Licenced to: Jeremy Goddard. Single user licence only
Download 274.61 Kb. View original pdf
|
- Navigate this page:
- 8.2.4 Execution
- (i) Identification of design deliverables for verification
| 8.2.3 Documenting the scheme There is no fixed way of documenting anew construction verification scheme and a number of methods have been employed ranging from having all details and records in a single document to having a number of separate documents dealing with different requirements. In the later case, an overall document will be necessary in order to describe how the various pieces of documentation relate to each other. Whichever approach is taken, it should ensure that all the details required by Schedule 7 of OSCR are provided (see section 8.1). 8.2.4 Execution During the design and construction phase the following issues need to be considered in executing the verification scheme Identification of design deliverables for verification Timing of verification submissions for design. — Scope of procurement/fabrication verification activities Scope of verification activities during Hookup Installation and Commissioning (HUIC). — Verification during startup activities Closeout of Construction (Project) Verification Scope. (i) Identification of design deliverables for verification It is important that the design deliverables that are subject to review by the ICP are clearly defined and agreed as early as possible in the life of the project. This Licenced to Jeremy Goddard. Single user licence only. IMPORTANT: This file is subject to a licence agreement issued by the Energy Institute, London, UK. All rights reserved. It may only be used in accordance with the licence terms and conditions. It must not be forwarded to, or stored or accessed by, any unauthorised user. Enquiries e pubs@energyinst.org.uk t +44 (0)207 467 VERIFICATION THROUGHOUT THE ASSET LIFE 19 process is usually facilitated by a markup of the project Master Document Register (MDR). Sufficient records should be maintained by the ICP to ensure that the documentation subject to review for each SCE is clearly identified and that its status, together with any associated ICP comment, can be readily established at anytime during the process. The duty holder may elect to maintain these records himself. A clear system should be established by the project to alert the ICP to changes to design documentation already examined which could affect the determination of suitability. This will help to avoid any necessity for examination of successive revisions of documentation in the future. The system should be subject to ICP audit and included as part of the overall verification scheme. Download 274.61 Kb. Share with your friends:
|