Route u. S. 130, raccoon creek


A. Roadway Design Criteria



Download 469 Kb.
Page2/6
Date16.01.2018
Size469 Kb.
#37046
1   2   3   4   5   6

A. Roadway Design Criteria



  1. Functional Classification: Divided, Rural Minor Arterial (DM)

  2. Design Speed: Rt. U.S. 130 - 65MPH (new alignment), posted Speed 55 mph

  3. Design Vehicle: Rt. U.S. 130 - Semitrailer Large (WB-62), Island Road - Car & Boat Trailer P/B

  4. Maximum Superelevation Rate: 4%

  5. English/Metric Design: English



B. Traffic Design Criteria and Pavement Design Criteria








Construction Year (2008)

Construction Year (2031)

ADT

11,100 vpd (two-way)

42,402 vpd (two-way)

DHV

1,221 vph (two-way)

4,664 vph (two-way)

DD

53%

53%

% Trucks

8%

8%

LOS

A

A



  1. Bridge Design Criteria



    1. Design Loading – AASHTO LRFD HL-93 or NJ Permit Vehicle vehicular live loading, whichever governs

    2. Operational Importance Factor – NHS Structures (operational importance) n=1.05

    3. Seismic Bridge Classification – Seismic Design Category “B”

    4. Vessel Impact Classification – AASHTO Article 3.14.1

    5. Under-clearances

i. Highway - 14’ 6” for Island Road (township road)

ii. Railroad - N/A



iii. Waterway - Navigable, 25’ high

  1. Pavement Design Criteria



    1. Traffic Volumes – 11,100 vpd (one-way 2008), 42,402 vpd (one-way 2031)

    2. % of Light and Heavy Trucks - 11%

    3. 18 kip Load Equivalency Factors (Heavy Trucks) – Flexible – 8.04

    4. Life Cycle – 20 years

    5. Directional and Lane Distribution Factors – 53%


  1. Construction Specifications



    1. Standard 2007 English



V. DESIGN STANDARDS



A. AASHTO – except where superseded by NJDOT standards
  1. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

  2. Highway Definitions

  3. Roadside Design Guide

  4. AASHTO Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures

  5. AASHTO Manual on Subsurface Investigations

  6. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 5th Edition, 2010

  7. AASHTO/AWS Bridge Welding Code D1.5 with NJDOT amendments



B. NJDOT

  1. Roadway Design Manual

  2. Road User Cost Manual

  3. Survey Manual

  4. Access Management Code


  5. Guideline: Designer Requirements for Revocations, Modifications and Adjustments of Access

  6. Maintenance Manual

  7. Design Manual for Bridges & Structures,

  8. Design Exceptions Manual

  9. Pavement Design Manual (AASHTO Companion)

  10. Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Standards

  11. Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction

  12. Standard Roadway Construction/Traffic Control/ Electrical/ Bridge Construction Details

  13. Sample Plans

  14. CADD Manual

  15. Context Sensitive Design Policy

  16. Context Sensitive Design Training Manual

  17. Procedures Manual

  18. Construction Schedule Manual

  19. Utility Accommodation Policy

  20. Right of Way Manual




  1. OTHERS




    1. TRB Highway Capacity Manual

    2. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

    3. American Society for Testing and Materials

    4. FHWA Federal-Aid Policy Guide (FAPG)

    5. NJDEP Technical Manual for Stream Encroachment Permits

    6. TR-55, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds

    7. American Standard for Nursery Stock, American Association of Nurserymen, Inc.
    8. Hortus III

    9. Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18, “Evaluating Scour at Bridges”


VI. DESIGN ELEMENTS


A. Geometrics



1. Vertical Geometry
The vertical geometry on Route U.S. 130 will be raised to meet the elevation of the proposed fixed span bridge over Raccoon Creek. The grade rate north and south of the Creek is -2.975% and 2.72% respectively.
2. Horizontal Geometry
The horizontal alignment will be shifted to the west in order to maintain traffic along Route U.S.

130 during construction and minimize the residential right of way impacts.


3. Highway Sections
The cross section on Route U.S. 130 will include two 12 foot lanes in each direction of travel with minimum 8 foot outside shoulders and 3 foot inside shoulders separated by either a concrete median barrier or guide rail. The typical section will vary in the vicinity of the acceleration and deceleration lanes proposed along Route U.S. 130 for Route U.S. 322 interchange.


B. Pavement Engineering



Full Depth Pavement (New Pavement Composition)
Route U.S. 130 (travel lane and shoulders) including acceleration and deceleration lane

3” Hot Mix Asphalt 12.5M76 Surface Course.

4” Hot Mix Asphalt 19M64 Intermediate Course.

5” Hot Mix Asphalt 25M64 Base Course.

10” Dense Graded Aggregate Base Course.

Geotextile, Roadway Stabilization.

10” Subbase.
Ramps connecting Route U.S. 130 & Route U.S. 322 (travel lane and shoulders)

2” Hot Mix Asphalt 12.5M76 Surface Course.

4” Hot Mix Asphalt 19M64 Intermediate Course.

5” Hot Mix Asphalt 25M64 Base Course.

10” Dense Graded Aggregate Base Course.

Geotextile, Roadway Stabilization.

10” Subbase.
Secondary Roads (Main Street, Island Road and firehouse connector)

2” Hot Mix Asphalt 12.5M64 Surface Course.

5” Hot Mix Asphalt 25M64 Base Course.

6” Dense Graded Aggregate Base Course.

6” Subbase.
Mill and Pave Section
Route U.S. 130

Mill up to 1” depth and pave with 3” Hot Mix Asphalt 12.5M76 Surface Course


Secondary Roads

Mill up to 2” depth and Pave with 2” Hot Mix Asphalt 12.5M64 Surface Course.


Note- At both ends of the approach of Route U.S. 130, break the existing pavement to accommodate new pavement.
Incidental Recommendations


  • The areas exhibiting moderate to severe fatigue cracking, patching, and potholes should be repaired in accordance with division 400 & 450 of the 2007 Standard Specifications book. Include the standard item “Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Repair and Concrete Pavement Repair prior to overlay.”

  • Saw cutting of existing pavement prior to excavation and sealing of joints must be done between the new and existing pavement section to remain.

  • Excavate and replace any unstable material with Subbase which is Subbase I-3.


C. Geotechnical Design
A geotechnical investigation was limited to a review of New Jersey Department of Transportation pavement data tested in September 2004. The following table provides a summary of this data:
Pavement Data –Route U.S. 130

Direction

MP From

MP To

IRI

NJ IRI Guidelines

SDI

NJ SDI Guidelines

Roadway Condition on Deficient Portion

Avg. Rut Depth

Northbound

10.5

10.6

175

Deficient

3.8

Good

Rough Only

0.16

Northbound

10.6

10.7

201

Deficient

3.8

Good

Rough Only

0.12

Northbound

10.7

10.8

186

Deficient

3.8

Good

Rough Only

0.14

Northbound

10.8

10.9

272

Deficient

4.1

Good

Rough Only

0.1

Northbound

10.9

11.0

318

Deficient

5.0

Good

Rough Only

0.13

Northbound

11.0

11.1

259

Deficient

5.0

Good

Rough Only

0.05

Northbound

11.1

11.2

363

Deficient

4.0

Good

Rough Only

0.08

Northbound

11.2

11.3

305

Deficient

3.9

Good

Rough Only

0.17

Northbound

11.3

11.4

337

Deficient

3.9

Good

Rough Only

0.11

Northbound

11.4

11.5

252

Deficient

3.9

Good

Rough Only

0.27

Northbound

11.5

11.6

153

Mediocre

3.9

Good

 

0.21

Northbound

11.6

11.7

166

Mediocre

3.9

Good

 

0.31

Northbound

11.7

11.8

276

Deficient

3.9

Good

Rough Only

0.07

Northbound

11.8

11.9

328

Deficient

4.7

Good

Rough Only

0.03

Northbound

11.9

12.0

135

Mediocre

4.9

Good

 

0.1

Northbound

12.0

12.1

166

Mediocre

2.7

Mediocre

 

0.14

Northbound

12.1

12.2

286

Deficient

2.5

Deficient

Rough & Distressed

0.19

Northbound

12.2

12.3

199

Deficient

2.4

Deficient

Rough & Distressed

0.12

Northbound

12.3

12.4

171

Deficient

2.4

Deficient

Rough & Distressed

0.13

Northbound

12.4

12.5

120

Mediocre

2.4

Deficient

 

0.08

Northbound

12.5

12.6

163

Mediocre

2.4

Deficient

 

0.08

Northbound

12.6

12.7

118

Fair

2.4

Deficient

 

0.15

Northbound

12.7

12.8

179

Deficient

2.4

Deficient

Rough & Distressed

0.16

Northbound

12.8

12.9

197

Deficient

2.4

Deficient

Rough & Distressed

0.16

Northbound

12.9

13.0

173

Deficient

2.4

Deficient

Rough & Distressed

0.12

Southbound

10.5

10.6

115

Fair

2.8

Mediocre

 

0.26

Southbound

10.6

10.7

114

Fair

2.8

Mediocre

 

0.22

Southbound

10.7

10.8

108

Fair

2.8

Mediocre

 

0.18

Southbound

10.8

10.9

118

Fair

3.8

Good

 

0.18

Southbound

10.9

11.0

312

Deficient

4.2

Good

Rough Only

0.24

Southbound

11.0

11.1

365

Deficient

2.4

Deficient

Rough & Distressed

0.27

Southbound

11.1

11.2

462

Deficient

2.6

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.4

Southbound

11.2

11.3

269

Deficient

2.7

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.44

Southbound

11.3

11.4

276

Deficient

2.8

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.29

Southbound

11.4

11.5

263

Deficient

2.8

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.33

Southbound

11.5

11.6

247

Deficient

2.8

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.45

Southbound

11.6

11.7

300

Deficient

4.2

Good

Rough Only

0.34

Southbound

11.7

11.8

418

Deficient

5.0

Good

Rough Only

0.17

Southbound

11.8

11.9

184

Deficient

5.0

Good

Rough Only

0.14

Southbound

11.9

12.0

266

Deficient

5.0

Good

Rough Only

0.25

Southbound

12.0

12.1

0

Good

0.0

Deficient

 

0

Southbound

12.1

12.2

0

Good

0.0

Deficient

 

0

Southbound

12.2

12.3

422

Deficient

2.7

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.2

Southbound

12.3

12.4

308

Deficient

2.7

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.26

Southbound

12.4

12.5

303

Deficient

2.7

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.18

Southbound

12.5

12.6

195

Deficient

2.7

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.06

Southbound

12.6

12.7

205

Deficient

2.7

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.08

Southbound

12.7

12.8

207

Deficient

2.7

Mediocre

Rough Only

0.15

Southbound

12.8

12.9

134

Mediocre

2.7

Mediocre

 

0.1

Southbound

12.9

13.0

208

Deficient

2.5

Deficient

Rough & Distressed

0.16

In the table above, the IRI is the International Roughness Index and the SDI is the Surface Distress Index.

The indices for the IRI and SDI are based on the following ratings:


Condition Status

IRI, (in/mi)

SDI

Deficient (Poor)

Above 170

0 - 2.5

Mediocre

120 - 170

2.6 - 3.0

Fair

95 –119

3.1 – 3.4

Good

0 - 94

3.5 - 5.0

Based on the above ratings, an analysis was performed on the deficient pavement based on the criteria listed below:


Rough Only: Road segments with excessive roughness (IRI > 170) but without severe distress (SDI > 2.5).

Distressed Only: Road segments with severe distress (SDI  2.5) but without excessive roughness (IRI  170).

Rough and Distressed: Road segments with excessive roughness (IRI > 170) and severe distress (SDI  2.5).
Subsurface exploration program and geotechnical engineering evaluation have been performed in connection with the replacement of the U.S. Route 130 Bridge over Raccoon Creek.
The subsurface conditions encountered north of Raccoon Creek consisted of granular soils composed predominantly of coarse to fine sand intermixed with varying amounts of silt and gravel. The subsurface conditions encountered on the south side of Raccoon Creek consisted of granular soils underlain by marine tidal marsh deposits and geologically older marine granular soils.
Deep foundation elements consisting of driven closed-end concrete filled pipe piles are recommended to support the abutments and three piers of the reconstruction of the U.S. Route 130 Bridge over Raccoon Creek. Due to the presence of soft compressible soils at the south approach embankment, it is recommended that column-supported embankment be utilized such that the applied embankment and vehicular loads are transferred directly to the underlying dense granular soils. The construction of approach embankments will requires that retaining walls be installed and mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall system such as manufactured by Reinforced Earth is recommended for the use in this project.
Please refer to the Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report dated August 2010 for more detailed information.
D. Survey Parameters
The base mapping for this project was developed through a combination of aerial photogrammetry and conventional surveying methods. The aerial photogrammetry work was performed by BAE Systems ADR, 124 Gather Drive, Suite 100, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054. The primary GPS horizontal and vertical control survey data was provided by the N.J.D.O.T. Geodetic Survey Unit.
The aerial photogrammetric portion consists of two segments, one high level flight, stations: HV 1 to HV 10, for mapping of adjacent wetlands and environmentally sensitive areas, southwest of the existing vertical lift bridge and one low level flight, stations HV 11 to HV 47 for mapping of existing road surface and surrounding topography.
Two primary GPS control stations were established and utilized as base-stations in preparation for performing Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS surveying on forty seven (47) photo control stations.
Observations for the primary survey control were performed on one day, November 16, 2007 (Julian day 320). Two 60-minute sessions were observed. Observations for the photogrammetric survey control were performed on two days: November 28, 2007 (Julian day 332) and January 23, 2008 (Julian day 023).
Point of Contact:

