SEMANTICS
Page The definition is clearly showing us that besides the correctness of our act of reason, it is claimed to be in order and ease. But shall we accept the argument like I have a pain in my foot.
-
My foot is my shoes.
-
Therefore, I have a pain in my shoes.
Is in case of its wrong conclusion We say it is wrong because it is possible all parts of my foot are in my shoes or my shoes itself feel pain.
Seeing that the conclusion does follow from the other two sentences but is it acceptable
to be logic To know this, it will be worth dividing logic into two, formal logic and material logic (as proposed by Sullivan).
Share with your friends: