A. Dugin Eurasia in network war
Download 22.04 Kb.
|
| A.Dugin
Eurasia in network war (Eurasian network on the eve of 2015) The reason for writing this text was an appeal of Vladimir Putin to the Federal Assembly and synchronized approval of an anti-Russian resolution 758 in the US Congress, commenting which Hillary Clinton has openly declared that "the US is starting an information war against Russia”, and Congressman Eliot Engel added: "It is time to recognize that Russia under Vladimir Putin – is a threat to European security and US interests in that region”. In his message, Putin said: "For Russia – Crimea, ancient Korsun, Chersonesos, Sevastopol have a great civilizational and sacred significance, as does the Temple Mount in Jerusalem for those who profess Islam and Judaism. And that is how we feel about it now and shall do forever," that is he proclaimed the course for the revival of the sovereignty and continental power of Russia, as well as its sacred Orthodox identity. In response, the United States openly admitted that they "begin an information war," which, in fact, they are long time waging against us. But now this war goes to the next round. Parallel to this, lately I recorded an increase in frontal attacks on eurasianists and me personally, as well as on a wide network of people, interacting with me in Russia and around the world in recent months. The final point was the hacking of the e-mail of employee of "Eurasian Movement" and the following flurry of publications in central European media about the alleged network of Russian agents of influence around the world, branded for greater discredit as "Black International". I believe that it is time to make some clarifications and simultaneously identify further line of our Eurasian strategy. Eurasianism as the anti-Western ideology Let me remind the background. Eurasianism from its beginning in the early 20-ies of XX century, has always opposed the global domination of Western European universalism and was for distinctive Russian civilization. Therefore, Eurasianism is, indeed, anti-Western ideology that denies the right of Western society to establish their criteria of good and evil as a universal norm. Russia - is an independent Orthodox Eurasian civilization, and not the periphery of Europe, Eurasianists insisted after their ideological predecessors, the Slavophiles and also together with other Russian conservatives. Gradually, Eurasianism was enriched with the geopolitical method based on the dualism of civilization of Land and civilization of Sea, whose concept was developed in the first half of the twentieth century by an Englishman H. Mackinder and developed by American strategists - from N. Spykman to Brzezinski. Russia - is the core of Land civilization, heart land of Eurasia, and is therefore doomed to lead centuries-old battle with the Anglo-Saxon world - previously its core was British Empire, from the second half of the twentieth century - the United States. If the West – is an enemy for the Eurasianists, than the Eurasianists - are enemies of the West and its agents of influence. This is logical. Eurasianists know who their enemy is and who they are fighting, and the enemy knows who are the Eurasianists. In such a situation, it would be strange if Atlanticists, the US imperialists and the liberals loved Eurasianists and their supporters around the world. And vice versa. Hence a clear thesis: either we are on the side of civilization Sushi, or we are on the side of civilization Sea. Land – is synonymous to tradition, faith (for Russian – Orthodox faith), the Empire, the people, the sacred, history, family, ethics. Sea - is for modernization, trade, technology, liberal democracy, capitalism, parliamentarism, individualism, materialism, gender policy. Two mutually exclusive sets of values. Neo-Eurasianism in the post-Soviet period All of these ideas have been restored and developed as a worldview since the late 1980s, by a group of neo-eurasianists who had gathered around me. We have restored a significant portion of the ideological heritage of the first Eurasianists, introduced geopolitics and traditionalism and applied everything to the political realities of a rapidly disintegrating Soviet Union. As the first Eurasianists in 1920, writing in immigration, we were for the transformation of the USSR in the Eurasian empire - with preservation of the entire space under a single strategic control, but with a change in the ideology to being Orthodox and Eurasian. Just like the first Eurasianists, we were convinced that the liberals and Westerners - are the worst enemies of the Russian idea (worse than Communists), and they would destroy the Greater Russia (USSR), if they get into power. Especially because they are - part of the Atlanticist network. And time fully confirmed this: They’ve gotten into power and destroyed it. And tried to break up after that of Russia. Therefore, the 1 –90’s of the Eurasianists were in radical opposition to Yeltsin and the entire liberal-democratic pro-Western puppet regime, which was dominated by the bourgeoisie and Russophobic agents of US influence. From this period begins the demonization of Eurasianists - as patriotic opposition in Russia and as "Russian chauvinists" - in the United States and in the West. In this anti-Eurasian hysteria Western ideology involved and a number of those leaders who adhered to the patriotic position - taking advantage of their ignorance or vanity, but sometimes right off buying them. All that changed in 2000 with the Putin came to power. He began to transform the Yeltsin system in a patriotic way, embodying the ideas of significant part directly from within the principles and values of the Eurasianists. Therefore, that is the only reason why the Eurasianists supported Putin and support him until now. There is nothing personal: against the Atlanticist Westerner Yeltsin we fought, for patriot Putin we support. Purely ideological, crystal clear choice. From this degree of hatred for the Eurasianists among Russian and pro-Western liberals in the United States and the West in general has increased dramatically. And since Putin's policies are increasingly moving into the