Proposal Cover Page Research Area Restoration Goal 1: Get the Water Right; Sub-goals (e) and (j) Program Area



Download 198.87 Kb.
Page2/7
Date19.10.2016
Size198.87 Kb.
#3934
1   2   3   4   5   6   7

2. Objectives


The objectives of the project are to:

  1. Develop a structured approach for setting seasonal, monthly and weekly water targets including a monitoring driven re-evaluation process;

  2. Develop specialized tools for generating climate and weather scenarios to aid the definition of these targets and to formulate an operational policy;

  3. Develop methods to improve estimates of stage response at gauged locations given stage, rain and structure release data;

  4. Identify ways in which the multiple performance measures can be “optimized” simultaneously while recognizing “trade-offs”, and providing input into a stakeholder mediated management process;

  5. Develop software tools to facilitate the development of “optimal” release policies for the network of hydrologic structures, recognizing the many sources of uncertainty and diverse targets.

  6. Perform a pilot test of the approach for a subset of the Everglades National Park

3. Approach


We start with a premise that the goal of ENP water delivery operations is to maximize the benefits of the system for the built and for the natural environment, with a particular emphasis on the ecological restoration goal. The delivery process entails releases from multiple structures and water conservation areas. The goals or targets are defined in terms of stage, flow, hydroperiod duration, or HSIs/PMs evaluated at specific control or target locations or over specific areas. They are associated with specific times of year evaluation periods. This approach is broader than one that would simply specify NSM targets as part of Rainfall Driven Operation. The conceptual structure for the development and implementation of an operational protocol is illustrated in Figure 3.1.



Season j Operating Plan

Development

1.Identify Performance Measures with spatial specificity

2.Use multi-year system simulations with climate ensembles and specific operating policy to evaluate performance and its variation

3.Identify “best” operating plan to meet long term performance targets with desired reliability



Implementation

1.If seasonal climate forecast is available, update the “best” operating plan for this year



2.Adaptive weekly operation: Proceed with weekly operation to meet storage, stage and flow targets (rule curves) with desired reliability, using evolving stage, release and rainfall (including weather forecast) information



Figure 3.1 Conceptual structure of general approach for Water Delivery Plan development. The operating rule includes the specification of hydrologic targets and control structure release policies. The operating rule could be a set of conditional statements or rules that are proposed by the stakeholders (e.g., ENP, SFWMD etc) or a mathematical allocation and release formula. Proposals for different rules could be compared, or a new rule set derived conditional on current system state, climate scenarios, and performance measures considered. Operating rules for a given season provide desired system performance in long run operation, or evaluate/modify such a rule for the upcoming season (week/month). For the long run, climate/weather scenarios would be ensembles of many years duration each. For the short run (season/week/month) analysis, these would be ensembles of sequences of the appropriate duration. In this case, if climate/weather forecast skill is high, these would be conditional or forecast ensembles, rather than drawn from the historical record. Updating the system state (e.g., using real time data on stage as operation progresses) would allow adaptive corrections to the operating rule. The system simulation would be performed using an appropriate model that translates rainfall and releases into associated stage and flow values at the target and control locations. Short-term analyses would be nested under longer-term analyses to ensure that both types of goals are considered.

We can think of the ENP system as composed of multiple reservoirs with multiple release structures that are required to meet certain demands with associated time schedules. In distinction to a traditional multi-reservoir operation study, we recognize that here the releases are not externally specified demands. Rather, the releases need to be derived from an examination of the problem constraints and targets (which could be several hundred). Since these targets typically vary by season (dry vs. wet), it is useful to consider seasonal operation and targets. In the wet season, there is sensitivity to intense storms and to flooding. A daily/weekly release policy in this period that is consistent with the seasonal goals is then needed. This conceptual structure is still consistent with the traditional approach to reservoir operation, where a rule curve may be used to guide daily releases in a way that allows the operator to meet an end of period target with a desired probability, while meeting the intermediate targets with some specified reliability. In the ENP context this translates into the following. Thus, one goal is to develop end of season storage targets for the reservoirs, and the associated rule curves for their operation. Concurrently, one needs to define the associated hydrologic targets in space and time, i.e., the ENP system rule curve for the season. These two goals are addressed through a Seasonal Simulation-Optimization Model.

