I think that this is a great public forum topic: it relates to a current event that will educate students on some of the nuanc



Download 2 Mb.
View original pdf
Page7/170
Date17.12.2020
Size2 Mb.
#55030
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   170
Victory
Lesson 4.2 Day 3
13NFL1-Compulsory Voting
Page 7 of 163
www.victorybriefs.com
STUDIES SHOW COMPULSORY VOTING ONLY BRINGS DISINTERESTED VOTERS TO THE POLLS COMPULSORY VOTING MAKES IT LESS LIKELY THAT THE RESULT WILL BE INLINE WITH CITIZENS PREFERENCES. VOLUNTARY VOTING SUPPORTS UNIVERSAL ENFRANCHISEMENT ..................................................147
AT

C
OUNTRIES
.............................................................................................................................. 148
OF THE COUNTRIES WITH COMPULSORY VOTING SYSTEMS, ONLY A FRACTION ENFORCE IT, AND HIGH TURNOUT IS DUE TO OTHER FACTORS. ......................................................................................148
AT

E
QUAL
R
EPRESENTATION
......................................................................................................... 149
STUDIES SHOW THAT COMPULSORY VOTING DOES
N’T ACTUALLY PROMOTE EQUAL REPRESENTATION. ITS FAIRER TO GIVE MORE WEIGHT TO THE VOICES OF THOSE AFFECTED BY PARTICULAR POLICIES AND DECISIONS RATHER THAN ENSURE THAT EVERYONE PARTICIPATES EQUALLY. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY FOLLOW THAT ALL POLITICAL INEQUALITIES NEED TO BE LEVELED DIFFERENTIAL VOTER TURNOUT RATES MAY SIMPLY EMPOWER THOSE WITH A GREATER INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME OF A VOTE VOLUNTARY VOTING ALLOWS INTENSE MINORITIES TO ASSERT THEIR INTERESTS MORE STRONGLY .................................................................................................................................................153
AT

F
REE
-
RIDING
............................................................................................................................ 154
FREE-
RIDING DOESN’T JUSTIFY COMPULSORY VOTING. THE POOR DON’T VOTE BECAUSE OF ACCESS BARRIERS, NOT APATHY. .......................................155
AT

I
NEQUALITY
.............................................................................................................................. 156
COMPULSORY VOTING DO
ESN’T ALLEVIATE SOCIAL INEQUALITY. ...................................................156
AT

L
IBERAL
D
UTY
.......................................................................................................................... 157
THE LIBERAL ARGUMENT FOR COMPULSORY VOTING IS FALSE. .....................................................157
AT

S
ELF
-I
NTEREST
........................................................................................................................ 158
PEOPLE CAN’T BE FORCED TO VOTE JUST BECAUSE IT MIGHT BE IN THEIR SELF INTEREST. BECAUSE ALTRUISM MAYBE A REASONABLE JUSTIFICATION TO FORGO SELF-INTEREST, IT IS UNREASONABLE TO FORCE PEOPLE TO DO SOMETHING JUST BECAUSE IT IS IN THEIR BEST INTERESTS VOTING IS NOT ALWAYS IN PEOPLE’S INTEREST SIMPLY HAVING THE RIGHT TO VOTE IS SUFFICIENT TO PROTECT OUR INTERESTS DEMOCRACY ASSUMES THAT ONE MAY FORGO SELF-INTEREST BY ALTRUISTIC VOTING AND ASSUMES THAT THERE IS ALWAYS A RISK TO ELECTORAL POLITICS, SO FORCING PEOPLE TO VOTE OUT OF SELF-INTEREST IS NOT JUSTIFIED ................................................................................162
A2

R
EDUCES
G
OVERNMENT
S
PENDING
P
ROGRAMS
........................................................................ 163
A2 CRAIN AND LEONARD STUDY WRONG VARIABLES, IMPLAUSIBLE REGRESSION .....................163


Download 2 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   170




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page