Oasis – Open architecture for Accessible Services Integration and Standardization


Cross-SP-3 Working at home and using environmental control, brain training and fall detection



Download 1.2 Mb.
Page19/21
Date19.10.2016
Size1.2 Mb.
#5047
1   ...   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21

Cross-SP-3 Working at home and using environmental control, brain training and fall detection


  1. Context of use (aim)

In-home working with the smart workplaces environment. Using the environmental control services and brain trainer. The fall detection is activated all the time (due to a stroke history).

  1. Primary actor

√ Young elderly (ages 55-65)

√ Elderly (ages 65-75)

√ Old elderly (ages 75+)


  1. Secondary actor(s)

√Family members

Informal care-givers (i.e. volunteers, neighbours, etc.)

Formal care-givers (both inpatient and outpatient)

Public / private Social security service providers and insurance companies

Service Centre

√Health care and emergency support service providers

Home automation service providers

Leisure and re-creation service providers

Infotainment service providers

Telematic service providers

Elderly associations

National, local and regional authorities

Policy makers

 Other: …………………………………………………………….



  1. Connected UCs

SP3-33 - SP3-35, SP2-57, SP2-29 - SP2-30, SP2-25 - SP2-28

  1. Priority Level

√ Essential  Secondary  Supportive

  1. Scenario(s)

The user is working at home (SP3-33 - SP3-35) and uses the environmental control (SP2-57). Then he/she decides to undertake some exercising of the brain (SP2-29 - SP2-30). Fall detection is on at all time since he/she has had a stroke in the past (SP2-25 - SP2-28).

  1. System output

Connection with the user’s company IT infrastructure and ability to perform a number of IT related tasks in the same way as his/her office. Information to the user for the status of a specific home appliance (heater temperature) and possibility to alter it.

Presentation to the user a set of exercises for brain training and analysis of the results.

Measurement of user’s actions that could cause the falling (knee extension strength, sit-to-stand performance, changes in the user’s walking patterns and speed, etc.) and warning in case of anomaly.


  1. Relevant OASIS WP

WP2.3, 2.4, 2.7, 3.5

  1. Services involved

Nutritional Advisor

√Activity coach

√Brain and Skills trainer

 Social communities platform

Health monitoring

√Environmental Control

Transport information

Route guidance

Driver telematic support

Driver comfort support

Tourism support

Leisure and social activities support

√Smart workplaces


  1. Devices & restrictions

11a. User Interaction devices & restrictions

Working: PC mainly (and PDA).

Test and training: PC, TV (touch screens), PDA and smartphones may be restricting

Edutainment module: PC, TV, PDA, Smartphone, and a stand-alone electronic gadget


11b. Sensor devices & restrictions

Motion sensors including accelerometer detecting parameters that could indicate a falling risk. When possible sensors will be wearable and unobtrusive.

In-door user localization.





  1. Critical success parameters



Services

Success parameters

Brain and Skills trainer

a) definition of the system´s reiterative adaptation loops based on user input;

b) results of test/training sessions

and

c) user profiles



Activity coach

Effectiveness in preventing a risk situation;

Reliable assessment of a “dangerous” situation and prompt call for help.

Increased peace of mind both for the elderly and for the family.


Environmental Control


Efficiency of monitoring/ detecting the status of home devices and control them automatically when there are safety issues present.

User friendliness of the application.

Interoperability in terms of connected devices.


Smart workplaces

Accuracy of the tasks provided in the workflows and appropriate timing



  1. Environmental restrictions




  1. Interaction level

Step 1 – the user wants to be connected to the IT infrastructure of his/her company by pushing a specific button (real or virtual hw/sw embedded) of his/her working device (Home PC, Laptop, PDA, etc)

Step 2 – the “OASIS - Connecting Bridge” taking into consideration all different parameters such as working device, company IT infrastructure security settings, working environment and telecom network existing in the environment, etc., connects the user working device with his/her company IT infrastructure end emulates his/her working environment in the office

Step 3: the user is able to perform a number of IT related tasks in the same way as his/her office.

Step 4: the user wants to check the temperature of the heater through the environmental control unit

Step 5: the system informs the user on the temperature

Step 6: the user changes the temperature level

Step 7: The user carries out a cognitive exercise aiming to support his/her daily activities (e.g. food recipe memorizing and cooking steps).

Step 8: the system stores the personal cognitive profile (if/when user accepted) and calibrates the user’s profile for individualized future training sessions with adjustable and scalable complexity and difficulty; it informs the user on the outcome (scores, comparisons with earlier sessions and recommendations on future steps).

General: throughout the above actions, the system detects risky situations for falling and warns the elderly and calls for help in case of emergency.


  1. Personalisation/ adaptation level

√Yes:

static parameters: any static disability(adapted UI);user psychological profile (affecting the feedback approach of the system); company IT infrastructure security settings

semi-dynamic parameters: working device and telecom network, etc. Normal walking patterns of the user, user’s habits, etc. The level of risk is defined on the basis of the deviation of the measured parameters against a “normal” set of values related to the specific user. User psychological profile (affecting the feedback approach of the system);

environmental parameters/context of use: Prevention approach could be impacted by the context and the environment. “Controlled environments” (e.g. home) will ensure a more effective action of the system.



  1. Quality of service indicators

Unobtrusiveness and acceptance by the elderly; Reduction in the number of falls; Reduced false alarms ; Communicate with emergency centre <1 min.

Environmental control reliability demands: 100% reliability (i.e. the system performs the commands of the user).

Environmental control efficiency: 100% efficiency (the status of the home devices is changed accordingly).

Brain training: Reliability and validity of testing procedures and outcomes; Effectiveness and efficiency of training procedures



  1. Potential input needed from other UCs (what input and which UCs?)

SP3-33 - SP3-35, SP2-57, SP2-29 - SP2-30, SP2-25 - SP2-28

  1. Important accessibility attributes (per UG)

System use may be restricting for individuals with:

Severely impaired eye-sight

Moderate to severe cognitive decline

(Mini Mental State Examination-MMSE < 22)



  1. Background info/ reason on selection and on assigning the priority level

See connected UCs.

  1. References

See connected UCs.

  1. Comments

See connected UCs.




Figure 103: Cross-SP-3 Working at home and using environmental control, brain training and fall detection


  1. Download 1.2 Mb.

    Share with your friends:
1   ...   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page