Total Manpower Strength 46,000

OPERATIONAL NOTES

LATEST UPDATE: 1 November 2010

© 2011 Military Periscope. All rights reserved. Redistribution of content is prohibited without prior consent of Military Periscope.

Published on Arms Control Association (http://www.armscontrol.org)

Home > Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: North Korea

Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: North Korea

This profile details which major arms control agreements, regimes, initiatives, and practices that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) subscribes to and those that it does not. It also describes the major weapons programs, policies, and holdings of North Korea, as well as its proliferation record. This profile is one of a series focused on the arms control record and status of key states, all of which are available on the Arms Control Association’s Website at http://www.armscontrol.org.

Major Multilateral Arms Control Agreements and Treaties

Signed

Ratified

- - -

Chemical Weapons Convention

- - -

- - -

- - -

Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT)

-Announced its withdrawal Jan. 10, 2003.

- - -

Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons

- - -

- - -

- - -

Ottawa Mine Ban Convention

- - -

- - -

Australia Group: Not a member.

Missile Technology Control Regime: Not a member, and has frequently exported missiles and related materials.

Nuclear Suppliers Group: Not a member.

Wassenaar Arrangement: Not a member.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Additional Protocol: None.

Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism: Not a participant.

Hague Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation: Not a participant.

Proliferation Security Initiative: Not a participant.

UN Security Council Resolutions 1540 and 1673: North Korea has not filed the requested reports on its activities to fulfill the resolutions.

Major Weapons Programs, Policies, and Practices

Biological Weapons:

Despite having signed the Biological Weapons Convention, North Korea reportedly maintains a biological weapons program. In 2003, the Central Intelligence Agency concluded that over the previous six months “North Korea was believed to have possessed a munitions production infrastructure that would have allowed it to weaponize [biological weapon] agents, and may have such weapons available for use.”[1]

Chemical Weapons:

North Korea is widely reported to possess a large arsenal of chemical weapons, including mustard, phosgene, and sarin agents. According to U.S. military estimates, North Korea “can deploy missiles with chemical warheads.”[2]

Missiles:

* Ballistic Missiles: North Korea is actively expanding its ballistic missile arsenal and allegedly working toward developing intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). It initially relied upon assistance from the Soviet Union and China to develop its arsenal, but North Korea is now a chief exporter of ballistic missile systems and technology. The North Korean military currently deploys short-range Scud and medium-range missiles. The inaugural flight test of North Korea’s longest-range missile, the Taepo Dong-2, ended in failure about 40 seconds after launch on July 5, 2006. The sole flight test of its predecessor, the Taepo Dong-1, also failed in August 1998.

* Cruise Missiles:The most recent flight tests of surface-to-ship cruise missiles occurred in early 2003. General speculation is that North Korean cruise missiles are derived from Chinese Silkworm missile designs.

Nuclear Weapons:

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) discovered in 1992 that North Korea had diverted plutonium from its civilian program. The resulting crisis eventually yielded the 1994 U.S.-North Korean Agreed Framework, in which North Korea committed to freezing its plutonium-based weapons program at Yongbyon in exchange for two light-water reactors and other forms of energy assistance.

The Agreed Framework collapsed after the United States accused North Korea of cheating on the arrangement. U.S. intelligence increasingly had suspected North Korea of pursuing a uranium-enrichment program as an alternative path to nuclear weapons, thereby violating the agreement’s spirit, as well as that of an earlier Korean peninsula denuclearization agreement (see “Other Arms Control and Nonproliferation Activities” below). U.S. officials say that North Korean negotiators admitted to having such a covert program when challenged October 2002 on the issue. North Korean officials, however, have denied that alleged admission and continue to deny ever pursuing an uranium-enrichment program.

The Korean Economic Development Organization (KEDO), the multilateral body created to provide energy assistance to North Korea under the Agreed Framework, halted its energy aid to North Korea in November 2002. A year and one month later, KEDO suspended construction of the two light-water reactors.

