Table of contents welcome 1


MLRA Approach to Soil Survey Why Change?



Download 0.65 Mb.
Page27/35
Date05.08.2017
Size0.65 Mb.
#26221
1   ...   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   ...   35

MLRA Approach to Soil Survey Why Change?


Tom Calhoun, Soil Survey Division
Mission is to get the concept of the MLRA approach to soil survey across to all that will listen. Repetition is key to doing that. As I told the MO leaders when they met in San Antonio this winter, you are going to hear this every time I am invited to speak.


MLRA APPROACH TO SOIL SURVEY


  • 1985 and subsequent “Farms Bills” need consistent, seamless soil data

  • Demand for multi-county, multi-state, survey information increases

  • NASIS implemented and it allows for management by geographic area

  • SSURGO digitizing project initiated

1985 farm bill - big push to complete mapping of all farm lands------Conservation was directly linked as a prerequisite to cost share of conservation practices and commodity payments. ASCS, Farm Credit, etc. wanted data on all the farmland. They knew all farmland was mapped and when they found inconsistency in data between fields or on the same soils, same farm, different county, they complained. Other agencies wanted multi county, state, and national data sets. They wanted them digitized. They too found the mismatches in lines as well as data, and they couldn’t handle all the different legends.



  • 40% of published soil surveys are out of date

  • The demand to update surveys equals or exceeds the demand for initial inventory

  • The inconsistencies between independent county level soil surveys limit their usefulness

  • A diversity of soil survey products is demanded



Customers wanted electronic data as well as hard copy. They wanted unique interpretations. Some wanted information for unique areas.



We found ourselves with a, as Dennis Lytle used to put it, patchwork quilt of information across the country. Different vintages, independently developed

With a great variety of need as far as updating.



KEEP THE FOCUS-- THE OBJECTIVES ARE:


  • To update survey where needed

  • To improve the quality of the data

  • To provide seamless digital products

  • To improve understanding of soil-landscape functions

  • To maintain the data, not letting it become obsolete

  • More efficient (fewer people and offices)

  • Increased stability to the lives of our staff

With all of that, what are we trying to do with this new approach? Improving the quality of data includes additional investigations and characterization of soils. Some of our most common soils have the least data. New attributes need to be collected. Modeled or projected data needs to be confirmed. Investigate landscape functions. How can we provide better information on soils if we consider their interactions with the landscape?


MLRA legends: I’ve heard lots about this during the weeks leading up to this meeting. Much of it negative, but this is essential. I think, as with so many things we do, the terminology is getting in the way of the idea. The basic premise is this:

Soils on similar landscape positions, with similar climate, parent materials, age, etc. Should be the same or very similar. ie. MLRA

HOW DO WE DO ALL THAT?


  • Develop soil survey legends on an MLRA basis

  • Evaluate the workload and locate offices where there is a long term (15-20 year) need

  • Establish “Super MLRA Project Offices”

  • Clearly define the administrative soil survey area

Or for that matter, any other geographic entity you want to define ----

Within the area defined, investigations should apply to the entire area.
Review the placement and description of soils throughout their natural extent and improve on the mapping and description of those soils. Get rid of the Taxajuncts and variants. Where need be, combine series or parts of series. Where need be split out phases of series to accommodate changes in soil moisture or temperature due to subtleties in landscape position or shifts from north to south etc.





  • Staff offices to conduct efficient project type work

  • Appropriate expertise from foresters, agronomists, GIS experts, range conservationists, etc., should be available

  • Focus on providing, not a book

  • Phase in at the earliest opportunity

Administrative area: what is this all about? It has to do with conducting project activities. Soil Survey is by policy to be conducted on a project basis. That means an area is identified that can be staffed, equipped, and completed within a 3 to 5 year period. That is an administrative area. That is different in most cases from a MLRA. It is smaller, a subset if you will. It is essential for us to be able to provide imagery and other support that must be scheduled. It is essential for efficient operations.


Info not a book; We have to get away from this publication mentality. It was and is a good concept for the first time over. Record copies is still the requirement, but don’t sell that as the product for update soil surveys. The concept of having better information in tailored formats. I was just reading a letter from one of the stated bragging about the CD they had developed for one of their soil surveys. Their comment, after telling us how happy everyone was with the product, was that it was just a stop gap measure until the publication comes out. What do you think people are going to do with the book when they get it?
Phase in these offices. Your people have to go somewhere when they finish the survey they are currently working on. You haven’t asked for special funds for that.

  • Should be well equipped with computers, GIS, digitizing, printing, GPS, DOQ’s, DEM’s etc. required to do a good job

  • Should be located where there are adequate communication links for data transmission



Adequate communication links: You have heard us encourage placing these offices on University campuses where possible. That is primarily because the Universities have better telecommunications that we do in our offices.


This is beginning to change now. But it also provided access to student help, helps with recruitment, and fosters closer cooperative relationships.


Within this geographic area known as: The Northern Mississippi Valley Loess Hills there are currently 40 independently developed legends. Why shouldn’t our Tech Guides be consistent in an area as uniform as this? Investigations performed at any point in this geographic area should apply to the whole area. Databases can be updated!!! Interpretations can be more consistent. Legends can be simplified. Maps can be joined.
There are three MLRA offices proposed for this area. That should be a minimum of nine soil scientists looking at these landscapes. That means a capability of updating 500,000 acres per year. A 28-year job. However, all doesn’t need to be remapped. 8 Counties are new; another 8 are less than 20 years old. Maintenance is appropriate for those. The remaining 24 counties need projects designed. 15 years at best if managed well.





Download 0.65 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   ...   35




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page