frustrated by its timely revelation; a plot to assassinate him on
leaving the king's residence, by the strength of his body-guard. A still
more atrocious scheme was concocted. Francis was to stab his cousin of
Navarre with his dagger, leaving his attendants to despatch him with
their swords. Such murderous projects can rarely be kept secret. Even
Catharine de' Medici is said to have attempted to dissuade Antoine from
going to the palace by warning him of the danger he would incur. At the
door of the king's chamber a friendly hand interposed, and a friendly
voice asked: "Sire, whither are you going to your ruin?" But the prince,
with a resolution which it had been well had he manifested at an earlier
period, paused only a moment to say to his faithful Renty: "I am going
to the spot where a conspiracy has been entered into to take my life....
If it please God, He will save me; but, if I die, I entreat you, by the
fidelity I have ever known in you, ... to carry the shirt I wear, all
covered with blood, to my wife and son, and to conjure my wife, by the
great love she has always borne me,
1 La Planche, 401; Davila, 37, 38; Castelnau, l. ii., c.
12. The unanimous voice of contemporary authorities, and the accounts
given by subsequent historians, are discredited by De Thou alone (ii.
835, 836), who expresses the conviction, based upon his recollection of
his father's statement, that the sentence was drawn up, but never
signed. He also represents Christopher de Thou as suggesting to Condé
his appeal from the jurisdiction of the commission, and opposing the
violent designs of the Guises.
2 La Planche, 401; Castelnau, liv. ii., c. 12.
and by her duty (since my son is not yet old enough to avenge my death),
to send it, torn by the dagger, and bloody, to the foreign princes of
Christendom, that they may avenge my death, so cruel and treacherous."1 These gloomy forebodings were not destined to be realized. Francis's anger
evaporated in words, or was restrained by his mother's secret injunctions,2 and
Antoine of Navarre was suffered to go away unharmed. The duke and cardinal,
who witnessed the scene from the recess of a window, are said to have
muttered half audibly as they left the room, "That is the most cowardly
heart that ever was!"3
A plot for the utter destruction of the Huguenots.
The assassination of the King of Navarre was, however, but a part of a
larger plot for the utter destruction of the Huguenots and of
Protestantism in France, the details of which are but imperfectly
known.4 It is alleged that preliminary lists of those infected by
heresy had been obtained from all parts of France, and that a more exact
knowledge was to be obtained by compelling all classes--from the
1 La Planche, 405, 406, has preserved this striking speech,
which I have somewhat condensed in the text. Agrippa d'Aubigné, Histoire
universelle, ubi supra.
2 La Planche, it may be noticed, leans to this supposition. Ibid., 405.
3 Ibid., 406; D'Aubigné, ubi supra.
4 See Michele Suriano's account, Rel. des Amb. Vén., i.
528. The ambassador seems to have entertained no doubt of the complete
success that would have crowned the movement had Francis's life been
spared: "Il quale, se vivea un poco più, non solamente averia ripresso,
ma estinto dal tutto quell' incendio che ora consuma il regno." The
Spanish ambassador, Chantonnay, writing to his master, Nov., 1560,
confirms the statements of Protestant contemporaries respecting the plan
laid out for the destruction of the Bourbons, and then of the admiral
and his brother D'Andelot; but the wily brother of Cardinal Granvelle,
much as he would have rejoiced at the destruction of the heads of the
Huguenot faction, was alarmed at the wholesale proscription, and
expressed grave fears that so intemperate and violent a course would
provoke a serious rebellion, and perhaps give rise to a forcible
intervention in French affairs, on the part of Germany or England. "Pero
á mi paresce que seria mas acertado castigar poco á poco los culpados
que prender tantos de un golpe, porque assi se podrian meter en
desesperacion sus parientes, y causar alguna grande rebuelta y admitir
mas facilmente las platicas de fuera del reyno ... o de Alemania o de Inglaterra."
Papiers de Simancas, apud Mignet, Journal des Savants, 1859, p. 39.
nobility and members of the Order of St. Michael down to the simple
citizen--to subscribe to the articles of faith drawn up eighteen years
before by the Sorbonne. At the close of the sessions of the States
General, the full forces at the command of the court were to be set on
foot, and four armies, under the Duke of Aumale and Marshals St. André,
Brissac, and Termes, were to serve as the instruments of destruction.
Termes was to effect a junction with a Spanish force entering France
never have given us any peace (il ne nous eust jamais donné
relasche)." Still more unreasonable was the infliction of the
death-penalty upon Robert Dehors, a merchant of Rouen, who had
chanced to ride into Paris just as Lhomme was being led to
execution. Booted as he still was, he became a witness of the
brutality with which the crowd followed the poor printer, and
seemed disposed to snatch him from the executioner's hands in order
to tear him in pieces. Indignant at this violation of decency,
Dehors had the imprudence to remonstrate with those about him,
dissuading them from imbruing their hands in the blood of a
wretched man, when their desire was so soon to be accomplished by
the minister of the law. The Rouen merchant little understood the
ferocity of the Parisian populace. The mob instantly turned their
fury upon him, and but for the intervention of the royal archers he
would have met on the spot the fate from which he had sought to
rescue another to whose person and offence he was an utter
stranger. As it was, he escaped instant death only to become a victim to the perverse
ingenuity of the same judges, and be hung on the same Place Maubert, "for the
sedition and popular commotion caused by him, at the time of the execution
of Martin Lhomme, by means of scandalous expressions and blasphemies
uttered and pronounced by the said Dehors against the honor of God and of the
glorious Virgin Mary, wherewith the said prisoner induced the
people to sedition and public scandals." (See Registres du
parlement, July 13, 15, and 19, 1560, reprinted by Read in "Le Tigre.")
