|
|
Page | 12/14 | Date | 07.02.2018 | Size | 1.89 Mb. | | #40066 |
|
and the charming Mrs. Lander moved into our neighborhood
78 The Lander Legacy
only about a year ago, they are generally regarded as old and
familiar friends.
Some exercise leadership by shouting: “Follow me!” while others shout
“Wait for me!” Still others are forced to drag their followers, often kicking
and screaming, to the place they wish to lead them. It was this third
situation that characterized the early days of Dr. Lander’s tenure as QJC
president. Lander soon discovered that every discussion about building a
new facility was soon dominated by a single issue: the cost. Where will the
money come from? How will we be able to afford the upkeep? We already
tried this, and it almost put us into bankruptcy!
With his ally Morris Lifschitz at his side, Lander fought valiantly to
convince a battered congregation that the cost of doing nothing was even
more expensive than building a new home. The two succeeded in slowly
generating community support for a new building that would include a
school for the children, a sanctuary for prayer and study and a social hall.
Lander laid out a two-part plan designed to spread the costs over a longer
period. Phase A, for which the funds could be raised from within the community
itself, would provide only the school building. The sanctuary and
social hall would be added later with funding raised from outside sources.
It was Lander’s vision that the school building would provide adequate
space for a day school, an institution that he felt was absolutely essential
for Jewish survival in America.
As the plans were drawn up and attractive elevation renderings were
displayed to the congregation, enthusiasm for the project accelerated dramatically.
It was clear that Morris Lifschitz had performed a great mitzvah
by enticing Bernard Lander into joining the Forest Hills community. The
rabbi—and now, doctor of sociology—not only understood the priorities
of survival required by a Torah community like Forest Hills, but he also
possessed the skills to vigorously articulate those priorities in the greater
context of Jewish history. This talent is clearly demonstrated in his dramatic
plea for support that included the following heart-stirring passage:
In the last two decades we have witnessed, first, the saddest
and, then, the happiest moments of almost two thousand years
of Jewish history. In the wake of Buchenwald and Dachau, the
song of our pioneers and builders again arises from the plains of
Sharon and hills of Judea.
New Horizons 79
Whilst we exalt in the victories and rejoicing of our brethren in Israel,
we must not forsake our Jewish Communities in the Diaspora. We
cannot surrender five million American Jews and American Jewish life
to religious assimilation and desiccation. As we work for an expanding
economy and community in Israel, we must simultaneously strive for
the building of a creative and self-respecting Jewish life in America.
In the building of our Synagogue and Center, we are making a significant
contribution to a vital Jewish life in Forest Hills.
A variety of topics were capturing the attention of the American
public on August 13, 1951. In Jerusalem, the World Zionist Congress
was convening to re-examine its future role in relation to the State
of Israel, while in East Berlin more than one million German youth
took to the streets in a frightening government-directed “peace festival”
marked by anti-American slogans and banners professing their
devotion to communism. Closer to home, golfer Ben Hogan blazed
to a stellar finish in the biggest single purse of his career as his six under
par performance earned him an astounding $12,500, while Babe
Didrikson-Zaharias took home the LPGA World Golf Championship
trophy. The New York Giants were on their way to winning the pennant
and black center fielder Willie Mays was completing his first season
in the majors that would result in his winning the League’s 1951
Rookie of the Year award.
But there were also two landmark events that coincided on that date
in the lives of Bernard and Sarah Lander that overshadowed all of the
other news of the day. It was on this bright summer afternoon that ground
was broken on 108th Street in Queens for the QJC’s new school building,
and it was also on this day that the Lander’s first child, Esther, arrived into
the world.
The school building was completed in June of the following year,
and since it could comfortably accommodate more than 300 worshippers,
regular services were soon scheduled. The use of the school building
was a temporary measure, intended to last only until funds could
be obtained to complete Phase Two of the project that would see a
sanctuary and social hall added to the floor plan. But a Jewish institution
is not merely built with bricks and mortar. Under Lander’s vision
for the future of the Forest Hills community, this new facility was to
be the home of a day school that would provide Jewish learning and
80 The Lander Legacy
transmit Torah values to each succeeding generation of young people.
So, months before the building was dedicated, Lander had turned his
focus to the vital goal of establishing just such a school.
Assembling a group of activist congregants and enlisting the enthusiastic
support of Rabbi Morris Max, Lander created a founder’s
group that would evolve into the day school’s first board of directors.
Lander felt that the school should be autonomous, with its own distinguishing
name and identity. He suggested naming the new school after
his Yeshiva mentor, Rabbi Dr. Bernard (Dov) Revel. The others agreed.
Yeshiva Dov Revel opened its doors for the fall semester of 1952 in
the QJC’s newly constructed school building, offering a first and second
grade curriculum. The school added classes each year and eventually served
children from kindergarten through eighth grade. With the exception
of Talmud and Torah classes in the middle school that were segregated
by gender, classes were mixed. Under the leadership of its first principal,
Rabbi Dr. Morris Charner, the school soon developed a reputation for
academic excellence. Attracting students through the high quality of both
its Judaic and general curricula, Yeshiva Dov Revel eventually reached an
enrollment of more than one thousand students, creating the need for a
new expanded building on 112th Street.
Bernard Lander continued to serve as president of the congregation
for another five years, but it would be nearly ten years before
the synagogue component of the QJC building would be completed.
Much to the sorrow of his congregants, the shul’s beloved Rabbi Max
made aliyah to Israel a few years later. He was succeeded by Rabbi
Joseph Grunblatt, who would serve as QJC’s spiritual leader for the
next forty years.
Bernard Lander’s work in restoring vitality to the Forest Hills Jewish
community reached beyond the day school and the synagogue, institutions
with which he was directly involved. Taken together these facilities
constituted a solid cornerstone for the entire Queens Jewish community.
Over the coming years, their presence attracted a class of highly committed
Jews to Forest Hills. The neighborhood was marked by an ambience
of reverence and serious dedication to Jewish values, as evidenced by the
thirty QJC families headed by ordained Orthodox rabbis. The community
became home to the leaders of major Jewish organizations such as
New Horizons 81
the Orthodox Union, the Rabbinical Council of America, and Mizrachi.
It was in Forest Hills that these observant families could confidently
send their children to school and enjoy the Torah lifestyle they preferred.
The growth of the Forest Hills Jewish community soon led to a second
Orthodox synagogue opening its doors and, as housing prices began to
escalate, the community expanded into adjoining neighborhoods such as
Kew Gardens.
The transformation of the Queens Jewish community from one eking
out an existence in a ramshackle storefront to a vital center for the nation’s
most Torah-devoted families is a dramatic one that Bernard Lander could
deservedly look back upon with pride. But while Lander was perhaps one
of the most tenacious and goal-oriented leaders to stride across the stage
of American Judaism, he was fundamentally a modest man who did not
thirst for glory. The driving impetus that characterized the Queens transformation
was driven not by Lander’s search for acclaim, but rather by
his intrinsic devotion to Judaic expression. It was these motivations and
instincts that would guide Bernard Lander over the coming decade as he
attained leadership positions at the national level among several major
Jewish organizations. They would guide Lander’s course in the days ahead
as his influence was starting to be felt in circles far beyond his Queens
neighborhood. Lander felt he was ready for the formidable challenges that
lay ahead and so, armed with his confidence and convictions, he set out to
fulfill his destiny in the broader panorama of national leadership.
83
Chapter nine
Learner to Leader
Let all your actions be for the sake of Heaven.
—Pirkei Avot (Ethics of the Fathers) 2:12
Watching the evening news in 2012, one would assume that
the question of Jewish settlements in the Middle East is an
entirely “au courant” issue. But, in fact, the struggle to reclaim
the ancient Jewish homeland dates back to the days before Theodore
Herzl first conceived and articulated the Zionist dream in the late
nineteenth century. There have traditionally been two streams flowing
from the Diaspora that have fed the Zionist current over the decades.
The two constructs of this dichotomy are labeled Political Zionism and
Religious Zionism. It was the latter stream, with its precepts of redemption
based on Biblical scripture, into which Bernard Lander was immersed,
and it was from this movement that he emerged as a leader of
the Mizrachi movement.
Mizrachi originated at the dawn of the twentieth century at a world
conference of religious Zionists held in Vilnius, Lithuania. The gathering,
called by Rabbi Yitzchak Yaacov Reines, was initiated in direct response
to Theodor Herzl’s recent rekindling of the ancient Jewish dream
of territorial redemption. Reines had attended the 1899 Third Zionist
Conference in Switzerland and was responding to Herzl’s call for European
rabbis to support his fledgling movement. Not an observant Jew
himself, Herzl nevertheless clearly understood that for it to gain acceptance,
the Zionist endeavor must contain a religious, not merely a political,
dimension. Rabbi Reines passionately concurred and expounded on
the Torah underpinnings of the Zionist vision during the Vilnius conference.
Inspired by his words, the delegates were moved to action and voted
to create an entity that would place Torah squarely into the heart of the
Zionist movement. In determining a name for this newly forged religious
84 The Lander Legacy
Zionist group, Reines recalled a term coined by his colleague Rabbi Samuel
Mohilever years earlier: Mercaz Ruhani or religious center. Shortened
to Mizrachi, the movement has been a potent force in the development
of the Jewish homeland.
While Mizrachi is perhaps best known for being the first religious political
party in the new state of Israel, where it vigorously campaigned for
laws enforcing Kashrut and Shabbat observance, it was in the American
vineyards of Mizrachi that Bernard Lander toiled, primarily due to the efforts
of Rabbi Meir Bar Ilan. As the American Jewish community sought
to rebuild its leadership in the wake of World War II, Bar Ilan began actively
recruiting young blood to serve in the Mizrachi movement. In 1946,
he succeeded in attracting both Rabbi Lander and his friend Morris Lifschitz
to serve on the organization’s executive board. Lander soon became
a popular and articulate advocate for Jewish settlement in Eretz Yisroel.
As he spoke before newly founded Mizrachi groups in cities across the
country, Lander became an impassioned exponent of the Zionist dream,
presenting the case for religious Zionism to an increasingly receptive audience.
“The clock of Jewish history is moving rapidly before our eyes,” he
would exhort. “It is our duty as serious and stalwart Jews to insure that Torah
is not abandoned in the rush to meet our destiny.” Within two years,
Herzl’s Zionist dream would become a reality, only six months shy of his
1898 prediction that a Jewish state would emerge within fifty years. With
the establishment of the sovereign State of Israel, the Mizrachi movement’s
primary mission shifted to one of shomer (watchman), guardians making
sure that traditional Judaic law and observance would be woven tightly
into the new nation’s legal structure and social fabric.
In 1949, Rabbi Lander’s friend and former faculty advisor Dr. Pinkhos
Churgin was elected president of the national Mizrachi Organization of
America. His first order of business was to begin work towards establishing
a new university in Israel that would combine both religious and general
studies—similar to the Yeshiva University model in New York. Churgin
needed an outspoken and energetic spokesman to carry the banner for his
vision and, not surprisingly, he turned to Bernard Lander. Churgin invited
Lander to join a founder’s group that convened in Atlantic City in 1950.
There, the concept of creating an Orthodox-affiliated institute of higher
learning in Israel was overwhelmingly endorsed, and the name Bar-Ilan
Learner to Leader 85
University, honoring the founder of the American Mizrachi movement,
was selected.
Churgin and Lander’s enthusiasm for the new project was soon met
with widespread scorn among the non-religious Jewish press in both
the United States and Israel. While this was to be expected, the reaction
among Israel’s Orthodox community was not. Churgin encountered
strong pressure from the country’s rabbinic leadership, including
Tel Aviv chief rabbi Isser Yehuda Unterman to abandon his notion of
exporting American-style Yeshiva learning to Israel. The idea of combining
religious and secular studies under the same roof was anathema
to the European-trained rabbis who now constituted the new state’s
religious hierarchy. Churgin was persuaded to abandon his original
concept and, instead, modified his plans to establish a secular, coeducational
Israeli university. The school would be sponsored by American
Orthodox Jewry, and while it would not include a seminary, it would
offer a full-fledged Jewish studies department. It was this concept, as
modified, that succeeded in gaining acceptance in both Israel and the
United States.
By 1952 the Israeli government agreed to allocate land for Bar-Ilan
University in Ramat Gan. At the same time, Dr. Lander was named to
the new school’s board, where he urged his fellow directors to purchase
the orchards and other properties adjacent to the site. This investment
advice proved to be indeed prescient since the school has today become
the nation’s second largest university with a growing enrollment of some
27,000 students. Construction began the following year, and the doors
were opened in 1955. Because of the recruitment and fundraising efforts
conducted by Lander and others, most of the school’s financing and the
majority of the original students came from North America. When Lander
was asked by the board—whose members greatly respected his foresight
and erudition—to conduct screening interviews with prospective American
applicants, he agreed and discovered that he greatly relished this role,
taking pride in his own ability to accurately discern the most promising
of candidates.
Bar-Ilan University articulated its mission in this way: “to blend tradition
with modern technologies and scholarship and teach the compelling
ethics of Jewish heritage to all. To synthesize the ancient and the modern,
86 The Lander Legacy
the sacred and the material, the spiritual and the scientific.” It is this transcendent
quest for ichud and havdalah—determining the points of unification
and lines of demarcation of the sacred and the secular—that would
come to characterize the rest of Bernard Lander’s professional life and
eventually form the cornerstone of his lasting legacy to the Jewish people.
Pinkhos Churgin died in 1957, shortly after Bar-Ilan University started
its third year of operation. Prior to his death, however, Rabbi Churgin
had attempted to point his prot.g.e, Bernard Lander, towards deploying
his talents to benefit his alma mater, Yeshiva University. Churgin had repeatedly
urged Yeshiva president, Dr. Samuel Belkin, to hire Dr. Lander
to reinvigorate the school’s flagging graduate programs. Eventually Belkin
saw fit to act upon Churgin’s advice.
The call came in November 1954 when Belkin, who had assumed the
helm at Yeshiva in 1943 after the death of founder Bernard Revel, told
Lander that he wanted to discuss bringing him onboard to help administer
Yeshiva’s two postgraduate schools. The first was a Jewish studies program
initiated by Revel himself in 1935 and renamed the Bernard Revel
Graduate School subsequent to the founder’s death. The second program
was established in 1948 as the School of Education and Community Administration
or SECA. SECA’s founding dean was a member of Yeshiva’s
first graduating class, Dr. Jacob Hartstein, who had fielded a small but
outstanding faculty and fashioned a curriculum offering advanced courses
in psychology, education, and social work. Hartstein left Yeshiva in the
early 1950s before either of the graduate programs had been accredited
for the issuance of postgraduate degrees. Lander greeted Belkin’s invitation
with enthusiasm and, after resolving a potential conflict with his employer
Share with your friends: |
The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message
|
|