Z o m g ! Z o m g ! 2010

written before Leibniz own development of calculus concepts and techniques

Download 0.82 Mb.

View original pdf

Page	26/29
Date	07.08.2023
Size	0.82 Mb.
	#61815

1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Comprehensive Critical Reasoning Guide

Researcher’s conclusion
The historian doesn’t defend the position, he opposes it. So incorrect.

written before Leibniz own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz
notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book sections that precede the ones in which
Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented.
In the historian’s reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles This is a question where it’s absolutely necessary to identify what the author’s stand on the argument
is, and hence identifying the conclusion becomes vital. The traditional view is that Leibniz and Newton developed these simultaneously. But people believe this is false because they found Leibniz mentioning that he’d studied Newton’s book. Look at what the historian says in response A more cautious conclusion. So this means he doesn’t believe that Leibniz had written the works after Newton and hence justifies that by giving an alternative explanation. Soto deconstruct this question we have two statements
Researcher’s conclusion: Traditional view is false.
Historian’s conclusion: Researcher’s conclusion is false.

| ZOMG! ZOMG! ZOMG!
28 A. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends the second is evidence that has been used to support an opposing position.
The historian doesn’t
defend the position, he opposes it. So incorrect.
B. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends the second is that position
. Once again, the historian doesn’t defend this position, hence incorrect.
C. The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.

Download 0.82 Mb.

Share with your friends:

1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29