENTRIFUGE OR FREEZE

    4. Carbon monoxide - refrigerate only - DO NOT CENTRIFUGE

    5. Glucose - centrifuge ASAP - remove and freeze plasma ASAP

    6. Drug levels - centrifuge, remove and freeze plasma

    7. Misc. - refrigerate only

The above samples should be labeled with NAME, SSN, DATE, AND TIME COLLECTED and turned over to the flight surgeon for submission to appropriate laboratories. A legal chain of custody is not required, but samples should be secure from damage or tampering.

 

4. Other:



  1. Identify and preserve all flight gear, helmets, LPA, etc.

  2. Have all aircrew begin writing a detailed 72 hour history as soon as practicable; include meals, rest, activities, etc

  3. Recovered bodies or body parts should be placed in body bags and refrigerated; DO NOT REMOVE FLIGHT GEAR OR CLOTHING.

  4. Aircrew should not return to flight duty until examined and cleared by a Naval Flight Surgeon. They may be transported by air (as pax or patients) if necessary.



Laser Exposure

 
Points of Contact



  • Unit Intelligence Officer/Safety Officer

  • Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center

  • NOMI Ophthalmology, DSN:  922-3938 / 4558

 

Definition:

LASER - Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation

 

General:

Lasers are of military usefulness by all nations for range finding, target designation and tracking. They may also be used as weapons for harassment and physical injury of opposing forces. They may be disruptive of operations by:



  • Obscuring dim lights, such as Heads Up Displays

  • Causing glare and interference with dark adaptation and target acquisition

  • Causing damage to canopies, cameras and weapons

  • Causing temporary or permanent eye damage

 

Laser Physics:

If energy is applied to a substance causing electrons to jump from the basal to the excited state, the same amount of energy is released as electrons return to the basal state. If that energy is released as light, the light will be of the wavelength (color) characteristic for that substance and the energy required to excite it. Thus, only a single wavelength is produced when an electron in a given molecule returns to its basal state. If that light is collimated by mirrors into a unidirectional beam, it will tend to retain its energy until dissipated by distance through the atmosphere, each wavelength absorbed by the atmosphere at different rates. So, some wavelengths will retain their energy and focus over greater distances than others. How intense the laser beam is depends upon the energy applied to excite the electrons (and therefore that released) and the excitability of the substance used. Therefore, a ruby laser is not necessarily stronger or more energetic than a neodymium laser, but the wavelengths produced have quite different properties. Each LASER will function at a discrete frequency (depending on the substance used), some of which are in the visible range, some not. Some LASER substances have more than one energy level capability on excitation, and therefore may radiate at more than one discrete frequency if different energy levels are applied.

 

Optical Media:

Atmospheric conditions will have an effect on LASER beams by diffusion or absorption by water vapor, smoke, etc., again depending on wavelength. Generally all LASER beams widen at least a small amount with distance. Unfortunately, the human eye has the capability of concentrating the LASER beam by a factor of about 100,000 times and focusing it on the retina. The temperature at the point of focus at the retina may be in the neighborhood of 1000 degrees, causing coagulation and destruction of that small area or, if a blood vessel is involved, a rupture of that vessel and hemorrhage into the vitreous with subsequent loss of vision. Or, since there are no pain fibers in the retina, damage may go undetected until it is discovered that there is a loss of some portion of the visual field. It is also worth noting that LASER beams may be reflected off mirror-like surfaces and picked up by the eye, losing some energy in transmission, but still dangerous. Skin burns are quite unlikely given the powers used and distances on the battlefield, and since skin does not concentrate the beam as the eye does.

The cornea will not allow all wavelengths to pass through, but acts somewhat like a filter. Wavelengths above 1300 nm (far infrared) are absorbed by the cornea and lens and may produce damage to these structures while the retina is undamaged. Thus, visible and near infrared LASERs may cause damage to the retina while far infrared LASERs cause damage to the cornea and lens structures ultimately leading to corneal scarring and cataract formation.

 

 



......Retinal Damage.................|...Corneal Damage......

|

UV Visible Light Infrared | Far Infrared



|

100nm.....400nm...........700nm......|..........110,000nm

|

|

| | | | | |

Ar H-N R G N CO2

(Argon He-Neon Ruby Gallium Neodymium CO2)

 

 

 



 

 

 



LASER Eye Protection

Just as with any other optical media, filters may be employed to absorb LASER light before it reaches the eye to cause damage. Unfortunately, if one were to filter out all the LASER wavelengths available, the result would be a filter which no one would be able to see through. The compromise is to filter out those frequencies most likely to be used in LASER operations, leaving as much usable visible spectrum as possible. Two examples of LASER protective goggles are shown with their absorption spectra.

 

 

UV Visible Light Infrared | Far Infrared



|

100nm.......400nm............700nm......…....|.....110,000nm



_________________________________|______________

| | | | | | |

  Ar H-N R G N | CO2

|

EEK-3/P.......................xxxxx.........|..................



|

LG-Bxxxxx.....................xxxxxxxxxx....|......xxxxxxxx....

........Retinal Damage...............................Corneal...

 

 



 

 

Note that while the EEK-3/P would only block the Neodymium wavelength, but the aircraft canopy would block the far infrared and provide some additional protection. The LG-B goggle provides protection against several wavelengths, but would also block out considerable amounts of visible violet and blue-green wavelengths, degrading normal vision and particularly night vision. Unfortunately, there are literally hundreds of different LASERs with different wavelengths available.



 

The Practicalities of LASER Protection

When operating in the neighborhood (5 mi) of U.S. deployed neodymium LASERs, eye protection at the 1040 nm wavelength is needed to prevent eye damage from this invisible wavelength device. This does not help much when confronted by opposing forces who may use different wavelength devices or multiple devices. The fact is that there is no good way to predict what might be used. We do know that there have been a number of incidents reported in which the Soviets have practiced their target designation on our aircraft and ships.

At this time the recommendations are to use protection against neodymium when that is the one most likely to be used, and LG-Bs when unknown frequency LASERs are the potential threat. At night, there is greater threat of eye damage due to enlarged pupillary opening, and so LASER protection is recommended when operating within 10 miles of suspected systems.

It is also recommended that people not fixate on a target with LASER use potential, but rather to one side of it. The rational for that is to minimize the possibility of central retinal burn and complete visual loss. Obviously, when LASERs are being used around friendly forces, they cannot be trained on ships, aircraft or uncleared ground.

It is very important that LASER exposure incidents be evaluated and reported in order to gather as much data as possible in an attempt to determine wavelengths being used, allowing use of appropriate protection.

 

Laser Incidents

The flight surgeon should be alert to the possibility of laser incidents which may be encountered. A high index of suspicion is necessary because laser damage may be produced without any particular immediate awareness of the event by the patient. Any such events need to be evaluated and reported.

QUESTIONS FOLLOWING POTENTIAL EXPOSURE TO LASERS


  1. What did the patient describe as the initial event which caused him/her to seek care. How long ago did incident occur?

  2. Was the patient wearing any type of goggles, sunglasses or other eye protection during this incident? Identify if possible.

  3. Was there a flash of light? Have the patient describe the light to the best of his/her ability...color, intensity, continuous or pulsed source, number of pulses observed (if any)? etc.

  4. Was the patient's vision disrupted or disturbed during or after the sighting? Any flashblindness or afterimage? Have patient describe to the best of his ability. If there was an after image what color was it or the surrounding background when the patient tried to see through it? Was the color of the image the same if the patient closed his eyes? (Positive vs. Negative after image)

  5. Is there any lingering visual problem?

    1. visual acuity

    2. visual field defects - define limits

    3. color defects

    4. photophobia/photopsia

  1. Gross physiological defects? Describe and diagram to the best of your ability.

  2. Slit lamp defects? Describe and diagram to the best of your ability.

    1. fluorescein - corneal lesions or anterior chamber abnormalities.

