Other than Honorable Discharge Update 04 ► All Time High
A report released on 30 MAR by Swords to Plowshares and National Veterans Legal Services Program, and covered by both Task and Purpose (www.taskandpurpose.com) and the New York Times has found that 125,000 veterans who served since 2001 have been excluded from basic VA services because of so-called “bad paper,” or other-than-honorable, discharges. Bad paper discharges occur when a service member leaves the military under conditions that are less than honorable: other-than-honorable, bad conduct, and dishonorable discharges. Approximately 33,000 of the 125,000 other-than-honorable discharges since 9/11 deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Many other servicemembers with less-than-honorable discharges are victims of military sexual trauma.
Overall, that 125,000 number amounts to 6.5% of all post-9/11 service members. In contrast, the report found that only 2.8% of Vietnam-era veterans and 1.7% of World War II-era veterans were excluded from VA benefits due to bad paper discharges. Further, the report suggests this may be in violation of the 1944 GI Bill of Rights. In the GI Bill of Rights, officially called the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944, Congress deemed that other-than-honorable discharges can only bar a veteran from basic VA services if the individual’s misconduct led to a dishonorable discharge after a court-martial due to serious crimes. As TREA and many other veteran service organizations have noted, two of the VA's main purposes are ending veteran homelessness and stopping veteran suicide. Veterans with bad paper are at higher risk for both homelessness and suicide, but are purposefully excluded from services that are specifically designed to help them.
The report cites the VA’s regulations as the problem because they do not match the eligibility standards set up by Congress, as noted above. Apparently this policy of denying veterans' benefits to those with other-than-honorable discharges is not consistently applied. www.Taskandpurpose.com reported that in 2013, VA regional offices denied eligibility to 90% of veterans with bad paper discharges. While the Boston regional office denied 69% of veterans with bad paper discharges, the Indianapolis regional office denied 100%. In an interview with taskandpurpose.com, Deputy Secretary of the VA Sloan Gibson said:
“Under long-standing law and regulations, VA considers whether individuals with less than honorable discharges are eligible for VA benefits on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the reason for the discharge. I believe the report provides us as a department an opportunity to do a thorough review, take a fresh look this issue and make changes to help veterans.”
However, even when the department does investigate the character of discharges to determine if a veteran should be blocked from receiving benefits, the report found that it takes too long to complete, averaging three years or more. [Source: TREA Washington Update | April 4, 2016|++]
********************************
ACTUV Update 01 ► USN Speed Testing Robot Ship
In late March, the Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), a Pentagon agency responsible for developing and testing cutting-edge military technologies, released a video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ0oW3wcFuo) of its Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV) depicting the ship being launched and undergoing speed tests earlier this year. The 132-feet (40 meters) long and 140-ton heavy ACTUV is an unmanned autonomous trimaran prototype. “The ACTUV technology demonstration vessel was recently transferred to water at its construction site in Portland, Ore., and conducted speed tests in which it reached a top speed of 27 knots (31 mph/50 kph),” according to a DARPA press release. “The vessel is scheduled to be christened on April 7, 2016, with open-water testing planned to begin in summer 2016 off the California coast.”
Immediately following the christening of the ACTUV at the Vigor Shipyards in Oregon, the ship will commence extensive open-water trials for 18 months in California. The sea-trials will also involve testing the vessel’s long-range tracking capabilities. Throughout this next testing phase, DARPA will closely liaison with the Office of Naval Research and the Space and Naval Systems Warfare Command.As explained in February, the ACTUV is specifically designed to track quiet diesel-electric submarines (See: http://thediplomat.com/2016/02/worlds-largest-anti-submarine-robot-ship-ready-for-sea-trials-in-april). The ship’s primary mission will be tracking enemy subs in shallow waters. Furthermore, (…) the ACTUV is designed to operate autonomously for 60 to 90 days straight, surveil large stretches of ocean territory and — should an enemy sub be spotted — guide other U.S. naval assets to the vessel’s location to destroy it (the ACTUV itself is unarmed).
