-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Baym, N. K. (1997). Interpreting soap operas and creating community. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet. (pp.103-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Beniger, J. R. (1987). The personalization of mass media and the growth of pseudo-community. Communication Research, 14(3), 352-371.
Blanchard, A. & Horan, T. (2000). Virtual community and social capital. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Social dimensions of information technologies (pp. 6-22). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Bolan, M. (1997). The mobility experience and neighborhood attachment. Demography, 34, 225-237.
Bollier, D. (Ed.). (1995). The future of community and personal identity in the coming electronic culture. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital (R. Nice, Trans.). In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
Broadband Differences [Pew]: How online Americans' behavior changes with high-speed Internet connections at home. (2002). Pew Internet and American life project. Retrieved July 11, 2003, from www.pewinternet.org
Calhoun, C. J. (1980). Community: Towards a variable conceptualization for computer research. Social History, 5, 105-129.
Calhoun, C. J. (1986). Computer technology, large-scale societal integration and the local community. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22, 329-349.
Calhoun, C. J. (2002). Virtual community. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Dictionary of the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved June 26, 2003, from http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.htmlsubview=Main&entry=t104.001764
Calhoun, C. J. (2002). Community. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Dictionary of the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved June 26, 2003, from http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ ENTRY.htmlsubview=Main&entry=
t104.000313
Carey, J. W. (1993). Everything that rises must diverge. In Philip Guard (Ed.), Agendas: New directions in communications research (pp. 171-184). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Castells, M. (2000). The information age Vol. I: Rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Cerulo, K. (1997). Reframing sociological concepts for a brave new (virtual?) world. Sociological Inquiry, 67(1), 48-58.
Chayko, M. (2002). Connecting: How we form social bonds and communities in the Internet age. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Cobb, J. B., Jr. (1996). Defining normative community. In W. Vitek and W. Jackson (Eds.), Rooted in the Land (pp. 185-194). New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1954). Community conflict. New York: Free Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1986). Individual interests and collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Coleman, J. S. & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books
Crow, G., Allan, G., & Summers, M. (2002). Neither busybodies nor nobodies: Managing proximity and distance in neighborly relations. Sociology, 36(1), 127-145.
Cultural Access Group. (2001). Ethnicity in the electronic age: Looking at the Internet through multicultural lens. Los Angeles, CA: Access Worldwide Communications, Inc.
Curtis, P. (1996). MUDDING: Social phenomenon in text-based virtual realities. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 121-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Darke, J. & Darke, R. (1969). Physical and social factors in neighbourhood relations. London: Center for Environmental Studies.
De Gournay, C. (2002). Pretence of intimacy in France. In J.E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 193-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dimmick, J. W., Jaspreet, S., & Patterson, S. J. (1994). The Gratifications of the household telephone: Sociability, instrumentality, and reassurance. Communication Research, 21(5), 643-663.
Dirksen, V. & Smit, B. (2002). Exploring the common ground of virtual communities. In J. Kisielnicki (Ed.), Modern organizations in virtual community. Hershey, PA: IRM.
Doheny-Farina, S. (1998). The wired neighborhood. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Durkheim, Emile. (1984) [1893]. The division of labor in society. New York: The Free Press
Edwards, A. D. & Jones, D. G. (1976). Community and community development. The Hague: Mouton.
Effrat, M. P. (Ed.). (1974). The community: Approaches and applications. London: Free Press.
Elliott, A. (2003, July 17). Talking to me? No, the cabby’s on his cell. New York Times, A1, B85.
Etzioni, A. (2001). The monochrome society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Figallo, C. (1995). The WELL: A regionally based on-line community on the Internet. In B. Kahin, & J. Keller (Eds.), Public access to the Internet (pp. 49-61). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fischer, C. R. (1982). To dwell among friends. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Fortunati, L. (1993). Gli italiani al telefono. Milano: Angeli.