mainstream of Eurasian ideas, s against Eurasianists in the West and in the liberal Russian media as well as among those pragmatically joined with Putin liberals inside the system began a frontal attack. Danger in Eurasian support of Putin they say, of course, not in numbers and in influence of the Eurasianists, but in power of the Eurasian ideas based on geopolitics and civilization methods, the accuracy of historical analysis and radically anti-Western and anti-liberal orientations, not allowing to give Westerners the field of manipulation, fraud and deceptive maneuvers. For this reason, thorough effort has been made to ensure that the part of Putin that Eurasians would not have the slightest support, which, according to the architects of Atlanticism, would have sooner or later, must marginalize Eurasianism and remove its ideology on the far periphery. These colossal forces have been thrown in the West and among Russian liberals. We can not say that we could overcome all their efforts , but the converse is obvious: Putin confidently goes to the creation of the Eurasian Union, is not afraid to throw a challenge to the West and its liberal values, in full voice refers to Faith, Tradition, conservative foundations of society. Eurasian network abroad Already in the 1990s, and especially in the 2000s, the Eurasians began to create vast and extensive network of relying on the forces who as Eurasians, rejected Atlanticism and American hegemony, opposed liberalism and gender politics – stood for traditions, sacred , Christianity, and other traditional faiths. Most often, the Eurasian network includes conservatives, which are called the "right", but very often there were opponents of American hegemony on the "left". Some of them were Russophile, but some often took Eurasianism for pragmatic reasons – because the traditional society in Russia was stronger than in the West, and the strategic potential of Russia could become a counterweight to American dominance. .Many in Europe and beyond studied geopolitics, and easily self-identified with Eurasianism as supporters of Land civilization (speaking of the tradition against liberalism). However, the Eurasian network was incomparably weaker and narrower than the huge Atlanticist network, based on the large world capital (especially George. Soros), a pro-American liberal elite (which is almost always the ruling class), military and intelligence power of the USA and NATO, an ever-expanding segment of the youth connected to the western network, forming a cosmopolitan view of things, individualism, overcoming of morality and a complete break with religion, tradition, people, family, and even gender. Nevertheless, the Eurasian network has been developed on the basis of the forces who disagreed with the new form of global domination - "third totalitarianism", which rejects the right of all other ideologies if they do not recognize the basic principles of liberalism. Any anti-liberal alternative on the "left" was classified as "Stalinism" and "Gulag" and on the "right" - as "Nazi" and "Auschwitz". Eurasianism was not a communist or fascist, that is neither "right" nor "left", so liberals have dubbed it the "red-brown International". For the sake of the situation it could be declared as "a network of agents of the KGB" ("Stalinism") or "black Internationale" ("Eurasian fascism"). The fact that it is neither the one nor the other does not interest anyone, as for liberals the truth outside liberalism does not exist. Hence the systematic and deliberate campaign of the Western media which began in the 90s of the twentieth century in systematic denigration of Eurasianism and Eurasianists. Gradually, the influence of the Eurasian networks grew outside Russia (in Europe, Turkey, the former Soviet Union - particularly in the Crimea and the former eastern territories of Ukraine) and in Russia itself. The last moment, showing dimensional and often imperceptible to the superficial observer growing influence of Eurasianism, was a response to Putin's coup in Kiev - the reunion with the Crimea and the beginning of the liberation of Novorussia. These scenarios have been described by me as inevitable as early as in the 1990s (A.Dugin Foundations of Geopolitics. M. 1997) and justified by historical inevitability and geopolitical necessity: the logic of the Eurasian geopolitics or Ukraine will be either with the atlantists (then east and south will break with it), or together with Russia (then the revolt will be started by westeners). That's what happened, and Putin in a difficult situation behaved like a Russian patriot and a Eurasianist, and not as a liberal and Atlanticist. As a result, in the West and among Russian liberals and their accomplices veiled a new wave of persecution of the Eurasianists, who are nominated endless and sometimes frankly absurd claims, blamed for all the deadly sins. The stronger these ideas became, and the more clearer they were translated into real political steps, the more hatred they aroused among representatives of the civilization of the Sea and their networks. Network against network Early on in the Ukrainian drama I divided the Russian segment of the Atlanticists on "fifth" and "sixth" column. "Fifth" column is openly Atlanticist, opponents of Putin, Russian patriotism, liberals and conductors US policy. "Sixth" - disguised in the pragmatic officials, apparently supporting Putin, but also as the "fifth" column, categorically rejects the Eurasian ideas and tries to either restrain or sabotage any patriotic endeavors of Putin, dealing a blow to the Eurasian network - both in Russia and abroad. In Ukraine, Maidan was the Atlanticist move. Crimea became the first Eurasian answer to the Maidan. Novorossia would be the second Eurasian answer, but our offensive here Atlantists outside and inside Russia have contained it. Much has changed in the course of dramatic events in Ukraine in the past 2014. But the Eurasian geopolitics has remained unchanged: the future of Russia – is sovereignty, multipolarity and full independence from US domination. This is evidenced by Putin and that he does. Therefore, in spite of everything remains the unshakable support for Putin