religion or patriotic institutions)--would thrive. Nevertheless, all
industrious individuals, Spencer believed, would end up being in fundamental
agreement.
Not surprisingly, then, Spencer maintained that the arguments of the early
utilitarians on the justification of law and authority and on the origin of
rights were fallacious. He also rejected utilitarianism and its model of
distributive justice because he held that it rested on an egalitarianism
that ignored desert and, more fundamentally, biological need and efficiency.
Spencer further maintained that the utilitarian account of the law and the
state was also inconsistent---that it tacitly assumed the existence of
claims or rights that have both moral and legal weight independently of the
positive law. And, finally, Spencer argues as well against parliamentary,
representative government, seeing it as exhibiting a virtual "divine
right"---i.e., claiming that "the majority in an assembly has power that has
no bounds." Spencer maintained that government action requires not only
individual consent, but that the model for political association should be
that of a "joint stock company", where the 'directors' can never act for a
certain good except on the explicit wishes of its 'shareholders'. When
parliaments attempt to do more than protect the rights of their citizens by,
for example, 'imposing' a conception of the good--be it only on a
minority--Spencer suggested that they are no different from tyrannies.
Assessment
Spencer has been frequently accused of inconsistency; one finds variations
in his conclusions concerning land nationalization and reform, the rights of
children and the extension of suffrage to women, and the role of government.
Moreover, in recent studies of Spencer's theory of social justice, there is
some debate whether justice is based primarily on desert or on entitlement,
whether the 'law of equal freedom' is a moral imperative or a descriptive
natural law, and whether the law of equal freedom is grounded on rights,
utility, or, ultimately, on 'moral sense'. Nevertheless, Spencer's work has
frequently been seen as a model for later 'libertarian' thinkers, such as
Robert Nozick, and he continues to be read--and is often invoked--by
'libertarians' on issues concerning the function of government and the
fundamental character of individual rights.
Bibliography
Primary Sources:
The Proper Sphere of Government. London: W. Brittain, 1843.
Social Statics. London: Chapman, 1851.
The Principles of Psychology. London: Longmans, 1855; 2nd edn., 2 vols.
London: Williams and Norgate, 1870-2; 3rd edn., 2 vols. (1890). [A System of
Synthetic Philosophy ; v. 4-5]
First Principles. London: Williams and Norgate, 1862; 6th edn., revised,
1904. [A system of Synthetic Philosophy ; v. 1]
Principles of Biology, 2 vols. London: Williams and Norgate, 1864, 1867; 2nd
edn., 1898-99).[A System of Synthetic Philosophy ; v. 2-3]
The Study of Sociology. New York: D. Appleton, 1874, [c1873]
The Principles of Sociology. 3 vols. London : Williams and Norgate,
1882-1898. [A System of Synthetic Philosophy, v. 6-8] CONTENTS: Vol. 1: pt.
1. The data of sociology. pt. 2. The inductions of sociology. pt. 3. The
domestic relations; Vol. 2: pt. 4. Ceremonial institutions. pt. 5. Political
institutions; v. 3: pt. 6. Ecclesiastical institutions. pt. 7. Professional
institutions. pt. 8. Industrial institutions.]
The Man versus the State: containing "The new Toryism," "The coming
slavery," "The sins of legislators," and "The great political superstition,"
London : Williams & Norgate, 1884; with additional essays and an
introduction by Albert Jay Nock. [adds "From freedom to bondage," and "Over-
legislation"] Intro. A.J. Nock. Caldwell, ID: Caxton, 1940.
Spencer, Herbert. The Factors of Organic Evolution. London: Williams and
Norgate, 1887.
Spencer, Herbert. The Principles of Ethics. 2 vols. London: Williams and
Northgate, 1892. [A system of synthetic philosophy ; v. 9-10]
An Autobiography. 2 v. London: Williams and Norgate, 1904.
Secondary Sources:
Andreski, S. Herbert Spencer: Structure, Function and Evolution. London,
1972.
Duncan, David. (ed.) The Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer. London:
Methuen, 1908.
Gray, T.S. The Political Philosophy of Herbert Spencer, Aldershot: Avebury,
1996.
Jones, G. Social Darwinism and English Thought: The Interaction between
Biological and Social Theory. Brighton, 1980.
Kennedy, James G. Herbert Spencer. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1978.
Miller, David. Social Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976. Ch. 6
Paxton, N.L. George Eliot and Herbert Spencer: Feminism, Evolutionism, and
the Reconstruction of Gender. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
1991.
Peel, J.D.Y. Herbert Spencer: The Evolution of a Sociologist. London, 1971.
Ritchie, David G. The Principles of State Interference: Four Essays on the
Political Philosophy of Mr Herbert Spencer, J.S. Mill and T.H. Green.
London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1891.
Taylor, M.W. Men versus the State: Herbert Spencer and late Victorian
Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Wiltshire, David. The Social and Political Thought of Herbert Spencer. New
York: Oxford, 1978.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1687. . . . . . . . . . . . Living Sober
From: Joanna Whitney . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/3/2004 9:30:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Group -- I am newly returning after a long stay away and glad to see you are all still here. I am really curious about the origins of the publication Living Sober and what conference approved it. Anybody?
Thanks, Joanna
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1688. . . . . . . . . . . . AA Literature at Unity retreats
From: victoria callaway . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/3/2004 9:20:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Can anyone clarify if some piece of AA literature was written at a
Nity Village retreat and what piece that is. this remark was made at
a meeting my sponsor was at and she wanted me to find out. Thanks
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1689. . . . . . . . . . . . Significant March dates in AA History - Revised
From: NMOlson@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/3/2004 6:51:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Thanks to the two eagle-eyed members who spotted
errors in the original list posted March 1. One
of these days I'll get it right the first time.
Nancy
[16]
March 1:
1939 - Readers Digest failed to write promised
article on AA.
1941 - Saturday Evening Post article by Jack
Alexander created national sensation. AA
membership quadrupled in one year from 2000 to
8000.
March 3:
1947 - Nell Wing, Bill's secretary and first
archivist of AA, began her career at Alcoholic
Foundation Office.
March 4:
1891 - Lois Wilson was born.
March 5:
1945 - Time Magazine reported Detroit radio
broadcasts of AA members.
March 9:
1941 - Wichita Beacon reported AA member from NY
who wanted to form a group in Wichita, Kansas.
March 11:
1947 - A Priest in St. Paul, Minnesota, founded
Calix International. Alcoholics in his parish
met after Saturday morning Mass to discuss the
readings for the upcoming Sunday and how their
faith melded with the Twelve Steps of Alcoholics
Anonymous.
March 12:
1940 - Ebby Thatcher, Bill Wilson's boyhood
friend and sponsor, was reported sober again.
March 14:
1941 - South Orange, NJ, AA held an anniversary
dinner at the Hotel Suburban with Bill Wilson as
the guest speaker.
March 15:
1941 - 1st AA group was formed in New Haven,
Connecticut.
March 16:
1940: Bill moved the Alcoholic Foundation office
to 30 Vesey St., NY. (30 Vesey St., NY, was
almost destroyed on September 11, 2001.)
March 18:
1951 - Cliff W. was elected 1st delegate from
Southern California.
March 21:
1881 - Anne Ripley, Dr. Bob's wife, was born.
1966 - Ebby Thatcher, Bill Wilson's sponsor,
died sober.
March 22:
1951 - Dr. William Duncan Silkworth died at
Towns Hospital.
1984 - Clarence Snyder, founder of Cleveland AA
and author of "Home Brewmeister," died at 81, 46
years sober.
March 23:
1936 - Bill & Lois Wilson visited Fitz Mayo,
"Our Southern Friend," in Maryland.
1941 - Sybil C.'s sobriety date. She was the
first woman to enter AA west of the Mississippi.
March 25:
1965 - Richmond Walker, author of "Twenty-Four
Hours a Day" book, died at age 72, almost 23
years sober.
March 29:
1943 - The Charleston Mail, WV, reported that
Bill Wilson had given a talk at St. John's
Parish House.
March 31:
1947 - 1st AA group was formed in London,
England.
Other events in March, for which I have no exact
date:
1942 - 1st Prison AA Group formed at San
Quentin.
1945 - March of Time film was produced and
supervised by E.M. Jellinek.
1946 - The Jefferson Barracks AA Group in
Missouri was formed. It is thought to be the
first ever in a military installation.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1690. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Living Sober
From: Mel Barger . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/3/2004 2:16:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Joanna,
I don't know what conference approved of Living Sober but I do know that
it was written by Barry Leach, now deceased. Barry was very devoted to Lois
Wilson---somewhat like a surrogate son---and even accompanied her on trips
when she was very elderly. I took a picture of Barry and Lois greeting Jack
Bailey (the famous Queen for a Day man) when he spoke in Akron in 1978. I
wish I could find a portrait of Barry for use in my Power Point
presentations.
Mel Barger
~~~~~~~~
Mel Barger
melb@accesstoledo.com
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1691. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Living Sober
From: Jim Blair . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/4/2004 12:12:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Mel wrote
> I don't know what conference approved of Living Sober but I do know that
it was written by Barry Leach, now deceased.
This is from the unpublished history manuscript by Bob P.
"Living Sober," the other booklet, published in 1975, had a more tortuous
history. Around 1968, there were discussions by the Board of the need for a
pamphlet for sober old-timers, and the need to point out "traps" or "danger
signals." Members of the Literature Committee and others were asked to
submit their ideas. Out of this grew a specific proposal for a piece of
literature to be developed around the topic, "How We Stay Sober." It was in
outline form by October 1969, and was assigned to a professional writer on
the staff of a prestigious national magazine. After nearly two years of
work, he submitted a complete draft.. Which everyone agreed would not do at
all. They felt it needed such drastic revision that it should be started
again from scratch by a new author. Barry L., a seasoned, skillful freelance
writer/consultant for G.S.O. was given the task. With Bob H., general
manager of G.S.O., he negotiated a flat fee for the project. After four and
a half years of organizing material and writing . and probably some
procrastinating, as well, Barry came up with a simple, intensely practical,
charmingly written manual on how to enjoy a happy, productive life without
drinking. It was not spiritual and contained nothing about getting sober;
but it was chock-full of the kind of advice and suggestions a newcomer might
get from a super-sponsor. ("A.A.'s First Aid Kit" was Bayard's name for it.)
And it was written in a style unlike any other A.A. literature: breezy,
impertinent, colloquial and informal. "Living Sober" proved to be hugely
popular, and after it had sold nearly a million copies, Barry L. felt he
should have been compensated more generously and should receive some sort of
royalty. He sent a letter to all past Trustees and G.S.O. staff members with
whom he was acquainted, to advance his claim. The AAWS Board and the General
Service Board considered his case, but declined to take action. He then
threatened legal recourse, but perhaps realizing the weakness of his case,
never followed through.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1695. . . . . . . . . . . . Marty Mann and Bill Wilson, 1956, Compiled from Previous Posts
From: NMOlson@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/8/2004 7:54:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
[17]
In 1956, Marty Mann had the pleasure of introducing Bill Wilson
at the annual meeting of the National Committee on Alcoholism.
This Committee was later to become the National Council on
Alcoholism (now the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug
Dependence).
Bill's talk, while it included his usual "bedtime story," was
also a call to cooperation and understanding and support of all
those who are trying to help the still suffering alcoholic.
Nancy
National Committee on Alcoholism
Annual Meeting
Hotel Statler, New York City, N.Y.
March 30, 1956
Introduction by the National Director of the National Committee
on Alcoholism, Mrs. Marty Mann.
Mr. President, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, I had
to have that formal beginning to find out if I had a voice. This
moment is of such import to me that I have been fearful for a
week that I would not be able to speak.
It's a moment I've been waiting for a long time. The National
Committee on Alcoholism was founded on a proof. Unless there had
been proof that alcoholics could recover there could have been
no National Committee on Alcoholism. That proof was available by
1944, the year of the founding of
the Committee because of what Alcoholics Anonymous had been
doing for nine years. And the work that Alcoholics Anonymous had
been doing for nine years is very largely due to a recovery of
an individual. Everything has to start somewhere.
We no longer look upon it as a divine plan, I think we should as
divine plans require instruments, instruments that we can see
and touch and hear, that can reach us. Such an instrument was
found in a man who had suffered deeply and terribly from
alcoholism and he was able to recover and he discovered that in
order to keep his recovery he had to share it, he had to pass it
on. I like to describe this as the discovery of a constructive
chain reaction.
Something was set in motion back in November 1934, that was to
become one of the great sources for good in our time. I was very
fortunate in coming in contact with this force when I most
desperately needed it. It was not easy for me to change the
pattern of my living from a negative one to a constructive one
and I had a little trouble from time to time in the beginning in
attempting my new life.
The most seriously difficulty I had was met by this same man who
sought me out and dug me out and whom I couldn't refuse to see
and when he spoke to me he said something that I'll never
forget. Something that is having is
culmination here today. He asked me if I wanted to stop
drinking. I said, "Yes." He put his arm around me and he said,
"I'm glad because we have a long way to go together."
Neither of us knew back in 1939 how far that road led or where
it was going to lead but we are still traveling that road
together and it's lead up all the way, up and on.
I believe that the contribution that was made by this
instrument, if you like, is a contribution past description,
past telling. I believe that it was largely through that
contribution which produced living proof that we have been able
to arrive at a meeting such as today where we have been able to
bring together representatives of all the professional
disciplines who are happily and gladly working in this field as
this wasn't always true fifteen years ago. But we were able to
get great names in medicine and psychiatry and social work and
psychology and in public health to be present at a meeting like
this, to take part in what we are doing, to join hands with that
little band of recovered alcoholics to help lick this problem.
