There are two major steps to this formula: the first is determined by the simple
characteristics of weight, power, and top speed; the second is a
rating of the technical design, varying with the systems for protection and repair costs. The initial constant equal to 20 is merely to increase the group's end result so that all models have the same value, which avoids confusion with the old method of setting the group which resulted in values ranging from 4 to 20.
The group is equal to:
20+
(27.88 x (DIN horsepower/unloaded mass in kilograms + 200)) +
(1/13 x (top speed in km/h - 130)) +
(0.00283 x GVWR)
the value obtained by this first step of the formula is then multiplied by (1 + design rating)
It is necessary to determine the importance of the weighting by the design rating of the vehicle. It is easy to establish by calculating the group of our 841 versions with the first step in the formula and comparing it to the value obtained by SRA with the whole formula. The correlation coefficient is very high indicating a very low intervention of the second step of the formula, at the very least for current vehicles which are those tested by Euro NCAP and which we have used in this present analysis. The coefficient may be far less lenient for "atypical" vehicles.
It is useful to analyse relations between the group of insurance companies and the variables set up from simple physical data able to translate the notion of vehicles' "aggressiveness" vis-Ă -vis occupants of other private cars. It must be noted that taking into account speed in the insurance companies' formula is interesting due to its reference to 130 km/h,
Share with your friends: