Seppo Suominen Essays on cultural economics


Spectators of performing arts – who is sitting in the auditorium?



Download 2.66 Mb.
Page17/31
Date19.10.2016
Size2.66 Mb.
#4243
1   ...   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   ...   31

4Spectators of performing arts – who is sitting in the auditorium?



4.1Introduction

Approximately 5 or 6 per cent of the Finns go to see performing arts or to an art exhibition several times per month and every sixth do not go at all. Most of the Finns occasionally go16. The purpose of this study is to find out characteristics of culturual consumption to see the allocation effects of cultural subsidies. Are females and ageing citizens more likely to be heavy user of performing arts (art exhibition, opera and theatrical performances) and how this interacts with attendance to sport events? What are the regional diffences, also when the effect of person’s education is taken into account? This analysis has economic meaning to the allocation of the state subsidies. Majority of these consists of lower ticket prices for the performing arts. The state subsidies to the performing arts are substantial and increasing since 1993 in Finland. Arts may suffer from Baumol’s cost disease (Baumol and Bowen 1966). Labour productivity in cultural sectors, especially at the theatre is low since live performing arts are labour intensive: the pianist plays, the actor acts, the singer sings – and there is no way to increase output per hour. The venue or the auditorium size will limit the revenue explaining the cost drawback due to Baumol’s disease. This is especially true in speech theatre, while opera performances are suitable for increasing the size of the audience of opera via online performance transmissions to cinema theatres around the world. It is usual the performance is presented in the original language (i.e. Verdi’s operas in Italian, Mozart’s operas in German).


If performing arts and sport events are substitutes, the state subsidies to performing arts may also be compensated by supporting sport events. However, the size of the sport events’ (e.g. soccer, ice hockey) audience is less limited than speech theatre due to large online broadcasting, and this reduces the need for subsidies.
The theatre and orchestra law (705/92) that has come into force in 1993 brought considerable changes to theatre financing in Finland. The state subsidy to the dramatic art had been discretionary until 1993 and mainly financed by profit funds of the pools and money lotteries. Since the beginning of 1993 the Ministry of Education has made theatre-specific decisions on state subsidies. The basic principle in the state subsidy system (VOS)17 is that a theatre receives subsidies on the grounds of unit cost based on full time equivalent (FTE) person years. The change in the FTE person years as criteria for state and the true (verified) person years have not been equivalent over the years since 1993. The actual change is higher than the criteria. Also the change in the unit cost as criteria for state and the verified unit cost has been lower18, however, during the last two decades the change (growth) in state subsidies and ticket revenues has been substantially higher than the change in municipal subsidies (Kangas and Kivistö 2011, 17). When the above mentioned law came into force 1993, the financing structure of theatres changed considerably. The state aid increased by about 50 per cent and correspondingly the municipal share dropped. During the years from 1993 to 2007 considerable changes did not take place but the unit cost standard was substantially changed a few years ago, and the state aid increased by more than 15 per cent annually during the years 2008 to 2010 (Tinfo, statistics). The raising of the unit cost returned its real value to the 1993 level (Kangas and Kivistö 2011, 11). The state support is directed to the administrator of the culture institution, municipality or federation of municipalities, to a private community or foundation. As a rule the state subsidy is 37 per cent of the price of the person year with certain exceptions19.
Fairly many good reports have been drawn up on the audiences of cultural events in Finland but a great majority of the results have been presented as descriptive statistics and virtually there are no studies that have used multivariate analysis.

Private research institution (Taloustutkimus) has conducted several surveys on the visitor density of theatre, opera or ballet performances on the basis of assignments by the association of Finnish theatres (Suomen teatterit). The sample size has been around 1000 in the surveys in 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2007 (table 3). The survey has also surveyed the frequency of visits and is thus somewhat comparable to the data used here.



Table 4: Suomen Teatterit (Taloustutkimus), survey on visits to theatre, opera or ballet during the past 12 months, years 1985, 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2007 in %

Has visited during the past 12 months

1994

n = 956


1998

n = 1013


2001

n = 994


2004

n = 984


2007

n = 999


once/occationally(2-5)/regularly (6- times) = total

16,/25/3 = 44

19/23/3 = 45

19/20/4 = 43

23/21/2 = 42

21/22/4 = 47

gender: once/occ/reg
















women:

17/34/4 = 55

20/30/5 = 55

22/27/5 = 54

25/26/4 = 55

22/28/4 = 54

men:

16/16/3 = 35

18/15/1 = 34

15/14/3 = 36

21/16/2 = 39

19/14/3 = 36

age: once/occ/reg
















15-24 y.:

19/20/1 = 40

22/17/2 = 41

23/15/3 = 41

25/14/1 = 40

17/11/1 = 29

25-44 y.:

19/21/2 = 42

19/21/3 = 43

22/19/4 = 45

26/17/3= 46

22/19/3= 44

45-64 y:

13/30/5 = 48

19/29/3 = 51

14/23/4 = 41

22/28/3 = 53

25/27/4 = 56

65-79 y:

12/16/12/3 = 43

12/9/10/5 = 36

15/14/13/3 = 45

15/12/9/3 = 39

14/18/8/5 = 45

education (once/occ/reg)
















Basic and primary

15/22/2 = 39

17/15/2 = 42

16/16/2 = 34

19/14/0 = 33

18/16/2 = 36

Secondary

16/18/3 = 37

18/20/1 = 39

15/14/1 = 30

20/16/1 = 37

17/17/2 = 36

Upper sec:

17/32/2 = 51

26/21/5 = 52

27/19/5 = 51

20/25/2 = 47

25/15/1 = 41

Tertiary lower

(AMK)


16/35/3 = 54

20/30/3 = 53

24/29/4 = 57

36/23/5 = 64

23/36/3 = 62

Tertiary higher (University):

24/31/14 = 69

18/38/12 = 68

19/31/19 = 69

17/42/11 = 70

29/23/10 = 62

Share of population in Region %: (once/occ/reg)
















Southern Finland

17/28/5 = 50

19/26/4 = 49

21/22/5 = 48

25/23/5 = 53

23/27/5 = 55

Central Finland:

14/26/2 = 42

19/18/1 = 38

15/23/2 = 40

23/21/1 = 45

18/14/1 = 33

Northern Finland:

17/16/1= 34

17/17/2 = 36

12/12/4 = 28

14/15/0 = 29

14/11/1 = 26



















The results in table 4-1 show that women go more often to the theatre, opera or ballet than men, especially the difference is biggest among those that visit occationally (twice or 3 – 5 times per year). It is noticeable that the share of occational visitors amount of those that visit 2-5 times per years has gradually declined throughout the years 1985 – 2007. The 45-64 years-old are the most active in this group. The effect of the visitor’s formal education is clear; higher education and a bigger frequency are related. The effect is stronger among those that go to theatre, opera or ballet more than 6 times per year. Persons living in the south Finland go most often and those in the northern Finland go least. Furthermore the visitor density of the people in the southern Finland has been growing during the period 1985 – 2007 while the northern Finns have decreased visitor activity. The most often mentioned reasons for not going were the lack of interest (56 %) or the lack of time (26 %). Furthermore, 12 % informed that there is no theatre on the locality.

Additional insights and confirmation of the results can be gained from culture and sport surveys in 1991 and 1999 (Statistics Finland 2001) reported as table A4-1 in Appendix and from Kulttuuripuntari 1999 survey reported as Table A4-2 in Appendix. In all surveys women go more often than men, highly educated are more active and the differences among provinces are substantial. The Finnish spectator profile of performing arts is remarkably similar to the audience profiles in western economies (cf. Seaman 2006, 419-422). The use of multivariable regression-based models in this study is important since these models have not generally verified the result that education is likely the most important single variable in explaining variations in performing arts attendance (Seaman 2006, 439).
Table A4-1 also confirms that the theatre visitor density did not change essentially during the 1990’s if not accounting for the temporary drop in early 1990’s recession (survey was conducted in 1991). So decrease in attendances has mostly taken place in 2000s but this can be partly explained by changes in the supply of cultural capital 1990s. The new opera house that was opened in 1995 is likely to explained the increase in attendance to opera and concert performances in the Uusimaa region (both the Helsinki metropolitan area and eastern Uusimaa province). The increase took places especially among the 25-44 and 45-64 years-old cohorts. In comparison the spectator frequency of the sport events and competitions decreased. Tables in Appendix also show that the visitor density of the dance performances is roughly half of the theatres, while these two forms of performing arts cannot be separated in our analysis.


Download 2.66 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   ...   31




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page