It is not, perhaps, very much to be wondered at that a pamphlet so
dangerous to have in one's possession should have so thoroughly disappeared that a few
years since not a copy was known to be in existence. It doubtless fared with the "Tigre"
much as it did with another outspoken libel--"Taxe des parties casuelles de la boutique
du Pape"--published a few years later, of which Lestoile (Read, p. 21) tells us that he
was for a long time unsuccessful in the search for a copy, to replace that which, to use
his own words, "I burned at the St. Bartholomew, fearing that it might burn me!"
By a happy accident, M. Louis Paris, in 1834, discovered a solitary copy that had
apparently been saved from destruction by being buried in some provincial library. The
discovery, however, was of little avail to the literary world, as the pamphlet was eagerly
bought by the famous collector Brunet, only to find a place in his jealously guarded cases,
where, after a fashion only too common in these days, a few privileged persons were
permitted to inspect it under glass, but not a soul was allowed to copy it. Fortunately,
after M. Brunet's death, the city of Paris succeeded in purchasing
the seven printed leaves, of which the precious book was
composed, for 1,400 francs! Even then the singular fortunes of the
book did not end. Placed in the Hôtel-de-Ville, this insignificant
pamphlet, almost alone of all the untold wealth of antiquarian lore
in the library, escaped the flames kindled by the insane Commune.
M. Charles Read, the librarian, had taken it to his own house for
the purpose of copying it and giving it to the world. This design
has now been happily executed, in an exquisite edition (Paris,
1875), containing not only the text, illustrated by copious notes,
but a photographic fac-simile. M. Read has also appended a poem
entitled "Le Tigre, Satire sur les Gestes Mémorables des Guisards
(1561), "for the recovery of which we are indebted to M. Charles
Nodier. Although some have imagined this to be the original "Tigre"
which cost the lives of Lhomme and Dehors, it needs only a very
superficial comparison of the two to convince us that the poem is
only an elaboration, not indeed without merit, of the more nervous
prose epistle. The author of the latter was without doubt the
distinguished François Hotman. This point has now been
established beyond controversy. As early as in 1562 the Guises had
discovered this; for a treatise published that year in Paris
(Religionis et Regis adversus exitiosas Calvini, Bezæ, et Ottomani
conjuratorum factiones defensio) uses the expressions: "Hic te,
Ottomane, excutere incipio. Scis enim ex cujus officina Tigris
prodiit, liber certe tigride parente, id est homine barbaro,
impuro, impio, ingrato, malevolo, maledico dignissimus. Tu te
istius libelli auctorem ... audes venditare?" While an expression
in a letter written by John Sturm, Rector of the University of
Strasbourg, July, 1562, to Hotman himself (Tygris, immanis illa
bellua quam tu hic contra Cardinalis existimationem divulgari
curasti), not only confirms the statement of the hostile Parisian
pamphleteer, but indicates Strasbourg as the place of publication (Read, pp. 132-139).
versed in classical oratory. Some of the best of modern French
critics accord to it the first rank among works of the kind
belonging to the sixteenth century. They contrast its sprightliness,
its terse, telling phrases with the heavy, dragging constructions that
disfigure the prose of contemporary works. Without copying
in a servile fashion the Catilinarian speeches of Cicero, the "Tigre" breathes their spirit
and lacks none of their force. Take, for example, the introductory sentences: "Tigre
enragé! Vipère venimeuse! Sépulcre d'abomination! Spectacle de malheur! Jusques à
quand sera-ce que tu abuseras de la jeunesse de nostre Roy? Ne mettras-tu jamais fin à
ton ambition démesurée, à tes impostures, à tes larcins? Ne vois-tu pas que tout le monde
les sçait, les entend, les cognoist? Qui penses-tu qui ignore ton
détestable desseing et qui ne lise en ton visage le malheur de tous
tes [nos] jours, la ruine de ce Royaume, et la mort de nostre Roy?"
Or read the lines in which the writer sums up a portion of the
Cardinal's villainy: "Quand je te diray que les fautes des finances
de France ne viennent que de tes larcins? Quand je te diray qu'un
mari est plus continent avec sa femme que tu n'es avec tes propres
parentes? Si je te dis encore que tu t'es emparé du gouvernement de
la France, et as dérobé cet honneur aux Princes du sang, pour
mettre la couronne de France en ta maison--que pourras-tu répondre?
Si tu le confesses, il te faut pendre et estrangler; si tu le nies, je te convaincrai."
A passage of unsurpassed bitterness paints the portrait of the
hypocritical churchman: "Tu fais mourir ceux qui conspirent contre
toy: et tu vis encore, qui as conspiré contre la couronne de
France, contre les biens des veuves et des orphelins, contre le
sang des tristes et des innocens! Tu fais profession de prescher de
sainteté, toy qui ne connois Dieu que de parole; qui ne tiens la
religion chrétienne que comme un masque pour te déguiser; qui fais
ordinaire trafic, banque et marchandise d'éveschés et de bénéfices:
qui ne vois rien de saint que tu ne souilles, rien de chaste que tu
ne violes, rien de bon que tu ne gâtes!... Tu dis que ceux qui
reprennent tes vices médisent du Roy, tu veux donc qu'on t'estime
Roy? Si Cæsar fut occis pour avoir pretendu le sceptre injustement,
doit-on permettre que tu vives, toy qui le demandes injustement?"
With which terribly severe denunciation the reader may compare the
statements of a pasquinade, unsurpassed for pungent wit by any
composition of the times, written apparently about a year later.
Addressing the cardinal, Pasquin expresses his perplexity
respecting the place where his Eminence will find an abode. The
French dislike him so much, that they will have him neither as