book
was published in 1946. Dr. Bob approved of "The Little Red Book". So Dr. Bob
not
only authorized the publication of the Akron pamphlets, he also endorsed
"The
Little Red Book", both of which were products of the "Beginners' Classes".
Even our first AA group handbook, originally entitled "A Handbook for the
Secretary", published by the Alcoholic Foundation in 1950, had a section on
the
"Beginners' Classes". At the time there were only three types of meetings:
Open
Speaker Meetings, Closed Discussion Meetings, and Beginners' Meetings. There
was
no such thing as an Open Discussion Meeting in the early days of Alcoholics
Anonymous. In the Beginners' Meetings, which are described in the Meeting
section, the handbook states: "In larger metropolitan areas a special type
of
meeting for newcomers to AA is proved extremely successful. Usually staged
for a
half-hour prior to an open meeting, this meeting features an interpretation
of
AA usually by an older member presented in terms designed to make the
program
clear to the new member. (Note: The Chicago Group held their "Beginners'
Classes" a half-hour prior to their Open Meeting. When publishing the group
handbook, the New York office only described Chicago's format.) After the
speaker's presentation the meeting is thrown open to questions." In each of
the
four one-hour classes there was always a session for questions afterwards.
"Occasionally, the AA story is presented by more than one speaker. The
emphasis
remains exclusively on the newcomer and his problem."
The four one-hour classes were taught all over the country. Some other
cities
include Oklahoma City, Miami Florida, and Phoenix Arizona.
If these classes were so important, then what happened to them? Most of the
people who have joined AA in the last twenty-five years or so have never
even
heard of them. Ruth R., an old-timer in Miami Florida, who came into AA in
1953,
gave some insight into the demise of the "Beginners' Classes". "At that time
the
classes were being conducted at the Alana Club in Miami - two books were
used:
"Alcoholics Anonymous" (Big Book) and the "Little Red Book". Jim and Dora
H.,
Florida AA pioneers, were enthusiastic supporters and they helped organize
several of the classes and served as instructors." (Note: Dora was a Panel 7
Delegate to the General Service Office.) Ruth recalled that the classes were
discontinued in the mid-1950s as the result of the publication of the book
"Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions" by Alcoholics Anonymous Publishing Inc.
In
the Miami area the "Twelve and Twelve" replaced both the "Big Book" and the
"Little Red Book" and "Step Studies" replaced the "Beginners' Classes". In
the
process, the period for taking the Steps was expanded and modified from 4
weeks
to somewhere in between 12 and 16 weeks. The Fourth Step inventory was
modified
and became a much more laborious and detailed procedure. What was originally
conceived as a very simple program, which took a few hours to complete,
evolved
into a complicated and confusing undertaking requiring several months.
Studying the Steps is not the same as taking the Steps. In the "Beginners'
Classes" you take the steps. The Big Book says, "Here are the steps we took"
not
"here are the steps we read and talked about." The AA pioneers proved that
action, not knowledge, produced the spiritual awakening that resulted in
recovery from alcoholism. On page 88, the authors of the Big Book wrote, "It
works-it really does. We alcoholics are undisciplined. So we let God
discipline
us in the simple way we have just outlined. But this is not all. There is
action
and more action. Faith without works is dead."
(This concludes the description of the "Beginners' Classes" during Wally
P.'s
talk in Masa, Arizona on November 23, 1996. Wally P. is an AA Archivist from
Tucson, Arizona. For two years he researched and studied areas of the
country
that held "Beginners' Classes" back in the 40's and '50's. He then started
teaching the classes under the guidance of his sponsor who took the classes
in
1953 and never drank again. In March of 1996 Wally mentioned the "Beginners'
Classes" as part of his historical presentation at the Wilson House in East
Dorset, Vermont. Wally then wrote and published a book entitled "Back to
Basics:
The Alcoholics Anonymous Beginners' Classes - Take all 12 Steps in Four
One-Hour
Sessions." Since then, there have been over 1000 "Back to Basics" meetings
and
groups started all over the world. Now, almost 60 years since the classes
were
first originated, newcomers are once again being taken through the Twelve
Steps
in four one-hour "Beginners' Classes".