  1. Ophthalmoscopic defects? Describe and diagram to the best of your ability.

    1. vitreous

    2. retina

    3. hemorrhage/hole/windows

    4. edema

PLEASE QUALIFY AND QUANTIFY THE ABOVE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY.

DESCRIBE ANY OTHER OBSERVATIONS YOU FEEL MAY BE PERTINENT TO THE LIGHT INCIDENT BASED ON YOUR EXAMINATION, TESTING, TREATMENT, AND INTERACTION WITH THE PATIENT.



  1. What is the estimated distance from the source taking into account slant angle and altitude?

  2. . Was the light directed at the patient? Did it follow the platform or did the patient move through the beam of light?

  3. Is the patient aware of any others exposed to the light? Have they been examined by the flight surgeon?

  4. Were any evasive maneuvers attempted by the individual? Describe please.

 

NOTIFY YOUR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER OF YOUR FINDINGS.

FORWARD MEDICAL INFORMATION TO DIRAFMIC FT. DETRICK MD//AFMIC-SA

 

TOXICOLOGY

 

 



Points of Contact:

Industrial Hygiene (IH) consultation can be obtained from:



  • Naval Hospitals - contact the one supporting your command

  • USMC Fleet Service Support Groups (FSSG) have IH's assigned

If these sources are unavailable, or unable to meet your needs, contact the nearest Navy Environmental Preventive Medicine Unit (EPMU).

  • EPMU - 2, Naval Station, Norfolk, VA. 23511-6288
        Com: (757) 444-7671   DSN: 564-7671

  • EPMU - 5, Naval Station, Box 143 San Diego, CA 92136-5143
        Com: (619) 556-7070   DSN: 526-7070

  • EPMU - 6, Box 112 Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-5040
        Com: (808) 471-9505   DSN: 471-9505*

  • EPMU - 7, PSC 824 Box 2760 FPOAE 09623-2760 (Sigonella, Italy)
        Com: 39-95-56-4099   DSN: 624-4099*

* Call your local DSN operator to see if applicable geographical area voice codes are required.

Message address: NAVENPRVNTMEDU - TWO, NORFOLK, VA (etc)

 

 

 Toxicologic Evaluation



Toxicity usually depends upon the dose and the duration of exposure. Simultaneous and consecutive exposure to more than one chemical may result in additive, synergistic, or potentiated effects. Likewise, chemical antagonism, functional antagonism, competitive antagonism, and noncompetitive antagonism may be factors to consider.

Toxicologic evaluation involves several concepts which must be defined. Risk denotes the probability (expected frequency) that a chemical will produce undesirable effects under specified conditions. NEL (no effect level) is the maximum dose that has not induced any sign of toxicity in the most susceptible species of animals tested and using the most sensitive indicator of toxicity (not applied to carcinogens). There is no threshold defined for carcinogens because cancer cells can be induced by a single change in the cellular genetic material and they are self-replicating. The dose-response relationship is graphically displayed by plotting the frequency of an event vs. the dose on a log scale, which results in a sigmoid-shaped curve. The portion of this curve between 16-84% response is nearly linear and represents one standard deviation each direction from the mean.

 

The LD50 is also utilized to classify the toxicity of substances, as demonstrated in the following:



Category LD50

Supertoxic ..........................................…..5mg/kg

Extremely toxic.........................................5-50 mg/kg

Highly toxic........................................…...50-500 mg/kg

Moderately toxic.......................................0.5-5 g/kg

Slightly toxic........................................…….5-15 g/kg

Practically non-toxic...............................……..15 g/kg

 

Duration and frequency of exposure are also important parameters:



  • acute exposure - an exposure of 24 hours or less.

  • subacute exposure - repeated exposure over one month.

  • subchronic exposure - exposure occurring over 1-3 months.

  • chronic exposure - over 3 months.

 

Toxic substances may be excreted as the parent chemicals, as metabolites, or as conjugates. Generally, when xenobiotic metabolism (biologically active but nutritionally valueless) results in more polar chemicals, they are more readily excreted by the kidneys. However, in some cases, the metabolite is more toxic (termed bioactivation).

Conjugation reactions are of several types, including glucuronide formation, sulfate conjugation, methylation, acetylation, amino acid conjugation, and glutathione conjugation. Glucuronide formation is the most common and important.

Adipose tissue presents a storage depot for lipid-soluble substances.

 

 

Major Routes of Exposure

Inhalation -- the most important in industry.

Ingestion -- most important in civilian exposure, least important in industry.

Percutaneous -- rare and seldom serious.

 

 

Types of Hazardous Substance Exposure Controls

1. Substitution. This implies using a less hazardous material, however, the substituted material seldom works either as well or as cheaply. Substitution is the best type of control.

2. Engineering controls. This involves placing a permanent barrier between man and the hazard. It can be simple or it can be very expensive. Engineering controls are the next best type of control.

3. Personal protective devices. These are self-donned temporary barriers. They often work well, however, a sizeable number of workers simply cannot be relied upon to use the devices.



4. Administrative controls. This entails setting limits, or educating those who may be exposed. Although important, it is the most difficult of the controls to enforce and should not be relied upon routinely.

 

 

GLOSSARY

PEL - Permissive Exposure Limit -- The maximum permissible concentration of a toxic substance (averaged over eight hours) to which an employee may be exposed, by directive. A legal limit that takes into account both chronic and acute effects.

 

TLV - Threshold Limit Value -- A time weighted average exposure over an eight hour day, five day week, from which no acute ill effects occur. Excursions above the TLV are permitted if properly compensated with appropriate times below the TLV. This is a practical limit developed by industry prior to OSHA which takes into account only acute effects and contains a generous safety factor.

 

TLV-C - Threshold Limit Value - Ceiling -- a value not to be exceeded even briefly.

 

STEL - Short Term Exposure Limit -- A legal fifteen minute time limited exposure which may not be exceeded.

 

OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration -- A Federal Bureau and a political organization empowered to enforce Federal Safety Standards. It was organized in 1970.

 

NIOSH - National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health -- Responsible for research, development and publishing of standards. This is a scientific organization.

 

ACGIH - American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.

 

Carcinogenesis - The ability to induce malignant neoplasm. Harms a single individual. Effects this generation.

 

Mutagenesis - The ability to change genetic material. Harms the succeeding generations.

 

Teratogenesis - The ability to cause birth defects by direct effects on the fetus. Harms the next generation.

 

Vapor - The gaseous phase of a material which is mostly solid or liquid at room temperature (e.g. gasoline).

 

Aerosol - A dispersion of particles, either solid or liquid, of microscopic, size in a gaseous medium.

 

Mist - An aerosol of suspended liquid droplets (e.g. fog).

 

Fume - An aerosol of solid particles (0.1 microns or less) generated from condensation from a gaseous state, usually after volatilization from metals (as a cutting torch on lead).

 

Smoke - An aerosol of carbon particles (0.1 microns or less) of very small size mixed with droplets of various things.

 

Dust - An aerosol of solid particles of 0.1 to 5.0 microns (eg.

talc).


 

Toxic - An inherent capacity to produce illness or injury when in physical contact with a living cell. Toxicity does not necessarily imply hazard.

 

Hazardous -- For purposes of discussion, a substance which is toxic, exposure is reasonably likely, and harmful effects are likely.

 

Threshold Value -- The level below which there is no effect. This involves determining exactly when "approaching zero" is replaced by "zero." Very difficult to define, much less determine.

 

Voids -- Voids are "unused" spaces aboard a ship that are closed and not ventilated for months at a time. Rust formation consumes available oxygen. They may be entered safely with a source of supplied air or generated oxygen. An organic vapor mask or a bandanna over the nose and mouth is not adequate.

 

 



Toxic Substances

A major difficulty in the study of toxicology is that there are too many toxicants. The following are substances that you may encounter while you are practicing aviation medicine:

 


Directory: milmed -> avitation

Download 341.78 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page