Personal Research Database



Download 6.47 Mb.
Page125/275
Date02.05.2018
Size6.47 Mb.
#47265
1   ...   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   ...   275
74 (3), 361-377.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics74, 361.pdf

Abstract: This article deals with the role of internationally co-authored papers (co-publications). Specifically, we compare, within a data-set of German research units, citation and co-publication indicators as a proxy for the unobserved quality dimension of scientific research. In that course we will also deal with the question whether both citations and co-publications are considerably related. Our results suggest that, although there is a strong partial correlation between citations and co-publications within a multivariate setting, we cannot use reasonably normalised co-publication indicators as an alternative proxy for quality. Thus, concerning quality assessment, there remains a primer on citation analysis.

Keywords: Alternative, Analysis, Assessment, Authorship, Bibliometric Indicators, Citation, Citation Analysis, Citations, Collaboration, Correlation, Course, Impact, Indicator, Indicators, International, MAR, Multivariate, Papers, Quality, Quality of, Research, Role, Scientific Research, System, Teams

Amat, C.B. (2008), Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting. Scientometrics, 74 (3), 379-389.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics74, 379.pdf

Abstract: Introduction: Publication delay, chronological distance between completion of a scientific work and distribution of its achievements as a peer reviewed paper, is a negative phenomenon in scientific information dissemination. It can be further subdivided in successive stages corresponding to the peer review process and the technical preparation of accepted manuscripts. Formal online posting in electronic versions of journals has been considered as a shortening of the process. Objectives: To determine publication delay in a group of leading Food Research journals, as well as factors affecting this lag and also to compute the effect of formal online posting on the distribution of papers in electronic form. Secondary objective is also to study the possible effect of informal posting of papers through some repositories on the publication delay in the field. Methods: 14 Food Research journals were selected and 4836 papers published in 2004 were examined. Dates of first submission, submission of revised manuscripts, acceptation, online posting and final publication were recorded for each paper. Analysis: Data collected were analyzed using SPSS and SigmaPlot. Parametric correlation between some variables was determined and ANOVA was performed with BMDP package for significance analysis of differences among journals. Results: average publication delay of papers submitted to the set of selected journals is 348 :h 104 days, with European Food Research and Technology and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry showing the shortest delays. Total delay strongly depends on the peer review process. On average, 85.75% of manuscripts are corrected prior to their acceptance by journals. Online posting of papers prior to their print publication reduces total delay in about 29%. On average, a paper is posted online 260 days after its submission to the set of journals. Conclusions: Publication delay of papers is strongly dependent on the peer review process, which affects most of the manuscripts in the Food Research field. Advanced online publication through formal posting at the editor’s sites only slightly reduces the time between reception and final publication of papers.

Keywords: Acceptance, Analysis, Analytical-Chemistry, Authors, Dissemination, First, Information, Journals, Lapse, Papers, Peer Review, Peer-Review, Peer-Reviewed, Preparation, Publication, Publication Delay, Review, Review Process, Science, Scientific Information, Scientific Literature, Speed, Work

? Kivinen, O. and Hedman, J. (2008), World-wide university rankings: A Scandinavian approach. Scientometrics, 74 (3), 391-408.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics74, 391.pdf

Abstract: Although universities’ world rankings are popular, their design and methods still request considerable elaborations. The paper demonstrates some shortcomings in the Academic World Ranking of Universities (ARWU, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) ranking methods. One deficiency is that universities’ scale differences are neglected due to omitting the whole input side. By resampling and reanalyzing the ARWU data, the paper proposes an input-output analysis for measuring universities’ scientific productivity with special emphasis on those universities which meet the productivity threshold (i.e. share of output exceeds share of input) in a certain group of universities. The productivity analysis on Scandinavian universities evaluates Multidisciplinary and specialized universities on their own terms, consequently the ranking based on scientific productivity deviates significantly from the ARWU.