and his course by the Eurasianists. Again, nothing personal. At any given time some aspects of policy can cause us to be more or less enthusiastic, and some not cause any enthusiasm, but generally at a great length of time, measured in decades, we see that Putin holds for Eurasian Policy. And obviously he will carry it further. His last address to the Federal Assembly leaves no doubt about it. His words in this speech sounded so to do not understand this was not possible. Openly declaring the Eurasian platform, Putin said: "If for some European countries, national pride – is a long-forgotten concept and sovereignty - too much of a luxury , for Russia real state sovereignty – is a necessary condition for existence. It should be obvious to us. I want to stress this, or we will sovereign, or we will be dissolved, lost in the world. And it must be understood by other powers”. In a situation with Ukraine Eurasian networks in Europe to demonstrate their full effectiveness. Almost all pro-russian actions, group of observers, and even the French volunteers in Novorossia were somehow connected with Eurasian networks, as well as close or parallel to them movements. This is quite natural. Eurasians in Europe and other countries are well aware from geopolitics that in Ukraine there is not a showdown between two Slavic nations - Ukrainian and Russian, but between Land and Sea, the US hegemony and unipolarity and multipolarity, represented by Russia. Therefore, the Eurasian network does not act in the interests of Russia, but in the interests of Europe, in the interest of the idea of multipolarity. Again, nothing personal: there are those who agree with liberalism and American agenda, and there are those who disagree. Conservative circles in Europe do not agree. Consequently, they are turning their eyes to wherever from the alternative may come. And what do they see? Putin’s Russia and the Eurasian ideology. And they understand one through another, from whichever end you may come. This logic is visible to friends, but it is also evident to the enemies. Putin – is the number one enemy of the modern liberal Western civilization to the Sea because he consistently defends the interests of Land civilization. Any successful ruler, making Russia a great and independent would be in the eyes of the West "villain", whoever he really is. Therefore, Putin simply can not become a hero for the US and world Atlanticism, because to do so he must destroy Russia, as did Gorbachev and the Soviet Union, for which he was applauded. And the same goes for Eurasianism: whatever the ideology may be, if it defies the American hegemony, and thus relies also on a powerful nuclear and energy power, it can not be indifferent or considered in an abstractly neutral manner; enemies perfectly understand and throw every effort to demonize Eurasianism with any means: in the course of which come denigration, defamation, slander, insults, name calling, identification with "Stalinism" or "fascism" (depending on context) paid trials and so on. Stand under attack. To prepare an offensive At some point, Putin as the leader of a great country and the Eurasian ideology as a conceptual apparatus that accurately describes the challenges and goals of current geopolitical situation, where the old ideology (left and right) no longer work, merged into a object of total hatred in the eyes of the whole Atlanticist network. Anyone who supports Russia or even criticizes the West at the same time becomes an "agent of Putin", "Russian spy" and "Eurasianist". At the same time, when we are talking about the Russian fifth column and network of Atlanticist agents of influence, we instantly bonded accusations of paranoia and conspiracy theories. But look at the headlines of the central western media: in full swing the search for "Putin's fifth column", published lists of Russian spies, and based on the foundation of CIA hackers, made up as "Ukrainians", e-mails of member of the"Eurasian Movement" carries out a front campaign to identify all those who are sympathetic to Russia. What is our little network heroic opponents of modern liberal world order as compared to the trillions of the Federal Reserve System, liberal universities, the latest technology, global media, with tens of thousands of NGOs and agents of influence on the very top of any country in Europe and Asia ... But even this causes rage and fury of the enemy. Since Russia is for us. At the head of Russia – is Putin. With him - our people and our history. And not so pathetic now becomes a handful of enthusiasts coming out with flags of Novorossia and portraits of the Putin at the streets of European cities. This is the wake-up of an alternative civilization from sleep - Land, heart land. It wakes up and will wake up further until it is awoken. Now is the calm before the storm. The situation in Novorossia reached an impasse. Pressure on Russia is growing by the minute. We are under the onslaught. Anyone who actively supports Putin, involves in the Eurasian network , defies the American Beast, is now under attack. Under heavy fire. Fire grows. Pressure is becoming increasingly strong. Most unpleasant in this situation is betrayal. It is bad, when the enemy is well aware of how much you are dangerous, but a friend does not know how much you are useful to him. But this is also a test. And it is possible to endure it only with the idea. Contrary to the psychology and complex network games with which our opponents are trying to strangle us. We have made and will continue to make Eurasian world networks. We have worked and will work against American hegemony, to work towards its explosion. We have supported and will support all alternative forces in Europe and Asia, which stand for tradition (and for us it is primarily Orthodox), justice, freedom and multi-polar world. Contrary to the West: there is not one but many civilizations; there is not one (liberal) and many ideologies; there is not one humanity, and the rich diversity of cultures that do not accept globalization and will fight it to the bitter end. God is with us, understand this peoples, and obey, for God is with us! Download 22.04 Kb. Share with your friends:
|