Quality management, environmental management and firm performance: a review of empirical studies and issues of integration



Download 276.85 Kb.
View original pdf
Page19/36
Date17.12.2020
Size276.85 Kb.
#55090
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   ...   36
Molina-Azor-n et al-2009-International Journal of Management Reviews
QM, EM and firm performance
212
© 2008 The Authors
Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and British Academy of Management process, practices, process-driven initiatives,
product-driven initiatives, technologies, means of reducing pollution, state of the environmental management system, ISO 14001 certification and environmental strategy.
As for EP variables, some studies mentioned EP both positively (emission reduction) and negatively (emissions generated).
The most commonly employed variables were input-oriented (resource consumption)
and output-oriented (emissions, toxic waste,
oil and chemical spills, and releases that are recovered, treated or recycled. Among the
FP measures used, ROA, ROS, ROE, stock market returns, stock price and profits stand out.
The influence of EM on firm performance may result from the positive impact on firm costs and differentiation levels. Preventing pollution may enable the firm both to save control costs, input and energy consumption,
and to reuse materials through recycling
(Greeno and Robinson 1992; Hart 1997;
Shrivastava a Taylor 1992). Thus, eco- efficiency involves producing and delivering goods, while simultaneously reducing the ecological impact and use of resources
(Knight 1995; Schmidheiny 1992; Starik and
Marcus 2000). The generation of pollution is thus regarded as a sign of inefficiency
(Kleiner 1991; Porter and Van der Linde
1995a). As for differentiation, reducing pollution may result in increased demand from environmentally sensitive consumers, because the ecological characteristics of products are likely to be appreciated by these ‘green’
customers (Elkington 1994). Moreover, a firm that shows good environmental initiatives will most probably acquire a high ecological reputation (Miles and Covin 2000; Shrivastava
1995b). Prevention can consequently help firms to reach a situation in which both the firm and the environment will benefit. This idea, which reflects an approach to the effects of the environment on firm competitiveness and profitability, is referred to as the Porter hypothesis (Porter and Van der Linde ab) in the literature.

Download 276.85 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   ...   36




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page