The silent massacre

I had given that employee excellent performance evaluations and had even written
Washington that as our presence in that country diminished, we should retain her services as long as we could. Nevertheless, after I left the country for another assignment, that employee lost her job. She told others that I caused her to be fired. In actuality, I did not find out that she had been dismissed until much later. In hind sight, I believe that her guilt convinced her that I had found out about her duplicity and had gotten her fired. Apparently that employee did not stop working with the Israelis when she took the job with the U. S. Government. Certain people in our government probably knew that she was still an Israeli agent.
In the 1970’s, Israeli Nazi hunters were still active in South America, funded in large part by the U. S. Government. The “dentist” probably worked with them, and the employee in my office may have also cooperated in the hunt. One of the contractors who worked with the
American Government and who alternated between Argentina and the country in which I was assigned was known to be associated with that group. The “Nazis” doubtlessly included anybody who opposed Israel and its pro-Israel factions in the United States.
The minuscule device implanted by the dentist in South America in the late 1970’s may have had only limited capability. That small object embedded in a molar was undoubtedly used to listen to my conversations through bone-to-instrument conduction as well as perhaps to track my movements. Since that time, however, much more sophisticated, high-tech, intelligence- gathering and mind control equipment and software have been developed, tested, and put into operation.
Over the years, I have continued to speak out against Israel’s foreign policy and our support for it. In the 1970’s, I defended the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) when it was still considered a renegade group, and in 1984 I became a member of the American Arab Anti-
Discrimination Committee (ADC) at a time when Americans were being led by the U. S. media down the anti-Moslem path. I never occupied an important decision-making position in the government; yet, to the Israelis, an enemy is an enemy, regardless of his rank. I have an analytical and inquiring mind, and I articulate my thoughts. My friends respect my opinions.
Thus, I am a threat.
In the early to mid-1980’s, I served in Washington, DC, where my anti-Israel views became widely known in my work venue. In that city, I subscribed to a small obscure newspaper called
The Spotlight, which often published negative Israeli actions that would never have been published in the controlled American media. Every subscriber to The Spotlight, now defunct, got a place on the pro-Israel hit list. While in Washington, the IRS, which represents a very powerful tool of the pro-Israel powerbrokers, audited me twice consecutively. Never think that the IRS is not political. It is an integral part of the Zionist powerbrokers.
In 1981, the U. S. Government’s plan to sell AWAKs to Saudi Arabia stalled in Congress because of Israel’s lobbyists. Israel has over fifty PACs in the United States that work aggressively to promote its interests. I wrote one of the senators from my home state: “. . .
Israel always has been and continues to be a liability to the United States, and our protection of that nation is not now, and never was, in our national interest.” I went on to say that our blind support of that country’s aims “has earned us the enmity and distrust of traditionally friendly Arab and Moslem countries . . . .”

