Rehva guidebook


Simulation Results and Conclusions



Download 0.72 Mb.
Page17/19
Date02.02.2017
Size0.72 Mb.
#15541
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19

6.2Simulation Results and Conclusions


The cooling load [W/m²] increases from North to South mainly due to higher temperatures and to a lesser extent due to higher solar heat gains. Beyond that Figure 5 shows that the useful cooling energy demand [kWh/m²a] is also a function of the comfort criteria to be met. If the daily mean temperature in summer is considerably lower than the room temperature, the comfort temperature does not differ significantly. Hence, the useful cooling energy demand is similar for both comfort models in North-European climate but differs in South-European climates. In Hamburg, the useful cooling energy demand is 27.6 and 26.3 kWh/m²a, respectively. Compared to this, the useful cooling energy demand in Rome is higher and differs considerably from 34.1 to 49.4 kWh/m²a for the two comfort models. These findings correspond to the results from the COMMONCENSE research project [CS 2009].

The end energy use for cooling and ventilation is calculated according to EN 15241 and EN 15243 for the comfort temperature according to the adaptive model in EN 15251. There is no energy demand for passive cooling, and the energy demand for the mechanical ventilation during the time of occupancy is 2.9 kWh/m²a for all locations.

Figure 5 shows that the energy demand for different cooling concepts does not differ considerably in Northern climates (Stockholm and Hamburg). The energy demand for mechanical night ventilation increases slightly from Mid-European climates (Stuttgart and Milano) to South-European climates (Rome and Palermo) since this concept reaches its capacity limit and cannot provide thermal comfort in hot summer climates. The energy demand for water based cooling increases significantly from Mid- to South-European climates since the compression chiller has to provide additional cooling. In hot summer climates, the energy demand for active cooling by fan coils is insignificantly higher than for water-based radiant cooling; however, these quick responding cooling concepts do not allow for peak-load shifting.

Figure 5 Useful cooling energy demand: The cooling energy demand increases from North to South. The static comfort model [ISO 7730] result in a higher cooling energy demand than the adaptive comfort model [EN 15251].



Figure 5 End energy demand for five cooling concepts in six locations: The cooling concepts do not necessarily meet the comfort requirements.

Figure 5 indicates clearly the limits of each concept with regard to thermal comfort:


  1. Passive cooling and night ventilation concepts cannot provide thermal comfort for typical office buildings in all European climates.

  2. Water based low-energy cooling can successfully be applied to office buildings in all climate zones and may be operated with additional active cooling.

  3. A fan coil provides thermal comfort more or less independent from the prevailing weather conditions. Therefore, fan coils might be an acceptable solution for buildings in hot summer regions. In contrast to a VRF system or individual room air-conditioners, the central compression chiller for cold-water supply allows for some load management.

Figure 5 Thermal comfort for five cooling concepts in six locations: Passive cooling, air- and water-based low-energy cooling (with compression chiller when needed to meet the cooling load), and active cooling with compression chiller..

Figure 5 does not consider whether a specific cooling concept can provide thermal comfort or not. Furthermore, Figure 5 does not consider the energy demand needed to provide thermal comfort. Figure 5 combines these results and classifies the cooling concepts with regard to both aspects. As some concepts are comparable in terms of energy efficiency and achievement of thermal comfort, the investment costs for these cooling concepts are used as third decision parameter.

Table 5 Application of cooling concepts to European climates: results of a simulation study with a typical office building in different European climate. Cooling concepts are rated according to the thermal comfort achieved during occupancy, the cooling energy used, and the energy efficiency of the system. The specific investment costs are considered as an additional criterion. Legend: (++) preferential concept, (+) good concept, (+/++°) good but comparatively expensive concept, (-) unfavorable concept, (x) not applicable concept to the climate, (ACH) air change rate per hour.






PASSIVE COOLING 1

AIR-BASED MECHANICAL COOLING

WATER-BASED MECHANICAL COOLING

ventilation during occupancy




free

1.3 ACH

1.3 ACH

1.3 ACH

1.3 ACH

ventilation during nighttime




free

4 ACH

no

no

no

active cooling




no

no

fan coil ²

ceiling panel ³

TABS 3,4

investment costs [€/m²]




20

32

85

138

117

application in European climates

Stockholm (hr)

++

+

-

+

+

Hamburg (hr)

+

++

-

+

+

Stuttgart (hr+dh)

-

+

-

++

++

Milano (hr+dh)

x

-

-

++

++

Roma (dh)

x

x

+

++

+

Palermo (dh)

x

x

++

+

-

1 if applicable considering noise, security etc

2 can also be used for heating in winter

3 should be used with ground coupled heat pump for heating in winter

4 for new buildings only

ventilation concept in real building design:

hr supply and exhaust air ventilation with heat recovery in winter

dh supply and exhaust air ventilation with dehumidification in summer


Figure 5 gives an overview on preferential cooling concepts in different European regions.

  1. In North-European climates, high solar heat gains due to the long-standing sunshine can efficiently dissipated by the cool ambient air. In some situation, mechanical night ventilation is recommended to enhance the night ventilation.

  2. In Mid-European climates, water-based low-energy cooling makes use of the cool ground in summer. If an additional active cooling is needed, thermo-active building systems (TABS) with a high thermal inertia allow for peak-load shifting.

  3. In South-European climates, high cooling loads ask for cooling concepts with high cooling capacities. As the temperature difference between ambient heat sinks and the comfort temperature are too low, active cooling is needed to provide thermal comfort.

Figure 5 Cooling concepts in six locations: Passive cooling, mechanical night ventilation, water-based low-energy cooling with bore-hole heat exchanger as heat sink (and optional compression chiller when needed to meet the cooling load), and active cooling with compression chiller and cooling tower as heat sink.



Directory: fileadmin
fileadmin -> The Collapse of the gdr and the Reunification of Germany
fileadmin -> Filmskript zur Sendung „From Georgia to Virginia“ Sendereihe: The East Coast of the usa
fileadmin -> Comparative Politics Central Europe Mgr. Juraj Marušiak, PhD. course coordinator
fileadmin -> Annex 1 to the Interim Report
fileadmin -> Review of projects and contributions on statistical methods for spatial disaggregation and for integration of various kinds of geographical information and geo-referenced survey data
fileadmin -> An overview of land evaluation and land use planning at fao
fileadmin -> Contact information
fileadmin -> Review of the literature
fileadmin -> Sigchi extended Abstracts Sample Adapted to mamn25
fileadmin -> Communication and Information Sector Knowledge Societies Division

Download 0.72 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page