Storyline | Learning Points |
Survival: The challenge of right versus wrong
|
Endurance,
by Alfred Lansing
Antarctic, 1914
|
How Ernest Shackleton saved the members of an Antarctic exploration expedition
|
-Impact of context / situation
-Burden of leadership
-Tactics of leadership
-Mixed motives
|
The challenge of right versus right
|
Antigone,
by Sophocles
Ancient Greece
|
A clash of competing “rights” in which neither side yields
|
-Action driven by principle
-Benefits and drawbacks of strongly held beliefs
-Moral alternatives
|
The challenge of a moral dilemma
|
Blessed Assurance, by Allan Gurganus
1940s America
|
A young, white insurance collection agent is torn between helping his black clients and his need for employment
|
-Moral awareness
-Exploitation
-Conflicting moral duties
|
The challenge of new principles
|
Things Fall Apart, by Chinua Achebe
Early 20th century Nigeria
|
An Ibo clan confronts the arrival of Christian missionaries and British colonial authorities
|
-Differences in world view
-Navigating a changing terrain
-Strategies for response
|
MODULE II: MORAL REASONING
Central Theme
| Text & Setting | Storyline | Learning Points |
Reasoning from moral theory
|
Trifles,
by Susan Glaspell
Early 20th century rural America;
“Moral Theories,” from Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Tom L. Beauchamp and James X. Childress
|
Two friends must decide whether to help a farm wife accused of murdering her husband
|
-Moral analysis
-Mounting a morally-defended argument
-The danger of unconscious assumptions
|
Reasoning from personal perspective
|
The Sweet Hereafter, by Russell Banks
Contemporary America
|
Four individuals respond in the aftermath of a school bus accident
|
-One event—many viewpoints
-Moral logic versus legal logic
-Emotion in moral reasoning
|
Reasoning from
a moral code
|
The Remains of the Day, by Kazuo Ishiguro
Britain between World Wars
|
A butler reckons with the consequences of a life in service to a British lord
|
-The limits of agency
-Benefits and drawbacks of fixed beliefs
-Balancing professional and personal commitments
|
Reasoning from multiple moralities
|
A Man for All Seasons, by Robert Bolt; 16th century England
|
Sir Thomas More looks for a way to reconcile duty to his King, religion, family, and self
|
-Making good on multiple obligations
-Capacity for complexity and tolerance for ambiguity
-Constitutive commitments
|
MODULE III: Moral Leadership
Central Theme
|
Text & Setting
|
Storyline
|
Learning Points
|
Exercising authority
|
The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli, 16th century Italy
|
A handbook of advice for new leaders
|
-How to obtain and maintain power
-Public versus private morality
-Relationship between leaders and followers
|
Earning legitimacy
|
The Secret Sharer by Joseph Conrad, 1890s on the coast of Siam
|
A new captain’s struggle to establish himself in his first command
|
-Procedural legitimacy
-Technical legitimacy
-Moral legitimacy
|
Balancing benefits and harms
|
Truman and the Bomb, Harvard Business School case Japan, World War II
Excerpts from Just and Unjust Wars by Michael Walzer
|
US President Harry S. Truman ‘s decision to use the atomic bomb and its consequences
|
-Leaders and advisers
-War as a rule-governed activity
-Judging leaders’ moral decisions
|
Taking a stand
|
Personal History, Autobiography of Katharine Graham, 1970s America, recalled
Excerpt from A Good Life, Autobiography of Ben Bradlee
|
The leadership of Washington Post publisher Katharine Graham during the investigations of the ‘Pentagon Papers’ and Watergate
|
-Moral courage
-Power of moral legitimacy
-Moral consistency
|
Assuming leadership
|
American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center, William Langewiesche, Post September 11th USA
|
How a small group of city bureaucrats and engineers came to manage the ‘unbuilding’ of the World Trade Center
|
-Willingness to act
-Power of technical expertise
-Learning to manage
|
Course objectives:
-
Define the nature of a moral challenge
-
Identify key burdens of leadership (Endurance)
-
List benefits and drawbacks of strongly held beliefs
-
Identify the key components of a moral analysis (Trifles)
-
List and explain three key moral theories (Moral Theories)
-
Identify key factors in balancing professional and personal commitments (The Remains of the Day)
-
List key elements in obtaining and maintaining power (The Prince)
-
List important factors in judging leaders’ moral decisions (Truman and the Bomb)
-
Explain how moral leadership is different from leadership of any other kind
-
To understand other people and other ideas through reading a number of great literature texts
-
Enhance writing skills through the SafeAssignment Term Paper.