Keywords: Analysis, Fatal Attraction, Methods, Ranking, Rankings, Universities, University

? Gokceoglu, C., Okay, A.I. and Sezer, E. (2008), International earth science literature from Turkey - 1970-2005: Trends and possible causes. Scientometrics, 74 (3), 409-423.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics74, 409.pdf

Abstract: We investigated the publication trends in the international earth science literature coming out of Turkey in the period of 1970-2005 using the Science Citation Index Expanded database. A database of 23 10 earth science publications with at least one of the authors with an address in Turkey was compiled. The number of earth science publications from Turkey shows a very rapid increase starting in the 1990’s in parallel with the increase in the total scientific output of Turkey. In the last decade the annual growth rate has been 16%. There was also a concomitant increase in the number of citations. The causes of the sharp increase in the publication numbers are, in order of importance, changes in the rules of academic promotion and appointment, changes in academic attitudes towards publishing, increasing support for research, financial incentives for publishing, and expansion of higher education. However, the sharp increase in the publication numbers was not accompanied by a similar increase in the impact of the publications as measured by the citations. Although publications with first authors from outside Turkey make up only 20% of the Turkish earth science publications in the period 1970-2005, these account for 38% of the total citations, and constitute 48 out of 100 most cited papers.

Keywords: Academic Promotion, Attitudes, Changes, China, Citations, Coesite, Dabie-Shan, Database, Diamond, Education, Eurasia, Evolution, Financial Incentives, First, Growth, Growth Rate, Higher Education, International, Landslide Susceptibility, Literature, North Anatolian Fault, Papers, Patterns, Promotion, Publication, Publications, Publishing, Research, Science, Science Citation Index, Scientific Output, Trends, Turkey, Zone

? de Araújo, A.F.P. (2008), Increasing discrepancy between absolute and effective indexes of research output in a Brazilian academic department. Scientometrics, 74 (3), 425-437.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics74, 425.pdf

Abstract: We investigate possible effects from a strong encouragement for a large number of publications on the scientific production of a Brazilian cell biology department. An average increase in individual absolute production and a concomitant decrease in individual participation in each paper were detected by traditional bibliometric parameters, such as number of publications, citations, impact factors and h index, combined to their ‘effective’ versions, in which co-authorship is taken into consideration. The observed situation, which might well represent a national trend, should be considered as a strong wanting against current criteria of scientific evaluation heavily based on uncritical counting of publications.

Keywords: Bibliometric, Biology, Citations, Co-Authorship, Coauthorship, Collaboration, Criteria, Evaluation, h Index, h-Index, Impact, Impact Factors, Index, Latin-America, MAR, Participation, Publications, Recognition, Research, Science, Scientific Cooperation, Scientific Production, Trend

? Frandsen, T.F. (2008), On the ratio of citable versus non-citable items in economics journals. Scientometrics, 74 (3), 439-451.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics74, 439.pdf

Abstract: This paper presents a study of possible changes in patterns of document types in economics journals since the mid-1980s. Furthermore, the study includes an analysis of a possible relation between the profile of a journal concerning composition of document types and factors such as place of publication and JIF. The results provide little evidence that the journal editors have succeeded in manipulating the distribution of document types. Furthermore, there is little support for the hypothesis that journal editors decrease the number of publications included in the calculation of JIF or for that matter for the hypothesis that journal editors increase the number of publications not included in the calculation of JIF. The results of the analyses show that there is a clear distinction of journals based on place of publication and JLF.

Keywords: Analysis, Changes, Economics, Evidence, Impact Factors, Institute, Journal, Journal Editors, Journals, Publication, Publications

? Biglu, M.H. (2008), The influence of references per paper in the SCI to Impact Factors and the Matthew Effect. Scientometrics, 74 (3), 453-470.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics74, 453.pdf