North Korea ordered IAEA inspectors to leave the country Dec. 27, 2002, and announced its withdrawal from the NPT Jan. 10, 2003. In response, the IAEA referred the case to the UN Security Council. In August 2003, Russia, China, Japan, the United States, and the two Koreas also launched a multilateral diplomatic process, known as the six-party talks.

The talks initially failed to resolve the disputes, and on Feb. 10, 2005, North Korea announced that it had assembled nuclear warheads. In September 2005, the six-party talks realized its first major success with the adoption of a joint statement in which North Korea pledged to abandon its nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons programs and return to the NPT. The talks faltered shortly after. On Oct. 9, 2006, North Korea conducted its first, and so far only, nuclear test. The UN Security Council responded by adopting resolution 1718, enacting a variety of multilateral sanctions and demanding that Pyongyang return to the NPT.

On Feb. 13, 2007, the six-party participants agreed to an action plan detailing initial steps to implement the September 2005 Joint Statement. That action plan included shutting down North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor in return for energy aid. Using the Yongbyon facilities, North Korea is thought to have produced sufficient plutonium to assemble 6-12 nuclear devices.[3]

The six parties concluded a follow-up agreement to the Feb. 13 action plan on Oct. 3, 2007. In that later agreement, North Korea agreed to disable its plutonium-production program at Yongbyon and provide a full accounting of all nuclear activities. In exchange for these actions, North Korea received the remaining energy aid pledged in the Feb. 13 agreement. The United States also committed to remove North Korea from its list of state sponsors of terrorism and to stop applying the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act against Pyongyang.

Proliferation Record

North Korea is a leading supplier of Scud missiles and longer-range missile technology to “the Middle East, South Asia, and North Africa,” according to the Central Intelligence Agency. It concluded in a 2003 report that “exports of ballistic missiles and related technology were one of the North's major sources of hard currency, which supported ongoing missile development and production.”[4] North Korea’s primary missile trading partners are Iran, Libya, Egypt, Pakistan, and Syria. There is ample speculation that North Korea bartered missiles for uranium enrichment technology from Pakistan.

Other Arms Control and Nonproliferation Activities

In December 1991, the two Koreas signed a Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. Under the declaration, both countries agreed not to “test, manufacture, produce, receive, possess, store, deploy or use nuclear weapons” or to “possess nuclear reprocessing and uranium enrichment facilities.” The parties also agreed to mutual inspections for verification, which have not been implemented.

-Researched and prepared by Alex Bollfrass.

ENDNOTES

2. Statement of General Thomas A. Schwartz, Commander in Chief United Nations Command/Combined Forces Command and Commander, United States Forces Korea, before the 107th Congress, Senate Armed Forces Committee, March 5, 2002.

3. Arms Control Association, Arms Control Association Condemns North Korean Nuclear Test Threat; Experts Call for More Effective, Energetic U.S. Diplomacy, October 4, 2006, http://www.armscontrol.org/pressroom/2006/20061004_NorthKorea.asp.

4. Central Intelligence Agency, Unclassified Report to Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Relating to Weapons of Mass Destruction and Advanced Conventional Munitions, 1 July Through 31 December 2003, https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/archived-reports-1/july_dec2003.htm.

* Fact Sheets & Briefs

* North Korea

* Country Profiles

The Arms Control Association is a non-profit, membership-based organization.

If you find our resources useful, please consider joining or making a contribution.

Arms Control Today encourages reprint of its articles with permission of the Editor.

© 1997-2009 Arms Control Association

1313 L St., NW, Ste. 130

Washington, DC 20005

Tel: (202) 463-8270 | Fax: (202) 463-8273

Source URL: http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/northkoreaprofile

---------

http://www.militaryperiscope.com/cgi-bin/news/archive/shownews.pl?date=20101013&recordnum=11159