Office of the Attorney General Annual Report 2009 Incorporating the
Download 0.98 Mb.
|
- Navigate this page:
- Staff Others
- Expenditure €
Statistics for 2009 Chief State Solicitor’s Office
Statistics from 21 April 1998 to 31 December 2009
Annex H Training and Development - Merrion Street Office Breakdown of Expenditure on Training on Development for 2009 in respect of the Office of the Attorney General:
Expenditure on Training & Development – 2009
Training and Development 2009 CSSO Breakdown of Chief State Solicitor’s Office Expenditure on Training & Development 2009 Training and Development 2009 CSSO Breakdown of Chief State Solicitor’s Office Expenditure on Training & Development 2009 The role of the Training and Development Unit (TDU) of the Chief State Solicitor’s Office is to provide targeted training for staff throughout the office. Throughout 2009 the TDU undertook a number of areas of training which had been identified by staff in their Personal Training and Development Forms under Performance Management and Development System (PMDS) and areas of training prioritised by the office ranging from health & safety issues, to legal topics to administrative training requirements. 2009 saw more of a focus on providing in-house training for staff, taking into account the 2008 CPD regulations which included public sector solicitors for the first time. The following training was provided for staff during 2009:-
The Training Unit were allocated €241,000.00 in order to provide training and development for CSSO staff during 2009. The allocation was broken into three specific areas.
Annex I Organisation Chart: 
Annex J High Court Cases from 2009 Involving the State O'Donnell, and Others v South Dublin County Council, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Ireland and the Attorney General Judgment delivered by Edwards J on 11/01/2009 These judicial review proceedings related to a challenge whereby the applicants claimed that they were entitled by law to be provided with suitable, adequate and accessible caravan accommodation by the first named respondent and that, by failing to provide such accommodation, the Council had acted in breach of their statutory duty under the Housing Acts 1966-2004 and the European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003.
Judgment delivered by Edwards J on 12/01/2009 This was an application for habeas corpus made in respect of the applicant's detention following his failure to produce necessary identification documents without satisfactory explanation.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 14/01/2009 This was a challenge to the request for the surrender of the respondent who was sought by a Polish judicial authority in order to serve a sentence of 10 months’ imprisonment which had been imposed upon him there.
Judgment delivered by Cooke J on 14/01/2009 (ex tempore) In these judicial review proceedings the applicant challenged the revocation by the Garda National Immigration Bureau of the applicant’s “leave to remain” in the State.
Judgment delivered by Finlay-Geoghegan J on 19/01/2009 This case was a decision on damages following an earlier finding by the Court of breach of contract by the Health Service Executive.
Judgment delivered by Cooke J on 20/01/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant sought to quash “rulings or orders” claimed to have been made by the respondents at hearings together with a stay of the District Court proceedings.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 22/01/2009 The respondent challenged his surrender sought by a judicial authority in the United Kingdom under a European arrest warrant.
Judgment delivered by O'Neill J on 23/01/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant sought to quash certain orders pertaining to the extension of time to serve the book of evidence.
Judgment delivered by Edwards J on 26/01/2009 In these proceedings the applicant sought to appeal an Order of Discovery made by the Master of the High Court in aid of the applicant’s judicial review proceedings.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 28/01/2009 These proceedings related to the surrender of the respondent sought by a Lithuanian judicial authority on foot of a European arrest warrant.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 28/01/2009 These proceedings related to the surrender of the respondent sought by a Polish judicial authority under a European arrest warrant.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 28/01/2009 These proceedings related to the surrender of the respondent sought by a United Kingdom judicial authority under a European arrest warrant.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 03/02/2009 This was a habeas corpus application which challenged the lawfulness of the applicant’s detention on foot of a warrant purported to have been issued from the Dublin Metropolitan District Court.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 05/02/2009 This was a challenge to an insurance company which declined to provide indemnity in respect of the plaintiff’s injuries on the basis that the policy in question did not cover liability where the personal injuries occurred in a part of the vehicle which was not designed and constructed with seating accommodation for passengers.
Judgment delivered by O'Neill J on 06/02/2009 This was a judicial review challenging the refusal of Supplementary Welfare Allowance and Jobseeker’s Allowance.
Judgment delivered by McMahon J on 06/02/2009 The plaintiff sought an injunction of prohibition until the trial of an action prohibiting the third-named respondent from proceeding with the trial by way of indictment of the plaintiff until the within proceedings have to be determined by the High Court.
Judgment delivered by Cooke J on 06/02/2009 These judicial review proceedings related to public access to planning appeal procedures.
Judgment delivered by Hedigan J on 10/02/2009 In these proceedings the applicant sought an order cancelling the decision of the Board to erase her name from the Register of Nurses and an order directing the Board to reinstate her name to the Register of Nurses.
Judgment delivered by Edwards J on 11/02/2009 These proceedings related to a habeas corpus application in respect of the lawfulness of the detention of a woman in hospital.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 12/02/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant challenged the lawfulness of the seizure of his vehicle by gardaí from him at the site of a protest at the gates of the Shell site in Belmullet, Co. Mayo.
Judgment delivered by Hedigan J on 12/02/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant sought an injunction restraining his prosecution in relation to charges on the grounds of delay and that there was a real and substantial risk that he would not get a fair trial because one of the witnesses could not be located.
Judgment delivered by Charleton J on 17/02/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant challenged the jurisdictional limits of the Equality Tribunal.
Judgment delivered by Charleton J on 17/02/2009 These proceedings pertained to a determiniation as to whether a trust was charitable.
Judgment delivered by Irvine J on 17/02/2009 These judicial review proceedings related to a challenge to a decision of an appeals committee under section 29 of the Education Act 1998.
Judgment delivered by McCarthy J on 18/02/2009 These proceedings related to the surrender of the respondent sought by a Lithuanian judicial authority pursuant to a European arrest warrant.
Judgment delivered by Laffoy J on 19/02/2009 The Plaintiff sought remedies for the refusal of the Minister for Justice, who had statutory responsibility for provision of criminal legal aid, to discharge his fees in connection with the representation by him of an accused who had free legal aid which covered representation by senior counsel.
Judgment delivered by O'Neill J on 20/02/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant sought an order of prohibition restraining the respondent from taking any further steps in a disciplinary enquiry initiated against the applicant and on which a hearing had been arranged to take place in November 2006.
Judgment delivered by McMahon J on 25/02/2009 In these proceedings the plaintiff sought damages against the State for an infringement by the State, through its judicial organ, of the plaintiff’s constitutional right to a fair trial.
Judgment delivered by Cooke J on 26/02/2009 This was an appeal from the Valuation Tribunal’s determination in respect of a car park.
Judgment delivered by MacMenamin J on 27/02/2009 The Plaintiffs sought an order for the preliminary determination of a number of points of law.
Judgment delivered by Hedigan J on 04/03/2009 This habeas corpus application involved a challenge by a Dutch national to his detention under section 15A of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977 on the basis of alleged unlawful procedures in the District Court at Cloverhill.
Judgment delivered by Hedigan J on 05/03/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant sought an order of certiorari quashing the decision of the first respondent (a Circuit Court Judge assigned to the Midlands Circuit) to affirm the conviction and sentence imposed by the District Court on the applicant on grounds of bias and error of law.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 05/03/2009 This was a habeas corpus hearing in respect of the continued detention of the applicants under section 30 of the Offences Against the State Act 1939.
Judgment delivered by Hedigan J on 10/03/2009 These judicial review proceedings related to the respondent's decision to continue the prohibition of hunting on State-owned lands.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 10/03/2009 The respondent challenged his surrender sought by a judicial authority in Poland on foot of a European arrest warrant.
Judgment delivered by Sheehan J on 10/03/2009 This matter related to an application for an interlocutory injunction to prohibit the termination of a contract of employment with the Department of Justice.
Judgment delivered by Laffoy J on 11/03/2009 These proceedings concerned an application to amend pleadings.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 13/03/2009 The surrender of the respondent was sought by a Polish judicial authority under a European arrest warrant.
Judgment delivered by Sheehan J on 13/03/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant sought an order of certiorari quashing a decision of the Minister to suspend/postpone the certification of shot firers by virtue of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Construction) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (S.I. No. 130/2008).
Judgment delivered by Laffoy J on 16/03/2009 The applicant sought leave to re-enter proceedings which had been adjourned generally with liberty to re-enter in July 2005.
Judgment delivered by Murphy J on 18/03/2009 This was an appeal against an order for discovery.
Judgment delivered by Murphy J on 18/03/2009 The applicant sought an interlocutory injunction restraining Dublin City Council, the respondent and her landlord, from evicting her from her residence in Dublin.
Judgment delivered by Peart J on 19/03/2009 The surrender of the respondent was sought by a judicial authority in Poland on foot of a European arrest warrant.
Judgment delivered by Hedigan J on 24/03/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant sought an order of certiorari of the decision to grant planning permission.
Judgment delivered by O'Neill J on 27/03/2009 In these judicial review proceedings the applicant sought costs following earlier judicial review proceedings. Directory: pub pub -> Project Scoring Template Pre-Construction Phase New Core/Branch Campus Projects pub -> Acm word Template for sig site pub -> The german unification, 1815-1870 pub -> Baltic Olympiads in Informatics: Challenges for Training Together pub -> Preparation of Papers for ieee transactions on medical imaging pub -> Forthcoming meetings and conferences pub -> Asilomar Conference on Circuits, Systems & Computers, Pacific Grove, ca, November 1978, pp. 55 58 pub -> Forthcoming meetings and conferences pub -> Harmonised compatibility and sharing conditions for video pmse in the 7 9 ghz frequency band, taking into account radar use Download 0.98 Mb. Share with your friends:
|