Abstract: All references data was extracted from the annual volumes of the CD-Edition of Science Citation Index (SCI) and the Web of Science of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), the journal citation and self-citation data extracted from the Journal Citation Report (JCR), the self-citing rate and self-cited rate calculated based on the JCR method. To determine the trend of mean value of references per paper throughout 1970-2005, a total number of 10,000 records were randomly chosen for each year of under study, and the mean value of references per paper was calculated. To determine the growth of journals IF a total number of 5,499 journals were chosen in the JCR in 2002 and the same set of journals in the year 2004. To show the trend of journals IF, all journals indexed in the JCR throughout 1999-2005 were extracted and the mean values of their IFs was calculated annually. The study showed that the number of references per paper from 1970 to 2005 has steady increased. It reached from 8.40 in 1970 to 34.63 in 2005, an increase of more than 4 times. The majority of publications (76.17%) were in the form of Journals Article. After articles, Meeting Abstracts (9.46%), Notes (3.90%) and Editorial Material (3.78%) are the most frequented publication forms, respectively. 94.57% of all publications were in English. After English, German (1.50%), Russian (1.48%) and French (1.37%) were the most frequented languages, respectively. The study furthermore showed that there is a significant correlation between the IF and total citation of journals in the JCR, and there is an important hidden correlation between IF and the self-citation of journals. This phenomena causes the elevation of journals IF. The more often a journal is citing other journals, the more often it is also cited (by a factor of 1.5) by others. In consequence the growing percentage of journal self-citation is followed by journal self-citedness, which can be considered as the Matthew Effect. There is a linear correlation between journal self-citing and journal self-cited value, the mean value of self-cited rate always stays higher than the self-citing rate. The mean value of self-cited rate in 2000 was 1.4% and the mean value of self-citing rate is 6.61%, whereas the mean value of self-cited rate in 2005 was 12% and the mean value of self-citing rate was 7.81%.

Keywords: Citation, Growth, Institute for Scientific Information, ISI, Journal, Journal Self-Cited, Journal Self-Citing, Journals, Languages, Publication, Publications, Records, SCI, Science, Science Citation Index, Self-Citation, Web of Science

? Jang, Y.C. (2008), Locating active actors in the scientific collaboration communities based on interaction topology analyses. Scientometrics, 74 (3), 471-482.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics74, 471.pdf

Abstract: while implementing a large-scale research project, it is necessary to appoint some principle scientists, and let each principle scientist lead a research group. In a scientific collaboration community, different scientists perform different roles while they implement the project, and some scientists may be more active than others, these active scientists often undertake the role of leadership or key coordinator in the project. Obviously, we should assign the role of principle scientists onto those active actors in the communities. In this paper, we present the model and algorithms for locating active actors in the community based on the analyses of scientists’ interaction topology, the actors with high connection degrees in the interaction topology can be considered as active ones. Finally, we make some case studies for our model and algorithms.

Keywords: Case Studies, Collaboration, Community, Cooperation, Coordinator, Interaction, Lead, Leadership, Model, Networks, Research, Scientific Collaboration

? Seol, S.S. and Park, J.M. (2008), Knowledge sources of innovation studies in Korea: A citation analysis. Scientometrics, 75 (1), 3-20.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics75, 3.pdf

Abstract: This paper is an investigation of the knowledge sources of Korean innovation studies using citation analysis, based on a Korean database during 1993-2004. About two thirds of knowledge has come from foreign sources and 94% of them are from English materials. Research Policy is the most frequently cited journal followed by Harvard Business Review, R&D Management and American Economic Review. An analysis of who cites the most highly cited journal is also included. Neo-Schumpeterians in Korea cite more papers from Research Policy than general researchers, and there is no difference between groups in the year of citation.

Keywords: Analysis, Author Self-Citations, Citation, Citation Analysis, Counts, Database, Flows, Indicators, Innovation, Investigation, Journal, Knowledge, Korea, Macro, Management Journals, Papers, Patterns, Perspective, Science, System

? Lewison, G. and Kundra, R. (2008), The internal migration of Indian scientists, 1981-2003, from an analysis of surnames. Scientometrics, 75 (1), 21-35.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics75, 21.pdf

Abstract: Although many Indian surnames are common across the whole country, some are specifically associated with just one or a few of the 35 states and union territories that comprise India today. For example, Reddy comes from Andhra Pradesh and Das, Ghosh and Roy from West Bengal. We investigated the extent to which researchers with names associated with some of the larger states were writing scientific papers in those states, and in other ones, and to see how these concentrations (relative to the whole of India) had changed since the early 1980s. We found that West Bengalis, for example, were now significantly less concentrated in their home state than formerly, and that their concentrations elsewhere were strongly influenced by the state’s geographical distance from West Bengal and, to a lesser extent, by the correlation between the scientific profile of their host state and their own preferences (which favoured physics and engineering over biology and mathematics). Thus they were strongly represented in nearby Bihar, Assam and Orissa, and much less so in Tamil Nadu and Kerala.

