Hindustan Unilever Marketing Strategy Case Study

Super Detailed Case
Study on Hindustan
Unilever Marketing Mix &
Strategy (with SWOT
Analysis)
by Aditya Shastri | Case Studies | 0 comments
Courses
!
15/07/21, 12:35 PM
Page 1 of 18

Contents
[ show
]
Introduction
FMCG implies fast moving consumer goods which are oftentimes bought fundamental or unimportant products, for example, food,
beverages, toiletries, and soda pops and spoils.
They are items that have a fast turnover and moderately minimal effort. Quick moving purchaser products are otherwise called
Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) (Samantha,
2016). Steadily, 2.5 billion individuals use
Unilever items to feel better, look great and get more out of life. Unilever’s 400 brands are confided in each of the 190 nations they offer to and along these lines they have developed into one of the world’s best shopper merchandise organizations (Kathrin Jansen, 2016).
The corporate technique of FMCG like Unilever assumes a fundamental function in furnishing business elements with a market bearing and the detailing and execution of corporate methodology which helps in furnishing organizations with capacities and abilities to keep up and create satisfactory movement with the reliably changing business climate, helps in the advancement of a key vision and spotlight on large business objectives and goals. The function of corporate technique turns out to be
15/07/21, 12:35 PM
Page 2 of 18

exceptionally huge when the business works all around the world. Unilever is expanding its endeavors. Through its settled dissemination network in both the customary and present day retail sources and with a decent capacity to adjust effective worldwide brand ideas to suit nearby business sectors. Unilever is in a fortunate situation to have the option to gain by the development gauge in the districts. In the beautifying agents and toiletries around the world industry, there is no uncertainty that
Unilever’s significant competitors, throughout the following, will be Procter and Gamble and
L’Oreal, the two brands are huge assets to new item improvement action, and react to changes in the market quicker than Unilever. L’Oreal likewise has the advantage of being only engaged with beauty care products and toiletries, dissimilar to both Unilever and Procter and Gamble which both have cross-industry association, for example, in bundled food. Much similar gathering of opponent organizations contends in a wide range of nations.
Accordingly, the opposition seeks after the organization to be more creative in building up its items and keeping up it’s brands (Kalsoom,
2013).
15/07/21, 12:35 PM
Page 3 of 18