November 2005 Review Period: July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005 Table of Contents



Download 1.98 Mb.
Page20/44
Date14.08.2017
Size1.98 Mb.
#32054
1   ...   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   ...   44

Graph 20 Graph 21




Graph 22 Graph 23


Graph 24



Appendix D5b

Academic Program Review

Department Of Social Work

Undergraduate Student Survey

University Comparisons Report

March 2005
Department N = 78 (response rate = 49.4 percent)

University (18 departments) N = 2241 (response rate = 41.3 percent)
Table 1



University

Department

University

Department

N

%

N

%

Mean*

SD

Mean*

SD

Faculty members in the department are interested in the academic development of undergraduate majors.



Strongly disagree

71

3.5

1

1.3

3.88

1.078

4.21

.922

2

160

7.8

2

2.6

3

419

20.4

14

18.2

4

690

33.7

23

29.9

Strongly agree

710

34.6

37

48.1

The undergraduate program of study is academically challenging.



Strongly disagree

65

3.1

1

1.3

4.14

1.020

4.07

1.011

2

106

5.0

5

6.6

3

262

12.5

15

19.7

4

713

33.9

22

28.9

Strongly agree

957

45.5

33

43.4

Faculty in the department are appropriately prepared for their courses.

Strongly disagree

62

3.0

3

3.9

4.05

1.015

4.19

1.052

2

113

5.5

2

2.6

3

304

14.7

12

15.6

4

767

37.1

20

26.0

Strongly agree

823

39.8

40

51.9

I feel the undergraduate program is preparing me for my professional career and/or further study.



Strongly disagree

98

4.7

1

1.3

3.89

1.116

4.34

.960

2

155

7.4

4

5.3

3

372

17.8

8

10.5

4

713

34.1

18

23.7

Strongly agree

753

36.0

45

59.2

There is open communication between faculty and undergraduate students about student concerns.



Strongly disagree

134

6.5

4

5.3

3.66

1.201

4.11

1.173

2

229

11.1

5

6.6

3

465

22.5

9

11.8

4

611

29.6

19

25.0

Strongly agree

625

30.3

39

51.3

Class size is suitable for effective learning.



Strongly disagree

105

5.0

3

3.9

3.83

1.139

4.14

1.140

2

182

8.6

5

6.6

3

404

19.1

11

14.5

4

698

33.0

16

21.1

Strongly agree

725

34.3

41

53.9

*Mean range: 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree

Graph 1 Graph 2


Graph 3 Graph 4



Graph 5 Graph 6


Table 2




University

Department

University

Department

N

%

N

%

Mean*

SD

Mean*

SD

Academic advisement available in the department

Poor

189

10.0

5

6.6

3.45

1.252

3.79

1.170

2

229

12.1

5

6.6

3

474

25.0

16

21.1

4

548

28.9

25

32.9

Excellent

454

24.0

25

32.9

Career advisement available in the department



Poor

180

11.4

3

4.5

3.21

1.220

3.67

1.093

2

245

15.5

6

9.0

3

486

30.7

18

26.9

4

409

25.9

23

34.3

Excellent

262

16.6

17

25.4

Availability of faculty to students outside the classroom



Poor

84

4.2

1

1.4

3.66

1.066

4.10

.869

2

187

9.4

1

1.4

3

517

26.0

15

20.5

4

733

36.9

29

39.7

Excellent

466

23.5

27

37.0

Effectiveness of teaching methods used by faculty



Poor

51

2.4

1

1.4

3.82

.956

4.14

.816

2

133

6.4

1

1.4

3

467

22.4

11

14.9

4

921

44.1

35

47.3

Excellent

516

24.7

26

35.1

Procedures used to evaluate student performance



Poor

64

3.2

1

1.4

3.65

.980

3.90

.965

2

154

7.7

4

5.7

3

579

29.0

18

25.7

4

815

40.8

25

35.7

Excellent

388

19.4

22

31.4

Frequency of undergraduate major course offerings



Poor

307

14.9

12

16.2

2.98

1.226

3.00

1.261

2

410

19.9

12

16.2

3

591

28.6

24

32.4

4

521

25.2

16

21.6

Excellent

236

11.4

10

13.5

Variety of undergraduate major course offerings



Poor

171

8.2

9

12.0

3.37

1.158

3.15

1.238

2

283

13.6

13

17.3

3

590

28.3

23

30.7

4

682

32.7

18

24.0

Excellent

359

17.2

12

16.0

Clarity of degree requirements

Poor

118

5.5

3

3.9

3.66

1.160

4.10

.954

2

245

11.5

0

.0

3

466

21.9

13

16.9

4

705

33.1

31

40.3

Excellent

593

27.9

30

39.0

*Mean range: 1=poor to 5=excellent



Download 1.98 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   ...   44




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page