10FIR Separation (SP):
Please provide the following FIR Separation information:
(SP-1): Identify the CURRENT and FUTURE PLANNED separation minima provided within the FIR. Select all that apply along within each operational environment(s). Indicate your response(s) with an “X”.
For the purposes of this question the definition of Separation Minima is — [ICAO] the MINIMUM longitudinal, lateral, or vertical distances by which aircraft are spaced through the application of air traffic control procedures.
AC = Area Control Center
AP = Approach Control Facility
AD = Aerodrome Facility
Insert Response Here:
Table : SP-1, Separation Minima
Separation
|
Current
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
FACILITY Type:
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
Applied Separation
|
Visual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30nm Lateral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50nm Lateral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60nm lateral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30nm Longitudinal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50nm Longitudinal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 min Longitudinal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 min Longitudinal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 min Longitudinal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mach Number Technique (MNT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(SP-1-1): Additional comments, as appropriate.
Insert Response Here:
(SP-2): Identify the CURRENT and FUTURE PLANNED spacing provided by the FIR to internal and external facilities. Select all that apply along within each operational environment(s). Indicate your response(s) with an “X”.
For the purposes of this question the definition of Spacing is --- the longitudinal, lateral, or vertical distances by which aircraft are transferred to internal or external facilities. This value is often contained in Letter of Agreements or other operational documents/requirements, and is typically greater that the MINIMUM SEPARATION requirement. It can be additional miles (nm) or minutes in trail (min).
AC = Area Control Center
AP = Approach Control Facility
AD = Aerodrome Facility
Insert Response Here:
Table : SP-2, Spacing Practices
Spacing
|
Current
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
FACILITY Type:
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
Applied Spacing
|
5nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 Minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(SP-2-1): Additional comments, as appropriate.
Insert Response Here:
(SP-3): Identify the CURRENT and PLANNED methods in which the above separation standards are applied within the FIR. Indicate your response(s) with an “X”.
Table : SP-3, Separation Application
Separation
|
Current
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
FACILITY:
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
AC
|
AP
|
AD
|
Applied Separation
|
Tactical (real-time target observation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic (trajectory separation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procedural (non-radar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(SP-3-1): Additional comments, as appropriate.
Insert Response Here:
(SP-4): Identify any planning initiatives to reduce the current separation standard(s) in use.
Insert Response Here:
(SP-4-1): If applicable, what separation standards would be considered for future implementation?
Insert Response Here:
(SP-4-2): If applicable, when is the considered separation standard being planned for implementation?
Insert Response Here:
(SP-5): Identify any planning initiatives to reduce the current spacing standard(s) in use.
Insert Response Here:
(SP-5-1): If applicable, what spacing standards would be considered for future implementation?
Insert Response Here:
(SP-5-2): If applicable, when is the considered spacing standard being planned for implementation?
Insert Response Here:
(SP-6): Is airborne separation (self-separation) a possibility within this FIR?
Insert Response Here:
(SP-6-1): If not, identify the constraints that would restrict eventual utilization of managed separation within the FIR.
Insert Response Here:
(SP-7): Is your FIR required to provide or accept a different separation standard from the nominal standard used in the FIR?
Insert Response Here:
SAMPLE - (SP-7-1): If Yes, identify the facility (FIR), separation or spacing standard, and its effect on this FIR’s operation. Insert your responses into the table.
Table : SP-7-1, Sample, Separation Effects
Responding FIR
(Name)
|
Nominal Local Separation or Spacing (1)
|
Nominal Local Separation or Spacing(2)
|
Impact to Local FIR operations of adjacent dissimilar Separation or Spacing standards
|
FIR “A”
|
5nm
|
|
FIR “B”
|
10min
|
|
Adjacent FIRs and Facility
(Names)
|
Required Adjacent Separation or Spacing
(1)
|
Required Adjacent Separation or Spacing
(2)
|
FIR “C”, FIR “D”
|
15nm
|
|
Increased controller workload- by requiring vectoring for the additional spacing, also holding is encountered during busy periods to achieve the required spacing.
|
FIR “E”, FIR “F”
|
15min
|
|
Local airport delays are encountered to meet the additional miles in trail requirement.
|
Insert Response Here:
Table : SP-7-1, Separation Effects
Responding FIR
(Name)
|
Nominal Local Separation or Spacing(1)
|
Nominal Local Separation or Spacing (2)
|
Impact to Local FIR operations of adjacent dissimilar Separation or Spacing standards
|
Insert FIR Name Here:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjacent FIRs and Facility
(Names)
|
Required Adjacent Separation or Spacing
(1)
|
Required Adjacent Separation or Spacing
(2)
|
Insert Adjacent FIR Name Here:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(SP-7-1-1): Additional comments, as appropriate.
Insert Response Here:
Directory: fichier -> mila7afichier -> Sorted by Airlinesmila7a -> Cns/atm survey please provide the following respondent informationfichier -> The list of glossesfichier -> Phagocytic activity of freshwater and marine bivalves: in vitro exposure to metals (Ag, Cd, Hg, and Zn) Sauvé S. 1, Brousseau P. 1, Pellerin J. 2, Morin Y. 3, Senécal L. 1, Goudreau P. 3, Fournier M. 1,3fichier -> Les pièces justificatives : une compétence partagéefichier -> Part 5: controllingfichier -> Storage capacities 2013-2014 technical capacities
Share with your friends: |