Microchips, the Most Plausible Agent of REA

scientists working with those non-human creatures were mainly interested in the transmissions. Then, they began experimenting with the receptive qualities of the microchips.
The carrier of those microchips can be monitored by satellite for thousands of miles. Much of the work with non-humans was probably experimental with the intention of later using the devices on humans.
Although targets will read and hear about several methods supposedly capable of hooking their minds, the only proven method is through surreptitiously implanting a microchip or a nano-microchip in the target’s body. Scores of patents dealing with microchips in the human body and operated by remote have indeed been filed, many of which, in the wrong hands, could be utilized for electronic abuse. I have read of only a handful of people who have located microchips in their bodies and had them surgically removed. To my knowledge, in only one case was the microchip identified and traced to the manufacturer.
My efforts to contact those individuals failed; however, their cases are well documented. I know other targets who have located foreign objects in their bodies but have not been able to find surgeons who would remove them. We know that many forms of microchips have been developed for the human body for many purposes, all of them capable of being controlled by remote.
If indeed microchips turn out to be instrumental in a target’s electronic assault and mind control, it directly implicates the medical profession. Only persons in the medical field, intelligence agents, and perhaps law enforcement are able legally to acquire microchips.
Those microchips had to have been implanted at some point by a dentist, a doctor, an anesthesiologist, a nurse, or somebody else in that field unless a target is somehow sedated by a knowledgeable person who implants the microchip. Those cases have indeed occurred.
Since syringes are generally used for the implantations, nurses are particularly suspect in committing that crime. If a doctor, nurse, or another member of the medical profession would implant a microchip in a patient, he would also probably not hesitate, if given orders, to inject that patient with live cancer cells, Hepatitis C, or AIDS. That, of course, does not mean that every doctor and nurse engages in that sordid practice.
I got a letter in early 2010 from the mother of a victim in Scotland who stated that her son was implanted with a microchip while he was in jail. He could later feel the lump where the microchip had been implanted. For months he suffered relentless electronic and neurological attacks. A local doctor later saw the microchip on his scanners and removed it. The victim instantly improved. Afterward, the doctor refused to discuss it with the victim and his mother, telling them that he found nothing. Most microchips cannot be located by the sense of touch.
Targets require some object, substance, or characteristic in their body that will attract frequencies used by their remote attackers. Otherwise, if the electronic and mind control assault is delivered along a frequency, how does the effect distinguish that particular person?
A target can receive vibrations while in the presence of other people without the others feeling it. Certain voice inflections and tones of narrators on TV also cause jolts in a target’s body without others sitting nearby feeling them. Something on or about the victim’s body has to act as the receiver for some device that delivers those effects.
The microchip has been around since the 1970s. Since then, many versions of microchips

have been invented and manufactured. One such microchip was invented by Peter Seth
Edelstein of Menlo Park, CA and Benjamin Theodore Nordell II of San Mateo, CA and patented on September 5, 2006 under the name Method and Apparatus for Locating and
Tracking Persons (Patent No. US 7,102,508 B2).
The patent was sold by the inventors to Persephone, Inc. of Menlo Park, CA. Interestingly, my online search for Persephone turned up very little on that company. It very well may be only a front for Department of Defense contractors who carry out experiments and invent and improve gadgets for the DOD. At any rate, it is not a highly visible organization.
Although the ostensible purpose of the above patented “device” is to locate and track persons who are lost or kidnapped, it lends itself to many more devious and sinister purposes.
Descriptions of patents of this type are purposely made very vague; however, reading between the lines, we can glean the following information about that particular patent as it relates to targeted individuals.
– the “device” is indeed a microchip;
– the microchip can be implanted in virtually every part of the human body, even in body cavities (use your imagination); the microchips serve as both transmitters and receivers;
those microchips are encased in a substance that does not irritate the flesh around them;
– the remote operators [the attackers] use a handheld device, probably a small radio or a cell phone, that in conjunction with cell phone towers "activates" the microchips;
– the users, or attackers, also communicate with each other by cell phone;
-- the users do not have to be physically present in a single location to coordinate their efforts but can instead use "conference calls from various locations;"
– the microchips CAN be shut off by the initiators;
-- the microchip lasts indefinitely, as it can be continually recharged by the target’s own body;
– the microchip’s software can indeed see the target’s body and even the organs inside his body;
– the microchip can be programmed with a vast variety of software that renders many of the physical and neurological effects (the voices, etc.) experienced by targets;
– those effects can be programmed to occur whenever the programmer wishes;
– users/operators of the microchip can monitor several targets at the same time by remote.
Distance was not mentioned in the patent. In the drawing that accompanied the patent, communication is depicted by three cell phone-looking towers. Patents, however, are often written in a vague and misleading manner, especially those patents that can also be used for unethical, intelligence, or military purposes. Thus, the communication system shown could be the triangulation of satellites. The use of satellites would make the patent workable at any distance. Even regular radio frequencies patched from one area to another would allow the attackers to operate from a far distance.
The triangulation could also conceivably be within the target’s body. To achieve the effects, the attackers may need to implant three different microchips within the body. All three of them may have different functions but work off each other.

Likewise, the device used to communicate with the microchip was not mentioned specifically.
Although the three towers were shown in the figure demonstrating how the patent works, the narrative did not state whether the device was a radio tuner, cell phone, land line phone, or some type of scanner/radio.
The microchip’s computer software determines its effectiveness. By adding new software, the microchip can be adapted by remote to the target’s evolving situation and change in location.
Additional software, tailored for the particular target, can be introduced into the microchip by remote at any time. That software can be continually refigured and reprogrammed as necessary, based on the target’s actions and reactions.

To be used in the human body by remote, microchips must have a unique identification (ID) such as a symbol, a number, a word, or a combination of those. There is even some evidence that a target’s DNA profile, or a distinct part of it, may be inscribed on the microchip. The target’s ID has to be known and entered into the handler’s device for a match before it can be contacted by remote. Once the codes are matched on the microchip and the device used by the attackers, the device’s computer software, without which the device is useless, acts through contact with the microchip to carry out its various and many purposes. There must also be a radio frequency to connect the sender to the receiver, becoming an RFID (radio frequency identification), much like that used in store scanners at the check-out counters.
The device used by the handler who operates the device and software must be reasonably small and portable (battery operated). The name of that device is carefully avoided in the patents; however, it will probably be a common or perhaps customized cell phone, a small radio or scanner, laptop computer, or a similar object that has both receiving and transmitting features. Logically, only one handler has use of the computer that controls all the functions of the software on the target through the implanted microchip; otherwise, the computer commands could conflict and negate each other. Nevertheless, other attackers using those handheld devices can doubtlessly locate the target using the device.
The attackers’ trainer manual doubtlessly instructs them to vary their methods of attack on their targets. Some targets may get the V2K and no neighborhood stalking; others may outwardly receive only the electronic effects, i.e. jolts, vibrations, and pin pricks; still others may get a combination of electronic effects, V2K, and organized physical stalking. That is totally by design, for if the same technique were used on every target, it would be far easier to research that technique, develop shielding for it, and possibly trace it to its origin.
Introduction of the microchip into a target’s body can be performed in a variety of manners: through shots and inoculations, through medical procedures, through tiny projectiles
(microscopic darts), and drugging the victim first and then administering the microchip.
Apparently many targets are “tagged” using the latter method. Hypnosis often accompanies the act so that the target will not remember being drugged.
Although hidden microchips have been recovered from the bodies of unknowing and involuntary targets, their detection and removal has proven very difficult, as doctors very reluctantly write orders for the use of instruments that can detect those microchips. Moreover, today’s microchips are purposely made too small to detect and with materials designed to conceal them. Regardless of whatever other device(s) and method(s) might be used to perform REA on involuntary targets, we know that microchips can be and are used for that purpose.
Most microchips, like implanted medical devices such as hip replacements and pacemakers, are probably not expected to last beyond a certain period of time. That argues that targets are implanted with multiple microchips so that if one stops functioning, another one will continue.
Continuity in electronic stalking and mind control is very important.
Many targets receive both voices as well as physical effects from their attackers. There is increasing evidence that the voices and the physical assaults may stem from two different remote weapons. For example, in my case I not only receive electronic effects but also get the voices. If the voices come from an illegally implanted microchip, why did hundreds of

holes appear in sheets of aluminum foil I had placed over my bedroom windows? This suggests that if indeed microchips are used, they must function in consonance with the electromagnetism and directed energy weapons.
We have been led to believe that microchips are cylindrical capsule-looking devices about the size of an oft-quoted “grain of rice.” That may no longer be true. Today scientists have the capability of manufacturing a microchip in many forms and shapes and from many substances. A microchip may now look like a very thin wire no longer than perhaps a quarter of an inch. Another possible microchip will look like a mole and will probably be attached to the sub-dermis with very short wires that serve as antennas. Nano-microchips can also probably be ingested orally.
Microchips have evolved from the traditional, capsule-like ones often pictured in articles about the Verichip on the internet. Today microchips take many shapes, forms, and sizes. There is proof that microchips in the form of tiny darts smaller than a human hair and less than a quarter of an inch long can be shot into a target from a distance.
The voices can be projected into the target using a microchip or other object or substance.
The voices are projected via the implant into the target's nervous system and thus his auditory canal. If that is the method, the voices would be directed to the target using the GPS to the target’s surroundings and his microchip would pick up the signal from the electromagnetic field. The magnetic field may not even be necessary. Animals and sea creatures implanted with microchips can be tracked from thousands of miles away. With implanted microchips, only the target would hear the transmissions.
Targets have long searched for ways to shield themselves from the targeting effects. There is no effective shield. Why? Because, in my opinion, the attacks come from inside one’s body via microchips rather than from outside. That being the case, any shielding is useless.
Testing for Microchips
Both of the methods described above may be utilized by the attackers, depending on the situation of the target and whether he is implanted with a microchip. I suggest that organizations that represent targets set up a massive program to examine every alleged victim for foreign objects or substances in his body. That can be carried out by examining targets by x-rays, MRIs, CT scans, or some other instrument.
The test will either locate one or more microchips or will rule out the possibility of implanted microchips. The outcome of the tests may show that some victims do indeed have implanted microchips while others do not. If microchips cannot be found on the victim examined, his
REA will probably be carried out from a relatively close distance. Some victims may be targeted by both the internal method as well as the external method.
At any rate, the testing will either confirm or lay to rest the microchip theory. If microchips are eliminated as a method, targets can focus their efforts on determining the device(s) and methods used on them externally and bringing those who are doing it to justice, presuming that justice will be forthcoming. The latter is doubtful under the powerbrokers who control the current form of government.

I definitely feel that there is at least one microchip in my body. Some of my symptoms could only come from within the body, for example, the unusual salivation, the cramps, the gastric disturbances, and the pin pricks. Those effects can probably be caused only by specialized software. That software must operate in conjunction with a code from an object within the body that responds to a computerized command – doubtlessly a microchip. Let me repeat that despite the many theories, so far ONLY microchips are PROVEN capable of interacting with victims to produce physical and mental torture.
In my case, most of the symptoms occur on and around my head, which leads me to believe that if there is indeed an object in my body probably located in that region. Here are some of the effects on my head: tinnitus (ringing in the ears); tops of ears oozing a colorless fluid; sensation of bubbles popping in mouth; salivating from the mouth at any time; pin pricks on the eyes and a loss of vision; the top of the nose coating over with a thick crust; tingling on the skin (as a result a brown spot has appeared on the right outside nostril and a sore-type depression, on the right side of my chin); clicking on my head and in my left ear; frequent, long-lasting, pin-like prick on the back of my neck; the sensation of flies crawling on my face; a psoriasis-like area on my cheek near the left eye; a very sharp sensation on or in several teeth (as if a dentist drill had hit a nerve); a heavy pounding, throbbing in the back of my head; an unnaturally intense itching in the corners of my eyes and on my eyelids; pin-like pricks in the depths of my ears that cause me to shudder violently; air that pushes my lips out as if I were snoring through my mouth; scratching of the throat, which causes either sneezing or coughing; a tingling inside my nostril that induces sneezing; blockage in my esophagus that makes it difficult to swallow; constant itching inside my nostrils that makes me want to “pick” my nose; and of course the voices that occur in my brain or ears. (More about symptoms later.)

Download 0.99 Mb.

Share with your friends: