knowing it?
Steele replicated this effect with other stereotyped groups as well.
When Steele gave a math test to a group of white and Asian men who were strong in math, the white men in
the group who were told thatAsians do slightly better than whites on the test indeed didn’t do as well as the white men in the control group who weren’t told that. Steele’s experiments with strong female math students showed similar results.
Again, when the students unconscious expectation was that they would score lower, they, in fact, did.
The greater meaning behind Steele’s research, then, is quite profound:
What we’re conditioned to believe about ourselves, and what we’re programmed to think other people think about us, affects
our performance, including how successful we are. It’s the same with placebos:
What we’re conditioned to believe will happen when we take a pill, and what we think that everyone around us (including our doctors) expects will happen when we do, affects how our bodies respond to the pill.
Could it be that many drugs or even surgeries actually work better because we’re repeatedly primed, educated, and conditioned to believe in their effects—when if it weren’t for the placebo effect, those drugs might notwork as well or at all?
Can You Be Your Own Placebo?Two recent studies from the University of Toledo perhaps shed the best light on how the mind alone can determine what someone perceives
and experiences For each study, researchers divided a group of healthy volunteers into two categories—optimists and pessimists—according to how the volunteers answered questions on a diagnostic questionnaire. In the first study, they gave the subjects a placebo but told them it was a drug that would make them feel unwell. The pessimists had a stronger negative reaction to the pill than the optimists. In the second study, the researchers gave the subjects a placebo as well, but told them it would help them sleep better. The optimists reported much better sleep than the pessimists.
So the optimists were more likely to respond positively to a suggestion that something would make them feel better, because they were primed to hope for the best future scenario. And the pessimists were more likely to respond negatively to a suggestion that something would make them feel worse, because they consciously or unconsciously expected the worst potential outcome. It’s as if the optimists were unconsciously making the specific
chemicals to help them sleep, while the pessimists were
67
unconsciously making a pharmacy of substances that made them feel unwell.
In other words, inexactly the same environment, those with a positive mindset tend to create positive situations, while those with a negative mindset tend to create negative situations. This is the
miracle of our own free-willed, individual, biological engineering.
While we may not know
exactly how many medical healings are due to the placebo effect (Beecher’s 1955 paper, mentioned earlier in this chapter, claimed the number was 35 percent, but modern-day research shows it can range anywhere from 10 to 100 percent, the overall number is certainly extremely significant. Given that, we have to ask ourselves,
Share with your friends: