Top 10 global brands



Download 0.5 Mb.
Page5/8
Date19.10.2016
Size0.5 Mb.
#5071
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

Cisco in the 1980's


Cisco was formed by the married couple, Len Bosack and Sandy Lerner, who worked as computer operations staff at Stanford University. In 1984 they were joined by another computer engineer Richard Troiano. They formed the company that would sell computer networking products. The name Cisco, comes from the city name San Francisco.

The early work on the router was the ability to use multiple routing protocols, i.e., instructions sets to guide traffic. Think of a router as a traffic signal at an intersection. All it does is move traffic forward, to the left, to the right, or stop. That is what a router does. But this is not trivial. Each network has its own address, and it works with a routing protocol. The Cisco router combines those elements and redirects traffic, like a Web Page, or e-mail, or a file or document across a network. It can direct traffic from one location to another; continent to continent, showed little growth in the company, this may have been due to the fact that networking operations were not driving computer sales the way they are now. The two founders Bosack and Lerner were managers of different departments at Stanford University.

The early days were difficult; at times making payroll was a challenge. It was not until 1988 that Donald Valentine was approached that things changed. Valentine was a venture capitalist and agreed to capitalize Cisco. In return he would be given stock ownership control of the company. This meant that the old management team was replaced. First he brought in John Morgridge as President and CEO. Over the next few years, while the Internet grew, the demand for Internetworking devices also grew. Cisco was, as they say, in the right place at the right time.

In 1991 John Chambers joined the company. He was brought in after having done management stints at IBM and Wang Computers. In 1995, however, he was named CEO. This was the beginning of the rise to new levels for Cisco. Since 1995, the company has exploded in growth, and it has been the acquisitions plus the basic R&D that Chambers insisted on that made the product brand a success.



STRENGTHS
Robust financial performance.
Diverse customer base and product offerings.
Extensive geographic reach.

WEAKNESSES
Weak presence in contact center technologies and declining storage networking market share.
Relatively weak presence in china.

STRATEGIES BEING EMPLOYED
Unfortunately, for the company’s stockholders and employees, these old glory days are gone and forgotten, as the company’s revenue growth has tapered off, margins have been shrinking, and its stock price hovering near all time low—near 80 percent below its all time high in 2001. What did it go wrong? What are the strategy lessons for its leadership?

Two things did go wrong. First, the company lost its innovation momentum, as it relied more on external acquisitions for new product development. Over the period 1993-2000, Cisco acquired seventy companies, including Cresendo Communications (1993), Newport Systems Solutions (1994), Network Translation (1995), Netsys Technologies (1996), Net Speed (1998), and Growth Networks (1999), etc. The problem with this strategy, however, is that it isn’t sustainable, as the owners of these smaller companies demand higher and higher premium to compensate them for the risks they assume — Cisco end up paying top prices for Net Speed and Growth Networks acquired at the peak of the high-tech bubble. Strategic acquisitions further end up being dilutive to existing stockholders when paid with the issuing of new stock — that’s how Cisco ended up with 5.5 billion shares.


Here is strategy lesson 1: Breakthrough innovation isn’t a commodity that can be purchased in the market, but an organizational capability that must be nurtured inside corporate boundaries.  Cisco must return to its innovative trait; develop its own internal capabilities as Corning Inc. (NYSE:GLW)—a 160 years old company—and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Google (NASDAG:GOOG) have been practicing, coming up with  the one innovative product line after the other,  pioneering their own markets rather than trying to colonize the market of others.
The second thing that went wrong with Cisco is that the company lost its customer-centric orientation. Its leadership got obsessed with the product supply chain, lost its focus, and end up distancing itself from its customers. The Flip video product line—a misguided acquisition that drove the company outside its core business is a case in point. The “edge” routers—Internet gear deployed by Cisco customers to get closer to their own customers are another case in point. By failing to keep up in this area of business, Cisco has been losing market share to Juniper Networks (NYSE:JNPR), Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE:ALU), and Huawei Technologies, distancing itself, at the same time, from the end customer.
Here is strategy lesson 2. The customer is the center of the economic universe, the beginning and ending of every economic activity, the ultimate boss of every capitalist enterprise. Breakthrough innovations begin with the customer and continue with the development of the right products to address the needs and desires of the customer; and end end when the product fulfills these needs and desires.

PRIMARY REASON FOR BEING THE GLOBAL BRAND
According to research by Google and CEB Marketing Leadership Council, consumers feel more emotionally connected to B2B brands than consumer brands. This is in relation to consumer buying habits and how B2B brands represent themselves to the public. In this study Cisco ranks highly as a global brand, which is supported by other recent studies of comparable brands.
This data is backed up by two other recent studies. One by Interbrand places the Cisco brand at number 13 out of the 100 top websites, rising 6% on last years survey, putting it one ahead of Disney. This gave it the position as number 8 among other high-tech brands.

Another survey, this time by Global by Design, ranked the Cisco brand as the Best Global Enterprise Technology website worldwide. This scorecard was done within a group of similar sized peers, including IBM, Xerox, SAP, Intel and Oracle, amongst others.

In another study by the same group the Cisco brand came out in the top 5 list for 2013. The reasons: a “global template that is flexible enough to support local content and promotions,” 40 international languages, and the support of locally relevant social networks. What works for Cisco customers in South Korea works equally well in South Dakota or Southampton.
Mark Yolton, VP of Digital, has been leading the charge within Cisco Marketing to deliver “a company-wide next-generation digital strategy” across all digital channels. Judging by the results outlined here, his strategy is paying dividends.

BMW
HISTORY




Download 0.5 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page