DARPA’s website notes that the ACTUV program objective “is to generate a vessel design that exceeds state-of-the art platform performance to provide propulsive overmatch against diesel electric submarines at a fraction of their size and cost.” The ACTUV will approximately cost $15,000 to $20,000 per day to operate. It is equipped with a Raytheon Modular Scalable Sonar System (MS3), the vessel’s primary search-and-detection sonar and purportedly the first fifth-generation medium-frequency hull-mounted sonar system built by the U.S. defense contractor. The MS3 is designed to autonomously conduct active and passive sonar searches. The ACTUV allegedly has already successfully tracked a submarine from one kilometer (0.62 miles) away. DARPA is also working on developing non-conventional sensor technologies to facilitate the correct identification of surface ships and other objects while at sea. Throughout its missions at sea, the ACTUV will be in constant contact with other ships or aircraft via satellite link. The robot ship prototype will serve as the basis for a whole fleet of cheap sub-hunting drone ships. [Source: The Diplomat | Franz-Stefan Gady | April 05, 2016 ++]
********************************
USS Paul Hamilton (DDG-60) ► Leaving Hawaii After 20 Years
Hawaii is losing the Navy destroyer Paul Hamilton after having it stationed in Pearl Harbor for more than 20 years. The ship left 5 APR and will swap home ports with the destroyer William P. Lawrence in San Diego, which is currently deployed and expected to arrive in Hawaii later this year, KHON-TV reported. Officials say the move supports efforts to bring the Navy's most advanced vessels and ships with greater capacity to the Indo-Asia-Pacific region. "The Navy is committed to basing approximately 60 percent of Navy ships and aircraft in the region by 2020," said Rear Adm. John Fuller, commander of Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific and Navy Region Hawaii. "As such, our readiness and the warriors' ethos in Hawaii will continue to be critical to maintaining security in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region." The Hamilton has been operating out of Pearl Harbor since it was commissioned in 1995. The vessel was named for a secretary of the Navy who served from 1809 to 1812 and played a major role in the creation of naval hospitals, according to KUSI-TV. The Lawrence is named after a vice admiral who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam and later commander of the Naval Academy. [Source: Washington Post | Craig Whitlock | March 17, 2016 ++]
********************************
Military Retirement Choice ► Updated Calculator Released
On 6 APR the nonprofit research and analysis organization CNA released an updated version of its web-based calculator at /www.cna.org/research/retirement-calculator which allows military servicemembers to determine which Department of Defense retirement plan will best serve their needs—a decision that could cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars in retirement benefits. Military personnel who entered service after July 31, 1986, who are eligible and intend to serve for 20 years, must choose between two retirement plans at their 15th year of service: High-3 plan, which bases retirement pay on the highest average basic pay for three years of their careers; and the REDUX plan, which provides a $30,000 upfront career status bonus with smaller retirement checks over time. The calculator, developed by CNA as part of its annual Retirement Choice study, allows future retirees to determine how much they would earn under the two competing retirement plans and decide which one is right for them.
To use the calculator, servicemembers type in the year they entered military service, the number of years they will have served when they retire, their tax rate, their paygrade at retirement, and their anticipated life expectancy. The calculator then generates the cumulative retirement pay with High 3 and the cumulative retirement pay with REDUX.
As reported in the conclusion of CNA’s latest retirement study report, Retirement Choice 2016: We find that, for almost all servicemembers, the REDUX retirement plan plus a $30,000 bonus paid at the 15th year of service is a bad choice that significantly reduces their retirement income. The higher the grade, the lower the years of service at retirement, and the longer the servicemember lives, the greater the reduction. Moreover, as each year passes, the difference between REDUX and High-3 retirement income increases (https://www.cna.org/cna_files/pdf/DRM-2016-U-012997-Final.pdf).
"The REDUX bonus effectively amounts to an early, partial cash-out of a servicemember's retirement plan, which translates into less future retirement income," said Anita Hattiangadi, research team leader for CNA’s Resource Analysis Division’s Marine Corps Manpower Team and one of the report’s authors. "The bonus may seem appealing but it’s important to understand the cost of that short-term gain in terms of lost long-term benefits." [Source: CAN News Release | April 06, 2016 ++]
********************************
Debt Collection Update 11 ► Military Members Lodge19,000+ Complaints
Members of the military may be the pride of their communities, but debt collectors lean on them to pay up, causing great stress on them and their families, a government consumer watchdog agency says. Military members lodged more than 19,000 financial complaints in 2015 with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, up from 17,000 the previous year, with almost half dealing with debt collection. Service members filed complaints about debt collections almost twice as often in 2015 as the general population did, the CFPB says in a report. “One issue ... is the concern that unpaid debts can threaten a military career.” The top financial complaints by military members to the CFPB were:
-
Mortgage 15%
-
Credit reporting 11%
-
Consumer loan 7%
-
Bank account or service 6%
-
Credit cards 6%
-
Payday loans 3%
-
Student loans2%
-
Prepaid1%
-
Other financial service1%
-
Money transfer0.8%
Debt collection complaints totaled more than 46% of all complaints by service members, the CFPB's report says: "While this could be due to a variety of factors, one issue … is the concern that unpaid debts can threaten a military career." ACA International, a trade group representing debt collectors, questions the report's accuracy. "It simply does not provide important and relevant details, including the actual data, methodology or supporting arguments," says Cindy Sebrell, ACA vice president of public affairs. The trade group criticizes the agency for issuing the report with complaint data that have not been verified. "The CFPB report itself acknowledges that the number of debt collection military complaints could be caused by a variety of factors," Sebrell says.
Even so, Ira Rheingold, executive director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates, says the bureau's findings come as no surprise. The industry is plagued by poor record retention. "The debt collector/debt buyer industries continue to be out of control," Rheingold says. Service members are relatively young, uneducated and unsophisticated about debt, and failure to pay debts can end their careers. "It's a toxic mix -- out-of-control debt collectors and particularly vulnerable service member consumers," Rheingold says. Holly Petraeus, the CFPB's assistant director for service member affairs, says predatory lenders continue to spring up around military bases. On a visit to the Fort Campbell Army base a year and a half ago, she counted 20 fast-cash lenders in a 4-mile stretch. "Service members can be targeted by bad financial actors," Petraeus says. "The realities of military life, such as deployment or frequent moves, can also make service members particularly vulnerable."
The CFPB outlined problems in many financial areas, but the most complaints came in 3 areas:
-
Debt collection: About 44% of the bureau's debt collection complaints from service members involved attempts to collect debt that the service members believed they didn't owe. "Veterans are often left stressed and worried about their credit report due to these potentially erroneous collections," the report says. In particular, the agency routinely hears from veterans who struggle with collectors on debts stemming from medical bills. "Many veterans leave the hospital believing their services were covered by their (Veterans Affairs) health insurance or Medicare/Medicaid, only to be hounded later by debt collectors," the report says. Only 1% of the complaints about debt collection were closed with monetary relief. A majority of the cases -- 66% -- were closed with an explanation that was tailored to the individual consumer's complaint. For example, this category would be used if the explanation substantively meets the consumer's desired resolution or explains why no further action will be taken.
-
Mortgages: Around 2,800 complaints covered home financing. Service members experienced servicing issues when they had to relocate from one base to another, the report says. Some complaints center on the Department of Veterans Affairs Home Loans program, which guarantees the loan with the lender. Veterans are charged a funding fee of 1.25% to 3%, but those disabled veterans with service-connected disabilities are not obligated to pay the fee or can have it refunded. "We often hear from our disabled veteran consumers that they are struggling to receive a refund," according to the report.
-
Credit reporting: Of approximately 2,200 credit reporting complaints from military members, 72% involved incorrect information on their credit reports. They usually learned of the problem after returning home from deployment and checking their credit report. Sometimes, the issue can be much more serious than just a mistaken listing on a credit report. "Many active-duty service members who submit credit reporting complaints highlight issues with fraud and identity theft," the report says. "They often struggle to rectify the situation with both their creditors and the credit reporting companies."