Principle Centered Leadership Assignments
**Note Well** There are no quizzes or exams in this course!
Getting Started
After reading this syllabus, the first thing you should do is familiarize yourself with BlackBoard (BB). Particularly important is familiarity with the Class Participation in Discussion Boards.
Next, students should go to Assignments in BB and submit an acknowledgement in the Syllabus Understanding Assignment Link indicating that they have read and understand the syllabus by 01/16.
If students have questions please contact the Instructor as soon as possible so that he can respond quickly to student concerns. Please print off a copy of the Course Syllabus and review it thoroughly. Furthermore, points may be deducted for missing this deadline.
Blackboard (BB)
Your instructor will be using Bb in this course and you will be required to enroll in this Southeastern course management system. The Bb website is http://blackboard.se.edu. Each week there will be an assigned reading/s and students will be asked to comment on the reading several times. Furthermore, student’s gradebook will be displayed in Bb so that students can always know their grades in this class. Your instructor is not an expert in the technical aspects of Bb so please contact Bb technical support with technical questions (email listed on Bb home page). The preferred way to communicate with your instructor for this course is to use the SE student email account you have been given. Because of firewall issues using personal or work email addresses to communicate with your instructor can be problematic.
Discussion Board (DB) in BB
The DB forum is the online version of classroom discussions. A new discussion thread will be posted on most Sundays by about 3:00 p.m. and will be available until 10:00 p.m. on Friday of the same week. Students will not be able to contribute to the discussion thread/s after the Friday night deadline. Students should plan on accessing the course in Bb at least five days each week because the instructor may place additional information on the DB. Additionally, students are expected to post at least six times to the weekly DB with the first post on Sunday.
The following provide some guidelines for DB postings:
• Post only meaningful and appropriate responses of 500 words or less, unless otherwise indicated. Simply “I agree or disagree” is not meaningful! Remember to use correct grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling, including capitalizing “I” when referring to yourself. In addition to your initial meaningful response, respond to at least one other person’s comments.
• Meaningful responses will be supported with evidence, such as references. Please refrain from just posting your opinions about the topics! Good references (i.e., references with references and/or footnotes can be obtained by accessing the electronic resources on the SE library page (http://www.se.edu/library/serials-department/electronic-resources/). Two particularly good electronic databases for this course are EBSCOHost and ABI-Inform. Students will want to check boxes that indicate peer review or scholarly articles or articles with references since these are references that have references.
• Here are some of the factors or elements that enter into your Instructor's grade determination. Your Instructor does not have any mathematical formula that is used in grading DBs such that X% is allocated to one factor and so much weight assigned to another element. Rather, your Instructor looks at the totality (gestalt, if you will) of the DB for each student. Generally, your Instructor will sort the DB by author and that will tell him who participated, how many times, and when the participation occurred.
o What a student says in terms of content; content is accurate and supported by
research rather than just a personal, unsubstantiated opinion (unless specifically asked for);
o The creativity of the response;
o How the student communicates information on the DB in terms of quality English writing;
o The quality of the references provided; a major determinant of quality is that references included in a file attachment have references in a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal;
o When the student responds; DBs are designed to involve some discussion and if students respond for the first time a day or so before the ending of the DB then s/he does not give others much of an opportunity to participate. Additionally, the Instructor is not pleased to see a student post responses all within a one hour period or on the last day since that does not allow for much discussion. Please respond throughout the week with the first posting on Sunday; and
o How many times a student participates in a meaningful way; for example, posting just an agreement or disagreement with a position offered will generally not count for much. It is suggested that students post 6+ times for each DB with the first post occurring on Sunday of each week.
There are 8 DBs and thus a significant amount of reading required.
Each DB will be graded using the following grading template:
Element
|
1-3
|
5
|
7
|
9
| -
Textual Analysis
|
Error or incomplete reading
|
Correct grasp of facts
|
Identifies patterns or themes
|
Novel or very well crafted interpretation
| -
Influence of comment
|
Distraction
|
Maintains flow of discussion
|
Adds new layer or larger question; class picks up on contribution
|
Sets new direction for discussion; class picks up and follows input
| -
Logic/coherence
|
Hard to follow; inconsistent; incoherent
|
Clear; consistent
|
Ability to lay out strands of argument and evaluate them
|
Excellent ability to lay out argument and evaluate it
| -
Argumentation
|
Harsh personal attack; inappropriate persistence
|
Direct, clear response to other; on point rebuttal; good defense of viewpoint with back-up data
|
Clear depiction of novel or well-structured point of view; ability to escalate/deepen argument
|
Direct engagement; helps others clarify their views or change them
| -
Meta-cognition
|
Treats on views as facts; does not separate fact from opinion
|
Aware of own thought patterns and opinions
|
Excellent description of thought process; can change point of view knowingly
|
Offers novel, well flushed out frameworks
| -
Linking/continuity
|
Repeats points without realizing/acknowledging; misses obvious links in material or comments
|
Knowingly maintains flow; acknowledges links in material or comments
|
Good summary; draws strands of discussion together; creates links across works or class sessions
|
Excellent synthesis of discussion; creates links across works or class sessions
| -
Application of course
concepts/frameworks
|
Misuse of concepts; no use of concepts
|
Use of frameworks within discussion as expected
|
Appeals to frameworks even when not expected; attempts to master frameworks through application
|
Helps other understand frameworks or concepts; brings new or novel dimensions or interpretations to concepts
| -
Personal experience
|
Inappropriate theme; inappropriate level of detail
|
Appropriate theme; appropriate level of detail
|
Illuminating; helps others see new angle or in more depth
|
Changes way class thinks about topic
| -
Writing Skill
|
Poor writing and grammar; difficulty expressing ideas; student has placed instructor in English teacher role
|
Fair writing; several grammar and writing errors
|
Good writing; generally good writing with just a few errors
|
Excellent writing; few, if any, errors
|
Participation
Since this is an online course, students are expected to be highly self-motivated. It is imperative the student make the time commitment to check the course website at least 6 times a week.
The Moral Leader Course SafeAssignment Paper
The assignment for the course paper is to describe and analyze a situation involving the demonstration of moral leadership. Your paper should be approximately 20 pages long (give or take 2 pages; page count does not include references page/s), double-spaced and typed left justified on regular 8.5” x 11” paper with margins of 1” (top, bottom, left, right) in Times Roman 12 point font in Word. The paper should have page numbers and the author’s name in the header on the upper right. Use American Psychological Association (APA; see FAQs below). In addition to the book/play/novella that contains your key protagonist please supply seven other journal references (please do not use Wikipedia as a reference) that support your views in the manuscript. Do not worry if your paper turns out to be a bit longer than this.
Please make your paper readable. The average college graduate student should be able to read and understand your paper. A good test is to find a graduate student without an extensive background in business and have them read it. Do not ask the Instructor to read your paper before you turn it in, but certainly feel free to have personnel at the SE Learning Center on campus review your paper before turning submitting your paper to your Instructor. Please allow time for this.
The SafeAssignment Term Paper is due 03/02. To assist you please refer to the Term Paper Checklist (click on the attached link; it is also available in BB > Course Information. This subject, your Instructor believes, is of interest to managers and supervisors and while it is a practitioner-oriented paper your Instructor is interested in a professional, library-oriented, well-documented, academic treatise. Your paper should have a minimum of 7 journal references. These references should be peer-reviewed journals (see this link for more information on peer-reviewed journals; please turn on speakers): http://library.nsuok.edu/tutorials/BSOL/bsol_peerreviewjournals.html. Each of the references used in the paper must have at least three references/footnotes/endnotes in its bibliography/reference list/footnotes. Each reference the student uses should be attached and should be submitted using BB > Assignments > Term Paper References. The entire journal article must be attached in case the Instructor wants to read the journal article. Please do not use books (including your text or the Bible for this course) or Internet sites as references.
