Zero Point Energy doc
Download 0.97 Mb. View original pdf
|
| ZP OWER C ORPORATION PAGE OF 352 Z ERO P OINT E NERGY There's another way to help also. When we draw out a certain rate of NATIVE energy format, and process it into observable format, then instead of just propagating that waste observable energy out of there, we can RETROREFLECT it repeatedly and intensely, and reuse it. That way, we dig a certain size "hole" in the local vacuum native energy, so to speak, and then stop. We reprocess most of the waste energy, so our overall POTENTIAL (i.e., density of collected energy) can be very great, without getting into all the weird "vacuum conditioning" effects. That is, we store up an intense reservoir of recycling observable energy, and use and reuse that energy over and over. In the real world, we can only do that so much, but in an intensely scattering medium that can be appreciable as shown by Patterson's macroscopic adaptation of anti-Stokes emission and by Lawandy's use of colloidal solutions of titanium dioxide (main ingredient in white paint) to achieve great energy gain and lasing without population inversion. In other words, you setup a given "storage" of "cumulation" of recycling energy. The actual linear flow of the energy can then be enormous, without taking out nearly that much from the native vacuum energy format. You only have to replenish the losses or inefficiencies of the recovery process. Say, e.g., that you can get good efficiencies in cumulation recovery so that only exp) of the energy is being irretrievably lost. Then you can power substantially large loads without too much fuss from the native vacuum. AND, you can also apply to those losses a "reprocessing into native format" process, to further reduce the local vacuum environment's degradation. I have wished for sometime that we could get the Department of Energy and the Universities turned onto this type of thing and to overunity. That still seems to be almost a lost cause. They simply can't seem to get it through their heads that only by altering Maxwell's equations (regauging symmetrically, the Lorentz condition) have they ASSUMED AWAY the overunity systems that Maxwell's unregauged equations rigorously allow and prescribe. And they can't seem to get it through their heads that (electromagnetically) the work-energy theorem W = (phi)(q) is a special case for ONE-PASS of the Poynting energy flow along and around a circuit, and on off into space. You get a completely different version when you use multiple passes by retroreflection (particularly by phase conjugate reflection. Then you have to use something like W = (alpha)(phi)(q), where alpha is a factor due to multipass, multicollection. In that case, alpha <1.0 gives you the conventional case, alpha = 1.0 gives the limit of the conventional case, and |