1. Scope and Standard References
Download 0.74 Mb.
|
- Navigate this page:
- 6. Evaluation system
- 6.2. Grading rules
- 7. Course description.
- › Visit Amazons Elana Wilson Rowe Page
- 10.1. Compulsory Readings.
  1. Scope and Standard References
The present course syllabus sets up minimal requirements for students’ knowledge and skills; it also determines content and forms of classroom work as well as evaluation/assessment methods. The syllabus is designed for the 2nd year students, MA program “Politics and Governance”, the MA program “Contemporary Social Analysis”, 39.04.01 “Sociology”, MA program “Public Administration”, 38.04.04 “Public Administration”, course «Russia in World Politics». The syllabus is based on the following normative documents:
Academic standard of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (Образовательный стандарт Государственного образовательного бюджетного учреждения высшего профессионального образования «Научно-исследовательский университет – Высшая школа экономики»); Curriculum of the 41.04.04 «Political Science», 39.04.01 “Sociology”, 38.04.04 “Public Administration” academic program, MA level; University curriculum of the MA program “Politics and Governance”, 41.04.04 «Political Science», the MA program “Contemporary Social Analysis”, 39.04.01 “Sociology”, MA program “Public Administration”, 38.04.04 “Public Administration” (Рабочий учебный план университета подготовки магистра магистерской программы “Политика и управление” по направлению 41.04.04 «Политология», «Современный социальный анализ» по направлению 39.04.01 «Социология», «Государственное и муниципальное управление» по направлению 38.04.04 «Государственное и муниципальное управление» 2015). 2. Course Goals and Learning Outcomes The main course goals are (1) to examine major drivers of Russia’s foreign policy in the post-Cold War era and (2) to describe the key functional and regional dimensions of Moscow’s international course. It is expected that the main learning outcomes will include: Understanding by students major concepts and categories of the discipline. Students’ ability to apply various research methods and International Relations (IR) theoretical frameworks while analyzing the contemporary issues of world politics. To understand the specifics of Russian foreign policy discourse and be able to distinguish between different Russian IR schools. Understanding the Russian foreign policy making system. To be capable of identifying major priorities of Moscow's present-day international course. To be able to describe Russia’s relations with key international actors. 3. Competences Acquired
4. The Role of the Course within the Academic Program’s Structure This discipline is an elective course and it belongs to the professional disciplines’ cycle within the MA program “Politics and Governance”, 41.04.04 «Political Science», the MA program “Contemporary Social Analysis”, 39.04.01 “Sociology”, The learning of this discipline is based on previous courses taught at the bachelor level and during the MA program’s 1st year: “Political Science”, “Political Theory”, “Comparative Politics”, “World Politics and International Relations”. 5. Course overview
6. Evaluation system
6.1. Grading criteria The detailed explanation of what student shall be able to present during the current, mid-term and final assessments in order to pass the course can be found in sections 6.2. “Grading rules” and 9 “Grading methods of student’s current progress and final attestation” of the present syllabus. Grading both for the current and final assessments shall be carried out according to the system where ≪0≫ is a minimal mark and ≪10≫ is a maximal grade. 6.2. Grading rules(The detailed recommendations on grading methods for each form of assessment of student’s current progress can be found in the section 9 «Grading methods for assessment of student’s current progress and final attestation» of the present syllabus).The teacher assesses student’s involvement into the class-room discussions over the issues raised in the compulsory readings for the DGs and his/her qualitative contribution to these discussions. Marks for the participation in the DGs are put into the lecturer’s work sheet. Accumulative marks (min – 0, max – 10) for the participation in the DGs are released at the end of the course (before the final assessment takes place) – Min-class. The teacher assesses student’s self-study by means of short multiple choice tests (10 questions over compulsory readings for the DGs; 1 correct answer among 4-5 possible answers) that take place in the beginning of every class. Marks for the self-study are put into the lecturer’s work sheet. Accumulative marks (min – 0, max – 10) for the self-study are released at the end of the course (before the final assessment takes place) – Mself-study. Accumulative mark is calculated as follows: Maccumulative = 0,6 x Mprogress + 0,2 x Min-class + 0,2 x Mself-study where Mprogress: Mprogress = 0,4175 x Messays + 0,4175 x Mtest + 0,165 x Mhomework All marks are approximated: in favor of the student. Net mark for the course is calculated as follows: Mnet = 0,65 x Maccumulative + 0,35 x Mexam All marks are approximated: in favor of the student. Grading and assessment rules do not allow retaking either any of the forms of the assessment of student’s current progress or forms of the in-class participation or self-study. Note: Exam mark shall not block passing of the course. Therefore in case of failing the exam, the net mark is calculated according to the above mentioned formula.7. Course description.Theme 1. Introduction. (Lectures: 1 hour) Objectives of the course; structure of the course; research design and methodology; sources and literature; course requirements. Theme 2. Russian foreign policy schools. (Lectures: 4 hours; DG/seminars: 4 hours) The transitional period: from Gorbachev’s New Political Thinking to the post-Soviet International Relations (IR) discourse. The problem of categorization of Russian IR schools: similarities and dissimilarities with Western IR theories. Is Russian IR theory unique? The following foreign policy schools will be examined: Atlanticism, Eurasianism, geopolitics, realism, liberalism, post-positivism, different churches and confessions, environmentalists, anti-globalists. Is there is a trend to the Russian foreign policy consensus? The future of the Russian IR discourse. The institutional dimension of IR studies in post-Soviet Russia: major research and educational centers (universities; the Russian Academy of Sciences; governmental/departmental centers; independent think tanks). Compulsory Readings: Sergunin A.A. International Relations in Post-Soviet Russia: Trends and Problems. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Linguistic University, 2007. Внешняя политика и безопасность современной России: в 4-х томах / Сост. Т.А. Шаклеина. М.: РОССПЭН, 2002. Российская наука международных отношений: новые направления. Под ред. А.П. Цыганкова, П.А. Цыганкова. М., 2005.
Sergunin, Alexander, Russia: IR at a crossroads // Tickner A., Waever O. (eds.) International Relations. Scholarship around the world. London and New York: Routledge, 2009. Trenin, Dmitri (2007), Getting Russia Right, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Конышев В.Н., Сергунин А.А. Теория международных отношений: канун новых «великих дебатов»? // Полис, 2013, № 2, с. 66-78. Кубышкин А.И., Сергунин А.А. Идеология исключительности: современная российская внешнеполитическая мысль в сравнительно-исторической перспективе // ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ НАУКА, 2013. — № 4. — С. 156-174. Сергунин А.А. Российская внешнеполитическая мысль. Н. Новгород: НГЛУ, 2003. Theme 3. Russian national security doctrines and threat perceptions. (Lectures: 2 hours; DG/seminars: 6 hours) The formative period of 1991-1993. National security doctrines of 1997, 2000 and 2009; foreign policy concepts of 1993, 2000, 2008 and 2013; military doctrines of 1993, 2000, 2010 and 2014. Russian doctrinal thinking in the Putin 1-2, Medvedev and Putin-3 eras. What does drive Russia’s foreign policy perceptions? Compulsory Readings: Gvosdev, Nikolas K., and Christopher Marsh. Russian Foreign Policy: Interests, Vectors, and Sectors (Washington: CQ Press, 2013). Sergunin A. The EU-Russia Common Space on External Security: Prospects for Cooperation. — Н. Новгород: Издательство Нижегородского государственного лингвистического университета, 2011. Tsygankov, Andrei P. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. 2d ed. (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2010). Конышев В.Н., Сергунин А.А. Современная военная стратегия. — Москва: Аспект-Пресс, 2014. Recommended Readings: Clunan, Anne L. The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security Interests (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009). Donaldson, Robert, and Joseph Nogee. The Foreign Policy of Russia: Changing Systems, Enduring Interests (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2009). Mankoff, Jeffrey. Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009). Sergunin, Alexander. Changes in the Perception of Military Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks in Russia (1991-2009). In: Hans Günter Brauch (ed.). Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2010. Smith, Hanna (ed.). Russia and its Foreign Policy: Influences, Interests and Issues (Helsinki: Aleksanteri Institute, 2005). Trenin, Dmitri (2008), Thinking Strategically About Russia, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Theme 4. Russian foreign policy decision-making system. (Lectures: 4 hours; DG/seminars: 4 hours) Governmental level: major policy actors such as Foreign Ministry, Defense Ministry, intelligence community, economic/financial ministries/agencies, presidential administration, Security Council. The problem of coordination of foreign policy activities. The executive-legislative relations on foreign policy making: areas of cooperation and contention. The problem of parliamentary control on Russian foreign policy making. The need of an executive-legislative liaison mechanism. The role of regional and local governments in foreign policy-making: cross- and transborder cooperation, twinning, etc. The impact of Russian federalism on Moscow’s international strategies. Non-governmental level: the role of political parties, independent think tanks and public policy centers, lobbies, NGOs, mass media and public opinion. The problem of public control over Russia’s foreign policy. Compulsory Readings: Gvosdev, Nikolas K., and Christopher Marsh. Russian Foreign Policy: Interests, Vectors, and Sectors (Washington: CQ Press, 2013). Sergunin, Alexander (2007), Russia’ Policy on Europe: Decision-Making Mechanism, Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Linguistic University. Sergunin A., Joenniemi P. Paradiplomacy as a Capacity-Building Strategy: The Case of Russia’s Northwestern Subnational Actors // Problems of Post-Communism, 2014. — Vol. 61, — № 6. — P. 18-33.
