Zubair, ayodeji opeyemi



Download 224.29 Kb.
Page2/3
Date20.10.2016
Size224.29 Kb.
#6132
1   2   3

CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

The procedure adopted in this research work forms the basis for deriving statistics of land use dynamics and subsequently in the overall, the findings.



Fig 1. Cartographic Model



3.2 Data Acquired and Source

For the study, Landsat satellite images of Kwara State were acquired for three Epochs; 1972, 1986 and 2001. Both 1972 and 1986 were obtained from Global Land Cover Facility (GLCF) an Earth Science Data Interface, while that of 2001 was obtained from National Space Research and Development Agency in Abuja (NASRDA). 0n both 2001 and 1986 images, a notable feature can be observed which is the Asa dam which was not yet constructed as of 1972.

It is also important to state that Ilorin and its environs which were carved out using the local government boundary map and Nigerian Administrative map was also obtained from NASRDA. These were brought to Universal Transverse Marcator projection in zone 31.



S/N

DATA TYPE

DATE OF PRODUCTION

SCALE

SOURCE

1.
2.
3.

Landsat image
Landsat image
Landsat image

2001-11-03
1986-11-15
1972-11-07

30m ™
30m TM
80m TM

NASRDA
GLCF
GLCF

4

FORMECU Land use/land cover

Vegetation map.


1995

1:1,495, 389

(view scale)



FORMECU


5

Administrative and local government

Map of Nigeria.


2005

1:15,140,906

(view scale)


NASRDA

6

Land use and infrastructure map

of Ilorin.

1984

1:150, 000

Ilorin Agricultural

Development

Project

Table 3.1 Data Source


3.2.1 Geo-referencing Properties of the Images
The geo-referencing properties of both 1986 & 2001 are the same while image

thinning was applied to the 1972 imagery which has a resolution of 80m using a factor of two to modify its properties and resolution to conform to the other two has given below;

Data type: rgb8

File type: binary

Columns: 535

Rows: 552

Referencing system: utm-31

Reference units: m

Unit distance: 1

Minimum X: 657046.848948

Maximum X: 687541.848948

Minimum Y: 921714.403281

Maximum Y: 953178.403281

Min Value: 0

Max Value: 215

Display Minimum: 0

Display Maximum: 215

Image thinning was carried out through contract; contract generalizes an image by reducing the number of rows and columns while simultaneously decreasing the cell resolution. Contraction may take place by pixel thinning or pixel aggregation with the contracting factors in X and Y being independently defined. With pixel thinning, every nth pixel is kept while the remaining is thrown away.


3.3 Software Used

Basically, five software were used for this project viz;

(a) ArcView 3.2a – this was used for displaying and subsequent processing and enhancement of the image. It was also used for the carving out of Ilorin region from the whole Kwara State imagery using both the admin and local government maps.

(b) ArcGIS – This was also used to compliment the display and processing of the data

(c) Idrisi32 – This was used for the development of land use land cover classes and subsequently for change detection analysis of the study area.

(d) Microsoft word – was used basically for the presentation of the research.



  1. Microsoft Excel was used in producing the bar graph.

3.4 Development of a Classification Scheme

Based on the priori knowledge of the study area for over 20 years and a brief reconnaissance survey with additional information from previous research in the study area, a classification scheme was developed for the study area after Anderson et al (1967). The classification scheme developed gives a rather broad classification where the land use land cover was identified by a single digit.



CODE

LAND USE/LAND COVER

CATEGORIES

1

Farmland

2

Wasteland

3

Built-up land

4

Forestland

5

Water bodies

Table 3.2 Land use land cover classification scheme

The classification scheme given in table 3.2 is a modification of Anderson’s in 1967

The definition of waste land as used in this research work denotes land without scrub, sandy areas, dry grasses, rocky areas and other human induced barren lands.


3.5 Limitation(s) in the Study

There was a major limitation as a result of resolution difference. Landsat image of 1972 was acquired with the multi - spectral scanner (MSS) which has a spatial resolution of 80 meters, whilst the images of 1986 and 2001 were acquired with Thematic Mapper ™ and Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM) respectively. These both have a spatial resolution of 30 meters. Although this limitation was corrected for through image thinning of the 1972, it still prevented its use for projecting into the future so as to have a consistent result. Apart from this, it produced an arbitrary classification of water body for the 1972 classification.


3.6 Methods of Data Analysis

Six main methods of data analysis were adopted in this study.



  1. Calculation of the Area in hectares of the resulting land use/land cover types for each study year and subsequently comparing the results.

  2. Markov Chain and Cellular Automata Analysis for predicting change

  3. Overlay Operations

  4. Image thinning

  5. Maximum Likelihood Classification

  6. Land Consumption Rate and Absorption Coefficient

The fist three methods above were used for identifying change in the land use types. Therefore, they have been combined in this study.

The comparison of the land use land cover statistics assisted in identifying the percentage change, trend and rate of change between 1972 and 2001.

In achieving this, the first task was to develop a table showing the area in hectares and the percentage change for each year (1972, 1986 and 2001) measured against each land use land cover type. Percentage change to determine the trend of change can then be calculated by dividing observed change by sum of changes multiplied by 100
(trend) percentage change = observed change * 100

Sum of change


In obtaining annual rate of change, the percentage change is divided by 100 and multiplied by the number of study year 1972 – 1986 (14years) 1986 – 2001 (15years)

Going by the second method (Markov Chain Analysis and Cellular Automata Analysis), Markov Chain Analysis is a convenient tool for modeling land use change when changes and processes in the landscape are difficult to describe. A Markovian process is one in which the future state of a system can be modeled purely on the basis of the immediately preceding state. Markovian chain analysis will describe land use change from one period to another and use this as the basis to project future changes. This is achieved by developing a transition probability matrix of land use change from time one to time two, which shows the nature of change while still serving as the basis for projecting to a later time period .The transition probability may be accurate on a per category basis, but there is no knowledge of the spatial distribution of occurrences within each land use category. Hence, Cellular Automata (CA) was used to add spatial character to the model.

CA_Markov uses the output from the Markov Chain Analysis particularly Transition Area file to apply a contiguity filter to “grow out” land use from time two to a later time period. In essence, the CA will develop a spatially explicit weighting more heavily areas that proximate to existing land uses. This will ensure that land use change occurs proximate to existing like land use classes, and not wholly random.

Overlay operations which is the last method of the three, identifies the actual location and magnitude of change although this was limited to the built-up land. Boolean logic was applied to the result through the reclass module of idrisi32 which assisted in mapping out separately areas of change for which magnitude was later calculated for.

The Land consumption rate and absorption coefficient formula are give below;
L.C.R = A

P A = areal extent of the city in hectares


P = population

L.A.C = A2 – A1



P2 – P1 A1 and A2 are the areal extents (in hectares) for the early and later years, and P1 and P2 are population figure for the early and later years respectively (Yeates and Garner, 1976)

L.C.R = A measure of compactness which indicates a progressive spatial expansion of a city.

L.A.C = A measure of change in consumption of new urban land by each unit increase in urban population

Both the 2001 and 2015 population figures were estimated from the 1991 and the estimated 2001 population figures of Ilorin respectively using the recommended National Population Commission (NPC) 2.1% growth rate as obtained from the 1963/1991 censuses.

The first task to estimating the population figures was to multiply the growth rate by the census figures of Ilorin in both years (1991, 2001) while subsequently dividing same by 100. The result was then multiplied by the number of years being projected for, the result of which was then added to the base year population (1991, 2001). This is represented in the formula below;
n = r/100 * Po (1)

Pn = Po + (n * t) (2)

Pn = estimated population (2001, 2015) Po = base year population (1991 & 2001 population figure)

r = growth rate (2.1%) n = annual population growth

t = number of years projecting for

*The formula given for the population estimate was developed by the researcher

In evaluating the socio – economic implications of change, the effect of observed changes in the land use and land cover between 1972 and 2001 were used as major criteria.


CHAPTER FOUR
DATA ANALYSIS

4.0 Introduction

The objective of this study forms the basis of all the analysis carried out in this chapter. The results are presented inform of maps, charts and statistical tables. They include the static, change and projected land use land cover of each class.


4.1 Land Use Land Cover Distribution

The static land use land cover distribution for each study year as derived from the maps are presented in the table below





LANDUSE/LAND COVER

CATEGORIES


1972

1986

2001

AREA

(Ha.)

AREA

(%)

AREA

(Ha.)

AREA

(%)

AREA

(Ha.)

AREA

(%)

FARM LAND

2437.62723

25

7965.5733

8

14068.4949

15

WASTE LAND

41436.7713

43

55561.149

59

50317.263

52

BUILT-UP LAND

2198.2734

2

9702.8136

10

10815.921

11

FOREST LAND

11036.494

12

21393.0405

22

19960.2315

21

WATER BODY

16874.6562

18

1326.8916

1

787.5576

1

TOTAL

95949.468

100

95949.468

100

95949.468

100

Table 4.1 Land Use Land Cover Distribution (1972, 1986, 2001)
The figures presented in table 4.1 above represents the static area of each land use land cover category for each study year.