If I was not already on the Israeli hit list, other points made in the same letter were sure to place me firmly on it. Here are other excerpts from that letter.
“. . . the United States has prostrated itself in Israel’s behalf and has received little, if anything, in return. In so doing, our country has lost many real opportunities in other countries.”
“The smoldering situation in the Middle East is very likely in the future to lead to a regional or perhaps global conflict in which our country would be inextricably involved.”
– “Mr. Begin’s statement (paraphrased) that 'one cannot be anti-Israel without also being anti-Jewish, because the two are inseparable' was a deliberate attempt to discourage criticism of that country.”
– “I am fully aware of the countless subtle means of retaliation to which I may be subjected for my views. Yet, I will no longer be numbered among the ‘Silent Majority’ and watch my beloved country subvert itself for the sake of a self-serving nation whose value to us and to mankind has yet to be demonstrated.”
That lawmaker wrote me back a sickeningly defensive letter, calling Israel a bastion of democracy and the U.S.’s best friend in that region. I have no doubt that either he or an aide forwarded a copy of my letter to the Israeli Embassy.
On April 25, 1985, I also wrote a letter to the editor of The Washington Post, criticizing
Reagan’s attacks on Gadhaffi’s palace in Libya, in which a small son of Gadhaffi was killed. A part of the letter stated: “In its recent attacks on Libya, the United States demonstrated the same unevenhandedness and injustice that it has misguidedly followed in the Middle East since 1948. Our blind pro-Israel stance has spawned hatred for us in the Arab world for almost forty years, causing acts of frustration by leaders like Col. Gadaffi, whom we then label
“flakey” and “mad dogs.” .
On April 25, 1986, I submitted a letter to the editor of The Washington Post in which I voiced objections to Reagan’s strikes against Gadhaffi in Libya. I referred to “my country’s shameful
Middle East policy” and blamed the Libya attacks on the US Government’s attempts to weaken Israel’s enemies. I also recalled Reagan’s bombing of Beirut in 1983 in support of
Israel’s invasion of Lebanon.
Later that same year I was reassigned to an African post. The American ambassador in that country was a political appointee who was ardently pro-Israel. He was also Jewish. Shortly after my arrival, he gathered several newly arrived employees supposedly to brief them.
During his talk, he told us point blank that a part of our duty was to support Israel’s interests in that country. I could hardly believe my ears. His remark was clearly intended for me. Having been apprised of my anti-Israel views, he may have been baiting me to challenge his statement and thus give him reason to send me back to the United States. In retrospect, I wish that I had challenged him.
That ambassador was not a career diplomat but a political appointee who had bought his position through so-called “campaign contributions” to the president. He left shortly after I arrived. His replacement was a female career diplomat, who, it turned out, was very evenhanded concerning Israel’s interests in that county. To her credit, she cut short the tour

of an American Foreign Service Officer, a Jew married to an Israeli woman, who often rode to local events in an Israeli Embassy vehicle, for his obvious connection with another foreign country.
I liked both the man and his Israeli wife. I had worked previously with that officer in
Washington, and we had often chatted during work breaks about various topics. He had remarked on one occasion that he had his bags packed for an anti-Jewish, holocaust-type movement that was bound to happen, a comment that made me question his loyalty to the
United States.
In that same country several years later when it looked like President George Bush (the elder) planned to attack Saddam Hussein, I objected to that action, as I saw it as a convenient pretext for removing one of Israel’s most implacable enemies. Taking advantage of a process known as the “dissent channel,” in which American government employees abroad may express opposition to U. S. foreign policy, I sent several cables – that was before electronic mail and cell phones – to the Secretary of State.
In those cables, I stated my opposition to the war and charged that the principal reason for the U. S. attacking Hussein was not to assist Kuwait but to fight a proxy war for Israel to maintain Israeli hegemony in the Middle East. However, the media had already pumped up the American public to support the so-called Gulf War. I was among only a handful of thoughtful Americans who opposed that war, and my opposition became duly noted by pro-
Israel factions within U. S. intelligence as well as the Israelis.
My cables criticizing both the U. S. and Israel for their Middle East policies may have triggered much more advanced electronic surveillance. I believe that as a result of those cables criticizing George H. W. Bush’s policies, the U. S. intelligence community joined Israel in placing me on the “watch list,” and most probably the “hit list.” My hind-sight observations tell me that probably in the early 1990’s pro-Israel elements within the FBI took over my surveillance from the original perpetrators when I retired and returned to the United States, probably on the pretended grounds that I was a subversive and a suspected terrorist. Their mind control assault on me probably began in earnest in the early-1990s and increased in intensity over the last ten to fifteen years.
When I retired, I continued speaking out against Israel in conversations with friends and in letters to editors of newspapers although I knew that elements in U. S. intelligence loyal to
Israel had placed me on their hit list and that they were following my activities. During Israel’s most recent invasion of Lebanon, I wrote to CNN to complain about Wolf Blitzer’s obvious bias in his interpretation of the events concerning that invasion. Blitzer, a Jew, had once worked for the Jerusalem Post. That he had previously worked for an Israeli newspaper should not be surprising, for, as a well written article in the March 16, 2011 issue of the online
Pakalert Press states, 96% of the world’s media is Zionist owned and/or operated.
After retiring, I continued to travel abroad occasionally, usually to Central America, where I owned property. Once when I returned to the Houston international airport from one of the trips, a rookie immigration official processed my entry. A veteran officer stood nearby. When the rookie scanned my passport and viewed his monitor, he looked perplexed. He turned to an older officer and pointed to something on his monitor that he obviously did not understand.
The veteran officer took a quick look and said to the rookie, “ADOD” (Advise Department of

Defense).
My computer has been hacked and my phone tapped for years. A recent accidental discovery strongly suggests that the hackers and phone tappers are pro-Israel Federal agents or foreign agents working with the permission of U. S. intelligence. Here is what happened. One day I entered my email Sent file to copy a paragraph that I had written to a correspondent about the tiny device having been implanted in a molar while living in South America in 1978. I cut and pasted that paragraph and re-sent it. Because my computer is monitored and my emails sometimes deleted or changed, I went back to the Sent box to see if the message had actually gone out. When I opened the previously sent email, I was astonished to see three words encased in blue-lined rectangular boxes: ISRAEL, MIDDLE EAST, and SOUTH
AMERICA.
As a former government employee, let me explain why those three areas were highlighted.
Intelligence organizations in every country organize their offices into geographical sections, which include Israel, the Middle East, and South America. Copies of my email went to those three offices in some intelligence agency in some country. Every U. S. law intelligence agency, including the Department of State and other agencies, has personnel sections that deal with regional affairs. Whoever monitors my email spotted my references to Israel, the
Middle East, and South America and marked that email for copies to be sent to those regional affairs offices. I suspect that copies not only went to U. S. intelligence agencies but also to the
Mossad.
The hackers never imagined that I would go back into a previously sent letter to cut and paste. Finding the highlighted words was a total accident, but a very fortunate one for me, for it told me that somebody monitors my email correspondence and that he is not looking for kiddy porn, drug and money laundering rings, and other unlawful activities but for material dealing with political views. After passage of the so-called Patriot Act, anybody working with the FBI can justify monitoring a citizen’s email and tapping his phones without getting judicial approval.
Later, to make their flub-up appear to be a computer glitch or a common internet action, the same monitors encircled other words on several other letters; however, when they saw that I had not fallen for that deception, they quit doing it. In view of the fraternal cooperation between the FBI-CIA and the Mossad, the person who monitored my emails could be an agent of the latter. What I do not know is the location of the person who monitors my computer, as computers can be hacked from anywhere in the world, including Monroe,
Louisiana, where I live, New York City, or Tel Aviv. As a result of internet providers turning over its information to U. S. intelligence in 2010, it is commonplace now for words in emails to be highlighted.
Freedom of expression in the United States seemingly comes at a price. Although I have never belonged to the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Brotherhood, the Survivalists, the Militia, or any other extremist organization, I have openly and consistently condemned Israel. As an
American, I thought that I had the right to do so. Apparently I was wrong. An American can publicly criticize England, France, Mexico, or any other country in the world, including his own country, but he cannot criticize Israel.
That point was driven home by Israeli spokeswoman Tzipora Menache, who was reported in

a February 1, 2009 article as saying, “You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we [the Israelis] control their government, irrespective of who sits in the
White House . . . . We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. IN AMERICA YOU CAN CRITICIZE GOD, BUT YOU CAN’T
CRITICIZE ISRAEL.” But I do, and I shall continue to do so in my small voice as long as I am alive.
Unfortunately for Americans, the Israeli woman was correct. Today in the United States one hears and reads in the media discussions on abortion, the death penalty, the legalization of marijuana, U. S. politicians’ personal relationships, illegal immigration, religious beliefs and their leaders, sex of all descriptions, the Iraq War, autism and every type of mental disorder, and other sometimes divisive and intimate topics. I defy the reader to provide a reference to a meaningful debate on Israel’s actions and policies in the United States during the last fifty years. The media, the clergy, and especially politicians on every level carefully avoid any negative criticism of Israel.
Moreover, one can verbally express doubt about evolution, the divinity of Christ, the existence of God, the holiness of the Pope, or the sanctity of the Bible, but he cannot doubt the Zionist version of the WWII European “holocaust.” In Canada, Germany, and other countries, one can be imprisoned for even questioning the holocaust. Zionist organizations have successfully kept that topic from being scientifically studied by historians. Arsonists set fire to and destroyed an institute in California whose aim was to use extant documentation to write a true history of the holocaust. The Jewish Defense League (JDL), the Anti-Defamation League
(ADL), or B'nai B'rith was suspected as the arsonist; however, investigators made little effort to determine the identity of the criminals.
The Israelis even target American and Israeli Jews who oppose their Zionist aims. The target support organization to which I belong, Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance, was founded by a woman from Israel who did not always agree with Israeli foreign policy.
That woman believed that she had been targeted by Israel or its surrogates in the United
States. I am sure that American Jewish clergy such as Rabbi Arthur Waskow, who opposes
Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory, are targeted.
Having always considered myself a fervently patriotic citizen, I smolder at being made a surveillance target and now a target of electronic torture and mind control because of my personal and political views. If communication with radical and terrorist groups is the only object of my surveillance, that surveillance would have concluded years ago that I am not a domestic or an international terrorist. That suggests that I am perceived by either pro-Israel
U. S. intelligence or Israeli intelligence as a threat to Israel and thus the reason for my surveillance. The aim of Israel and its pro-Israel American accomplices is to stifle any opposition at all in the United States – and worldwide -- to Israel, and American intelligence appears only too ready to lend assistance toward that objective.
That Israel sees any anti-Zionist views as dangerous and attempts to silence those views is obvious. That pro-Israel organizations in the U. S. such as the JDL, the ADL, and the
Americans for Israel PAC (AIPAC) perform unlawful acts to advance Israel’s agenda is a matter of record. That Israel and its U. S. backers have reason to want me and others silenced is readily evident. They are masters, however, in using misinformation, staging “false flag” operations, and developing schemes to get others to perform their dirty work while they

sit and watch several levels removed from the action. They discover the target’s vulnerabilities and then farm them out to pro-Israel PACs, Christian Fundamentalist Zionists, and plain hirelings, who, without ideals and agendas, simply work for the money.
Such is the control by Israel and its supporters over the U. S. Government that today we do not have a U. S. Middle East foreign policy. Instead, our Middle East policy is Israel’s Middle
East policy. Every serious candidate for U. S. president today must extol Israel’s position as the “Middle East’s only democracy,” and our foremost ally.
Those candidates even have to make a symbolic trip to Israel to seek the blessing of its prime minister for his/her candidacy before the U. S. election. We do not know what concessions now-President Obama promised when he made the traditional pre-election trip to Israel. He probably reassured the Israelis that his top advisors would have strong traditional ties to Israel and that the U. S. would not interfere with Israel's Palestinian policy. Indeed, Obama has done just that. No person with unfriendly views toward Israel can expect to get a job with any administration in the White House or a top job in the government despite his brilliance and impressive education and job qualifications.
This paper is not about Israel; nevertheless, I feel compelled to make several observations about Israel, as Americans will never see anything critical of Israel in the controlled mainline
U. S. media.
(1) Israel often “creates” its enemies to justify its agenda, knowing full well that the United
States will back it. Despite the media hype, the facts show that Israel has made no genuine effort to make peace with its neighbors. On the contrary, through its actions it has ensured continued Arab and Moslem hostility.
(2) Israel purposefully engenders the belief that it is surrounded by hostile forces, as it unites the Western world in its support and opens pocketbooks on its behalf. Indeed, the U. S. provides billions of dollars a year for no-strings budget support for Israel that far exceeds the entire budgets of most developing countries.
(3) Israel spies on and steals secrets from the United States. Jonathan Jay Pollard, an
American Jew and a civilian analyst with the Navy Intelligence Service (NIS), spied for the
Israelis in the 1980’s. He was eventually caught and sentenced in 1986 to life in prison. Today he is incarcerated in the same prison with Bernard Madoff, recently sentenced to 150 years for a multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme rip-off. Ron Olive, chief of counterintelligence for NIS at the time, stated in a later book that Pollard’s treachery constituted “one of the most devastating cases of espionage in U.S. history” Olive claimed that Pollard passed to Israel over a million classified documents. One of those stolen documents is of particular interest to targeted individuals: a ten-volume manual called Radio-Signal Notations, which

Download 0.99 Mb.

Share with your friends: