Russia 110308 Basic Political Developments


What Happened to the Reset?



Download 245.04 Kb.
Page4/17
Date06.08.2017
Size245.04 Kb.
#27784
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   17

What Happened to the Reset?


http://russiaprofile.org/international/33217.html
The "Reset" Rings Hollow Two Years On

By Tom Balmforth Russia Profile 03/06/2011

Two years on, the “reset” in U.S.-Russian ties has changed the tone of relations, but the “hollow” veneer of its overall success does not mask enduring mistrust between the countries and their different national interests, say analysts. U.S. Vice President Joe Biden is due in Russia on March 10 to “energize” the reset, but analysts question how warmer ties can develop further, while noting that the Barack Obama administration – keen to flaunt a foreign policy triumph domestically – has shouldered the weight of the reconciliation.

“The determination of the United States not to rock the boat on a number of issues where it could have done has effectively led to the appearance of the reset working, whereas in fact there is very little of a substantive nature,” said James Nixey, head of the Russia and Eurasia Program at Chatham House, a London-based think tank.

Advocates of the reset point to the signing and ratification of the strategic arms reduction treaty – voted through the U.S. Senate by a close margin – as a milestone in closer ties, but analysts say it could well have been signed without the reset. “I’m not convinced you can point to START as a direct result of the reset,” said Nixey. “The treaty was always in the interests of both sides.”

Alexander Konovalov, the president of the Moscow-based Institute of Strategic Analysis, said that the reset has struggled to overcome the legacy of Cold War enmity. “There could definitely be more going on overall,” said Konovalov. “Relations are still built on the ruins of the system of confrontation. In the nuclear field we still rely on nuclear containment, although it’s pretty clear that there is no need to contain each other.”

Since Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her counterpart Sergei Lavrov “hit the reset button” in Moscow on March 6, 2009, the Kremlin has tentatively inched closer to the U.S. position on Iran by backing moderate UN sanctions to curb Iran’s perceived nuclear ambitions. But Moscow questions the efficacy of sanctions, and is also reluctant to anger Tehran as it risks losing its traditional economic interests in the oil rich pariah state.

Moscow gave the green light to the “Northern supply route,” a key transit corridor for non-lethal U.S. cargo needed to service the faltering military campaign in Afghanistan.

But far from a Russian concession related to the reset, the move was entirely “in line with Russia’s national interest.” Russia does not to want to see instability in Afghanistan worsen, potentially resonating throughout post-Soviet Central Asia, along Russia’s underbelly, Nixey said.

For its part Washington has appeased Moscow by taking Georgia and Ukraine off the entry roadmap to NATO, by shelving missile defense plans in Europe and by reneging on the Goerge Bush administration’s democracy promotion in the post-Soviet space, Russia’s so-called “backyard.”

American rhetoric aimed at Russia has also softened. Nixey said he was “extremely doubtful” that there would be anything more than “token” criticism of Russia’s upcoming parliamentary and presidential elections in December and early next year – unthinkable during the lows of relations under Bush and Putin. “The desperation to make the reset work has almost made it work,” said Nixey. “But it doesn’t quite cover up for the hollowness of it all and the fact that there are still vast differences on various things.”

The relatively calm way that Washington dealt with uncovering the largest post-Cold War spy ring exemplified the U.S. political will to make the reset work. But it will still have raised eyebrows behind the White House’s closed doors. “There’s a public face and a private face to these things. Privately, this was unsurprising and merely confirmed in the minds of American policymakers that Russia is awkward and not really to be trusted,” said Nixey.


The next step


Nixey said “it is conceivable” that Russia will soon accede to the World Trade Organization, and that there will be increased cooperation between Russia and NATO. “But in fact I think it’s more conceivable that the values gap between Russia and the West will expose the reset for the hollow thing that it is,” said Nixey.

Konovalov agreed, despite suggesting that areas of joint cooperation could be waiting around the corner. “It’s difficult to imagine what more can be done in the reset. The lack of trust on both sides remains strong. But life keeps on throwing new topics at us, like the situation in North Africa. We have to find ways to act together on these matters,” he said.



Seperate missile defense unaccepatable – Rogozin


http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/03/08/47081083.html
Mar 8, 2011 05:36 Moscow Time

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen is optimistic regarding cooperation with Russia on missile defense but according to Russia's permanent representative to the alliance, Dmitry Rogozin, negotiations will be complex as the parties will only be able to agree if NATO's missile defense will not affect the strategic nuclear potential of Russia, the diplomat said.

Mr. Rogozin underlined the fact that the alliance proposes the creation of  two independent systems of missile defense, one European the other Russian. This option does not suit Moscow, Rogozin stressed.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011 | Volume: 11106

Bushehr plant marks the start of nuclear energy use: Russian ambassador

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=237028


Tehran Times Political Desk

TEHRAN – The Bushehr nuclear power plant is not just a symbol for Iran, rather it marks the start of a move to use nuclear energy on a legal basis, Russian Ambassador to Tehran Alexander Sadovnikov has said.

Speaking to the Mehr News Agency, Alexander Sadovnikov commented on problems in making the plant fully operational, saying this important project sometimes encounter some technical hurdles, which need thorough examination.

And it is wiser to fix these problems now instead of having to incur losses in the future, he added.

There is no doubt that Russia will finish the project and this is like an objective for Moscow as it is for Tehran, he added.

Iran had started loading the fuel into the reactor in October 2010 after the inauguration of the plant on August 21, 2010.

The Bushehr nuclear power plant has a pressurized water reactor with a capacity to produce 1,000 megawatts of power




Download 245.04 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   17




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page