This paper should be written in American Psychological Association (APA) format. Refer to the following page for APA formatting: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/. Briefly, manuscripts must be double-spaced and typed left justified on regular 8.5” x 11” paper with margins of 1” (top, bottom, left, and right) in Times Roman 12-point font in Word. The manuscript should have a title page, an abstract page, a list of references used in the paper, and page numbers.
Students should retain a disk copy of their paper in the event it is misplaced or lost.
The manuscript/s is a professional paper and colloquialisms (e.g., “a lot of” vs. “many”; “bugged” vs. “upset”; “doesn’t have a clue” vs. “does not understand”; “all the time in the world” vs. “much time”) and contractions (e.g., they’ve, aren’t) should be avoided. Such colloquialisms may be fine for a conversation or an informal written communication, but not for a formal paper. Also, avoid lengthy quotations. Furthermore, your Instructor does not want to read a paper of quotes since part of your job is to read and interpret the references. Additionally, students should back up what they say with references. Do not say things like: “Males have worse attendance records that females” without a reference to back it up. I am from Missouri (the Show Me state) when it comes to papers—so Show Me! Say instead, “Von Bergen (1999) reported that males have worse attendance than females….” Be sure that you cite the references in the body of the paper and then list the references in alphabetical order by the last name of the first author on the References page of your paper. Personal interviews and personal accounts are not considered a reference and should not be included. Please limit the use rhetorical questions in your paper as excessive use indicates to your Instructor an immature writing style (e.g., “What is self-esteem?” and then the writer goes ahead and answers his or her question). Significant grade reductions will occur for poor punctuation, grammar, or spelling, or for insufficient references, or for incoherent, awkward or run-on sentences. Please refer to the Term Paper Checklist in BB. Papers less than the required pages will be penalized at least 25% of the possible points for the paper. Significant grade increases will be given for particularly creative and well written papers. Late papers (submitted after the date indicated in the Tentative Weekly Assignments below) will generally receive a 10% point reduction for each hour late or part thereof. For example, a paper submitted 1minute late will have a point deduction of 10% of the total points allotted to the this assignment; a student submitting this assignment 61 minutes late will result in a 20% point reduction.
Please make your paper readable. The average college graduate student should be able to read and understand your paper. A good test is to find a student who writes well but does not have an extensive background in business and have them read it. Do not ask the Instructor to read your paper before you turn it in. Certainly feel free to have personnel at the Writing Center (137 Hallie McKinney; http://www.se.edu/dept/learning-center/writing-center/; email: ewatkins@se.edu) on campus review your work before submitting your paper. Alternatively, at the Henry Bennett Library students can go to the Writing Resource Center on Sunday thru Thursday evenings from 5-10p.m. As a third alternative students may wish to use Smart Thinking, an online essay proofreading service called SmartThinking (http://services.smartthinking.com). Please give these resources a lead time to review your paper and return it back to you so plan your schedule accordingly and contact them for more details. Dr. Von has examples of both poor and good term papers. This should give all students a better idea of what he is looking for. To review these four term papers go to Dr. Von’s homepage (http://homepages.se.edu/cvonbergen/), click on Class Resources, and then click on Principle Centered Leadership, and then scroll down the alphabetical listing and locate Example of a Good Term Paper (two papers) and Example of a Poor Term Paper (two papers).
An electronic copy of the term paper must be submitted on or before 03/02. To submit your SafeAssignment Term Paper go to BB and for this course click on Assignments > SafeAssignment Term Paper >. Then scroll down to Attach File > Browse My Computer > Submit and locate your term paper on your computer that you previously saved. Upload your term paper. Essentially, SafeAssignment checks for plagiarism and matching scores above 30% (excluding reference list) indicate to the Instructor that significant plagiarism has occurred and penalties may apply up to and including a zero on the assignment, an F in the class, or expulsion from university. Do not plagiarize or use too many quotes in the term paper.
Share with your friends: |