Given a seasonal operation plan, weekly or shorter-term control structure release policies can be developed constrained by the storage and system rule curves. In this case, system simulation tools that can accurately predict the stage response at target locations given a combination of upstream releases and rainfall are needed. The operator needs guidance as to how to maintain a seasonal trajectory by making weekly/daily release decisions at the control structures that allow system storages and water levels to stay on the right side of the system rule curve, while adapting to real time feedback (i.e. stage response to recent releases) and forecasts (e.g., near term weather forecasts). Since the seasonal system rule curve was derived considering a specified reliability, the daily/weekly decisions need to seek this reliability over seasonal operation. A real time system control model would have to be developed for this purpose.

A number of hydrologic system simulation models (NSM, SFWMM, 2*2) are available through the SFWMD. These models typically have a resolution that is coarser than is needed for ecological analyses. Specifically, they can exhibit strong local biases in their sensitivity to releases from the control structures. Where these biases are systematic, they can be easily dealt with in the operational setting. However, where these biases are due to an inability to model subscale processes or hydrologic features that have a large local impact (as is apparently the case in the C-111 canal area), it is difficult to make them operational. In such a setting, it may be more effective to directly build a statistical model that connects existing and emerging data on releases, rainfall and stage or flow response. Given 20 years of training data, a neural network model appears to effectively approximate the dynamics of the NSM model. This suggests that given enough real data, a statistical approach may be as effective as one of the deterministic models currently in use. However, such an approach needs careful though to enable effective pooling of information across multiple recording locations at multiple times. It may indeed be useful to consider applying the statistical model to correct the bias (for instance) the SFWMM model results. In the general case, we seek to develop a statistical approach to simulating response to release and rainfall that can effectively use both the available and evolving data and the database of concurrent simulations of existing SFWMD models.

The simplicity of just trying to attain the predicted NSM stage given current conditions and projected rainfall is very attractive as a yardstick for developing the seasonal or real time optimization plans. However, as noted earlier, particularly for real time operation, this strategy may not guarantee improvement of real outcomes in terms of the various PMs and HSIs. On the other hand, trade-offs between and interpretation of the very large number of state variables/targets/ PMs are a concern. In reviewing the IOP and HSI reports from the ENP and the SFWMD we have noted that at a given location, and for a given time period, many of the proposed PMs, HSIs and water levels are highly correlated. Indeed, many of the PMs and HSI's are monotonic functions of the same target variable (e.g., hydroperiod duration). Further, many of these measures are highly correlated spatially. Thus, at least in as far as seasonal planning and assessment is concerned it may be possible to dramatically reduce the dimensionality of the assessment process. Development of a reduced set of objective performance measures that derive from the NSM targets and the HSIs is consequently a goal.

Probabilistic considerations typically follow from the random nature of streamflow and rainfall inputs into the reservoir, i.e., weather and climate uncertainties. Consider dry season operation. The reservoir operator would like to begin the dry season with the reservoir full, or with the reservoir storage above some target level with some probability. Given this probability, and the corresponding reliability for meeting the dry season demands, a Monte Carlo simulation of climate scenarios can be used to identify the end of season target level, as well as the week by week lower bound (i.e., rule curve) on storage in the preceding wet season. Since flood control is a competing factor in the wet season, the wet season operating rules also need to consider flood storage and release policies from the control structures. Weather scenarios for these rules could be derived through system simulation using a space-time daily weather generator. In the ENP context, the climate/weather scenarios allow for a system wide probabilistic evaluation of the impacts of a specific operating rule or release policy on the performance measures selected. The development of climate/weather forecasts and long-term simulations is next.


Download 198.87 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page