earlier. In the case of the health-care
system this is not correct, these extensive coverage of services is much more expensive than a change of path or direction; less coverage would be cheaper.
However, people expect these universal heath-care services, thus one might call this process social path-dependence. When looking at the creation and reforms of labour-market
policies in Poland, one can also see an influence of the communist era. The newly created labour-market and unemployment policies were very state oriented and workers were highly protected. Economic circumstances resulted in many reforms which needed to create a stable, sustainable and cheaper labour-market policy. In spite of a major cut of government expenditures, workers were always protected. This Bismarckian approach was the result of the history of Poland and choices made earlier. The economic circumstances forced Poland to reform its labour-market. In stead of a more liberal approach
which was taken by Slovakia, Poland choose to protect its workers and hold on to some of its socialist ideas.
All in all, one must conclude that the analysis of reforms of four important aspects of the Polish and
Slovakian welfare state does not lead to a consequent answer on the question whether a process policy diffusion or path-dependence has taken place and will take place in the future. As said above, both processes can be observed in both
Poland and the Slovak Republic; it simply depends on the aspect of the welfare state or policy field. Policy diffusion has taken place during the reforms of the
Polish pension system. Path-dependence has taken place during the creation of adjustment of labour-market and unemployment policies in Poland. Also policy diffusion has taken place during the reforms of the Slovakian health-care system. At the same time, a process of path-dependence has taken place. The wide scope of services covered is the result of the communist era.
The latter is very interesting; a combination of both policy diffusion and path-dependence has taken place at the same time.
Concluding one can see three processes which have taken place, namely the process of policy diffusion, the process or path-dependence and a process which combines both policy diffusion and path-dependence. Again, what process is taking place to what extent depends on the policy field and country one analyses.
Share with your friends: