Theorizing Social Media Usage Behaviour


Availability of data and material



Download 124.43 Kb.
View original pdf
Page7/8
Date16.04.2023
Size124.43 Kb.
#61141
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8
theory article.edited
Chapt5-Single (1)
Availability of data and material: Not applicable
Code availability Not applicable
Conflict of interest:
There is no conflict of interests
Funding sources:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public,
commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Ethics approval: Not applicable
Consent to participate: Not applicable
Consent for publication: Not applicable


References
Appel, H, Gerlach, AL Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, Barrett, D. (2010). Supernormal stimuli How primal urges overran their evolutionary purpose. WW Norton & Company.
Błachnio, A, Przepiórka, A, & Pantic, I. (2015). Internet use, Facebook intrusion, and depression Results of a cross-sectional study. European Psychiatry, 30(6), 681-684.
Brailovskaia, J, & Margraf, J. (2017). Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD) among German students—A longitudinal approach. PLoS One, 12(12), e0189719.
Brand, M, Wegmann, E, Stark, RM ller, AW lfling, K, Robbins, T. W, & Potenza, MN. (2019). The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet- use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 104, Chen, GM. Revisiting the social enhancement hypothesis Extroversion indirectly predicts number of Facebook friends operating through Facebook usage. Computers
in Human Behavior, 39, Davis, FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Davis, FD, Bagozzi, RP Warshaw, PR. User acceptance of computer technology a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8),
982-1003.
Dunbar, RI, Arnaboldi, V, Conti, M, & Passarella, A. (2015). The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world. Social networks, 43, Ellison, NB, Vitak, J, Gray, R, & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855-870.
Haidt, J, Stockwell, TR. (2019). The dark psychology of social networks why it feels like everything is going haywire.
Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/12/social-media-democracy/
600763/
Johnston, K, Tanner, M, Lalla, N, & Kawalski, D. (2013). Social capital the benefit of
Facebook friends. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(1), 24-36.
Kahneman, D, & Riis, J. (2005). Living, and thinking about it Two perspectives on life. The
science of well-being, 1, 285-304.
Katz, E, Blumler, JG Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The public opinion quarterly, 37(4), Keep, M, Janssen, A, & Amon, K. (2019). Image Sharing on Social Networking Sites Who,
What, Why, and So What. In The Oxford Handbook of Cyberpsychology.
Leary, MR. Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value Getting to the root of self-esteem. European review of social psychology, 16(1), 75-111.
Matz, SC, Kosinski, M, Nave, G, & Stillwell, DJ. Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the national academy of
sciences, 114(48), 12714-12719.


Mercier, H. (2017). How gullible are we A review of the evidence from psychology and social science. Review of General Psychology, 21(2), 103-122.
Muthukrishna, M, & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human

Download 124.43 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page