This report was produced using data, forecasts and price information current at the time of writing (2013). It should be noted that these inputs are likely to



Download 130.89 Kb.
Page1/8
Date02.02.2017
Size130.89 Kb.
#15393
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

multi-page-doc-logo-04.jpg



Auxiliary Report

Final Australia's Emergency Liquid Fuel Stockholding Update 2013: Ticket Markets Part A: Non-IEA Country Part B: Australia

Prepared for the Department of Industry, Canberra

23 October 2013



This report was produced using data, forecasts and price information current at the time of writing (2013).  It should be noted that these inputs are likely to change over time and users of this report should refer to report updates where available or consider the age of the report when reviewing the results presented.

Hale & Twomey Limited is an energy consultancy specialising in strategic issues affecting the energy sector. With a comprehensive knowledge of local and international energy markets, we provide strategic advice, comprehensive analysis and services across the entire sector.

Hale & Twomey prides itself on being able to analyse and interpret the detail, then translate the implications into strategic directions for our clients. We provide expertise to a broad range of companies and government departments. Hale & Twomey has established a strong reputation in the sector by producing timely, high quality, value-adding work.

Authorship

This document was written by:

Ian Twomey ............... Phone: +64 4 471 1109, e-mail: ian@haletwomey.co.nz

Please phone or e-mail for further information.

Disclaimer

Hale & Twomey Limited, its contributors and employees shall not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by any person relying on this report, whatever the cause of such loss or damage.

Executive Summary

Ticketed stock (tickets) is the name given to a stockholding arrangement under which the seller agrees to hold (or reserve) an amount of oil on behalf of the buyer in return for an agreed fee. The buyer is purchasing an option to purchase physical oil that can only be exercised in an oil supply emergency declared by the International Energy Agency (IEA). The purchaser of the ticket gets the right to count the reserved stock as part of its IEA stockholding commitment, and the seller of the ticket does not count the stock in its commitment.

Tickets were developed in Europe as a flexible way for companies to manage their compulsory stock obligations which is why they are linked explicitly to being exercised in an IEA disruption event and counting towards stock obligations. Tickets can be between parties in different countries as long as the respective countries have a bilateral agreement allowing such deals (also referred to as government to government agreements).

The National Energy Security Assessment (NESA) Identified Issues: Australia’s International Energy Oil Obligation report (2012 Report) provided details of the ticket market and ticket contracts. All four stockholding models developed in the 2012 Report included at least a portion of ticket stock. This is because tickets provide a flexible way to manage a target that can change annually and where the physical stocks are likely to be added in large increments. Ticket stock has the advantage of being:

Relatively short term (normally 3 months to a year) which is useful in managing a changing emergency stock requirement;

Traded openly (although not on a regulated market) giving transparency to buyers and sellers;

International in nature where ticket stock can be held in other countries if the respective governments have bilateral agreements;

Cost effective (in limited volumes), especially when compared with the long term commitment needed for physically holding emergency stock; and

Simple to manage as the ticket seller continues to own and manage the stock on which the ticket is sold.

Developing a ticket market in non-IEA countries


Ticket contracts between entities in different countries have historically been restricted to IEA countries as they are the countries with the stock obligations. The IEA rules note that there must be a bilateral agreement between the participating countries which is defined in the Agreement on an International Energy Program (IEP).

The IEA has recently allowed IEA member countries to hold ticket stock in non-IEA countries who are European Union members as the European Union members also have a stock obligation.

The majority of IEA members are European (see Figure in Background Section) so are not a logical place for Australia to hold emergency stocks. However, of the other three Asia-Pacific IEA members, New Zealand is short of stock and South Korea restricts how stocks are released in an emergency so would not be able to sign a bilateral agreement, leaving only Japan as a possible offshore stock location in the region. It would make sense for Australia to look at developing a ticket market in some other (non-IEA) Asian countries if it can be done in a way such that the IEA is prepared to count the stock held.

The requirements that the IEA might set for a non-IEA country to be allowed as an emergency storage location are not known but may include:

A bilateral agreement between Australia and the other country that no impediment will be imposed on the transfer of stocks in an emergency (this will be a definite requirement);

Monthly reporting of the stocks (at minimum the stock held under the agreement); and

Acceptance of the non-IEA country as a suitable location for an IEA country to hold stock by the IEA Governing Board.

The ticket contracts are commercial contracts between two entities and not dependent on whether those entities are in IEA countries so could be used in the same form for securing stock in a non-IEA country. As with any ticket contract, the counterparty risk on the contract being honoured will need to be assessed, along with the country risk that the country will honour its bilateral agreement in a supply disruption.

The non-IEA country would get benefit from allowing ticket stock to be held on its territory as it would provide an income stream to its petroleum industry. It would need to evaluate how it allows tickets to be sold as it would not want the sale of tickets to affect its own supply security. This means the country is likely to require the stocks on which tickets can be sold to be additional to the normal commercial supplies to the domestic market (e.g. they are sold on traded volumes).

Ticket market in Australia


This report updates and expands discussion on the option of developing a ticket market in Australia. Development of such a market in Australia would provide benefit for most of the stockholding models being considered by Australia. However, the structure of the domestic ticket market will depend on the particular model.

For a model where the government has the task of securing the required emergency stock through ticket contracts, while the bulk of these are likely to be offshore, there will be benefit in developing an internal market to:

Hold some of the emergency stock within Australia, providing more prompt emergency response stock and protection against domestic disruption;

The opportunity to use excess/ underutilised storage facilities that may be more cost effective than new facilities; and

Increase the pool of locations where stock can be held increasing the availability of ticket stock.

Models that use an industry obligation as part of the stockholding model, typically require each market participant (companies supplying petroleum) to hold a certain minimum number of days' supply. Companies' inventory cycles depend on a number of factors including supply frequency and method, storage facility availability, market opportunities and demand variation. Using tickets allows companies to manage the short term variation. For example if a company was doing maintenance on a storage facility which meant they could not hold their normal stock level for a period, it could buy a ticket to ensure it continued to meet its obligation level.

The ticket market in this case is primarily providing flexibility to market participants rather than a means of actually increasing physical stock holdings, although it could also do that if a central stock agency purchased ticket contracts from companies holding more than the minimum stock obligation for a period.

Ticket costs


For this report ticket costs have been updated based on current market information. There have been some changes to the ticket market following changes to more closely align the European Union compulsory stock obligations with those of the IEA at the end of 2012. In addition, the market structure of oil markets over the last couple of years has, in general, not favoured storing oil (it is favourable when forward prices are generally lower than current prices providing a financial incentive for companies to hold stock). A lack of incentive to store oil has been reflected in higher ticket prices.

Table : Ticket cost assumptions






2012 report

(USD/tonne/month)



Update

(USD/tonne/month)



Up to 300,000 tonnes

1.00-2.00

2.75

300,000-500,000 tonnes

3.50

3.50

500,000-1,000,000

5.50

5.50

1,000,000+

7.50 (5.00-9.00)

9.00

The price for volumes above 1 million tonnes has been increased to USD 9.00/tonne/month from the USD 7.50/tonne/month used in the 2012 Report. While this is well above where ticket contracts are currently trading, like any commodity market, if a large new buyer comes into the market prices will rise. Ultimately the price will rise to the cost of providing more supply, hence the assumption of a similar cost to holding physical stock for large volumes. Exactly how much volume purchased would shift the market this high will not be known until Australia enters the market. Ticket prices could go above the level assumed above (the cost of physical stock holdings) if there is a demand spike exceeding current supply or if companies are expecting a higher return on their assets than assumed in this cost estimate.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary 3

1.Introduction 8

2.Background 8

3.Methodology 10

3.1Scope of Work 10

i.holding stock in-country for industry to meet Australian Government requirements; and 11

ii.holding stock on behalf of other IEA or non-IEA member countries in the Asia-Pacific region, including ASEAN members. 11

4.Summary of ticket markets 12

4.1Ticket market changes 13

4.2Ticket costs and availability 13

5.PART A: Using a non-IEA country as a provider of ticket stock 16

5.1Current IEA rule for counting stock 16

5.2Possible IEA requirements for acceptance of a non-IEA country as a ticker provider 17

6.A bilateral agreement between the non-IEA, OECD or EU member country and the government which wanted the ability for it or its companies to hold stock in that country. 17

7.An agreement between the non-IEA, OECD or EU member country and the IEA for that country to report stocks monthly (at minimum the stocks under the contract) so the IEA would have assurance that the stock was being held for the benefit of the country in which entities were purchasing the tickets. 17

8.Possibly acceptance by IEA members (through adoption at the Governing Board level) that the new country is an acceptable location for IEA member countries to hold stock. 17

8.1Factors in considering a non-IEA country 18

8.2Benefits and issues for the host country 19

8.3Ticket contract structure 19

8.4List of actions to develop a ticket market in a non-IEA country 21

9.Case Study: Republic of Singapore as an example of a non-IEA country providing ticket stock 22

9.1Assessment of Singapore as a ticket location 25

1.Availability of petroleum infrastructure 25

2.Ease of transport of stock to Australia in an emergency 25

3.Access to shipping 25

4.Stability of the country and rule of law 26

5.Suitable counterparties operating in the country 26

9.2Singapore summary 26

10.PART B: A domestic ticket market within Australia 28

10.1A domestic ticket market 28

10.1.1Ticket tender system 30

10.1.2Industry obligation system 31

10.2Market incentives 32

10.3Ticket contract structure & pricing 33

10.4Links to global market 34

10.5Rules for release 34

10.6Summary 35

Associated Reports 36





Glossary

APEC

Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation

ASEAN

Association of Southeast Asian Nations

Bbl

Barrel (measure of petroleum volume = 159 litres).

Backwardation

A term used in commodity markets where the price for prompt delivery is more expensive than future delivery.

Bilateral agreement

Agreement between two countries allowing one country to hold stock (and count it towards its obligation) in the other country (also known as government to government agreement).

Central stock agency

An agency established specifically to manage emergency stocks in a country. May be government or industry owned.

Contango

A term used in commodity markets where the price for prompt delivery is cheaper than future delivery.

EU

European Union

IEA

International Energy Agency

IEP Agreement

IEA Agreement that covers the coordination of petroleum in an emergency along with minimum stock holding requirements

LNG

Liquefied Natural Gas

OECD

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development


































Download 130.89 Kb.

Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page