Review of Studies of Voice Identity Processing in Schizophrenia and Its Relationship with avh sz vs. Hc
Date 18.10.2016 Size 59.19 Kb. #395 Type Review
Supplemental Table 1. Review of Studies of Voice Identity Processing in Schizophrenia and Its Relationship with AVH
SZ vs. HC
Author
Sample size and features
Subtypes
Method and design
Results
(Ford, Mathalon, Kalba, et al., 2001b)89
10 HC; 12 SZ (a, e)
4 P; 6U; 1D; 1 R
ERP - responses to acoustic probes during talking vs. listening
SZ ≠ HC
(Ford, Mathalon, Heinks, et al., 2001)92
7 HC; 7 SZ (N.A.)
N.A.
ERP - talking aloud vs. listening
SZ ≠ HC
(Ford, Mathalon, Kalba, et al., 2001a)90
15 HC; 15 SZ (a, e)
N.A.
ERP - inner speech vs. listening
SZ ≠ HC
(Ford & Mathalon, 2005)87
Aims 3 and 4: 21 HC; 20 SZ (a, e)
(aims 1 and 2 in Ford, Mathalon, Kalba, et al., 2001b)
N.A.
EEG coherence - talking vs. listening
SZ ≠ HC
(Ford, Roach, Faustman, & Mathalon, 2007)96
25 HC; 24 SZ/SAD (e)
10 U; 9 P; 3 SAD; 2 R
ERP and EEG coherence - talking vs. listening to self-generated voice.
SZ ≠ HC;
Neural synchrony anomalies↔ AH severity
(Rotarska-Jagiela et al., 2009)82
24 HC; 24 SZ with AVH (c, d)
N.A.
DTI
SZ ≠ HC
(Kumari et al., 2010)65
20 HC; 63 SZ (c)
N.A.
fMRI - identity judgment of vocal feedback during reading
SZ ≠ HC; Good ≠ bad performers;
brain functioning anomalies ↔ AH severity
(Whitford et al., 2011)83
25 HC ; 21 SZ (e)
N.A.
ERP - self-induced vocal stimuli by button press; DTI
SZ ≠ HC
(Simons et al., 2010)72
12 HC; 15 SZ with AVH (during illness exacerbations)
N.A.
fMRI - listening vs. inner speech generation
SZ ≠ HC
(Ilankovic et al., 2011)67
23 HC; 23 SZ with AVH ( ≥3 score) (a)
N.A.
Behavioral - voice identity judgment preceded by a congruent/incongruent cue
SZ ≠ HC;
misattribution errors ↔ delusional severity
AVH vs. NAVH
Author
Sample size and features
Subtypes
Method and design
Results
(Johns et al., 2001)23
20 HC; 10 AVH (current) (a) ; 8 NAVH (i)
N.A.
Behavioral - identity judgment of vocal feedback during reading
SZ ≠ HC; AVH ≠ NAVH;
(Ford, Mathalon, Whitfield , Faustman, & Roth, 2002)95
10 HC; 7 AVH (5-7 score)(e, a) ; 5 NAVH (1-2 score)(e, a)
4 P, 6 U, 1 D, 1 R
EEG coherence - responses to acoustic probes during talking vs. listening
AVH ≠ NAVH / HC;
(Allen et al., 2004)33
15 HC; 15 AVH (current & ≥3 score) (a) ; 13 NAVH (no current & 0 score) (a)
N.A.
Behavioral - voice identity judgment
AVH ≠ NAVH / HC
(Hubl et al., 2004)81
13 HC; 13 AVH (current) (d) ; 13 non-AVH (no history)
N.A.
DTI
AVH ≠ NAVH / HC
(Johns et al., 2006)24
20 HC; 10 AP with AVH; 15 SZ/SAD with AVH (current)(a) ; 15 SZ/SAD with AVH history (i) ; 15 SZ /SAD without AVH history (i)
N.A.
Behavioral - identity judgment of vocal feedback during reading
SZ/SAD with AVH ≠ HC / SZ/SAD with AVH history / AP with AVH
(Allen, Amaro, et al., 2007)28
11 HC; 10 AVH (past week & ≥3 score )(a) ; 10 non-AVH (no history)
N.A.
fMRI - voice identity judgment
AVH ≠ NAVH / HC
(Heinks-Maldonado et al., 2007)69
17 HC; 20 SZ: 10 AVH (past 4 weeks) (a) ; 10 NAVH (absent for the last 4 weeks & ≤1 score)(a)
N.A.
ERP - identity judgment of vocal feedback during talking
AVH ≠ NAVH / HC
(Mechelli et al., 2007)68
10 HC; 11 AVH (past week)(a) ; 10 NAVH (no history)
N.A.
fMRI & DCM - voice identity judgment
SZ ≠ HC; AVH ≠ NAVH / HC
(Fu et al., 2008)70
13 HC; 10 AVH; 10 NAVH
N.A.
fMRI - identity judgment of vocal feedback
AVH ≠ NAVH / HC
(Zhang et al., 2008)30
13 HC; 26 SZ: 13 AVH; 13 NAVH (a)
P
fMRI - familiar vs. unfamiliar voices discrimination
AVH ≠ HC
(Alba-ferrara, Weis, Damjanovic, Rowett, & Hausmann, 2012)29
13 HC; 13 AVH (current & ≥3 score) (a) ; 12 NAVH (no current & ≤1score) (a)
N.A.
Behavioral - famous voices recognition
SZ ≠ HC; AVH ≠ NAVH;
(Chhabra, Badcock, Maybery, & Leung, 2012)31
34 HC; 65 SZ/SZ spectrum disorder: 33 AVH (current) (b) ; 32 NAVH (no current)
N.A.
Behavioral - similarity judgment between voices
SZ ≠ HC
(Mou et al., 2013)64
13 HC; 13 AVH (past 2 weeks & ≥4 score)(a) ; 13 NAVH (no history & 0 score)(a)
N.A.
fMRI- identity judgment of familiar vs. unfamiliar voices
AVH ≠ NAVH / HC
Note . SZ=schizophrenia; NAVH=without AVH; SAD=schizoaffective disorder; AP=affective psychosis; P=paranoid; U=undifferentiated; D=disorganized; R=Residual; PNOS=psychosis not otherwise specified; SZP=schizophreniform; SZD=Schizoid; FEP= First-episode: N.A. = NON APPLICABLE; AH=auditory hallucinations
a Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms – SAPS (Andreasen, 1984);97 b Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (Haddock, McCarron, Tarrier, & Faragher, 1999);98 c Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale – PANSS (Kay, S R Fiszbein & Opler, 1987);99 d Semi-structured interview ; e Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale – BPRS (Overall, 1961);100 f Modified version of the Present State Examination (Wing et al., 1990);101 g Topography of Voices Rating Scale (Husting & Hafner, 1990);102 h Launay-Slade Hallucination Scale (Bentall & Slade, 1986);103 i Assessed by case-notes and patients self-report.Share with your friends:
The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message