UNICEF, 2011
SOME OF THE ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS
|
AARREC
ACF
ACTED
ADRA
Africare
AMI-France
ARC
ARS
ASB
ASI
AVSI
CARE
CARITAS
CEMIR International
CESVI
CFA
CHF
CHFI
CISV
CMA
CONCERN
COOPI
CORDAID
COSV
|
CRS
CWS
DanChurchAid
DDG
Diakonie Emerg. Aid
DRC
EM-DH
FAO
FAR
FHI
FinnChurchAid
FSD
GAA
GOAL
GTZ
GVC
Handicap International
HCSO
HealthNet TPO
HELP
HelpAge International
HKI
Horn Relief
HT
|
Humedica
IA
IEDA
ILO
IMC
INTERMON
Internews
INTERSOS
IOM
IPHD
IR
IRC
IRD
IRIN
IRW
Islamic Relief
JOIN
JRS
LWF
Malaria Consortium
Malteser
Mercy Corps
MDA
MDM
|
MEDAIR
MENTOR
MERLIN
Muslim Aid
NCA
NPA
NRC
OCHA
OHCHR
OXFAM
PA
PACT
PAI
Plan
PMU-I
Première Urgence
RC/Germany
RCO
Samaritan's Purse
Save the Children
SECADEV
Solidarités
SUDO
TEARFUND
|
|
Table I. Requirements per cluster 10
Table II. Requirements per priority level 10
Table III. Requirements per organization 12
2.1 Changes in the context 14
2.2 Summary of cluster achievements in 2011 16
2.3 Lessons learned 20
2.4 Review of humanitarian funding 23
2.5 Review of humanitarian coordination 25
4.1 Scenarios 34
4.2 The humanitarian strategy 34
4.3 Strategic objectives and humanitarian indicators for 2012 36
4.3.1 Strategic objectives 36
4.3.2 Strategic indicators 38
4.4 Project selection and prioritization criteria 38
4.5 Cluster Response Plans 40
4.5.1 Shelters/NFI Cluster 40
4.5.2 CCCM Cluster 46
4.5.3 Coordination 51
4.5.4 Education Cluster 56
4.5.5 Logistics Cluster 61
4.5.6 Nutrition Cluster 66
4.5.7 Multi-sector/UNHCR Programme 71
4.5.8 Protection Cluster 79
4.5.9 Early Recovery Cluster 85
4.5.10 Health Cluster 90
4.5.11 Food Security Cluster 95
4.5.12. WASH Cluster 102
4.6 Cross-cutting issues 108
4.7 Roles and responsibilities 110
Table IV. List of projects grouped by cluster 113
Table V. Requirements per location 120
Table VI. Requirements per gender marker score 120
Table VII. Requirements and funding per cluster 121
Table VIII. Requirements and funding per organization 122
Table IX. Total funding per donor (for projects included in the EHAP)
123
Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://unocha.org/cap. Full project details, continually updated, can be viewed, downloaded and printed from http://fts.unocha.org.
|
1. Executive Summary
Six months after the post-election crisis, the security and socio-political situation has gradually improved in most parts of Côte d'Ivoire. This has enabled hundreds of thousands of internally displaced people (IDPs) and Ivorian refugees in countries of the region to return to their places of origin. However, security issues persist. They include armed attacks and abuse against civilians, as well as communal tensions particularly in the west and south-west. Côte d'Ivoire remains in a fragile recovery phase, strongly affected by the legacy of several crises that have taken place over the past decade or more. The latest crisis has severely exacerbated the situation. The process of reconstruction, peace-building and reconciliation will likely be long and difficult, as numerous challenges face President Ouattara’s Government. They include restoring a secure environment throughout the territory and along the borders; restoring the rule of law and justice; consolidating State services; reconciling and strengthening social cohesion; economic recovery; and the fight against poverty.
Côte d'Ivoire Consolidated Appeal 2012:
Key Parameters
|
Duration
|
1 January 2012 –
31 December 2012
|
2011-2012
milestones
|
Elections in Liberia
Legislative elections in CDI
Local elections in CDI
Trial of Former President Gbagbo
|
Target beneficiaries*
|
Internally displaced population
|
186,000
|
Returnees (IDPs who have returned home)
|
420,000
|
Repatriated refugees (including 96.000 recorded by UNHCR)
|
130,000
|
IDP host families
|
26,000
|
Host communities (host households for repatriates and returnees)
|
90,000
|
Vulnerable populations
|
1,560,000
|
Refugees
|
54,000
|
TOTAL
|
2,466,000 **
|
Total requested funding
|
Requested funding per beneficiary
|
US1$173 089,333
|
$70
|
*Planning figures harmonized as at 20 October 2011 by the humanitarian community.
** Total beneficiaries based on an average of five people per household.
|
In this context of transition, humanitarian aid to vulnerable populations remains a top priority. This includes the protection of civilians, the restoration of livelihoods, and the voluntary return and reintegration of IDPs and refugees. Hundreds of thousands of people are still in profound vulnerability—mainly in the west and south-west. This is because they are still internally displaced (more than 186,000 according to humanitarian actors), or because they have not recovered their livelihoods or are exposed to abuses committed by armed men. Important needs persist in all areas: protection, health, access to water, shelter, education, food security, nutrition and early recovery. In addition, according to UNHCR almost 182,000 Ivorians are still refugees in countries of the region, including over 156,000 in Liberia.
In 2012, humanitarian action will prioritize the most problematic regions in the west and south-west, where significant efforts must still be made. Interventions in areas such as food security, health and nutrition will also be pursued in other regions in the centre and north.
Humanitarian partners have identified the following strategic objectives: 1) improve the living conditions and protection of affected populations, including IDPs, host families, host communities and other vulnerable people, by ensuring the access to basic services according to SPHERE standards; 2) facilitate voluntary return to secure areas by identifying and supporting sustainable solutions; 3) reduce risk and mitigate the effects of possible future crises.
The objectives defined at the sectoral level are closely linked to the strategic objectives. A reinforced monitoring mechanism will be set up to measure, based on defined quantifiable indicators, progress vis-à-vis these objectives and, by extension, the implementation of the overall humanitarian strategy.
The projects will seek the active participation of local communities and authorities concerned. This will help to ensure the sustainability of actions undertaken to allow a gradual withdrawal of humanitarian actors, and to facilitate a smooth transition with development programmes. In the same spirit, coordination with the authorities will be strengthened and the CAP with its humanitarian action plan will be integrated into the Government’s National Development Plan, which is being prepared.
This humanitarian aid will likely continue beyond 2012 in some areas. A premature withdrawal of humanitarian agencies could cause the humanitarian situation to deteriorate, or even be an indirect cause of tensions. Therefore, it is essential that financial resources be available to carry out the strategic actions planned in this appeal.
Ivorian refugees in neighbouring countries
SITUATION overview
-
Main features of the emergency: (i) massive population displacement inside and outside the country and gradual return; (ii) protection and insecurity; (iii) loss of property and livelihood by a significant part of the population of Côte d'Ivoire; (iv) dysfunction of basic social services
-
Most-affected groups: IDPs and refugees; repatriates and returnees; IDPs who have returned home; host families; host communities; and vulnerable people.
-
Most-affected regions: a) priority areas requiring a multi-sectoral approach; b) priority areas requiring a sectoral approach; c) risk areas (cf.map).
-
Key drivers of the crisis: the post-electoral crisis from December 2010 to April 2011. This plunged the country into a situation of armed violence that resulted in a humanitarian crisis.
vulnerable Populations and priority humanitarian areas
Humanitarian Dashboard
Share with your friends: |