PROJECT DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND PROCESSING


Frederick A. Czepiga and Ronald J. Kuzma

NJDOT Geodetic Survey Section

P.O. 615 (Thiokol Building 6)

1035 Parkway Avenue, Trenton, NJ 08625

Telephone: (609) 530-5665
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC CONTACT
Andrew F. Pickford, Regional Manager

BAE SYSTEMS, ADR Mission Solutions

124 Gather Drive

Suite 100

Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Telephone: (856) 866-9700


BASELINE ESTABLISHMENT
The field work for the establishment of the baseline was conducted by N.J.D.O.T. Survey South. All field data was acquired electronically and downloaded at the Cherry Hill Regional Survey Office. The file name for the “Baseline” is ebase_f.dgn and ebase1_f, the directory is “Design Projects by Route\Route 130\13001101 Rt 130 over Raccoon Creek MP 11.43 to 12.08\Field Survey”.
Point of Contact:
Chris Otani

Acting Supervising Engineer, Survey South

1 Executive Campus

Route 70 West

Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002-4106

Telephone: (856) 486-6623


A First-Order GPS Control Survey providing Horizontal and Vertical control was supplied by NJDOT, Division of Design Services, Bureau of Civil Engineering Geodetic Survey Unit.
A loop bench run was performed utilizing a Leica NA 2002 Digital Level, Mfr. Serial No. 309990, N.J.D.O.T. No. 107436, serviced and calibrated on 02/13/08.

Additional Cross Sections and Topography were provided in areas which could not be obtained through Photogrammetry. Directions and distances were observed utilizing two Leica TRC 1103 Electronic Total Stations, Mfr. Serial No. 619623, and 619621, N.J.D.O.T. No. 107419, and 107418, serviced and calibrated on 07/13/09.


NJDOT Control Monuments and existing property corners were uncovered and located for the purpose of associating the Route U.S. Existing Baseline with the newly obtain Photogrammetric Survey.
PROJECT STATIONS *
SOURCE : National Geodetic Survey NSRS Database Retrieval-11/16/2007


STATION

PID

(NAD 83)

LATITUDE

(NAD 83)

LONGITUDE

(NAV 88)

HEIGHT

NJGC CORS ARP

DF8717

39º 46’ 52.79170”

75º 07’ 11.25056”

N/A

8 K 1

A14363

39º 49’ 45.50010”

75º 17’ 05.93207”

1.474

8 D 1

A14356

39º 43’ 24.10511”

75º 13’ 29.01853”

25.419

A 100

JU2203

39º 40’ 20.64304”

75º 30’ 08.16191”

4.050

BRIDGEPORT 1

JU4011

39º 47’ 49.95501”

75º 20’ 33.90080”

5.7

* Project stations were borrowed from “Bridge Replacement & Roadway Improvements” report compiled and written by Frederick A. Czepiga, PLS, and Ronald J. Kuzma, PLS.


VERTICAL DATUM
Orthometric heights (U.S. Survey Foot) as shown in the above table were held.
Listed below are the bench marks set for the project.


Description

Station

Offset

(NAV 88) Adjusted

Elevation

HV11

712+41.74

60.10’ L, Rt.130 BL

14.188

HV12

715+37.35

60.51’ R, Rt. 130 BL

12.328

HV16

722+59.69

29.63’ R, Rt. 130 SB BL

8.569

HV 17

725+29.91

18.36’ L, Rt. 130 NB BL

12.371

HV 18

728+54.02

19.61’ R, Rt. 130 SB BL

14.54

HV 20

731+33.75

28.07’ L, Rt. 130 NB BL

14.609

HV21

719+29.87

51.26’ Rt. Rt.130 BL

13.015

HV22

722+44.00

28.37’ L, Rt.130 BL

11.713

HV23

721+71.44

361.41’ R, Rt.130 BL

8.023

HV24

725+17.88

37.41’ L, Rt.130 BL

12.073

HV25

724+37.49

242.55’ L, Rt.130 BL

14.555

HV26

728+86.22

29.41’ L, Rt.130 BL

10.335

HV27

732+29.20

27.33’ R, Rt.130 BL

5.307

HV28

734+91.32

34.26’ L, Rt.130 BL

5.157

HV29

738+31.35

35.08’ R, Rt.130 BL

5.065

HV30

740+89.94

34.83’ L, Rt.130 BL

4.469

HV31

744+33.26

36.58’ R, Rt.130 BL

4.050

HV32

746+88.56

35.00’ L, Rt.130 BL

4.926

HV33

750+30.81

35.30’ R, Rt.130 BL

5.633

HV34

752+86.75

35.55’ L, Rt.130 BL

4.732

HV35

756+29.59

37.03’ R, Rt.130 BL

4.462

HV36

758+58.84

35.14’ L, Rt.130 BL

4.960

HV37

762+27.64

41.05’ R, Rt.130 BL

5.784

HV38

764+84.16

35.71’ L, Rt.130 BL

7.975

HV39

768+38.30

56.44’ R, Rt.130 BL

8.928

HV40

769+75.29

199.35’ L, Rt.130 BL

5.842

HV41

774+37.81

39.44’ R, Rt.130 BL

7.351

HV42

727+64.61

334.34’ R, Rt.130 BL

8.347

HV43

734+39.32

254.35’ R, Rt.130 BL

7.803

HV44

741+56.81

201.31’ R, Rt.130 BL

8.635

HV45

744+49.73

256.00’ R, Rt.130 BL

8.535

HV46

764+53.64

191.93’ R, Rt.130 BL

10.614

HV47

752+54.53

207.04’ R, Rt.130 BL

8.454

* Vertical datum were borrowed from “Bridge Replacement & Roadway Improvements” report compiled and written by Frederick A. Czepiga, PLS, and Ronald J. Kuzma, PLS.


METHOD FOR EXISTING BASELINE ESTABLISHMENT
Reference Plans & Documents are listed below:
a.) N.J.D.O.T. As-built Construction Plans, Route U.S. 130, Section 4E, Resurfacing
b.) N.J.D.O.T. Construction Plans, Route 44, Section 8
c.) N.J.D.O.T. Construction Plans, Route 44, Section 10
d.) N.J.D.O.T. Construction Plans, Route 44, Section 10A
e.) N.J.D.O.T. Construction Plans, Route 44, Section 16B & 8A
f.) N.J.D.O.T. 2005 Straight Line Diagrams
g.) Delaware Port Authority Chester-Bridgeport Bridge Plans
Existing monuments found is listed below:


Point

No.

Northing

Easting

Station

Offset

Baseline

Description

1

354042.5871

253038.1504

727+94.29

69.34’ L

N.B. Rt. 130

Property Monument

2

353935.8229

252901.8057

729+56.37

138.85’ L

N.B. Rt. 130

Iron Pipe

3

353925.0798

252752.7630

731+02.94

109.75’ L

N.B. Rt. 130

Iron Pipe

4

354033.3461

252655.9007

716+69.65

0.29’ R

Rt. 130

NJDOT Monument

5

353870.7667

252364.3841

720+01.55

60.49’ L

Rt. 130

Rebar/w cap

6

353826.3279

252238.6073

721+37.31

51.44’ L

Rt. 130

Iron Pipe (Disturbed)

7

353816.4999

252239.2835

721+40.88

60.65’ L

Rt. 130

Rebar/w cap

8

351276.7376

247367.5501

776+56.87 Bk.

776+66.55 Ah.