Built-up in 1972 occupies the least class with just 2% of the total classes. This may not be unconnected to the fact that the town (Ilorin) was made the state capital in


MAP I. Derived from landsat image of Ilorin in 1972
1967 which is just five years old from the date of creation to the date the image was taken.

Also, farming seems to be practiced moderately, occupying 25% of the total classes. This may be due to the fact that the city is just moving away from the rather traditional setting where farming seems to form the basis for living. Apart from this, the time of the year in which the area was imaged which happens to fall within the onset of hamattan could also be a major contributing factor to the observed classification, contributing to the high percentage of waste land and the low percentage of forest land.


Water body also seems to be arbitrarily exaggerated in the classification due to the aforementioned problem in section 3.5

In 1986, waste land still occupies the highest class with 59% of the total class, taking up more than half of the total classes. Furthermore, the high percentage may be due to the season of the year as mentioned in the last paragraph. Water body takes up the least percentage in the total class.



The pattern of land use land cover distribution in 2001 also follows the pattern in 1986. Waste land still occupies a major part of the total land but there exist an increase by half in the total farm land. Still, water body maintains the least position in the classes whilst built-up occupies 11% of the total class.
4.2 Land Consumption Rate and Absorption Coefficient


YEAR

LAND CONSUMPTION RATE

YEAR

LAND ABSORPTION

COEFFICIENT

1972

0.005

1972/86

0.09

1986

0.02

86/2001

0.005

2001

0.01







Table 4.2.1



YEAR

POPULATION FIGURE

SOURCE

1977

400,000

EPLAN GROUP 1977

1984

480,000

OYEGUN 1986

2001

689,700

RESEARCHER’S ESTIMATE

Table 4.2.2 Population figure of Ilorin in 1977, 1984 and 2001
It should be noted here that the closest year population available to each study year as shown above were used in generating both the Land Consumption Rates and the Land Absorption Coefficients as given in table 4.2.1
4.3 Land Use Land Cover Change: Trend, Rate and Magnitude



LANDUSE/LAND

COVER

CATEGORIES


1972 - 1986

1986 – 2001

ANNUAL RATE

OF CHANGE

AREA

(Ha.)

PERCE

TAGE

CHANGE

AREA

(Ha.)

PERCENT

AGE CHA

NGE



72 - 86



86 - 2001

FARM LAND

-16410.699

-17

6102.9216

7

14068.4949

1.05

WASTE LAND

14124.3777

16

-5243886

-7

50317.263

-1.05

BUILT-UP LAND

7504.5402

8

1113.1074

1

10815.921

0.15

FOREST LAND

4518.3838

10

-1432.809

-1

19960.2315

-0.15

WATER BODY

16874.6562

-17

-539.334

0

787.5576

0

Table 4.3 Land use land cover change of Ilorin and its environs: 1972, 1986 and 2001
From table 4.3, there seems to be a negative change i.e. a reduction in farm land between 1972 and 1986. This may not be unconnected to the change in the economic base of the city from farming to other white collar jobs as a result of the creation of Kwara State in 1967 in which Ilorin was made the state capital. Subsequently, built-up land increased by 8% while both forest land and waste land both increased by 10% and 16% respectively.

Many projects were embarked on after the creation of Kwara State which also falls within the oil boom era of the 1970s and this attracted a lot of people to the area thus contributing to the physical expansion of the city as evident in the increased land consumption rate from 0.005 to 0.02 and land absorption coefficient by 0.09 between 1972 and 1986. Many of these projects include the Army barracks at Sobi, Adewole Housing Estate, the International Airport, Niger River Basin Authority Headquarters, University of Ilorin among many others which all encouraged migration into the city.

The period between 1986 and 2001 witnessed a drop in the rate at which the physical expansion of the city was going as against 1972 and 1986. For instance, the built-up land only increased by 1% as against the 8% increase between 1972 and 1986. This is also evident in the drop observed in the land absorption coefficient from 0.09 between 1972 and 1986. In deed, the austerity measure known as (SAP) introduced into the country at this period to restore the country’s economy could be a major factor to what was witnessed at this period.

Also, there was a general increase of 7% in farm land which is evident in the 7% reduction of waste land and 1% reduction of forest land. This may be as a result of the shift back towards farming after the initial excitement of the oil boom which attracted many people from farming to white collar jobs.

Furthermore, water body seems to remain at 1% though there are slight differences in the total hectare between this period. This was not so in 1972 because Asa river was not yet dammed which was the case in the period between 1986 and 2001 as shown in the maps.

MAP II. Derived from landsat image of Ilorin in 1986



Download 224.29 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page