On Saturday 4/11/98, members of the "Into Action Big Book Group" of Berkeley
Heights, N.J. went to see Wally give a presentation of the "Beginners'
Classes"
in Philadelphia. Members went through the Steps in the four one-hour
classes,
all in one day. This group then began facilitating the classes in June 1998
in
various locations throughout New Jersey and has taken thousands of AA
members
through the Steps since. They have expanded the classes to be five,
one-and-one-half hour sessions, to include more of the material for each
Step in
the Big Book.
The Cherry Hill Group of Southern New Jersey has taught Beginners' Classes
every
Sunday evening since May 1997.
The Woodlands Group in Texas have been conducting the "Beginners' Classes"
since
April 1998. Within one year, about ten "Back to Basics" meetings resulted
from
the Woodland group and approximately 1,650 alcoholics were taken through the
Steps that year! The Woodlands and subsequent groups in Texas are enjoying a
75-93% success rate like the Cleveland groups had in the 1940's.
Wally P. has a website containing much information on the AA "Beginners'
Classes" at www.aabacktobasics.com on the World Wide Web.)
-----Original Message-----
From: friendofbillw89 [mailto:friendofbillw89@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 5:16 PM
Subject: Back to Basics
I have attended a few *cycles* of the Back to Basics meetings in my
area. It is where we do all 12 steps in 4 one-hour sessions. What
is the history of working the steps in this method? I was told this
was the way it was done in the early days in Akron.
Nisa
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1628. . . . . . . . . . . . Periodical literature, Christian Science Monitor, Jan. 21, 2004
From: NMOlson@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/30/2004 2:30:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
This was sent to me by John B., but without a proper subject line, so I have
copied it and am sending it for him.
Nancy
From the Christian Science Monitor, January 21, 2004, edition
How far can 12 steps go?
Thousands attest to the power of 12-step programs in breaking the hold of
addiction. But might the popular programs be wrong for some?
By Jane Lampman | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
Americans have a penchant for 12-step programs. The original beacon for a
path out of addiction - Alcoholics Anonymous - has grown past 50,000 groups
in the US (and twice that worldwide). And its message is being reincarnated
in self-help fellowships to fight drugs, gambling, overeating, sexual
addictions, smoking, and even indebtedness.
Conventional wisdom has it that the 12-step approach -- in which an
individual acknowledges his or her powerlessness before the addiction, turns
to a higher power, and takes specific steps to change -- is the most
effective route out of addiction. Its popularity seems to support that. Some
90 percent of residential and outpatient treatment programs draw directly on
its principles.
Yet there are many who question not that it helps thousands, but whether its
predominance may get in the way of some people finding their freedom. There
are issues, some critics say, related to its quasi-religious nature, its
definition of addiction as an incurable disease, the creation of long-term
dependence on the program, and the way courts and other agencies mandate
addicts' participation. Are some with alcohol or drug problems being coerced
to follow a path that may not be suited to their needs and beliefs?
"The problem is that people think AA is the only correct treatment," says
Lance Dodes, assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical
School. "That's true only for a subset of the population, and many people
are harmed by it."
An AA representative declined to respond, saying it is the group's tradition
to refrain from controversy and not comment on what others say about
alcoholism or about AA.
Over the past 70 years, AA has helped huge numbers to find sobriety and a
new lease on life. "If you look at the number of groups and 2,000,000
members worldwide, it's clearly got longevity and appeal," says Barbara
McCrady, clinical director of Rutgers University's Center of Alcohol
Studies. Yet AA's own surveys show that of the people who attend a meeting,
9 out of 10 drop out within the first year. Research hasn't yet been done on
its siblings, Narcotics Anonymous (NA) and others, she says.
For many who stay with it, the benefits can't be overestimated. A big-time
drinker who turned to drugs after a family tragedy, "Alan" was in denial
about his situation. Near the end of college, though, he was weary and tried
unsuccessfully to quit. It was only when he tagged along with a friend to an
NA meeting that his turnaround began.
"Listening to people's stories, I knew I was an addict and these were people
I could relate to," he says. "Going to meetings, I'd stay clean for a while
and then use. It took six months 'til I got clean for the last time." He's
been free for six years but attends meetings several times a week.
"Once you stay clean for a while you realize drugs were only the tip of the
iceberg," adds Alan who asked that his real name not be used. "You also need
to change your compulsive behaviors and how you react to situations. There's
a wealth of knowledge in that room."
Keith Humphreys at Stanford University's School of Medicine sees this kind
of "instillation of hope" as a crucial factor in changing addicts' lives.
