Test statistics: =1.49
(i) Reject H0 if z -z/2=-1.96 or z z/2 =1.96. -1.96< z=1.49 < 1.96 and fail to reject H0. .
(ii) P-value = 2P(Z>1.49)=2(0.0681)=0.1362. Since the P-value > =0.05, fail to reject H0.
Conclusion: Yes it is reasonable to assume that both machines produce the same fraction of defective parts
The MINITAB output analyzing such data is
Test and CI for Two Proportions
Sample X N Sample p
1 15 300 0.050000
2 8 300 0.026667
Estimate for p(1) - p(2): 0.0233333
95% CI for p(1) - p(2): (-0.00733568, 0.0540023)
Test for p(1) - p(2) = 0 (vs not = 0): Z = 1.49 P-Value = 0.136
Test for single true proportions as an example
Test of p = 0.04 vs p not = 0.04
Sample X N Sample p 95.0% CI Exact P-Value
1 15 300 0.050000 (0.028251, 0.081127) 0.461
2 8 300 0.026667 (0.011582, 0.051866) 0.247
Example 6 (Exercise 9.48(a)):
Sample sizes are large enough to satisfy the assumptions and it is a two-tailed test.
=0.2875 where =0.21 and =0.4167
Test statistics: =-4.844
Decision:
(i) Reject H0 if z -z/2=-1.96 or z z/2 =1.96. |z| =4.844 > 1.96 and reject H0.
(ii) P-value = 2P(Z>4.844)=2(0)=0. Since the P-value =0.05, reject H0.
Conclusion: it is different for two groups of residents.
The MINITAB output analyzing such data is
Test and CI for Two Proportions
Sample X N Sample p
1 63 300 0.210000
2 75 180 0.416667
Estimate for p(1) - p(2): -0.206667
95% CI for p(1) - p(2): (-0.292174, -0.121159)
Test for p(1) - p(2) = 0 (vs not = 0): Z = -4.74 P-Value = 0.000
Share with your friends: |