0' (Held)

Rt. 130

NJDOT Monument

General Notes


A formal traverse was not conducted due to the fact that all horizontal control was established thru a “First-Order GPS Control Survey”.
Only 2 N.J.D.O.T. monuments and 6 property corners were found throughout the project, therefore Panel Points, inlets, guide rail, ends of curb, and the Bridge Deck were used to tie down the Existing Route U.S. Baselines.
E. Traffic Engineering
McCormick Taylor collected manual traffic turning counts in February 2004 at the intersections of Route U.S. 130 with Island Road and Main Street. Classifications of medium and heavy trucks were also collected as part of this count effort. A growth rate of 2.00% was applied to the 2004 base year volumes to obtain 2006 and 2026 design year volumes. Level of Service (LOS) analyses conducted for this highway was performed using the HCS+ 5.21 version of the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) which utilizes the methodology contained in the Highway Capacity Manual. The levels of service for the base year 2006 and design year 2026 have been provided in the Table below.


Levels of Service


Level of Service


Weekday Peak Hour

Route U.S. 130

2006

2025

AM

PM

AM

PM

A

A

A

A




  1. Traffic Signals

There are no proposed traffic signals for the project.


2. Signing
All signing applications are derived from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. One overhead sign structure will be upgraded.
3. Striping
All striping applications are standard and derived from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Services. Standard striping applications include centerlines, lane lines, and edgelines.
4. Traffic Control/Staging


  • Construction will be staged to create a minimum amount of disturbance to existing traffic patterns

  • No detours are planned for this project.

  • A reduction to the speed limit is recommended within the project limits.

  • There will be a need to reduce the number of lanes to one in each direction of travel on Route U.S. 130 during construction.


5. Maintenance of Traffic:
Stage 1
Stage IA

Tasks to be completed include the following:



  • Set up all traffic control devices and warning signs as shown in the lanes.

  • Mill 6 inch and pave 6 inch the NB shoulder area for traffic staging.

  • In the north end of the project remove the portion of the median guide rail and install temporary pavement to provide an opening for traffic to cross from southbound travel lanes to northbound left temporary lanes for stage 1B construction.

  • In the south end of the project remove the portion of guide rail and build permanent pavement to cross SB traffic on NB left lanes back to the SB side. Install temporary telescoping guide rail end terminal to protect the existing median guide rail.

  • Cover / remove / replace the OH sign structure at NB station 58+80 for the new traffic pattern. Restrict Route U.S. 30 northbound traffic to one lane and re-stripe and install construction barrier curb on Route U.S. 130 northbound. Place barrier curb to stop access from Sheets Avenue to Route U.S. 130 northbound.

  • Place detour signs to close Island Road during stage II and stage III construction.

  • Relocate the gas main along the south bound side of Route U.S. 130.

Stage IB


  • Shift the SB traffic into the NB left lanes using improvements from stage IA. The Route U.S. 130 lane configuration for this stage will be one lane in each direction.

  • Construct a portion (±32 ft width section) of the realigned southbound Route U.S. 130 Bridge and approaches. Construct the median barrier on the south side of the bridge.

  • Install temporary sheeting in the median and permanent southbound retaining wall to build the road box. Complete all the drainage, retention basins and all roadwork.

  • Pave the road up to the intermediate course then install temporary construction barrier next to the temporary sheeting.

  • Construct the required crossing for Route U.S. 130 NB traffic to shift to the newly constructed portion of the bridge.


Stage 2
Tasks to be completed include the following:

  • Shift Route U.S. 130 traffic pattern to the newly constructed southbound section. Access to Route U.S. 130 northbound to Route 322 eastbound ramps will be maintained.

  • Demolish the existing structure, and remove all the piles. Demolish the bridge house and remove all machinery.

  • Continue the work on the northbound Route U.S. 130 Bridge and approaches, road box and North bound retaining wall.

  • Remove temporary sheeting in the median then construct the median barrier curbs and the permanent northbound retaining wall. Complete all the drainage and all roadwork on Route U.S. 130.

  • Construct the road adjacent to Route U.S. 130 northbound and the emergency access road to Route U.S. 130 northbound. Complete the construction of Main Street and Island Road connection and reopen Island Road access to Main Street. Install all permanent guide rails.


Stage 3
Tasks to be completed include the following:

  • Shift the traffic back to the outer lanes of the constructed realignment to allow for median construction. Construct the median / barrier curb on the north side of the project.

  • Access to Route U.S. 322 eastbound to Route U.S. 130 southbound and the Route U.S. 130 northbound to Route U.S. 322 eastbound will be maintained during Stage III.

  • During nighttime/weekend/ off peak hours, pave the surface course, construct permanent traffic striping / markings and all remaining works required for the project.


Download 469 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page