Shevtsova, Lilia (2007), Russia—Lost in Transition. The Yeltsin and Putin Legacies, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Wallander, Celeste A. (ed) (1996), The Sources of Russian Foreign Policy After the Cold War, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
US-Russia EU-Russia NATO-Russia Russia’s strategies in the Arctic region Russia policies in East Asia Russian and the Middle East Compulsory Readings: Heininen L., Sergunin A., Yarovoy G. Russian Strategies in the Arctic: Avoiding a New Cold War. — Москва: Международный дискуссионный клуб "Валдай", 2014. Konyshev V., Sergunin A. Russia in search of its Arctic strategy: between hard and soft power? The Polar Journal, 2014. Vol. 4, № 1, pp. 2-19. Konyshev V., Sergunin A. Russia's Policies on the Territorial Disputes in the Arctic, Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy, 2014, Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55-83. Laruelle, Marlene. Russia’s Arctic Strategies and the Future of the Far North. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2014. Sergunin A. The EU-Russia Common Space on External Security: Prospects for Cooperation. — Н. Новгород: Издательство Нижегородского государственного лингвистического университета, 2011. Stent, Angela E. The Limits of Partnership: U.S. Russian Relations in the Twenty-First Century (Princeton UP, 2014). Tsygankov, Andrei P. Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin: Honor in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Bialos, Jeffrey P. et al. (2008), Ideas for America’s Future Core Elements of a New National Security Strategy, Washington: SAIS. The BRICS and Coexistence An Alternative Vision of World Order. — Abingdon: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
Carpenter, Ted Galen (2008), Smart Power: Toward a Prudent Foreign Policy for America, Washington: Cato Institute. Emerson, Michael (ed.) (2007), The Elephant and the Bear Try Again: Options for a New Agreement Between the EU and Russia, Brussels: CEPS. Engelbrekt, Kjell and Bertil Nygren, eds., Russia and Europe. Building Bridges, Digging Trenches (London: Routledge, 2010). Evangelista, Matthew, Parsi, Vittorio (eds.). Partners or rivals? Europe-American relations after Iraq. Milano: Vita & Pensiero, 2005.
Ted Hopf (ed.). Russia’s European Choice (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008). Hough, Peter. International Politics of the Arctic: Coming in from the Cold. London and New York: Routledge, 2013. Kanet, Roger E. Russian foreign policy in the 21st century (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010). Legvold, Robert, ed. Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century and the Shadow of the Past (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007). Lo, Bobo (2008), Axis of Convenience Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics, London: Chatham House. Lyne, Roderic, Talbott, Strobe, Watanabe, Koji (2006), Engaging with Russia. The Next Phase, New York: Trilateral Commission. Makarychev, Andrei (ed.) Russia and the European Union: Spaces, Identities, Discourses. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Linguistic University, 2008. Roberts, Sean P. Russia as an international actor: The view from Europe and the US (Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, 2013) (FIIA Report 37). Russell, Jesse, Cohn, Ronald. Arctic Policy of Russia. Bookvika Publishing, 2013. Russia and the North. Ed. By Elana Wilson Rowe. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2009.   Elana Wilson Rowe (Editor)
› Visit Amazon's Elana Wilson Rowe PageSmith, Julianne (2008), The NATO-Russia Relationship. Defining Moment or Déjà vu? Washington: CSIS. Арктический регион: проблемы международного сотрудничества. Москва: Аспект-Пресс, 2013. T. 1-3. Сергунин А. А. Россия и Европейский союз в Балтийском регионе: тернистый путь к партнерству // БАЛТИЙСКИЙ РЕГИОН, 2013. — № 4. — С. 53-66.
Russia’s foreign economic policies Russia’s arms control policies: weapons of mass destruction non-proliferation, nuclear-free zones, strategic arms control and reduction, Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty, Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, Convention on Chemical Weapons, the future of the ballistic missile defense regime, further development of confidence-building and security measures, etc. Russia’s policies on climate change. Compulsory Readings: Kanet, Roger E. Russian foreign policy in the 21st century (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010). Legvold, Robert, ed. Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century and the Shadow of the Past (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007). Конышев В.Н., Сергунин А.А., Шацкая В.И. Система противоракетной обороны США: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Санкт-Петербург: Издательство «Нестор-История», 2015.
Lucas, Edward (2008), The New Cold War. How the Kremlin Menaces Both Russia and the West, Bloomsbury. Lucas, Edward. The New Cold War: Putin’s Russia and the Threat to the West. Rev. ed. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).
Interactive teaching methods such as classroom simulations, gaming, policy workshops, and computer generated technology (especially Internet) will also contribute to the practical preparation given to the students. 9. Grading methods for current progress and final assessment. 9.1. Current progress assessment. Essays: The first essay is a review of one of the seminal works of one of the Russian foreign policy thinkers representing one of the IR paradigms. Word limit: 500-600. The second essay should be on one of the regional or functional priorities of Russia’s foreign policy. Word limit: 800-1000. In case of plagiarism the student gets “0” for the essay. Homework. Students should make their homework systematically during the whole term. It should be presented in the discussion groups/seminars. Class participation. Students’ attendance at class sessions is very important. Students’ comments in class are mostly welcome to make class sessions more interactive and efficient. It should be noted that the quality of students’ comments is more important than their quantity. Both students’ attendance and participation in class discussions will contribute to final grade-making. To monitor the students’ progress throughout the course short tests (in various forms) and quizzes on specific sections of the course are planned. Mid-term test represents a written multiple choice test covering the first half of the course. 9.2. Final assessment. The final exam takes a form of a written multiple choice test that covers the content of the entire course (duration is 1 hour 20 min). Total sum of the points that the student has got for the test is converted into percentages (100% are given when all the answers are correct). To mark the test, the following table for converting percentages into marks is used:
10. Readings and IT Support for the Course 10.1. Compulsory Readings.Gvosdev, Nikolas K., and Christopher Marsh. Russian Foreign Policy: Interests, Vectors, and Sectors (Washington: CQ Press, 2013). Heininen L., Sergunin A., Yarovoy G. Russian Strategies in the Arctic: Avoiding a New Cold War. — Москва: Международный дискуссионный клуб "Валдай", 2014. Kanet, Roger E. Russian foreign policy in the 21st century (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010). Konyshev V., Sergunin A. Russia in search of its Arctic strategy: between hard and soft power? The Polar Journal, 2014. Vol. 4, № 1, pp. 2-19. Konyshev V., Sergunin A. Russia's Policies on the Territorial Disputes in the Arctic, Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy, 2014, Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55-83. Laruelle, Marlene. Russia’s Arctic Strategies and the Future of the Far North. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2014. Legvold, Robert, ed. Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century and the Shadow of the Past (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007). Sergunin A.A. International Relations in Post-Soviet Russia: Trends and Problems. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Linguistic University, 2007. Sergunin A. The EU-Russia Common Space on External Security: Prospects for Cooperation. — Н. Новгород: Издательство Нижегородского государственного лингвистического университета, 2011. Tsygankov, Andrei P. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. 2d ed. (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2010). Stent, Angela E. The Limits of Partnership: U.S. Russian Relations in the Twenty-First Century (Princeton UP, 2014). Tsygankov, Andrei P. Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin: Honor in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Внешняя политика и безопасность современной России: в 4-х томах / Сост. Т.А. Шаклеина. М.: РОССПЭН, 2002. Конышев В.Н., Сергунин А.А. Современная военная стратегия. — Москва: Аспект-Пресс, 2014. Конышев В.Н., Сергунин А.А., Шацкая В.И. Система противоракетной обороны США: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Санкт-Петербург: Издательство «Нестор-История», 2015. Российская наука международных отношений: новые направления. Под ред. А.П. Цыганкова, П.А. Цыганкова. М., 2005. 10.2. Recommended Readings. Arctic Security in an Age of Climate Change. Ed. by James Kraska. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Bialos, Jeffrey P. et al. (2008), Ideas for America’s Future Core Elements of a New National Security Strategy, Washington: SAIS. The BRICS and Coexistence An Alternative Vision of World Order. — Abingdon: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
Carpenter, Ted Galen (2008), Smart Power: Toward a Prudent Foreign Policy for America, Washington: Cato Institute. Clunan, Anne L. The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security Interests (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009). Donaldson, Robert, and Joseph Nogee. The Foreign Policy of Russia: Changing Systems, Enduring Interests (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2009). Emerson, Michael (ed.) (2007), The Elephant and the Bear Try Again: Options for a New Agreement Between the EU and Russia, Brussels: CEPS. Engelbrekt, Kjell and Bertil Nygren, eds., Russia and Europe. Building Bridges, Digging Trenches (London: Routledge, 2010). Evangelista, Matthew, Parsi, Vittorio (eds.). Partners or rivals? Europe-American relations after Iraq. Milano: Vita & Pensiero, 2005.
