Instructions
This questionnaire is supplemental to the initial questionnaire distributed during October 2015. In a few cases, there are questions that are similar to those in the initial questionnaire. To differentiate these questions, the similar questions are identified with a grey outlined box, as indicated below. Those States that have already provided full responses to the preliminary questionnaire may choose to bypass these highlighted questions.
Questions Contained in Initial Questionnaire
This questionnaire is developed in Microsoft© Word Document format and is open to the respondent for edits. The principal method of data insertion will be accomplished by using ‘tables.’ Each table has been formatted to accept input and ‘expand’ as data is inserted. Following each question table is an opportunity for the respondent to add any additional information—this insertion will be accomplished by adding text.
Each new Category is paginated by ‘section’, which will allow for the automatic movement to the next page as information is added to previous sections.
Data Input Consistency:
To ensure as full and complete an understanding as possible of the individual and regional operational environments, the Airbus ProSky team will be heavily relying on the data provided by the ACAC Member States. Critical to obtaining this understanding, is a level of uniformity and consistency in format and detail to the responses provided to both the initial and supplemental questionnaires. To achieve this goal, questions that require significant detail within the supplemental questionnaire are preceded with a sample response, indicating the minimum desired detail and format. The sample DOES NOT restrict the respondent from providing more information.
Sample input will be indicated with red highlights as indicated below:
-
SAMPLE - (CD-5): Identify the currency and availability status of the following documentation or their local equivalents. Indicate your response in the table with a ‘Y’ or ‘N’.
Document Title (or local equivalent)
|
Document Status
|
Established
|
Available
|
Current
|
Under Revision
|
Not Current
|
Sample Doc. Name
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
|
Sample Doc. Name
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Yes
|
|
Sample Doc. Name
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Several questions will ask the responder to judge the operational adequacy of a system/method. To ensure uniform understandings that later will allow for logical analysis, the following definitions have been developed. For those type questions, please use the following definitions when completing your responses.
-
Adequate – The subject system/method provides you with most of the modern era operational capabilities you need, and at a high level of quality or reliability to perform your daily job function. (On a scale of 1-10, this level would be a 9-10)
-
Moderately Adequate – The subject system/method provides you with many of the modern era operational capabilities you need, and at a medium level of quality or reliability to perform your daily job function. (On a scale of 1-10, this level would be a 6-8)
-
Minimally Adequate – The subject system/method provides you with few of the modern era operational capabilities you need, and at a low level of quality or reliability to perform your job function. (On a scale of 1-10, this level would be a 3-5)
-
Not At All Adequate – The subject system/method does not provide you with any of the modern era operational capabilities needed, and at a poor or inconsistent level of quality or reliability to perform your daily job function. (On a scale of 1-10, this level would be a 0-2)
-
Not Applicable – You have no interaction with the subject system/method.
Data Delivery Means and Procedures:
To ensure ease and security of data transmission from each FIR to the Project team, individual SECURE File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites have been established for EACH participating project State Point of Contact (POC). These FTP sites will allow for the (1) transfer of large file sizes that are often restricted in general email accounts, and (2) secure transmission of data between the intended participants. The following FTP site and data transmission procedures will be used by all affected parties:
-
Each of the FTP site addresses and passwords will be forwarded to the ACAC POC Mr. Mohamed Rejeb by Airbus ProSky.
-
Mr. Mohamed Rejeb will forward each specific site address and its password to the individual point of contact (POC) for each ACAC Member State.
-
Each POC FTP recipient should initiate a test upload to ensure proper site functionality.
-
As the Member State collects and transmits its data, it will upload the information to the FTP Site.
-
Upon successful upload to the FTP site, the State POC will initiate an email to Mr. Mohamed Rejeb (Mohamed.rejeb65@gmail.com), indicating that data has been uploaded to the FTP site.
-
Mr. Mohamed Rejeb will confirm the upload of the data to the FTP site, and then initiate an email to Airbus ProSky (Peter.Hruz@metronaviation.com and Barbara.Cogliandro@metronaviation.com), indicating the originating member state, and that data is available for review.
-
Airbus ProSky will conduct an initial ‘quick-look’ review of the uploaded information to confirm (1) completion, and (2) level of response detail. If clarification of the data or additional information is required, Airbus ProSky will advise Mr. Mohamed Rejeb of the needed attention, who will in turn contact the member state.
-
The FTP sites will be eliminated, and their use will no longer available either when the (1) data collection process has ended, or (2) the project has ended. In either case, Mr. Mohamed Rejeb will be advised, and he then will advise the member states.
Questionnaire Response Period:
The project team is estimating a reasonable completion and submission period to be 45 days from the State’s reception of the questionnaire. We are therefore requesting your finalized input by January 31, 2016.
The project team requests your support in providing (1) responses that are as thorough and detailed as possible to both questionnaires (initial and supplemental), and (2) submission of requested/available documentation, so that we can obtain the best possible understanding of your operations and its needs.
Questions for the project team should be routed through the ACAC Representative, Mohamed Rejeb, (Mohamed.rejeb65@gmail.com).
Thank you for your time, cooperation, and support.
Directory: fichier -> mila7afichier -> Sorted by Airlinesmila7a -> Cns/atm survey please provide the following respondent informationfichier -> The list of glossesfichier -> Phagocytic activity of freshwater and marine bivalves: in vitro exposure to metals (Ag, Cd, Hg, and Zn) Sauvé S. 1, Brousseau P. 1, Pellerin J. 2, Morin Y. 3, Senécal L. 1, Goudreau P. 3, Fournier M. 1,3fichier -> Les pièces justificatives : une compétence partagéefichier -> Part 5: controllingfichier -> Storage capacities 2013-2014 technical capacities
Share with your friends: |