Niger: Rural Financial Services


The constraints faced by MFIs in lending to agriculture and rural areas are similar to those of the commercial banks



Download 0.68 Mb.
Page7/9
Date02.06.2018
Size0.68 Mb.
#53340
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

The constraints faced by MFIs in lending to agriculture and rural areas are similar to those of the commercial banks and include: lack of structured demand, low visibility on the borrower to a large extent because of the absence of financial statements and business plans, poor infrastructure (road/electricity/water), weather vagaries, low income and low savings. The lack of internal capacity and difficult financial situation of some MFIs further limits their ability to respond to demand. Nonetheless, MFIs are able to do more in rural areas than commercial banks because of their proximity to the client and their willingness to play a role in these areas. However, the capacity of several fragile large MFIs needs to be strengthened to preserve the long term provision of financial services to low income populations, and especially women in rural areas.

Performance of Microfinance Institutions

  1. The financial performance of MFIs in Niger shows a sector that is highly dependent on donor subsidies and several major institutions in difficulty. An assessment of 70 MFIs (i.e. 74 percent of all MFIs in Niger) reveals a median financial self-sufficiency rate20 of 58 percent which clearly indicates that, without grants and donor subsidies MFIs would operate at a loss (see Table 9). Only 14 MFIs out of 72 show a self-sufficiency ratio greater than 80 percent, of which only one MFI is financially self-sufficient. When expenses are adjusted for inflation, cost-of-funds and in-kind subsidy, the median self-sufficiency rate drops to 37 percent. MFIs cannot cover even half of their expenses. Only three MFIs achieve a financial self-sufficiency rate higher than 80 percent; none is financially self-sufficient. The level of non-performing loans, i.e., portfolio at risk (PAR>90 days) remains high by international standards at 8 percent in 2009.

Table 9: Financial Performance of MFIs in Niger

 


All MFIs

Independent

MCPEC

UMEC

Credit Mutuel

Median adjusted Financial Self Sufficiency

37%

49%

25%

34%

43%

Maximum

92%

92%

62%

62%

56%

Median non-adjusted Financial Self Sufficiency

58%

63%

50%

61%

66%

Maximum

110%

110%

81%

83%

82%

Source: World Bank Survey data


  1. In Niger, larger independent MFIs perform on average better than financial cooperative networks, with the exception of Credit Mutuel. In addition, two of the three networks which are active and present in rural areas, MCPEC and UMEC, have been experiencing difficulties. MCPEC has been in receivership (administration provisoire) for the past 10 years. The apex organization of UMEC was placed in liquidation after its license was withdrawn in 2010. Now, UMEC retail institutions are trying to reorganize by creating a new apex or joining other existing networks. MCPEC is still undergoing restructuring.

  2. The financial difficulties experienced by 25 percent of MFIs in Niger can be traced back to weaknesses in governance, non performing information systems, as well as weak internal control systems. Many institutions are not operationally self sustainable. Two MFIs have been under interim administration for a very long time; several have closed. As MFIs are much more present in rural areas than commercial banks, these problems which have plagued the sector for several years will hurt the financing of the rural world if no action is taken to restructure the industry. The microfinance strategy adopted in 2004 already recommended several actions which were only partially implemented by 2010 (See Annex 1). It is clear that the microfinance sector is in fragile health and the need to strengthen institutions must be part of any rural finance strategy. Despite its difficulties, the future of microfinance in Niger is promising in view of the recent emergence of dynamic institutions that are showing strong growth. However, the sector remains vulnerable and needs targeted capacity building efforts.

Supply-Side Constraints in the delivery of Rural Financial Services

  1. The supply of rural financial services is limited by several constraints inherent to the institutions themselves. The location of most bank branches in urban centers makes it difficult for them to cater to rural populations. Banks also readily admit their lack of expertise in the area of rural financing. In addition, some bad experiences have led them to review their strategy vis-à-vis the agricultural sector. In the case of microfinance institutions which have developed financial products and methodologies suited to the needs of the rural and agricultural sector, their development is hindered considerably by their lack of technology and financial resources. In addition, as noted above, the largest MFI networks with the greatest rural reach are experiencing performance problems that threaten their viability.

  2. Government policies and regulations are also a constraint to the expansion of rural finance. In the past decade, the Government of Niger has implemented policy reforms aimed at creating an enabling environment for financial sector development. As part of reforms undertaken by the West African Monetary Union (WAMU), the authorities have taken a number of steps to strengthen the financial sector: (i) they discontinued directed lending and monetary funding of the Government deficit, (ii) created a regional banking supervision body, and (iii) opened the financial sector to foreign institutions. These measures have resulted in a more stable system that is better able to weather exogenous shocks and economic downturns. However, some policies and the regulatory framework and supervision practices directly affect the growth of rural finance.

Regulation of Banks and Microfinance Institutions

  1. Banks and leasing companies are regulated under the Banking Law of 1990, as modified in 2008 and microfinance under a regional law which latest update was adopted by Niger in 2010. Although in general the legislation is relatively modern and in line with international standards, the regulatory framework includes provisions which discourage financing in rural areas.

  1. Interest rate ceilings have hampered lending to clients in the rural areas who have had to rely on informal lenders at much higher costs. The regional microfinance law imposes a usury rate of 27 percent on loans although that has proven insufficient for MFIs to cover their costs, especially in hard to reach rural areas. Recent pilot studies commissioned by BCEAO in three member countries confirmed that the usury rate is insufficient to cover costs and risks. Indeed, operating costs per CFAF lent are much higher for MFIs than for banks, because of the small amount of the loan (granting and monitoring a small loan costs at least as much as for a large loan) and the fact that the rural population is scattered over large areas. Interest rates ceilings may thus limit access to finance in rural areas. In addition, BCEAO’s exclusion of credit to MFIs from being eligible for Central Bank refinancing discourages financing of MFIs by commercial banks.

  2. Regulations limiting conversion of short term deposits (25 percent) into long-term credit are intended protect depositors but affect bank’s willingness to provide medium and long term financing.

  3. The regulatory framework for leasing remains rather restrictive. As indicated above, MFIs who could use leasing for equipment financing in rural areas are not legally allow to do so under the new regional microfinance law which was recently adopted by the Niger Parliament.

  1. The judicial system continues to be a barrier to access to financial services. As indicated by respondents to the study questionnaire, judicial procedures are long and costly and there are too many postponements. Obtaining a land title is also a lengthy procedure. Registration of mortgages could take up to two years. Attachments and public auctions are rare, not to say nonexistent. Magistrates are not specialized and take time to understand relevant documents. The writing up of the decision often takes a long time, delaying its implementation.

  2. Land ownership in Niger remains an issue despite recent reforms. According to the rule prevailing throughout OHADA, full ownership requires land titles, which must be registered and announced publicly. Such titles confer rights that may be invoked against third parties. A very significant reform of the land tenure system was introduced by the 2006 Budget Law (Law of November 15, 2005). It created a simplified formality for the establishment of land titles (“Sheida” titles) and even lowered costs. However, the Law contains certain ambiguities which, initially, caused some banks to refrain from granting mortgages for property covered by a “Sheida” title, but today commercial banks accept “Sheida” titles without reservation. However, the land tenure legislation is in need of update. (See Annex 3 on Land Tenure System).



    1. Innovative Institutions and Instruments to Increase Access



  1. Other providers of financial services include telephone operators, associations of farmers and non bank financial establishments.

Telephone Operators

  1. Mobile banking which is registering fast growth throughout the world has the potential to substantially increase access to financial services to unbanked rural populations in Niger as witnessed by experiences throughout the world (See Box 1). Two telephone operators (Zain and Orange) have launched services that provide money transfers, payments for the purchase of goods and services, payments of utility bills and repayment of bank and MFI loans. The systems were developed by the private sector, without any financial support from Government or donors. As more and more owners of cell phones join in, the efficiency and usefulness of the systems will increase, particularly as the chain of transactions using electronic value without conversion into cash broadens. Of particular interest in rural areas is the possibility of using the phone to pay for commercial transactions, i.e. the purchase of goods and services. However, operations are still limited by the lack of interoperability between the two networks and between the network and the debit/credit card systems.

  2. ZapZain started operations in Niger21 at the beginning of 2010 by capturing 76,000 clients out of 1.7 million mobile phone Zain customers. ZapZain operates through partnerships with several financial institutions (Ecobank, Asusu SA and another NGO in the Tahoua region). It is developing a network of dealers, mainly merchants with sufficient liquidity. As more and more merchants join in, ZapZain hopes that it can be used as a means of payment, without having the electronic value converted into cash, an individual paying the merchant, the merchant paying a supplier, and so on.