Future Security of the Global Arctic. Defence, Sovereignty and Climate. Ed. by Lassi Heininen. Palgrave Pivot, winter 2014-2015. Globalization and the Circumpolar North. Ed. by Lassi Heininen and Chris Southcott. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press, 2010. Hopf T. (ed.). Russia’s European Choice (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008). Hough, Peter. International Politics of the Arctic: Coming in from the Cold. London and New York: Routledge, 2013. Kanet, Roger E. Russian foreign policy in the 21st century (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010). Legvold, Robert, ed. Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century and the Shadow of the Past (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007). Lo, Bobo (2008), Axis of Convenience Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics, London: Chatham House. Lyne, Roderic, Talbott, Strobe, Watanabe, Koji (2006), Engaging with Russia. The Next Phase, New York: Trilateral Commission. Makarychev, Andrei (ed.) Russia and the European Union: Spaces, Identities, Discourses. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Linguistic University, 2008. Makarychev A., Morozov V. Is “Non-Western Theory” Possible? The Idea of Multipolarity and the Trap of Epistemological Relativism in Russian IR // International Studies Review, 2013, № 15, p. 333. Malcolm, Neil; Pravda, Alex; Allison, Roy; Light, Margo (1996), Internal Factors in Russian Foreign Policy (New York: Oxford University Press). Mankoff, Jeffrey. Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009). Roberts, Sean P. Russia as an international actor: The view from Europe and the US (Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, 2013) (FIIA Report 37). Russell, Jesse, Cohn, Ronald. Arctic Policy of Russia. Bookvika Publishing, 2013.
Sergunin, Alexander, Russia: IR at a crossroads // Tickner A., Waever O. (eds.) International Relations. Scholarship around the world. London and New York: Routledge, 2009. Sergunin, Alexander. Changes in the Perception of Military Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks in Russia (1991-2009). In: Hans Günter Brauch (ed.). Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2010. Shevtsova, Lilia (2007), Russia—Lost in Transition. The Yeltsin and Putin Legacies, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Smith, Hanna (ed.). Russia and its Foreign Policy: Influences, Interests and Issues (Helsinki: Aleksanteri Institute, 2005). Smith, Julianne (2008), The NATO-Russia Relationship. Defining Moment or Déjà vu? Washington: CSIS. Trenin, Dmitri (2007), Getting Russia Right, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Trenin, Dmitri (2008), Thinking Strategically About Russia, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Wallander, Celeste A. (ed) (1996), The Sources of Russian Foreign Policy After the Cold War, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. Арктический регион: проблемы международного сотрудничества. Москва: Аспект-Пресс, 2013. T. 1-3. Конышев В.Н., Сергунин А.А. Теория международных отношений: канун новых «великих дебатов»? // Полис, 2013, № 2, с. 66-78. Кубышкин А.И., Сергунин А.А. Идеология исключительности: современная российская внешнеполитическая мысль в сравнительно-исторической перспективе // ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ НАУКА, 2013. — № 4. — С. 156-174. Сергунин А.А. Российская внешнеполитическая мысль. Н. Новгород: НГЛУ, 2003. Сергунин А. А. Россия и Европейский союз в Балтийском регионе: тернистый путь к партнерству // БАЛТИЙСКИЙ РЕГИОН, 2013. — № 4. — С. 53-66. 10.3. IT support for the course All compulsory readings are available in electronic form. Recommended readings are available either in the e-Library (Национальная электронная библиотека) or JStore. 11. Material and Technical Basis for the Course For the lectures and DGs/seminars a class-room with laptop, PowerPoint projector and Internet access are required. Directory: data -> 2016 data -> By Fel (aka James Galloway) Table of Contents Chapter 1 data -> Vitaly Goldshteyn data -> Hurricane Katrina, a climatological Perspective October 2005, Updated August 2006 Introduction data -> 1997 Atlantic Tropical Storms data -> Introduction data -> The Impact of Saharan dust aerosols on tropical cyclones using wrf-chem: Model framework and satellite data constraint technique data -> Earth-Atmosphere Interactions: Tropical Storm and Hurricane Activity in the Caribbean and Consequent Health Impacts data -> Meeting Of September 16, 2010 today’s meeting 2016 -> Russian exceptionalism: past and present 2016 -> Hyundai Motorsport advances wrc driver line-up for 2017 Download 0.74 Mb. Share with your friends:
|