Keywords: Analysis, Biology, Campobasso Province, Define Chinese Ethnicity, Identification, Inbreeding Coefficients, India, Information, Mortality, Pakistan, Papers, Populations, Science, Validity

? Chavalarias, D. and Cointet, J.P. (2008), Bottom-up scientific field detection for dynamical and hierarchical science mapping, methodology and case study. Scientometrics, 75 (1), 37-50.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics75, 37.pdf

Abstract: We propose new methods to detect paradigmatic fields through simple statistics over a scientific content database. We propose an asymmetric paradigmatic proximity metric between terms which provide insight into hierarchical structure of scientific activity and test our methods on a case study with a database made of several millions of resources. We also propose overlapping categorization to describe paradigmatic fields as sets of terms that may have several different usages. Terms can also be dynamically clustered providing a high-level description of the evolution of the paradigmatic fields.

Keywords: Case Study, Co-Word Analysis, Cocitation, Database, Evolution, Hierarchical Structure, Information, Methodology, Methods, Networks, Science, Science Mapping, Statistics, Structure

? Liu, C.Y. and Luo, S.Y. (2008), Analysis of developing a specific technological field using the theme code of Japanese patent information. Scientometrics, 75 (1), 51-65.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics75, 51.pdf

Abstract: The paper was to establish an easy and effective method to investigate and develop a specific technological field from Japanese patent information. The walking technique of the biped humanoid robot was used as an example to study the relative research capabilities and patent citation conditions for patent owners and patent map by the searching method of the theme code for FI (File Index) and F-term classification system of the Japanese Patent Office (JPO). A formulated technical matrix of patent map was established to indicate that the ZMP (Zero Moment Point) control means was the main technology to achieve stabilized walking control of the humanoid biped robot. This method can aid to establish a specific technological matrix from the specific selected term codes (single viewpoint or multiple viewpoints) of the F-term list in the theme code of the JPO system through Boolean logical operations. The resulting particular technical fields were developed to improve the technological capability or seek the merging technology opportunities.

Keywords: Citation, Classification, Indicators, Information, Output, Patent, Research, Technology

? Huang, Y., Ao, X.L. and Ho, Y.S. (2008), Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate pentachlorophenol research. Scientometrics, 75 (1), 67-80.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics75, 67.pdf

Abstract: The objective of the study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of all pentachlorophenolrelated publications in the Science Citation Index (SCI). Analyzed parameters included document type, language of publication, page count, publication output, authorship, keywords plus, publication pattern, citation and country of publication. The US produced 29% of the total single country publications where the seven major industrial countries accounted for the majority of the total production (66%). An indicator citation per publication was successfully applied in this study to evaluate the impact of umber of authors, countries, and journals. The mean value of citation per publication of collaborative papers was higher than that of single country publications. In addition analysis of keywords plus in different period was applied to indicate a research trend.

Keywords: Analysis, Authorship, Bibliometric, Bibliometric Analysis, Citation, Country, Degradation, Impact, Indicator, Journals, Papers, Pattern, Publication, Publications, Research, Research Trend, SCI, Science Citation Index, Trend, US, Value, Water, Wood Preservatives

Adams, J., Gurney, K. and Jackson, L. (2008), Calibrating the zoom - a test of Zitt’s hypothesis. Scientometrics, 75 (1), 81-95.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics75, 81.pdf