"Most people feel defeated and have a frightening sense they can't control
their own behavior," he says. "They go to a group and see others who've had
the same problem now doing well, and that instills a lot of hope."
Twelve-step groups provide a valuable public health benefit, says Dr.
Humphreys. Not only are they widely available, but one cost study showed
that people going to the groups require $5,000 less per person from the
healthcare system annually. "Multiply that by more than a million people
getting treatment each year, and they are taking an extraordinary burden off
the system," he adds.
At the same time, the very limited research done so far doesn't back up the
conventional wisdom. Comparisons of professional treatment based on 12-step
with other professional treatment modes show no superior outcomes.
Longitudinal studies of self-help groups in treatment showed them comparable
on most dimensions with any other kind of treatment except in the area of
abstinence, where they had better results.
Given the limited evidence and quasi-religious nature of 12-step plans, some
object to the way courts and other agencies mandate addicts' participation.
"Several aspects of AA don't work for everyone -- such as its spiritual or
religious nature, or the emphasis on powerlessness, or its group approach,"
says Stanton Peele, a psychologist and lawyer who has written several books
on addiction, including "Resisting 12-Step Coercion."
Some courts have ruled it unconstitutional to require participation because
they deem the program religious, while others have ruled it is not. AA
literature emphasizes that its message is spiritual but not religious --
that people decide on their own what the higher power is, and for some it is
simply the group itself. The only membership requirement is the desire to
stop drinking.
Other issues some find troubling relate to theories of addiction. The
12-step message is that addiction is an incurable disease, that while
alcoholics can become sober, they remain alcoholics, and should stay in the
program to maintain that sobriety. In each meeting, people introduce
themselves: "I'm [name], and I'm an alcoholic," no matter how long they've
been clean.
The disease model isn't helpful, Dr. Peele says. "If you had an 18-year-old
drinking way too much on weekends, would the best approach be to take him to
AA and convince him he has a lifelong disease?" he asks.
Dr. Dodes, who has treated various forms of addiction, says the disease idea
takes the moralizing out of it, which is good, but discourages people from
understanding the problem. "They think it's a physical problem, which it's
not, or a genetic problem, which it's not, or a biological or chemical
problem, which it's not," he says. In his book "The Heart of Addiction," he
describes it as psychological.
"All addictions are an attempt to treat a sense of overwhelming
helplessness," which is accompanied by rage over that helplessness, he says.
He helps people identify the kind of helplessness that's troubling them and
address it, "not by white-knuckling it but because they understand what is
happening."
While AA requires you to make "a fearless moral inventory" and make amends
to those you have hurt, Dodes adds, that sometimes leaves people feeling
something is very wrong with them while not getting to the root of their
emotional trouble.
While many talk of a genetic element to alcoholism, Dodes reviewed the
genetic research and says there is no such gene, that there is at most the
idea of a susceptibility gene, but it's not been discovered either. McCrady
suggests addiction has psychological, genetic, and/or social components.
Others object to what they see as the creation of a dependency on the
program itself. An alternative program, Woman in Sobriety, for example, aims
to help people take responsibility for themselves and then move on with
their lives on their own.
Yet the ongoing group support offers valuable benefits, some argue. People
who leave addictions behind usually require new friends who don't drink or
take drugs. "I have friends that have over 20 years of abstinence," says
Alan. "They've been through all kinds of crises ... but didn't return to
use. That gives you strength."
Practitioners and problem drinkers, however, say drinking problems differ
greatly and it's a fallacy that one must be in lifelong recovery. "There are
people with less severe problems who can benefit from a limited period of
counseling and then they are just done with it," says McCrady.
In fact, a 1996 study showed that three-quarters of those who'd recovered
from alcohol problems had done so on their own. For her book, "Sober for
Good," Ann Fletcher interviewed some 200 people who had recovered through
various means, from AA to secular self-help groups, psychological
counseling, and religion.
But there are also millions who don't know where to go for help. An
estimated 14 million Americans have drinking problems; only 1 in 10 receives
treatment. Experts say more treatment options for addictions need to be
supported.
Meanwhile, those in AA and NA point to results. "I was at a regional NA
conference in Richmond last weekend with about a thousand people," Alan
says. "All these people who used to be addicts, what was their drain on
society? Now they're clean and working and productive. It's amazing."