Fortunati, L. (2000, June 16). The mobile phone: New social categories and relationships. Paper presented at the seminar, Sosiale konsekvenser av mobiltelefoni, organized by Telenor, Oslo, Norway.
Fortunati, L. (2002). Italy: Stereotypes, true and false. In J.E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 42-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fuentes, A. (2000). Won’t you be my neighbor? American Demographics, 22(6), 60-62.
Gans, H. J. (1962). The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: HarperCollins.
Gergen, K. J. (2003, April 24). Self and community in the new floating worlds. Presentation at the Mobile communication and social and political effects conference, Budapest, Hungary.
Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Haase, A. Q., et al. (2002). Capitalizing on the Internet: Social contact, civic engagement, and a sense of community. In B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet and Everyday Life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Retrieved July 11, 2003, from http://web.mit.edu/knh/www/pub.html
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hampton, K. (2000, October). Grieving for a lost network: Collective action in a wired suburb. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning.
Henderson, S., R. Taylor and R. Thomson. (2002). In touch: Young people, communication and technology. Information, Communication and Society, 5(4), 494-512.
Hillery, G. A., Jr. (1982). A research odyssey: Developing and testing a community theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Hiltz, S. R. & Turoff, M. (1995). Network nation (revised ed). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Horn, S. (1998). Cyberville: Clicks, culture, and the creation of an online town. NY: Warner Books.
Hozic, A. (2001). Hello my name is: Articulating loneliness in a digital diaspora. Afterimage, 28(4), 21-22.
Jacobs, J. (1961). Death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Jeffres, L. W., Atkin, D., & Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). A model linking community activity and communication with political attitudes and involvement in neighborhoods. Political Communication, 35, 587-421.
Johnsen, T. E. (2003). Social context of mobile phone use of Norwegian teens. In J.E. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 144-67). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Jones, S. G. (1995). Understanding community in the information age. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer mediated communication and community (pp. 12-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, S. G. (1999). Understanding community in the information age. In P. Mayer (Ed.), Computer media and communication (pp. 219-240). NY: Oxford University Press.
Katz, J. E. (1998). Struggle in Cyberspace: Fact and friction on the World Wide Web. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 556, 194-200.
Katz, J. E. (1999). Connections: Social and cultural studies of the telephone in American life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Katz, J. E. (2001). The telephone. In The international encyclopedia of social science (2nd ed), vol. 23, (pp. 15558-15565). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Katz, J. E. (2003a). Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Katz, J. E. (2003, April 24). A nation of ghosts? Presentation at the Mobile communication and social and political effects conference, Budapest, Hungary.
Katz, J. E. & Aakhus, M. (2002). Apparatgeist. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.) Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 287-317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, J. E. & Rice, R.E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement and interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kendall, J. E. (2003, March). E-distance and the theatre of South Jersey. Decision Line, 13-15.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication. The American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
Kim, S., D. (2002). Korea: Personal meanings. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 63-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kodama, M. (2001). New regional community creation: Medical and educational applications through video-based information networks. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18(3), 225-240.
Kolko, B. & Reid, E. (1998). Dissolution and fragmentation: Problems in online communities. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0 (pp. 217-228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kollock, P. & Smith, M. A. (1999). Communities in cyberspace. In P. Kollock and M. A. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 3-25). London: Routledge.
König, R. (1968). The community. (E. Fitzgerald, Trans.). New York: Schocken Books.
Kraut, R. E., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, M. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
Kraut, R. E., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.
LaRose, R., Eastin, M., & Gregg, J. (2001). Reformulating the Internet paradox: Social cognitive explanations of Internet use and depression. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(2). Retrieved July 7, 2001, from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/paradox.html.
Laurel, B. (2001). Utopian entrepreneur. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Licoppe, C. (2003). Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone: From the domestic to the mobile phone. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 56-89). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Licoppe, C. & Heurtin, J. (2002). France: Preserving the image. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 94-109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ling, R. & Helmerson, P. (2000, June 16). It must be necessary, it has to cover a need: The adoption of mobile telephony among pre-adolescents and adolescents. Paper presented at the seminar, Sosiale Konsekvenser av mobiletelefoni, organized by Telenor, Oslo, Norway.
Ling, R. & Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phone in Norway. In J.E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 129-59). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ling, R. (2003). Mobile telephony, mobility, and the coordination of everyday life. In J. E. Katz, (Ed.) Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication (pp. 127-39). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Lipset, S. M., J. Coleman and M. A. Trow. (1977). Union democracy. The internal politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Maffesoli, M. (1996a). Ordinary knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Maffesoli, M. (1996b). The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass societies. London: Sage.
Magdol, L. & Besser, D. R. (2003). Social capital, social currency, and portable assets: The impact of residential mobility on exchanges of social support. Personal Relationships, 10(2), 149-169.
Magdol, L. (2000). The people you know: The impact of residential mobility on mothers' social network ties. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(2), 183-204.
Mele, C. (1999). Cyberspace and disadvantaged communities: The Internet as a tool for collective action. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 290-310). London: Routledge.
Merton, R. K. (1946). Mass persuasion: Social psychology of the war bond drive. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (1989). The generalized elsewhere. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6(3), 326-334.
Meyrowitz, J. (1997). Shifting worlds of strangers: Medium theory and changes in `them' vs. `us.'” Sociological Inquiry, 67(1), 59-71.
Morgan, A. E. (1942). The small community: Foundation of democratic life. Beallsville, OH: Raven Rocks Press.
Morse, M. (1998). Virtualities: Television, Media Art, and Cyberculture I. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Mukerji, C. & Simon, B. (1998). Out of the limelight: Discredited communities and informal communication on the Internet. Sociological Inquiry, 68(2), 258-273.
Nancy, J-L. (1991). The inoperative community. (P. Connor, Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 420-435.
Nisbet, R. A. (1966). The sociological tradition. New York: Basic Books.
Noll, A. M. (1997). Highway of dreams: A critical view along the information superhighway. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Oksman, V. and Rautiainen, P. (2002). Perhaps it is a body part: How the mobile phone became an organic part of the everyday lives of Finnish children and adolescents. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Machines that Become Us (pp. 293-310). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Palen, L., Salzman, M., & Youngs, E. (2001). Discovery and integration of mobile communications in everyday life. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5, 109-122.
Park, R. E. (1952). Human communities: The city and human ecology. New York: Free Press.
Peters, S. & Hulme, M. (2002, April 10-12). Rethinking networks: identities and connectivity in the global age. Presentation at Absent Presence: Localities, Globalities and Method Workshop, Helsinki, Finland.
Poole, I. de Sola. (1981). Technologies of freedom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Poplin, D. E. (1979). Communities: A survey of theories and methods of research. New York: Macmillan.
Poster, M. (1995). Postmodern virtualities. In The second media age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. Retrieved June 28, 2003, from http://www.humanities.uci.edu/mposter/writings/Internet.html
Poster, M. (2001). What’s the matter with the Internet? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Preece, J. & Ghozati, K. (2001). Experiencing empathy online. In R. E. Rice & J. E. Katz (Eds.), The Internet and health communication (pp. 237-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of the American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rakow, L. F. Gender on the line: Women, the telephone, and community life. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Rathge, R. & Beegle, J. A. (1980). The role of networks in the nonmetropolitan population revival. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier (2nd ed). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs. Cambridge: Perseus.
Rice, R. E. (1982). Communication networking in computer-conferencing systems: A longitudinal study of group roles and system structure. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook, vol. 6 (pp. 925-944). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Rice, R. E. (1987). New patterns of social structure in an information society. In J. Schement & L. Lievrouw (Eds.), Competing visions, complex realities: Social aspects of the information society (pp. 107-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Rice, R. E. (1990). Computer-mediated communication system network data: Theoretical concerns and empirical examples. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 32(6), 627-647.
Rice, R. E. & Katz, J. E. (Eds.). (2001). The Internet and health communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rice, R .E. & Katz, J. E. (2003). Mobile discourtesy: National survey results on episodes of convergent public and private spheres. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), Mobile democracy: Essays on society, self and politics (in press). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Rice, R. E. (1990). Computer-mediated communication system network data: Theoretical concerns and empirical examples. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 32(6), 627-647.
Sanders, I. T. (1966). The community: An introduction to a social system (2nd ed). New York: Roland Press.
Schmalenbach, H. (1977). Herman Schmalenbach on society and experience: Selected papers. (G.Lüschen & G. P. Stone, Eds. & Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sclove, R. E. (1995). Democracy and technology. New York: Guildford Press.
Sennett, R. (1971). The uses of disorder: Personal identity and city life. New York: Vintage Books.
Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. New York: Knopf.
Sennett, R. (1995). Community becomes uncivilized. In P. Kasinitz (Ed.), Metropolis: Center and symbol of our times (pp. 226-249). New York: New York University Press.
Shapiro, A. & Leone, R. (1999). The control revolution: How the Internet is putting individuals in charge and changing the world we know. New York: Public Affairs/Century Foundation.
Skog, Berit. (2002). Mobiles and the Norwegian teen. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 255-273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slack, R. S. & Williams, R. A. (2000). The dialectics of place and space: On community in the ‘information age.’ New Media and Society, 2(3), 313-334.
Slater, Philip E. (1970). The pursuit of loneliness: American culture at the breaking point. Boston, MA: Beacon.
Slevin, J. (2000). Internet and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Smith, A. D. (1999). Problems of conflict management in virtual communities. In P. Kollock & M. A. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp.134-163). London: Routledge.
Smith, M. J. (1999). Strands in the Web: Community-building strategies in online fanzines. Journal of Popular Culture, 33(2), 87-99.
Soto, M. (2003). Too much technology diminishes work relationships, author says. Seattle Times, August 8. Retrieved October 9, 2003 from: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2001436284_neds08.html
Steinmueller, W.E. (2002). Virtual communities and the new economy. In R. Mansell (Ed.), Inside the communication revolution (pp. 21-54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York: Doubleday.
Stone, A. R. (1991). Will the real body please stand up? In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First Steps (pp. 504-528). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stone, A. R. (1998). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sternberg, J. (2001). Misbehavior in cyber places: The regulation of online conduct in virtual communities on the Internet (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(07), 2277 (UMI No. AAT 3022160). Straus, S. (1997). Technology, group processes, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 227-266.
Sudweeks, F., McLaughlin, M., & Rafaeli, S. (Eds.). (1998). Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Suttles, G. D. (1972). The social construction of community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tepper, M. (1997). Usenet community and the cultural politics of information. In D. Purter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp. 39-54), New York: Routledge.
Terkenli, T.S. (1995). Home as a region. Geographical Review, 85(3), 324-334.
Tönnies, F. (1957). Civilization and society: Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. (C. P. Loomis, Trans.). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State Press.
Tönnies, F. (1963). Community and society. New York: Harper and Row.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: Searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 26, 50-57.
Umble, D. Z. (1992). The Amish and the Telephone: Resistance and Reconstruction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Uncapher, W. (1999). Electronic homesteading on the rural frontier: Big Sky Telegraph and its community. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 264-289). London: Routledge.
Uslaner, E. (2000, April). Trust, civic engagement, and the Internet. Paper presented at the Joint Sessions of the European Consortium for Political Research, Switzerland, University of Grenoble. Retrieved Summer 2001 from http://www.pewInternet.org/papers/paper.asp?paper=5
Van Dijk, J. (1999). The network society: Social aspects of new media. (Spoorenberg, Trans.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Veblen, T. (1934). Theory of the leisure class. New York: Modern Library.
Virnoche, M., & Marx, G. (1997). “Only connect” - E. M. Forster in an age of electronic communication: Computer-mediated association and community networks. Sociological Inquiry, 67(1), 85-100.
