Standing Operating Procedure (sop)
Download 1.29 Mb.
|
(2) The MSCOE QAO is aligned with and has oversight responsibility for the 8th Brigade (Multifunctional), 108th Division (Individual Training), Puerto Rico. Administrative as well as financial support is provided for the mission executed by the three assigned Title XIs.(3) Army Regulation 350-1, Army Training and Education, paragraph 3-15a states that each student will be afforded the opportunity to submit an evaluation of the course upon completing the training. Efforts are on going to formalize end-of-course questionnaires. In addition, an electronic One-Minute-Student Critique, accessed via the Quality Assurance Home Page, will allow students an opportunity to provide immediate feedback on courses they are attending. (4) MSCOE QAO and QAEs will continue to use the methodologies identified below to evaluate training. The methodologies for internal assessments are: (a) Full Course Evaluation (FCE) - Used to assess over eighty-five percent of a course. The FCE should be used when significant problems exist based on feedback of poor performance of graduates. This effort entails a complete audit trail review, observation of all classes and field activities, feedback from students, instructors, and other training developers. A three-person (minimum) evaluation team will be assigned to all FCEs. The FCE will be conducted in three phases:
audit trail, which supports the SAT process, and all course documents.
field training, and criterion reference testing; participating in After Action Reviews (AARs); administering end-of-course questionnaires (EOCQs) as a means of formal feedback, and interviewing students and instructors to gather informal feedback; and collecting external feedback from students and graduates at least six months after graduation.
will receive the written evaluation report. The proponent school and the QAE will develop a plan to track and assist with the corrective actions, if deficiencies are noted. (b) In-Process Evaluations (IPE) - Used to assess major changes in an existing course, a new module, or courses where problems have been identified and require follow-up. Involves observing and evaluating the module in question in its entirety (similar to an FCE), to include a complete review of the audit trail, and collecting external feedback. On-the-spot corrections can be made, if possible. Administrative or course design/development discrepancies which cannot be corrected on the spot will be forwarded to the appropriate departments for action. The proponent will receive the written evaluation report. The proponent school and the QAE will develop a plan to track and assist with the corrective actions, if deficiencies are noted. (c) Maintenance Evaluation (ME) - Used as a routine assessment for existing courses. Classroom observations will be conducted by sampling the courses in session, weekly, using the Fort Leonard Wood (FLW) Form 2, Observation Sheet; and administering phase or EOCQs for each iteration taught, with the exception of OSUT, in which case one EOCQ will be administered monthly or as directed by the brigade commander. On-the-spot correction will be made, if possible. Administrative discrepancies, which cannot be corrected on the spot, will be forwarded to the training departments. The FLW Form 2, Observation Sheet is designed to accommodate verification of critical tasks, current doctrine, review of ELO/TLO, test items, POI compliance, equipment/ammunition requirements, and provide feedback to training developers in the Directorate of Training Development for each visit to a classroom. (d) Self-Assessment (SA) – Used to assess training (initial military, leader development, and functional) as a precursor to a formal accreditation visits from TRADOC, CAC, and DCG-IMT QAOs. SAs will be conducted IAW the TRADOC Accreditation Standards Guide. A written report is provided to the accrediting agency 30 days prior to the Accreditation Visit. Systematic evaluations using the FCE, IPE and ME methodologies are formative evaluations, which focus on maintaining quality, meeting accreditation standards, and maintaining an awareness of deficiencies. (5) Assessment and accreditation of TASS Battalions will be conducted IAW the TRADOC Accreditation Standards Guide. Detailed schedules for FY04 TASS assessments are at Annexes A-C, Appendix B, and Annex D, Appendix A, respectively. b. External Evaluations. Courses scheduled for external assessments in FY04 are at Annexes A-C, Appendix C, respectively, for MSCOE proponents. Completing surveys for functional courses will be a priority in FY04. Annex AUS Army Chemical School Appendix A, Section 1 Chemical School Internal Assessment Plan
Download 1.29 Mb. Share with your friends:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||