The Twelve Steps
1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol -- that our lives had become
unmanageable.
2. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to
sanity.
3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as
we understood Him.
4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
5. Admitted to God, to ourselves and to another human being the exact nature
of our wrongs.
6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make
amends to them all.
9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so
would injure them or others.
10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly
admitted it.
11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact
with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us
and the power to carry that out.
12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried
to carry this message to alcoholics and to practice these principles in all
our affairs.
Source: Alcoholics Anonymous
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1629. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Periodical literature, Christian Science Monitor, Jan. 21, 2004
From: Mel Barger . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/30/2004 11:12:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Nancy,
I appreciate your going to the effort of copying the Jane Lampman article
from the Christian Science Monitor. It is a good article, although some AA
members may feel it's too critical.
I have followed criticisms of AA ever since the first major one appeared in
Harper's magazine in 1963. This was really the first time AA had received
serious criticism in an important publication, and many of us were enraged
by it. While AA World Services made no direct reply to the article, Bill W.
did offer an excellent response in the April, 1963, issue of The AA
Grapevine. This can be found today in "The Language of the Heart," a
collection of Bill's articles published over the years in The Grapevine. See
"Our Critics Can Be Our Benefactors," p. 345. I consider it a masterpiece of
conciliatory writing.
Since then, we've had much more criticism of various kinds, and there are
even several books which take AA to task. While some of the critics are
malicious, others are honest and sincere in pointing to problems with the
way our program is presented. Bill often acknowledged that we don't have all
the answers and should never present our program as the only solution to
problem drinking.
Criticism is almost always difficult to accept, but Bill explained that we
can benefit from it. I feel very secure about our program. As for any
statistics about its success percentages, my answer is 100%. I haven't had a
drink since I fully accepted the program on April 15, 1950.
All the best,
Mel Barger
~~~~~~~~
Mel Barger
melb@accesstoledo.com
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1630. . . . . . . . . . . . Tyler Tex Morning Telegraph 2004 -57th anniv
From: t . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/31/2004 5:34:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
MEMBERS SHARE STORIES, SUPPORT AT AA ANNIVERSARY
By: MEGAN MIDDLETON, Staff Writer January 10, 2004
Gayle S. still wells up with tears when she thinks about the day more than 20 years
ago that a pastor told her about Alcoholics Anonymous.
She said he threw an Alcoholics Anonymous book down on the table in front of
her,
letting it make a loud thud, and told her, "'These are the only people who
can
help
you. There's more love in Alcoholics Anonymous than there is in my big old
...
church.'"
And that night she went to her first AA meeting.
"Those women just grabbed me and welcomed me," Gayle, a former Tyler
resident,
said.
"They overwhelm you with love because they know how you feel."
And for more than 20 years Gayle has remained sober.
"This is a deadly disease, treated, in my case, only by abstinence from
alcohol," she
said.
About 700 AA members from East Texas and throughout Texas and the country
attended
Saturday's celebration of the group's 57th anniversary in Tyler, which began
Friday
and continues Sunday at Harvey Convention Center.
AA members identify themselves with only their first names and initials to
preserve
the anonymity on which the group is based.
On Saturday participants listened to several speakers from across the state
and
nation tell their stories of dealing with alcohol and its effect on their
lives.
They also had a barbecue dinner and a dance.
More speakers are scheduled for Sunday, beginning at 9 a.m. The cost for the
weekend
is $10.
Gayle, who came from Kerrville to attend the conference, said the AA
anniversary
celebrations are important because "it tells us there's continuity in
Alcoholics
Anonymous."
"If Alcoholics Anonymous had not arrived here, many of us would not have
found
sobriety," she said.
A Saturday afternoon speaker, Maryann W. of Corpus Christi, kept the crowd
laughing
while also bringing a message of the importance of AA.
Maryann was married and became a mother at 15 years old, she said, and to
deal
with
her feelings she eventually turned to drinking.
"My solution was alcohol," she said. "It was my best friend."
She described the kind of drinker she was, comparing how different people
would
react
to having a fly in their drink. She said the non-drinker would ask for a
Diet
Coke, a
heavy drinker would ask for a different glass, and "I would have the fly by
the
nape
of the neck saying, 'Spit it out, spit it out!'"
"It was never enough," she said to the laughing crowd.
She explained that her husband, who also drank, was her "cover" and the
Share with your friends: |