Gdi 2011 Gemini Lab China qpq cp
Download 406.16 Kb.
|
China QPQ CPChina QPQ CP 1 1NC (1/2) 2 1NC (2/2) 3
Say yes – General 5 Say yes - Space 6 Say yes - Space 7 Say yes - Space 8 Say yes – Tech Affs 9 Say yes – Development Affs 10 Say yes - Demilitarization 11 Say yes - Demilitarization 12 Say yes - Demilitarization 13 Say yes - Demilitarization 14 Say yes - Demilitarization 15 Say yes - Demilitarization 16 Say yes - Cooperation 17 Say yes - Cooperation 18 Say yes - Cooperation 19 Say yes - Cooperation 20 Say yes – U.S. Unilateralism 21 A2: Plan = Modelling – Formality Solves 22 A2: Plan = Modelling – Formality Solves 23 A2: Plan = Modelling – Formality Solves 24 A2: Plan = Modelling – Formality Solves 25 A2: Plan = Modelling – Formality Solves 26 A2: Plan = Modelling – Transparency Solves 26 A2: Plan = Modelling – Spillover 28 CP Solves – Militarization 29 CP Solves – Verification 30 CP Solves – Globally 31 Impact—Extinction 32 Impact—Heg 33 Impact – Relations 34 A2: Politics Link 35 A2: Politics Link 36 A2: Heg Turn 37 A2: Heg Turn 38
Say no – Space 40 Say no – Space 41 Say no – Space 42 Say no – Space 43 Say no – Space 44 Say no – Space 45 No Solvency – Cheating 46 No Solvency – Cheating 47 No Solvency – Cheating 48 No Solvency – Cheating – Impacts 49 No Solvency – Cheating – Impacts 50 No Solvency – Cheating – Impacts 51 No Solvency – Verification 52 No Solvency – Verification – Impacts 53 No Solvency – Arms Control Fails 54 No Solvency – Arms Control Fails 55 No Solvency – Arms Control Fails 56 No Solvency – Space Law 57 No Solvency – Formal Treaty Bad 58 No Solvency – Formal Treaty Bad 59 No Solvency – Formal Treaty Bad 60 No Solvency – Bilateral Bad 61 No Solvency – No Multilateral Spillover 62 No Solvency – Space treaties fail 63 CP links to politics 64 CP links to politics 65 CP links to politics 66 Turn – Relations 67 Turn – Heg 68 Turn – Heg 69
1NC (1/2)Counterplan text: The United States federal government will [plan] if and only if The People's Republic of China signs the PAROS negotiations. The CP solves militarization Blazejewski 8 (Kenneth, received his master’s degree in public affairs from the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University and his JD degree from the New York University School of Law, " Space Weaponization and US-China Relations." Spring, http://www.au.af.mil/au/ssq/2008/Spring/blazejewski.pdf, AD 6/29/11) AV Third, the United States should demand greater transparency in Chinese military planning, especially with regard to ASAT and space-focused programs. Such transparency, long sought by US defense officials, would reduce the likelihood of potential conflicts over speculative intelligence and give the United States greater insight into how military decisions are made (and whether China indeed suffers from a stovepiped bureaucracy). I argue that progress in each of these three areas would represent a greater security gain than proceeding with the weaponization of space. If the United States is able to negotiate a quid pro quo in one or all of these areas in return for a commitment not to weaponize outer space, the agreement would represent a clear US net security gain. China will say yes – The plan is a bargaining chip for tech modeling and free-riding Tellis 8 (Ashley, senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, specializing in international security, defense, and Asian strategic issues, " China’s Space Capabilities and U.S. Security Interests." October, http://carnegie.ru/publications/?fa=22595, AD 7/1/11) AV Third, China’s space efforts are focused in multiple ways. To begin with, although some Chinese activities are intended to procure symbolic benefits that enhance the control or legitimacy of Communist rule, these gains are usually conceived of as positive externalities that derive from some other material benefits of exploiting space for specific economic, political or military aims. To that degree, Beijing’s space investments are in fact conservative. Given its relative under-development, China has consistently sought to avoid frittering its resources on showcase projects that provide few tangible gains, preferring instead to invest in those activities that provide highest value within what are acknowledged fiscal constraints. Given the desire to secure the most while spending the least, even more controversial initiatives such as the manned space program have been authorized mainly because it is expected that this effort would push the frontiers of innovation, create a new quality control culture across the space program, generate new demands for technical education, and produce spin-offs that would benefit the economy more generally. China’s space program is focused in other ways as well. Beijing abundantly recognizes that for all its impressive space achievements in recent years, it still operates in a milieu characterized by emerging political competition with a technologically dominant United States. Consequently, given the differences in cultural ethos, political systems and comparative advantage, the Chinese space program has deliberately avoided either replicating the American endeavor or attempting to compete with it across the board. Rather, Beijing’s space efforts have been characterized by two different orientations in this regard. To the degree that raising its technological standards to American levels is judged necessary, China has embarked on a quite calculated “buy, copy, or steal” approach in regards to procuring various critical technologies. Where competing with the United States is deemed necessary, China has focused its space programs not on mustering any comparable superiority but by aiming at Washington’s "soft ribs and strategic weaknesses ". In any event, and irrespective of the endeavor in question, Beijing’s space efforts have been marked by deliberation and purposefulness. Directory: files files -> Answer True False 2 points Question 2 files -> Integer programming and game theory files -> 4 Integer Programming files -> Bpa vehicle Window Repair Scenario #1 task: Procure vehicle window relacement. Objective files -> Pop Warner History files -> North Carolina Inclusion Initiative Mapping Where Children with ieps are Being Served Purpose files -> Fall 2013 Spring 2014 Program Data: Standard 1 Exhibit 4d files -> Hanban – asia society confucius classrooms network 2010 request for proposal files -> Northern England’s set-jetting locations Download 406.16 Kb. Share with your friends:
|