Scientific Kernels on viram and Imagine Media Processors Manikandan Narayanan1, Leonid Oliker2 Adam JaninError: Reference source not found,3, Parry HusbandsError: Reference source not found, and Xiaoye LiError

Table 2: Percentage of algorithmic peak performance of VIRAM and Imagine with M =1 and L =16

Download 217.16 Kb. Page 3/4 Date 09.06.2018 Size 217.16 Kb. #53784

Navigate this page:

• Figure 3: Percentage of algorithmic peak performance of VIRAM and Imagine for varying vector/stream lengths when N =3 and M = 1
• Table 3: Numbe r of VIRAM cycles using various stride patterns, with and without address generation, for N =1, M =1, and L =256

Table 2: Percentage of algorithmic peak performance of VIRAM and Imagine with M =1 and L =16 Figure 3: Percentage of algorithmic peak performance of VIRAM and Imagine for varying vector/stream lengths when N =3 and M = 1 Stride 1 1 2 4 Address Generation No Yes Yes Yes Cycles 118 173 186 298 Table 3: Number of VIRAM cycles using various stride patterns, with and without address generation, for N =1, M =1, and L =256 M VIRAM IMAGINE 1 39% 7% 10 82% 38% 20 89% 49% Download 217.16 Kb. Share with your friends: