Consistent with the City’s standard objective to inform and involve citizens, and to fulfill the public involvement requirements of the mitigation planning programs, the City solicited input and notified and invited residents to review the Plan and attend a public meeting.
2.3.1 Public Work Session at City Council
Two City Council public work sessions were held during the planning process, on May 12, 2003 and October 6, 2003. The work session on May 12th included an overview of the mitigation planning process and progress to date. As with all work sessions, this meeting was open to the public and a notice of the meeting was posted on the City’s website and at City Hall. Specific items covered in this work session presentation included:
-
How and why the City is undertaking the mitigation planning process;
-
Overview of Pearland’s natural hazards;
-
Draft mitigation actions under consideration by the planning committee;
-
Proposed public involvement; and
-
The schedule for completion.
The work session on October 6, 2003 included an overview of the planning process, progress to date, a summary of public questionnaire responses, and an overview of the prioritized mitigation actions. As with all work sessions, this meeting was open to the public and a notice of the meeting was posted on the City’s website and at City Hall. Specific items covered in this work session presentation included:
-
How and why the City is undertaking the mitigation planning process;
-
The planning process;
-
Summary of public involvement;
-
Overview of public questionnaire responses;
-
Overview of the prioritized mitigation actions; and
-
The schedule for completion.
2.3.2 Public Questionnaire
A questionnaire to solicit input from citizens about hazards and mitigation ideas was prepared and distributed to over 4,000 addresses of people in the mapped floodplain and those who have reported flooding and drainage problems. The questionnaire was posted on the City’s web page (Appendix B, including a summary of responses). Two-hundred eighty-two homeowners returned completed questionnaires. Highlights of the most frequent responses include:
-
Drainage/storm sewer backups as a significant contributor to flooding. Respondent’s recommendations include improving drainage beyond current needs and keeping all ditches and creeks cleaned.
-
Street flooding as a significant problem.
-
New home developments are being built higher than older, established neighborhoods, and there is a concern the City is allowing too much. It was stated that both of these concerns are contributing to flooding. Respondent’s recommendations include enforcing zoning and regulations to prevent overbuilding and to reduce new home building permits.
-
HazMat accidents are a significant potential hazard. This concern was furthered with the concern that City roads may be too congested to handle an evacuation.
-
Increased traffic in the City is a hazard that has increased in severity in recent years.
-
Sewers backup during most heavy rains.
-
Recommend cleaning/dredging Clear Creek.
-
Most all respondents stated they are aware of the City’s floodplain permitting requirements.
2.3.3 Final Public Meeting
The Pearland, TX, Hazard Mitigation Plan (Public Review Draft) was presented to the public at a meeting held on October 29, 2003. Notices of the meeting were published in the Reporter News: A notice of the final public meeting was published in the Legal Notice section on October 15; and on October 29, a four-column notice was published in the main section of the Reporter News (Figure 2-1).
Prior to the meeting, copies of the Public Review Draft were made available to the public in City of Pearland offices and at the Pearland Branch of the Brazoria County public library, Tom Reid Building. In addition, it was posted online at http://www.ci.pearland.tx.us. One member of the public and one member of the press attended this meeting. Comments received are summarized below:
-
Pearland should have included a member of the public on the planning committee;
-
There was not sufficient public notice prior to this public meeting;
-
There was a major heat wave in July of 1980 that should be included in the hazard history section;
-
Grass fires have occurred within the City;
-
There was a winter storm in 1978 that damaged pipes around the City.
Figure 2-1. Public Meeting Notices Published in the Reporter News on October 15 and 29, 2003.
These comments were taken into account when preparing the final plan and where relevant were incorporated into the draft. Due to the concern regarding public participation and the small turnout at this meeting, the City agreed to keep the public comment process for the draft plan open another two weeks. An article prepared by the meeting attendee from the press appeared in the Houston Chronicle informing people that the draft was available for public review and comment through November 14, 2003. At the end of this period, only one additional public comment was received.
2.3.4 Public Session of City Council
The Hazard Mitigation Plan was presented for adoption during the October 11, 2004 public session of the City Council and adopted effective immediately. The Emergency Management Department was directed to forward the Plan to the Texas Water Development Board and the Texas Division of Emergency Management for appropriate review and action.
Directory: publications -> reportspublications -> Quantitative skillspublications -> Multi-core cpu and gpu implementation of Discrete Periodic Radon Transform and Its Inversepublications -> List of Publications Department of Mechanical Engineering ucek, jntu kakinadapublications -> Sa michelson, 2011: Impact of Sea-Spray on the Atmospheric Surface Layer. Bound. Layer Meteor., 140 ( 3 ), 361-381, doi: 10. 1007/s10546-011-9617-1, issn: Jun-14, ids: 807TW, sep 2011 Bao, jw, cw fairall, sa michelsonpublications -> Sample disaster and emergency plan for alabama public librariesreports -> -reports -> Street nw edmonton, Albertareports -> Subject: Telecom Decision crtc 97-16
Share with your friends: |