Hpmj12(1). book(hpmj a 337346. fm)
Download 193.9 Kb. View original pdf
|
| Social Psychology, 72, 544–557. Boldry, J, Wood, W, & Kashy, DA. Gender stereotypes and the evaluation of men and women in military training. Journal of Social Issues, 57, Browne, K. (1999). Divided labours An evolutionary view of women at work: New Haven, CT Yale University Press. Brescoll, V, & LaFrance, M. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex differences. Psychological Science, 15, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Gender differences in employee tenure. Retrieved January 3, from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2002/sept/wk3/art05.htm. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2001). Labor force participation trends for women and men. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2001/dec/wk3/art02.htm. Cann, A, & Siegfried, W. D. (1990). Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leader behavior. Sex Roles, 23, Catalyst. (2003). Women in US. corporate leadership. New York Author. Catalyst. (2004). Women and men in US. corporate leadership. Same workplace, different realities? New York Author. Catalyst. (2007). 2006 census of corporate officers and top earners. New York Author. Catalyst & The Conference Board. (2002). Women in leadership A European business imperative. New York Author. PRIME, CARTER, AND WELBOURNE Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism and their manifestations. Social Justice Research, 17, 143–169. Davison, H. K, & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 225–248. Eagly, AH Carli, LL. The female leadership advantage An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834. Eagly, AH, Johannesen-Schmidt, MC van Engen, ML. Transformational, transac- tional and laissez-faire leadership styles A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychologi- cal Bulletin, 129, 569–591. Eagly, AH Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256. Eagly, AH Karau, SJ. Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. Eagly, AH, Karau, SJ Makhijani, MG. Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125–145. Eagly, AH, Makhijani, MG Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22. Eagly, AH Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.) European Review of Social Psychology (Vol, 5, pp. 1–35). New York Wiley. Fullager, J. F, Sumer, H. C, Sverke, M, & Slick, R. (2003). Managerial sex-role stereotyping: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 3, 93–106. Ganahl, DJ, Prinsen, T. J, & Netzley, SBA content analysis of prime time commercials: A contextual framework of gender representation. Sex Roles, 49, 545–551. Glick, P, Fiske, ST, Mladinic, A, Saiz, J. L, Abrams, D, Masser, B. Adetoun, B, Osagie, J.E., Akande, A, Alao, A, Brunner, A, Willemsen, T, Chipeta, K, Dardenne, B, Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D, Eckes, T, Six-Materna, I, Expósito, F, Moya, M, Foddy, M, Kim, H, Mucci-Faina, A., Romani, M, Sakalli, N, Udegbe, Bo., Yamamoto, M, Ui, M, Ferreira, MC, & López, W.L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, Goldberg, S. (1993). Why men rule A theory of male dominance. Chicago Open Court. Hanke, R. (1998). The “mock-macho” situation comedy Hegemonic masculinity and its reiteration. Download 193.9 Kb. Share with your friends:
|