Walls, J. (1993). Global networking for local development. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Global networks: Computers and international communication (pp. 153-166). Cambridge, MIT Press.
Walmsley, D. J. (2000). Community, place, and cyberspace. Australian Geographer, 31(1), 5-19.
Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
Wellman, B. (1971). Who needs neighborhoods? In A. Powell (Ed.), The City: Attacking Modern Myths (pp. 94-100). Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
Wellman, B. (1988a). The community question re-evaluated. In M. P. Smith (Ed.), Power, Community, and the City (pp. 81-107). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. Retrieved June 29, 2003, from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html
Wellman, B. (1988b). Networks as personal communities. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social Structures: A Network Analysis (pp. 130-184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved June 29, 2003, from http://www.chass.utoronto.
ca/~wellman/publications/index.html
Wellman, B. (1993). An egocentric network tale: Comment on Bien et al. Social Networks, 15, 423-36. Retrieved June 29, 2003, from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/
publications/index.html
Wellman, B. (2001). The persistence and transformation of community: From neighbourhood groups to social networks. Report to the Law Commission of Canada. 101 pp. Retrieved June 29, 2003, from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html
Wellman, B., Boase, J., & Chen, W. (2002). Networked nature of communities online and offline. IT & Society, 1(1), 151-165. Retrieved June 29, 2003, from http://www.chass.
utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html
Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual community as community. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the Global Village (pp. 331-367). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Retrieved June 29, 2003, from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html
Wellman, B & Hampton, K. (2001a). Long-distance community in network society: Contact and support beyond Netville. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 477-96. Retrieved June 29, 2003, from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html
Wellman, B. & Hampton, K. (2001b). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
Wellman, B. & Quan-Haase, A. (Forthcoming). How does the Internet affect social capital? In M. Huysman & V. Wulf (Eds.), IT and Social Capital. Retrieved June 29, 2003, from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, D. R. (2003). Ties, weak and strong. In K. Cristensen & D. Levinson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved July 28, 2003, from http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/6WWWVIT.html
Wilbur, S. P. (2000). Archaeology of cyberspace. In D. Bell & B. M. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 45-55). London: Routledge.
Wright, J. D. (2000). Small towns, mass society, and the 21st Century. Society, 38(1:249), 3-10.
Wynn, E. & Katz, J. E. (1997). Hyperbole over cyberspace: Self-presentation in Internet home pages and discourse. The Information Society, 13(4), 297-329.
Wynn, E. & Katz, J. E. (2000). Teens on the telephone. Info, 2(4), 401-419.
Young, K. (1996, August 15). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Paper presented at the 104th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada. [Later published in Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 1(3), 237-244].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1.
Characteristics of Physical Communities, with Representative Authors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borders/wholeness/exclusion of others (Kolko, 1998; Meyrowitz, 1997; Sanders, 1966)/(König, 1968)/(Etzioni, 2001; Jacobs, 1961)
Background and memory (Bellah et al., 1985; Dirksen & Smit, 2002; Morgan, 1942)
Crisscrossing, interpersonal bonds, (Morgan, 1942; Poplin, 1979; Tönnies, 1957; Walls, 1993)
Equality (Nisbet, 1966)
Face-to-face communication (Beniger, 1987)
High social influence on human action (Beniger, 1987; Calhoun, 1980)
Identity in common (Cobb, 1996; Etzioni, 2001; Sennett, 1971; Suttles 1972; Wenger, 1998)
Information driven (Meyrowitz, 1985; 1989)
Intimacy ties/sentiment (Etzioni, 2001; Kolko, 1998; Maffesoli, 1996a; Merton, 1946; Morgan, 1942; Sclove, 1995; Tönnies, 1957)
Involuntary participation of members (Ahlbrandt, 1984)
Needs in common (Edwards & Jones, 1976; Morgan, 1942)
Organization/civic engagement (Calhoun, 1980; Cobb, 1996; Edwards & Jones, 1976; Etzioni, 2001; König, 1968; Putnam, 2000)
Requires embodied selves (Kolko, 1998; Nisbet, 1966)
Sameness (Jacobs, 1961; Sennett, 1971)
Small in size (Beniger, 1987, Coleman, 1954; Morgan, 1942)
Stability/sustained interaction among members (Coleman, 1986; Sclove, 1995)
Trust/sincerity (Giddens, 1994; Merton, 1946)
Values (Morgan, 1942; Schmalenbach, 1977; Tönnies, 1957)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2.
Characteristics of Community, When Also or Only Online.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Additional characteristics of communities when they exist online
Absence of institutional authority (Steinmueller, 2002; Sternberg, 2001)
Based in information exchange (Carey, 1993; Steinmueller, 2002; Walls, 1993)
Characterized by links more so than relationships (Steinmueller, 2002
Common interest (Wellman, 1971, 1999)
Emerge from technology (Rheingold, 2000)
Reconfiguring the nature of physical communities (Meyrowitz, 1985, 1989, 1997)
Self-organized (Dirksen & Smit, 2002; Katz & Rice, 2002)
Voluntary participation by members (Ahlbrandt, 1984; Steinmueller, 2002)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Novel characteristics of virtual community a
Beliefs and practices in common (Coleman, 1954; Etzioni, 2001; Morgan, 1942) - (Stone, 1991)
Group-specific meanings/norms (Putnam, 1993) - (Baym, 1995)
Informal conversation (Coleman, 1986) - (Rheingold, 2000)
Interpersonal bonds (Etzioni, 2001) - (Baym, 1995)
Mediated “generalized other” (Meyrowitz, 1985, 1994)
Purpose in common (Putnam, 1993; Slevin, 2000; Tönnies, 1957; Wenger, 1998) - (Baym, 1995; Rheingold, 2000)
Reciprocity (Giddens, 1994; Putnam, 1993) - (Wellman & Gulia, 1999)
Sense of belonging/community feeling (Anderson, 1983; Morgan, 1942; Tönnies, 1957) - (Dirksen & Smit, 2002; Wellman, 2001)
Spontaneous formation (Morgan, 1942; Suttles, 1972) - (Rheingold, 2000; Katz & Rice, 2002)
Supported by meaningful communication (Poster, 2001; Sanders, 1966) – (Rice, 1987; Turkle, 1995; Walls, 1993; Wenger, 1998)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a The first analyst(s) after each characteristic emphasized that characteristic in physical community; analyst(s) after a dash emphasized the characteristic in the virtual context.
Figure One.
Two dimensions and four conceptualizations, with associated researchers, of community
y-axis: subjective
Social Network
Suttles Meyrowitz
K
Synthesis and Social Capital
olko
Carey Castells Sanders
|
- Person Oriented Jones Ahlbrandt
- Private Fortunati
- Impersonal Links Turkle
- Common Interest
- Voluntary Steinmueller
- No Authority
- Self-Organized Kiesler
- Organic
- Informal Conversation
- Group Meanings Etzioni Stone
- Interpersonal Relations Wellman
- Meaningful Communication Poster
|
Putnam
Walls
Coleman
Sennett
Cobb Calhoun
König Giddens
Sclove
Putnam Hillery
Bellah
Arensberg
Jacobs
Park
Schmalenbach
Tönnies
Morgan
|
- Spontaneous
- Common Beliefs/Practices Wenger
- Common Purpose Slevin Baym
- Reciprocity
- Sense of Belonging
- Moral Poplin Nisbet
- Trust
- Intimacy/Sentiment Maffesoli Katz & Rice
- Civic Involvement
- Interpersonal Bonds Rheingold
- Commonness Dirksen
- Patterned Behavior
- Exclusion
- Small
- Involuntary
- Mechanical
- Community Oriented Nancy
|
Traditional Community
Share with your friends: |