Abstract: Bibliometric indicators are widely used to compare performance between units operating in different fields of science. For cross-field comparisons, article citation rates have to be normalised to baseline values because citation practices vary between fields, in respect of timing and volume. Baseline citation values vary according to the level at which articles are aggregated (journal, sub-field, field). Consequently, the normalised citation performance of each research unit will depend on the level of aggregation, or ‘zoom’, that was used when the baselines were calculated. Here, we calculate the citation performance of UK research units for each of three levels of article-aggregation. We then compare this with the grade awarded to that unit by external peer review. We find that the correlation between average normalised citation impact and peerreviewed grade does indeed vary according to the selected level of zoom. The possibility that the level of ‘zoom’ will affect our assessment of relative impact is an important insight. The fact that more than one view and hence more than one interpretation of performance might exist would need to be taken into account in any evaluation methodology. This is likely to be a serious challenge unless a reference indicator is available and will generally require any evaluation to be carried out at multiple levels for a reflective review.

Keywords: Aggregation, Assessment, Challenge, Citation, Correlation, Cross-Field, Evaluation, Field, Field-Normalization, Impact, Indicator, Indicators, Journal, Methodology, Peer Judgment, Peer Review, Peer-Review, Performance, Practices, Rates, Research, Review, Science, Timing, UK, Volume

? Li, Z. and Ho, Y.S. (2008), Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate contingent valuation research. Scientometrics, 75 (1), 97-110.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics75, 97.pdf

Abstract: This is the first article using bibliometrics to study the field of contingent valuation research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contingent valuation research performance based on all the related articles in SCI and SSCI databases from 1991 to 2005. An indicator named citation per publication (CPP) was presented in this study to assess the impact of article output per year, different countries, institutes, and authors from the worldwide. Publication per institute (PPI) in a country was used to be an indicator to compare institute’s research performance by country. Citation analysis was made to select the most frequently cited articles since publication to 2005 of each year. A citation model was applied to describe the relationship between the cumulative number of citations and article life. The results indicate that with the increase article output per year, the CPP decreased slightly since 1997. The USA produced 55% of all pertinent articles. Institutes from the UK had a higher PPI. The most prolific institutes and authors, and the most frequently cited articles per year were all listed. In addition, a citation model was successfully applied to evaluate performance of each year, and the most frequently cited articles of each year were also compared by the model.

Keywords: Analysis, Bibliometrics, Citation, Citations, First, Impact, Indicator, Life, Model, Publication, Research, Research Performance, SCI, SSCI, UK, USA

? Huang, Y. and Zhao, X. (2008), Trends of DDT research during the period of 1991 to 2005. Scientometrics, 75 (1), 111-122.

Full Text: 2008\Scientometrics75, 111.pdf

Abstract: A keyword analysis was applied in this work to evaluate research trends of DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane) papers published between 1991 and 2005 in any journal of all the subject categories of the Science Citation Index compiled by ISI (Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, USA). DDT was used as a keyword to search parts of titles, abstracts, or keywords. The published output analysis showed that DDT research steadily increased over the past 15 years and the annual publication output in 2005 was about twice that of 1991. The two peaks in 1997 and 2000 were closely related to two new research fields on DDT, namely the endocrine disruption and the persistent organic pollutants (POPs). A paper entitled ‘Persistent DDT metabolite p,p’-DDE is a potent androgen receptor antagonist’ published in 1995 in Nature by Kelce et al. firstly discovered DDT’s toxicity for humans. As a result, public concerns regarding DDT ballooned and now play a key role in DDT research. Keyword analysis indicated that the research interest changed remarkably from 1991 to 2005. ‘Endocrine disruption’ was one of the most frequently used author keywords in the period between 2002 and 2005 whilst it did not appear before 1997. The new conception of POPs showed the same trend. The whole paper published by India and Mexico ranked at 6(th) and 13(th). That showed that DDT research is often related with DDT’s risk and benifits to humans.

Keywords: Analysis, Humans, India, Institute For Scientific Information, ISI, Journal, Mexico, Papers, Publication, Research, Risk, Risks, Science Citation Index, Toxicity, Trends, USA, Work

? Gupta, B.M. and Dhawan, S.M. (2008), Condensed matter physics: An analysis of India’s research output, 1993-2001. Scientometrics,



Download 6.47 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   ...   275




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page