Alcoholics Anonymous couldn't do it alone. We couldn't expect
any other victims of a particular affliction to carry the whole
burden of doing something about that particular disease and we
shouldn't expect it in this field. To lick a problem as complex,
as vast and as devastating as alcoholism requires the
cooperation of every one of us, of every area of our life. To
have that cooperation we had to have evidence that it could
produce them. That evidence exists in the growing ranks of
Alcoholics Anonymous and that truth exists because back in 1934,
one man got sober and allowed himself to be used as the great
instrument in spreading this word of hope. In my book he is one
of the greatest men of our times. I give you my friend, my
sponsor, the reason why I am here, Bill.
Address by Bill W.
Well, folks, our world is certainly a world of contrast, it was
only a few year ago that Westbrook Pegler wrote a piece in which
he described Dr. Bob and me as "the wet brain founders of
Alcoholics Anonymous." But very seriously and very happily, too,
I think that the A.A.'s present in and out of this Committee and
everywhere join in with Lois and me and are able to say that
this is one of the finest hours that has yet to come to us.
Some people say that destiny is a series of events held together
by a thin thread of change or circumstance. Other people say
that destiny is composed of a series of events strung on a cord
of cause and effect and still others say that the destiny of
good work is often the issue of the will of God and that he
forges the links and brings the events to pass. I've been asked
to come here to tell the story of A.A. and in that story,
everyone here I am sure can find justification for either of
those points of view.
But, I want to tell more than the story of A.A., this time. I
was beset, I must confess, by a certain reluctance and the
reluctance issues out of this fact, of course everybody is
fairly familiar with the fact that I once suffered from
alcoholism, but people are not so wise to the fact that I
suffer also from schizophrenia, split personality. I have a
personality say as a patriarch of A.A.,founding father, if you
like, and I also have a personality as an A.A. member and
between these personalities is a terrific gulf.
You see, a founding father of A.A. has to stand up to the A.A.
Tradition which says that you must not endorse anything or
anybody or even say good things about your friends on the
outside or even of Beemans chewing gum lest it be an
endorsement. So as the father of A.A. I am very strictly bound
to do nothing but tell the story of our society.
But as an A.A. member like all the rest, I am an anarchist who
revels in litter so I'm really going to say what I damn please.
So, if only you will receive me as Mr. Anonymous, one of the
poor old drunks still trying to get honest!
Now to our narrative and to the first links in the chain of
events that has led us to this magnificent hour. I was by no
means the first link in this chain and only one of very many. I
think the founder business ought to be well deflated and I'm
just going to take a minute or two to do it.
As a fact, the first link in the chain was probably forged about
twenty-five years ago in the office of a great psychiatrist,
Carl Jung. At that time he had as a patient a certain very
prominent American businessman. They worked together for a year.
My business friend Rowland was a very grim case of alcoholism
and yet under the doctor's guidance he thought he was going to
find release. He left the doctor in great confidence but
shortly, he was back drunk. Said he to Dr. Jung, "What now,
You*re my court of last resort."
The doctor looked at him and said, "I thought that you might be
one of those rare cases that could be touched with my art, but
you aren't. I have never seen," continued doctor Jung, "one
single case of alcoholism recover, so grave as yours under my
tutelage."
Well, to my friend Rowland this was tantamount to a sentence of
death. "But doctor," said he, "is there no other course, nothing
else."
"Yes," said Dr. Jung, "there is something. There is such a thing
as a transforming spiritual experience."
"Well," Rowland beamed, "after all I've been a vestryman in the
Episcopal Church, I'm a man of faith."
"Oh," Dr. Jung said, "that's fine so far as it goes but it has
to go a lot deeper. I'm speaking of transforming spiritual
experiences."
"Where would I find such a thing," asked Rowland.
Dr. Jung said, "I don't know, lighting strikes here or there, it
strikes any other place. We don't know why or how. You will just
have to expose yourself in the religion of your own choice or a
spiritual influence as best you can and just try and ask and
maybe it will be open to you."
So my friend Rowland joined up with the Oxford Groups, the
sometime Buchmanites of that day, first in London and then came
to New York and lo and behold the lighting did strike and he
found himself unaccountably released of his obsession to drink.
After a time he heard of a friend of mine, a chap we call Ebby,
who sojourned every summer in Vermont, an awful grim case, he
had driven his father's bright, shiny new Packard into the side
of someone's house. He had bashed into the kitchen, pushing
Share with your friends: |