International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (ijaems) [Vol-2, Issue-10, Oct- 2016]



Download 111.7 Kb.
View original pdf
Page6/9
Date10.01.2023
Size111.7 Kb.
#60339
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9
A Comparative Study between Samsung and
Samsung
50%
d in Table Non depending upon er of interviewed to 6 hours. As all up of 18-25 and sage time is seen use it for varied more than 6 hours ction towards the ecessity of their requirements. The s that the most his point in turn ractive apps and erred feature the smartphone. This ness and feature
. This also shows the familiarity of the stu demonstrating the user smartphones in turn increas convenient sampling is used that the sample represents the
Chart No.5.2

Table.5.2:
Usage time
less than 2 hours
2 to 4 hours
4 to 6 hours
more than 6 hours
Total

5.3 Preferred Feature As shown in Chart No an features of the respondents requirement and interest.18.3
maximum importance to th quality of battery. 18.33% camera quality should be go will feel that apps are very im of the respondents are of the important and that decides a of the respondent operating system. Resolution given much prominence, wh
6.67% and music is preferred group.
Vol, Issue, Oct- 2016]
ISSN : 2454-1311
Page
|
1821
student with the smartphone friendly nature of their easing the ease of use. Here sed with much care to ensure the entire area of study.

.2 Usage time
2: Usage time

15%
20%
40%
25%
100%
and Table No, the preferred nts differ according to their
8.33% of the respondents give the battery backup and the of the respondents consider good. 15% of the youngsters important in a mobile. 13.33% he opinion that memory is very s about their satisfaction level. ents will examine about the tion, satellite navigation are not whereas video is preferred by red by 3.33% of the respondent




Download 111.7 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page