  3. Orange Money which just started its Niger22 operations in May 2010, has about 3,000 subscribers. It maintains a partnership with BOA which issues the electronic value and with three micro finance institutions for account openings and cash-in/cash-out operations.

Mooriben

  1. Among farmers’ organizations, Mooriben,23 a federation of 25 unions bringing together 1 496 farmers organizations and 62 683 members of which 21 percent are women, plays an important role as service provider. Mooriben’s activities include: (a) support for production and commercialization of products and food security; (b) natural resources management; (c) capacity building; (d) financial services; and (e) representation of farmers’ interests.

  2. The financial services activities to farmers take place either through microfinance institutions, some of which were created by Mooriben or through lines of credit. The financial services are accompanied by technical support and advice. In particular support is provided for warehouse facilities, cereal banks, savings mobilization, and management of credit.



Box 1: The Development of Mobile banking to improve access to finance worldwide

Mobile banking has grown rapidly and has the potential to dramatically increase access to financial services. It is estimated that 1.7 billion low-income cell phone worldwide users do not have a bank account. They could potentially gain access to financial services through their mobile phone.

There have been a number of interesting experiences of improving access to financial services by using cellular telephones, as documented by several CGAP briefs and focus notes.24 Examples include Gcash and SMART MONEY in the Philippines, and Telenor/Tameer in Pakistan. In Africa, there are eTransact and Flash-me-Cash in Ghana and Nigeria, WIZZIT and MTN Banking in South Africa , INOVA in Burkina Faso and M-PESA in Kenya. In addition, some banks, such as First National Bank (FNB) of South Africa operate mobile channels. FNB had, in 2010, two million mobile customers. Many of these could not be served efficiently and profitably through traditional banking channels.

In Kenya, M-PESA, owned by SAFARICOM, Kenya’s largest mobile network operator, offers mobile banking to 9.5 million customers in a country with only 8.4 million bank accounts. Half of M-PESA users are unbanked. More than 10,000 merchants act as agents throughout the country. Clients can use their mobile phone to check their balance, send money, pay bills, pay for the purchase of goods and services, repay a bank loan and even save by keeping an unused balance in their account in the form of electronic value. In addition, through an agreement with Equity Bank a package of financial products issued by Equity Bank is made available to M-PESA users under the brand name M-Kesho. M-PESA is launching services in South Africa with Vodacom in conjunction with Nedbank. According to Vodacom Chief Executive, “it may not be long before people are paying for taxi rides using their phones”. 25



In Burkina Faso, INOVA which operates under BCEAO’s Instruction No. 01/2006/SP regulating the Issuing of Electronic Money and Electric Money Establishments offers similar services to those of M-PESA. It maintains, by law, links to banks and insurance companies.



  1. Mooriben created six micro credit institutions linked to the farmers’ unions of Tera, Sawani, Falwel, Karabédji, Baro Koara and Goberi. In addition, it extended CFAF 206 million in lines of credit managed by around 10 MFIs (including three created by Mooriben). However, only one of the six Mooriben MFIs, Falwel, has a license to operate, as required by law. In addition, these MFIs do not appear to be viable and are plagued with deficient internal management controls, high non performing loans, and very weak capacity. Although Mooriben is trying to fill a void in rural finance, it is doing so by operating outside of the law, and the institutions facing difficulties cannot benefit from the help of the regulator. Discussions are ongoing for Mooriben to structure a licensed federation and transform the individual institutions into points of sale.

SAHFI

  1. The Société Sahélienne de Financement (SAHFI) operates with a license as a non bank financial establishment and has developed an original approach with three commercial banks (BIA, BOA and Sonibank) and the support of the European Investment Bank (EIB) to extend term credit to small and medium enterprises. This approach brings together financing, a partial credit guarantee and technical assistance. SAHFI provides technical assistance to firms to elaborate financial statements and/or business plans and to prepare a credit application. If funding is approved, SAHFI monitors the use of the loan as well as it repayment. This approach permits to overcome the constraints linked to the lack of capacity of SMEs to prepare loan requests of quality and that of banks to analyze SMEs. Banks will finance the credit on their own funds or on a line of credit from the EIB.26 In addition, SAHFI provides a 50 percent guarantee on the credit extended. This approach has been quite successful and merits to be extended more widely, particularly in rural areas.27



    1. Rural Finance Support Organizations

  1. To accompany the provision of financial services, technical assistance is often needed to both financial institutions and clients. Several organizations including associations and other technical assistance providers have thus been created to support farmers and producers and help them access financial services. However, most of these providers face financial constraints that limit their outreach and may endanger their long term viability.

  2. FUCOPRI is the Apex organization of the cooperatives of rice growers. FUCOPRI facilitates the financing of the cooperatives and provides technical assistance as well. For instance, SONIBANK finances FUCOPRI which buys the inputs (seeds and fertilizers) for rice producers through a tripartite contract SONIBANK/FUCOPRI/CPS. FUCOPRI sells the production and reimburses SONIBANK. FUCOPRI is a member of The Plate Forme Paysanne du Niger (PFPN), a lobbying and consultative group made up of 29 farmers’ groups.

  3. The Centre de prestation de services (CPS) provides support to 10 rice cooperatives in accounting services and water management. CPS assists member cooperatives in establishing their financial statements as well as managing their cash flow. CPS helps its members prepare financing requests to SAHFI and other financial institutions. CPS also conducts studies on various topics of interest to its members.

  4. The Réseau National des Chambres d’Agriculture du Niger (RECA) has a membership composed of eight regional chambers of agriculture. Cooperatives are member of the regional chambers. RECA’s objective/mandate is to represent and defend the interests of the rural world and provide technical assistance to its members.

  5. Entreprendre au Niger (EAN) has a similar approach to SAHFI, but is not a financial establishment. EAN, created with the support of UNDP, assists in the establishment and development of micro and small enterprises. Its activities include: training for the creation and managements of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), establishing management tools within MSMEs, providing management and development advice, identifying and selecting projects, preparing financing requests and, guaranteeing financing offered by financial institutions (50 percent for banks and between 25 and 50 percent for MFIs). EAN has developed partnerships with several commercial banks and MFIs and has a presence in three regions outside Niamey in an effort to cover rural areas.



  1. Recommendations for The way forward



  1. Improving access to financial services in rural areas will involve actions on several fronts dealing with: (a) the supply of financial services and innovative instruments; (b) the demand for financial services; as well as (c) the judicial and regulatory environment and Government policies.

The Supply Side

  1. Boosting the supply of financial services is a necessary condition to improve access to rural finance. That would involve strengthening existing banks and microfinance, promoting new institutions and developing existing and new products. As previously shown, commercial banks and microfinance institutions are providing services to rural areas either timidly or in the absence of a coherent global approach.

  2. Two possible approaches exist for banks to increase their financing to rural areas: (i) by increasing their presence in rural areas and their direct lending to agriculture and livestock. For that, they would need to develop the expertise to do so through technical assistance, and they may have to establish a special department with specialized staff, such as agriculturalists; (ii) by linking up with MFIs that are closer to the rural clientele and contribute to agriculture financing by refinancing MFIs. A mixture of the two approaches is possible depending on the individual strategies of commercial banks and on the impact of increased competition. Banks should also increase the number of ATMs, particularly outside of Niamey as they make their debit/credit cards available to more clients.

  3. Microfinance institutions need to maintain and expand their activities in rural areas. For MFIs to fully play their role, they need to be financially strong, viable and sustainable. Those in difficulty would need to be either restructured or closed with the help of the regulatory agency (ARSM). This should result in a healthier microfinance sector constituted by strong competitive MFIs that provide services at the lowest cost possible. The restructuring of MFIs and the reinforcement of supervision should increase the confidence of the banking sector in refinancing MFIs to on-lend to the rural world.

  4. Smaller independent MFIs should be encouraged to join existing networks to improve their long term viability and enjoy economies of scale. Indeed, networks provide an opportunity to share costs and information, contribute to improve governance and benefit from back-office services provided by the Apex organization such as audit and other related activities. To achieve this objective, ARSM could restrict the issuing of licenses to MFI that join a network and could charge special fees for supervising the small independent MFIs. Apex organizations could also consider creating their own financial organisms that would be delivered a bank license. Under the current laws, that would provide MFI network members with access to the payment system, foreign exchange transactions, international transfers, leasing products, etc.


  5. Download 0.68 Mb.

    Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page