The agency also received veterans' complaints on consumer loans, bank accounts and services, credit cards, payday loans, student loans, prepaid cards, money transfers and other financial services complaints. The majority of complaints in the financial services category -- 50% -- involved accusations of fraud or scams, the report says. Another 26% dealt with excessive or unexpected fees, while 8% involved issues of disclosure or lost or stolen checks. With credit cards, the largest percentage of complaints -- 15% -- centered on billing disputes. The CFPB says service members complain that they are confused and frustrated by the billing process and by their limited ability to challenge inaccuracies on their monthly statement. Service members lodged 500 payday loan complaints, with 51% dealing with fraud or scams. Debt collection complaints about payday loans outnumbered debt collection complaints about auto loans, mortgages, and student loans combined, the CFPB says. "The cost and structure of a particular (payday) loan can make it difficult for service members to repay," the report says. [Source: Bankrate.com | Stephen Pounds | April 04, 2016 ++]
********************************
USS Zumwalt Update 06 ► Reflective Material Added to Increase Visibility
The future USS Zumwalt is so stealthy that it'll go to sea with reflective material that can be hoisted to make it more visible to other ships. The Navy destroyer is designed to look like a much smaller vessel on radar, and it lived up to its billing during recent builder trials. Lawrence Pye, a lobsterman, told The Associated Press that on his radar screen the 610-foot ship looked like a 40- to 50-foot fishing boat. He watched as the behemoth came within a half-mile while returning to shipbuilder Bath Iron Works. "It's pretty mammoth when it's that close to you," Pye said.
Despite its size, the warship is 50 times harder to detect than current destroyers thanks to its angular shape and other design features, and its stealth could improve even more once testing equipment is removed, said Capt. James Downey, program manager. During sea trials last month, the Navy tested Zumwalt's radar signature with and without reflective material hoisted on its halyard, he said. The goal was to get a better idea of exactly how stealthy the ship really is, Downey said from Washington, D.C. The reflectors, which look like metal cylinders, have been used on other warships and will be standard issue on the Zumwalt and two sister ships for times when stealth becomes a liability and they want to be visible on radar, like times of fog or heavy ship traffic, he said. The possibility of a collision is remote. The Zumwalt has sophisticated radar to detect vessels from miles away, allowing plenty of time for evasive action. But there is a concern that civilian mariners might not see it during bad weather or at night, and the reflective material could save them from being startled.
The destroyer is unlike anything ever built for the Navy. Besides a shape designed to deflect enemy radar, it features a wave-piercing "tumblehome" hull, composite deckhouse, electric propulsion and new guns. More tests will be conducted when the ship returns to sea later this month for final trials before being delivered to the Navy. The warship is due to be commissioned in October in Baltimore, and will undergo more testing before becoming fully operational in 2018. [Source: The Associated Press | David Sharp | April 10, 2016 ++]
********************************
USMC Osprey Crash Apr 8, 2000 ► Family Finds Truth – And Peace
The tradition is always the same. Every April 8, Connie Gruber visits her husband's grave. She and daughter Brooke kneel in front of his tombstone in Jacksonville, North Carolina. Together, they run their fingers over each letter in his name, saying out loud "Brooks Scott Gruber." Connie carries with her two things: flowers and a constant ache in her heart. This year, though, she brought with her something she hasn't had since he died in an aircraft crash in the Marana desert -- peace. It was bad enough to lose her soulmate, but in the accident's aftermath a Marine Corps news release blamed her 35 year old husband and Lt. Col. John Brow for the Osprey accident that killed 19. It's taken 16 years, but Connie -- ever the faithful Marine Corps wife who supported her pilot husband's many far-flung assignments -- has finally accomplished her own mission to clear his name. To read what transpired refer to the attachment to this Bulletin titled, “Major Brooks Gruber’s Vindication”. [Source: The Arizona Daily Star, Tucson | Kristen Cook | Apr 12, 2016 ++]
********************************
Archive Photo of the Day ► Suresnes, France September 1952
Suresnes, France, September, 1952: A woman cleans one of the grave markers in the military cemetery at Suresnes, just outside of Paris, where a ceremony was held to dedicate a memorial to fallen U.S. servicemembers from World War II. Retired five-star general and former Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense George C. Marshall spoke at the dedication, and pledged that U.S. forces in Europe "will not go home until our friends here feel that our presence is no longer essential to their freedom." [Source: Stars & Stripes | Joe Gromelski | April 06, 2016 ++]
********************************
Medal of Honor Citations ► Baker, Thomas A | WWII
The President of the United States in the name of The Congress
takes pleasure in presenting the
Medal of Honor posthumously
To
Thomas A. Baker
Rank and organization: Sergeant, U.S. Army, Company A, 105th Infantry, 27th Infantry Division
Place and date: Saipan, Mariana Islands, 19 June to 7 July 1944
Entered service: Troy, N.Y.
Born: Troy, N.Y. on 25 June 1916
Citation
For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty at Saipan, Mariana Islands, 19 June to 7 July 1944. When his entire company was held up by fire from automatic weapons and small-arms fire from strongly fortified enemy positions that commanded the view of the company, Sgt. (then Pvt.) Baker voluntarily took a bazooka and dashed alone to within 100 yards of the enemy. Through heavy rifle and machinegun fire that was directed at him by the enemy, he knocked out the strong point, enabling his company to assault the ridge. Some days later while his company advanced across the open field flanked with obstructions and places of concealment for the enemy, Sgt. Baker again voluntarily took up a position in the rear to protect the company against surprise attack and came upon 2 heavily fortified enemy pockets manned by 2 officers and 10 enlisted men which had been bypassed. Without regard for such superior numbers, he unhesitatingly attacked and killed all of them. Five hundred yards farther, he discovered 6 men of the enemy who had concealed themselves behind our lines and destroyed all of them. On 7 July 1944, the perimeter of which Sgt. Baker was a part was attacked from 3 sides by from 3,000 to 5,000 Japanese. During the early stages of this attack, Sgt. Baker was seriously wounded but he insisted on remaining in the line and fired at the enemy at ranges sometimes as close as 5 yards until his ammunition ran out. Without ammunition and with his own weapon battered to uselessness from hand-to-hand combat, he was carried about 50 yards to the rear by a comrade, who was then himself wounded. At this point Sgt. Baker refused to be moved any farther stating that he preferred to be left to die rather than risk the lives of any more of his friends. A short time later, at his request, he was placed in a sitting position against a small tree . Another comrade, withdrawing, offered assistance. Sgt. Baker refused, insisting that he be left alone and be given a soldier's pistol with its remaining 8 rounds of ammunition. When last seen alive, Sgt. Baker was propped against a tree, pistol in hand, calmly facing the foe. Later Sgt. Baker's body was found in the same position, gun empty, with 8 Japanese lying dead before him. His deeds were in keeping with the highest traditions of the U.S. Army.
Baker was posthumously promoted to sergeant and, on May 9, 1945, awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions throughout the battle for Saipan. He was buried at Gerald B. H. Solomon Saratoga National Cemetery in Schuylerville, New York. In November 2009, a memorial honoring Baker and fellow Troy natives Major General Ogden Ross and Lieutenant Colonel William J. O’Brien was installed in the Rensselaer County office building. O’Brian, like Baker a member of the 105th Infantry, was also posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions on Saipan: he died there within hours of Baker. Ross was a former commander of the 15th infantry and an assistant divisional commander during the Battle of Saipan. The memorial includes replicas of the Medals of Honor awarded to Baker and O’Brien
[Source: http://www.history.army.mil/moh/wwII-a-f.html Mar 2016 ++]
********************************
Share with your friends: |