ANTI-MONEYLAUNDERINGREGULATIONSANDTHEEFFECTIVEUSEOFMOBILEMONEYIN SOUTHAFRICA–PART1* MKersop**SFdu Toit*** SUMMARY Mobilefinancialservices,specificallymobilemoney,hasthepotentialtoexpandaccesstofinancialservicestomillionsofunbankedpeopleinSouthAfrica.Assuch,itlooksverypromisingintermsoffinancialinclusion.However,concernsexistthatmobilemoneycan be detrimental to financialintegritysince there are severalprovenriskfactors linkedtomobile financialservices.These riskfactorsmakemobile moneyverysusceptibletomoneylaundering.Thepotentialforabuseandtheneedforappropriatecontrolsisthereforesomethingwhichcannotbeignored. WhiletheSouthAfricanlegislatorhasmadeprovisionforcomprehensiveanti-moneylaunderingpreventativemeasuresbymeansoftheFinancialIntelligenceCentreAct38of2001,thereexistsnoSouthAfricanlegislationexplicitlyconcernedwithmobilemoney. It istherefore difficulttodeterminewhattheregulatorystanceisinterms ofmobilemoneyinSouthAfrica.TheFinancialActionTaskForce(FATF)is,however,currently focusing attention on theeffectwhichmobile moneymayhave on financialintegrity.ThelatestFATFRecommendationsmakeprovisionforseveralanti-moneylaunderingcontrolswhicharespecificallyapplicabletomobilemoney,includingcontrolsregardingmoneyorvaluetransferservicesandnewtechnologies. Whileitisalwaysdifficulttobalancefinancialintegrityandfinancialinclusion,therisk-basedapproachmakesitpossibleforgovernmentstoimplementeffectiveanti-moneylaunderingmeasures,therebypreservingfinancialintegrity,withouttheneedtocompromiseonfinancialinclusionobjectives.ThefactthatSouthAfricahasnot
* Thisarticle(in twoparts) isbased on M Kersop'smini-dissertationwith the sametitle, submittedinpartialfulfilmentofanLLMinImportandExportLawatthePotchefstroomcampusoftheNorth-WestUniversity,preparedunderthesupervisionofProfSFduToit.